- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Quote (t8 @ May 11 2009,22:13) Quote (Stu @ May 07 2009,20:23) And the most of the IDer’s problems. It was their pin-up example and now it turns out to be just another adaptation in a very long chain of them.
I got the impression that he used this example to show in a simple way to simple people how biological machines are cleverly constructed and cannot be pieced together in a gradual way. Sometimes simplicity is best because you have less ways to argue something away.If he used the human brain as an example, many atheists would have been completely lost.
If you think about it, more complex things like the human body which takes it's instructions from a supercomputer (brain) and the whole body not only works in unison, but is also composed of trillions of cells that include these micro-machines. But that might be too much for you to handle.
I though the simple cell was a great example that atheists might be able to get their head around.
But perhaps even that was too much. I don't know if you can be helped.
Might just be better to leave you to it and maybe one day, it will dawn on you?
I think in attempting to comprehend the false claim of the IDers, I don't think anyone can be helped by your musings t8.I'm glad you mentioned the human brain. Part of the human brain is known as the 'reptillian brain'. Do you know why that is?
Stuart
Because 45% of our DNA we have in common with a tulip?
Did I get it right?
Obviously you do not understand a code base and how you can mix and match code to produce different designs. Such is not proof that one design came from another but that it was made by the same programmer who reuses his own code.
Even I do that because it is not necessary to redesign the wheel with each new machine.
Quote (t8 @ May 11 2009,22:34) Because 45% of our DNA we have in common with a tulip? Did I get it right?
Obviously you do not understand a code base and how you can mix and match code to produce different designs. Such is not proof that one design came from another but that it was made by the same programmer who reuses his own code.
Even I do that because it is not necessary to redesign the wheel with each new machine.
So do you confirm that you are making a falsifiable claim? That you would expect the same job to be done in the same way in different organisms?Stuart
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
