Matt 28:19? Article – What do you think?

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #334922
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi w,
    So God is just a title??
    Son of God is just another title??

    I guess you would have to clear the decks and say these things
    if you were promoting a new trinity god not found in the bible

    #334923
    TimothyVI
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:09)

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,05:59)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,05:41)
    It is my opinion that “Son of God” was a term only found about 4 times in the OT scriptures and to the Jews of his day we see that for Jesus to claim to be the “Son of God” was blasphemy and meant to them he was making himself equal to God. John nor Jesus rebuked Thomas!

    :)


    In those days to be the son of a king meant that you were heir to the throne and would be king.
    I think that is what upset them the most. In effect, Jesus was telling them that he was heir to the position of God and thus would be God.

    Tim


    Tim

    So Jesus was promoting “Polytheism”?

    ???


    Hi worshippingJesus,

    Of course not. Jesus merely told them that he was the son of God.
    The Pharisees believed that he was claiming heir to the throne. Whoa to them, they were wrong about a lot of things.

    Tim

    #334924

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 29 2007,06:20)
    Hi w,
    So God is just a title??
    Son of God is just another title??

    I guess you would have to clear the decks and say these things
    if you were promoting a new trinity god not found in the bible


    NH

    Is God and Son of God a name?

    :D

    #334925

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,06:25)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:09)

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,05:59)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,05:41)
    It is my opinion that “Son of God” was a term only found about 4 times in the OT scriptures and to the Jews of his day we see that for Jesus to claim to be the “Son of God” was blasphemy and meant to them he was making himself equal to God. John nor Jesus rebuked Thomas!

    :)


    In those days to be the son of a king meant that you were heir to the throne and would be king.
    I think that is what upset them the most. In effect, Jesus was telling them that he was heir to the position of God and thus would be God.

    Tim


    Tim

    So Jesus was promoting “Polytheism”?

    ???


    Hi worshippingJesus,

    Of course not. Jesus merely told them that he was the son of God.
    The Pharisees believed that he was claiming heir to the throne. Whoa to them, they were wrong about a lot of things.

    Tim


    Tim

    You say…

    Quote

    The Pharisees believed that he was claiming heir to the throne. Whoa to them, they were wrong about a lot of things.

    Is there a scripture for this statement?

    ???

    #334926

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 29 2007,06:04)

    Quote (chosenone @ June 29 2007,06:01)
    I thought this post was to gather opinions on what Matt.28:19 meant, not a debate about the trinity!


    CO,

    Every thread comes back to the Trinity……  it's WHO God is!  It's so easy to get side-tracked because everything becomes so related.

    Why don't you get us back on track.


    LOL

    Matt 28:19 is a Trinitarian verse!

    :)

    #334927
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:28)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 29 2007,06:20)
    Hi w,
    So God is just a title??
    Son of God is just another title??

    I guess you would have to clear the decks and say these things
    if you were promoting a new trinity god not found in the bible


    NH

    Is God and Son of God a name?

    :D


    Hi W,
    Are these the only choices available?
    If Jesus said he is the son of God does that mean he is not really the son of God but an aspect of God called the son?

    #334928
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:14)
    Or if it will make you feel better Ill refraise and say “you refuse to believe what I believe it says”.

    I am 100% sure of what Thomas meant. Just as sure as Jesus is my Saviour he is also “MY Lord and God”.


    That's much better, thank you! :)

    And of course I think you are wrong about Thomas, but that is my opinion and we can certainly agree to disagree.

    While we may be going around the mountain – others are listening in. So I guess it's OK to go around the mountain more than once! Besides, I'm a hiker and love the mountains. I'm OK with it if you are! :laugh:

    #334929
    TimothyVI
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:31)

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,06:25)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:09)

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,05:59)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,05:41)
    It is my opinion that “Son of God” was a term only found about 4 times in the OT scriptures and to the Jews of his day we see that for Jesus to claim to be the “Son of God” was blasphemy and meant to them he was making himself equal to God. John nor Jesus rebuked Thomas!

    :)


    In those days to be the son of a king meant that you were heir to the throne and would be king.
    I think that is what upset them the most. In effect, Jesus was telling them that he was heir to the position of God and thus would be God.

    Tim


    Tim

    So Jesus was promoting “Polytheism”?

    ???


    Hi worshippingJesus,

    Of course not. Jesus merely told them that he was the son of God.
    The Pharisees believed that he was claiming heir to the throne. Whoa to them, they were wrong about a lot of things.

    Tim


    Tim

    You say…

    Quote

    The Pharisees believed that he was claiming heir to the throne. Whoa to them, they were wrong about a lot of things.

    Is there a scripture for this statement?

    ???


    In those times wasn't it common for the only son to be heir to his father's kingdom?
    What else would they have thought about someone claiming to be the son?
    You say that they thought that Jesus was claiming to be equal. I say that nothing ever implies that a son is equal to his father.

    Tim

    #334930
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:33)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 29 2007,06:04)

    Quote (chosenone @ June 29 2007,06:01)
    I thought this post was to gather opinions on what Matt.28:19 meant, not a debate about the trinity!


    CO,

    Every thread comes back to the Trinity……  it's WHO God is!  It's so easy to get side-tracked because everything becomes so related.

    Why don't you get us back on track.


    LOL

    Matt 28:19 is a Trinitarian verse!

