- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- December 10, 2009 at 5:26 am#163534bodhithartaParticipant
Quote Has BD been moved to the skeptics section and banned from the believers? I was waiting for when it would be the end but I want to say that for some reason tears came to my eyes reading this simple question you wrote.
I understand that you understand and that is enough for me you have great love in your heart.
I hate what they did to me but I love them anyway because they do not know what they are doing.
But they have you and others who have actually FELT and BELIEVED what you spoken about.
Thank you for being a friend!
I Love you and May God bless you always and forever. This is my last Post(God willing)
December 10, 2009 at 5:46 am#163535NickHassanParticipantHi BD,
We weep no tears for you.
Rebellion is it's own reward.December 10, 2009 at 6:17 am#163536Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (bodhitharta @ Dec. 10 2009,00:26) Quote Has BD been moved to the skeptics section and banned from the believers? I was waiting for when it would be the end but I want to say that for some reason tears came to my eyes reading this simple question you wrote.
I understand that you understand and that is enough for me you have great love in your heart.
I hate what they did to me but I love them anyway because they do not know what they are doing.
But they have you and others who have actually FELT and BELIEVED what you spoken about.
Thank you for being a friend!
I Love you and May God bless you always and forever. This is my last Post(God willing)
BDGive me a break! You act as if you have been crucified for righteousness sake.
You havn't been banned from the sight, but only to post in certain threads.
Why do you think it is so wrong for t8 to not allow certain sections for certain discussions?
To be honest with you it wouldn't bother me a bit if he created a thread for Trinitarian discussions only, for I know that it wouldn't change anything for me to be able to defend the truth. In fact the most talked about discussion on this sight is the Trinity.
You fuss about “Trinitarians” being able to post, yet you fail to see that there has never been a “Trinitarian” here that I know of that questions the validity of the Scriptures.
HMMM, I wonder why? You find all kinds of anti-trinitarians questioning the sriptures and claiming they are corrupt!
The problem you have is your own, for coming to a “Biblical” sight and continuing to trash the “Bible” while you promote the Quran over the scriptures.
So it may mean that know one would care to talk to you now in your own thread because most everyone here defends the Scriptures over the Quran.
This was the main reason the “unbelievers” and “Atheist” threads were created because it disrupted honest debate over the scriptures from those who simply were here to trash them.
But take note of kejonn and stu, they didn't run away in tears and stop posting but in fact stu post as much as ever and has a good amount of interaction by others.
IMO you guys should thank t8 for letting you have the liberty you have here.
For most sights would ban you for trashing the Bible!
WJ
December 10, 2009 at 6:50 am#163537StuParticipant“it disrupted honest debate over the scriptures“
It have never been that honest WJ! After all, no one has a good answer to the charge that it is all an ancient political manifesto!
Quote For most sights would ban you for trashing the Bible! Very true.
Stuart
December 10, 2009 at 6:52 am#163538Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (Stu @ Dec. 10 2009,01:50) “it disrupted honest debate over the scriptures“ It have never been that honest WJ! After all, no one has a good answer to the charge that it is all an ancient political manifesto!
Quote For most sights would ban you for trashing the Bible! Very true.
Stuart
stuAnd you are not honest in what you teach!
HMMM, how would I know the integrity of your heart?
I don't but I thought I would make the statement anyway so you might see the fallacy of your statement!
WJ
December 10, 2009 at 6:55 am#163539StuParticipantNullius in verba.
Let the evidence do the talking.
Stuart
December 10, 2009 at 7:01 am#163540Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (Stu @ Dec. 10 2009,01:55) Nullius in verba. Let the evidence do the talking.
Stuart
stuMy point is, people can be honest and yet be wrong.
But, now that I think about it, I do think that some are not honest!
But I will leave judgment of their motives to God!
WJ
December 10, 2009 at 7:13 am#163541StuParticipantOK, that is a fair enough point.
That is why I only ad hom creationists. They are definitely dishonest, or ignorant. Or mad.
Stuart
December 10, 2009 at 9:37 am#163547karmarieParticipantLove you back BD, God bless
December 10, 2009 at 3:49 pm#163571Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (Stu @ Dec. 10 2009,02:13) OK, that is a fair enough point. That is why I only ad hom creationists. They are definitely dishonest, or ignorant. Or mad.
Stuart
Stu“Dittos” toward the Atheist and Evolutionist!
December 10, 2009 at 6:32 pm#163603StuParticipantQuote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 11 2009,02:49) Quote (Stu @ Dec. 10 2009,02:13) OK, that is a fair enough point. That is why I only ad hom creationists. They are definitely dishonest, or ignorant. Or mad.
Stuart
Stu“Dittos” toward the Atheist and Evolutionist!
That line of logic doesn't really work, except on those non-believers who say “I know for CERTAIN there is no god”. Or “evolution is proved”. There are few atheists or believers in the fact of evolution who would say either, because they understand epistemology better……because atheists and scientists are on average more intelligent that the religious…
Although I have found it is quite entertaining to simply assert without evidence that there is no god, because that is all the god-believer has anyway: assertion.
Stuart
December 11, 2009 at 12:48 am#163665ProclaimerParticipantIntelligence doesn't amount to wisdom.
Many intelligent people do the silliest and unwise things.
Adolf Hitler was most likely intelligent. So was Sir Isaac Newton.IMO, one of these guys was wise, but both were intelligent.
Are you wise enough to know which one of these was wise?
December 11, 2009 at 4:17 am#163725StuParticipantQuote (t8 @ Dec. 11 2009,11:48) Intelligence doesn't amount to wisdom. Many intelligent people do the silliest and unwise things.
Adolf Hitler was most likely intelligent. So was Sir Isaac Newton.IMO, one of these guys was wise, but both were intelligent.
Are you wise enough to know which one of these was wise?
Yes, Isaac Newton was intelligent but not wise.Tell me about the wisdom of Hitler, t8. I'm not sure I would be able to defend it but it seems you will be able to.
Stuart
December 11, 2009 at 5:57 am#163739ProclaimerParticipantI figured that you would choose Sir Isaac Newton as the unwise one.
You are entitled to your opinion of course.December 11, 2009 at 5:58 am#163740ProclaimerParticipantThe fool has said in his heart, there is no God.
December 11, 2009 at 6:21 am#163746Worshipping JesusParticipantQuote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,01:17) IMO you guys should thank t8 for letting you have the liberty you have here. For most sights would ban you for trashing the Bible!
WJ
BTW, Thank you t8!!!WJ
December 11, 2009 at 10:27 am#163768StuParticipantQuote (t8 @ Dec. 11 2009,16:58) The fool has said in his heart, there is no God.
Which one was the fool, in your opinion?Stuart
December 11, 2009 at 10:36 am#163773ProclaimerParticipantThe one who damned his soul.
December 11, 2009 at 10:38 am#163775ProclaimerParticipantQuote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 11 2009,17:21) Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 10 2009,01:17) IMO you guys should thank t8 for letting you have the liberty you have here. For most sights would ban you for trashing the Bible!
WJ
BTW, Thank you t8!!!WJ
Hey thanks WJ.December 11, 2009 at 10:44 am#163777StuParticipantQuote (t8 @ Dec. 11 2009,21:36) The one who damned his soul.
And which of them was that?Stuart
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.