    :)


    Oh, mocking brother…….. so sad!

    You say it's a “Trinitarian verse” that is interesting. How many other “Trinitarian” verses are there?

    Verses that mention three are one?

    #334931

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 29 2007,06:40)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:33)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 29 2007,06:04)

    Quote (chosenone @ June 29 2007,06:01)
    I thought this post was to gather opinions on what Matt.28:19 meant, not a debate about the trinity!


    CO,

    Every thread comes back to the Trinity……  it's WHO God is!  It's so easy to get side-tracked because everything becomes so related.

    Why don't you get us back on track.


    LOL

    Matt 28:19 is a Trinitarian verse!

    :)


    Oh, mocking brother……..  so sad!

    You say it's a “Trinitarian verse” that is interesting.  How many other “Trinitarian” verses are there?

    Verses that mention three are one?


    Not3

    Is there anything I can say without your critisism?

    How am I mocking?

    ???

    #334932

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,06:40)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:31)

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,06:25)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,06:09)

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,05:59)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,05:41)
    It is my opinion that “Son of God” was a term only found about 4 times in the OT scriptures and to the Jews of his day we see that for Jesus to claim to be the “Son of God” was blasphemy and meant to them he was making himself equal to God. John nor Jesus rebuked Thomas!

    :)


    In those days to be the son of a king meant that you were heir to the throne and would be king.
    I think that is what upset them the most. In effect, Jesus was telling them that he was heir to the position of God and thus would be God.

    Tim


    Tim

    So Jesus was promoting “Polytheism”?

    ???


    Hi worshippingJesus,

    Of course not. Jesus merely told them that he was the son of God.
    The Pharisees believed that he was claiming heir to the throne. Whoa to them, they were wrong about a lot of things.

    Tim


    Tim

    You say…

    Quote

    The Pharisees believed that he was claiming heir to the throne. Whoa to them, they were wrong about a lot of things.

    Is there a scripture for this statement?

    ???


    In those times wasn't it common for the only son to be heir to his father's  kingdom?
    What else would they have thought about someone claiming to be the son?
    You say that they thought that Jesus was claiming to be equal. I say that nothing ever implies that a son is equal to his father.

    Tim


    Tim

    A Son is equal to his Father!

    They are both 100% human!

    To say you were the “Son of God” to them was saying you sere something other than a man.

    In fact it was to them saying he was God!

    Jn 5:18
    Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.

    John wrote these words because he knew what the Jews were saying.

    He understood what Jesus was saing also!

    :)

    #334933
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi W,
    Why would you align your thoughts with the enemies of Christ?
    Jesus showed them they were deceived

    #334934

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 29 2007,07:35)
    Hi W,
    Why would you align your thoughts with the enemies of Christ?
    Jesus showed them they were deceived


    NH

    Jn 5:18
    Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.

    These are Johns words. I align with what Johns says about the Jews.

    Do you?

    ???

    #334935
    TimothyVI
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,07:44)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 29 2007,07:35)
    Hi W,
    Why would you align your thoughts with the enemies of Christ?
    Jesus showed them they were deceived


    NH

    Jn 5:18
    Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.

    These are Johns words. I align with what Johns says about the Jews.

    Do you?

    ???


    Hi WorshippingJesus,

    John only said that the Jews thought that saying He was the son of God made Him equal to God.
    John didn't say it was true.
    The Jews were trying to make Jesus guilty of any sin that they could. They were wrong about any sin.

    Tim

    #334936

    Quote (TimothyVI @ June 29 2007,08:39)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 29 2007,07:44)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 29 2007,07:35)
    Hi W,
    Why would you align your thoughts with the enemies of Christ?
    Jesus showed them they were deceived


    NH

    Jn 5:18
    Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.

    These are Johns words. I align with what Johns says about the Jews.

    Do you?

    ???


    Hi WorshippingJesus,

    John only said that the Jews thought that saying He was the son of God made Him equal to God.
    John didn't say it was true.
    The Jews were trying to make Jesus guilty of any sin that they could. They were wrong about any sin.

    Tim


    Tim

    The problem that we have with your interpretation is John didnt refute what they said.

    In fact he seemed to support it expecially in light of Jn 1:1 and John 20:28.

    I see it differently than you. So we will have to disagree!

    :)

    #334937
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi W,

    Jesus is not guilty of blasphemy.
    Withdraw your false charges.

    #334938

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 29 2007,08:48)
    Hi W,

    Jesus is not guilty of blasphemy.
    Withdraw your false charges.


    NH

    Of course he isnt. He was the Word\God in the flesh!

    The Lord from heaven. The Mighty God! The King of Kings and the Lord of Lords, the first and the last, and by him all things were created and without him was not anything made that was made.

    So remember NH that “God alone” created all things!

    #334939
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi W,
    Then who is the Son of God?
    It is not a matter of being clever or using smart popups or winning arguments.
    Your expressed faith is opposed to the revelation of the bible and this should concern you.

    Jesus Christ is the Son of the living God.

    #334940

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 29 2007,09:09)
    Hi W,
    Then who is the Son of God?


    NH

    He is YHWH in the flesh!

    Believe the scriptures. They were written about him.

    Jn 5:
    39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which *testify of me*.
    40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.

    So many going to God without coming to Jesus!

    :O

    #334941
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi W,
    So the
    Son of God
    is
    God Himself?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 143 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account