- This topic is empty.
- Posts
First we may hear from Professor Walter J Veith, a one-time atheist and evolutionist, even working in the fields of zoology, etc, but is now Creationist, even 7th Day Adventist, because of the science and also scripture he studied.
Earth In Space and Time:
Now, let's hear from a one-time Nasa engineer, once Atheist, now Creationist, due to what he himself studied…
Evolution – What Do They Purposefully Leave Out? – Spike Psarris, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish He were]:
Our Created Universe – Spike Psarris, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish He were]:
Our Solar System – Evidence Of Creation – Spike Psarris, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish He were]:
[Planet Truths Part 01; Intro]:
[Planet Truths Part 02; Mercury]:
[Planet Truths Part 03; Venus]:
[Planet Truths Part 04; Earth]:
[Planet Truths Part 05; Moon]:
[Planet Truths Part 06; Mars]:
[Planet Truths Part 07; Jupiter]:
[Planet Truths Part 08; Saturn]:
[Planet Truths Part 09; Uranus]:
[Planet Truths Part 10; Neptune]:
[Planet Truths Part 11; Comets]:
[Planet Truths Part 12; Conclusion]:
Now we are beginning to look at some hard facts, but there is still yet more to come. Details…
Hi wahn,
I don't know how anybody could find the time to read the wall of text that you post, but I glanced at the beginning.You said
Quote God can number the stars, and has even names for them… He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by [their] names. [Psalms 147:4]
…yet mankind will never be able to, though some claim to be able to estimate…
He also said that these stars would fall to the earth.
He evidently didn't know how much bigger they are than the earth.Tim
Quote (TimothyVI @ Nov. 30 2012,21:04) Sorry AWHN, I got your name wrong.
That wasn't intentional.Tim
That is ok Mr. Timothy VI. My pseudonym and/or moniker is not really relevant to the topic, but thank you for letting me know! I do appreciate it.Quote (TimothyVI @ Nov. 30 2012,21:03) … I don't know how anybody could find the time to read the wall of text that you post, but I glanced at the beginning.
You said
Quote God can number the stars, and has even names for them… He telleth the number of the stars; he calleth them all by [their] names. [Psalms 147:4]
…yet mankind will never be able to, though some claim to be able to estimate…
He also said that these stars would fall to the earth.
He evidently didn't know how much bigger they are than the earth.Tim
Hi Mr. Timothy VI,Thank you for taking some time to glance at the post, but if you would find the time to spare just or even 10 minutes, you will be able to read the rest. I find the time to read it meny times in that length of time, even as I am making corrections and posting, it.
It really is not that long, compared with actual research papers and articles in journals, like Nature, Science, etc. There is no time limit in which you or any have to complete its reading.
I must say that this is always one of the very first two things which are used as an excuse to not so read…
…'color' and 'length'. And I have been on many forums and the excuses [but this is what it is] are always the same. never is addressed the actual documentation. And the documentation is given so that it may be known that this is fact, and evidenced.
Yes, Mr. Timothy VI, stars do fall to the earth, even called “shooting stars” and “falling stars”, etc by our own scientists. if you want an example that has already happened in History and foretold hundreds to over a thousand years in advance, is the events of November 1 1755 [great Lisbon Earthquake], followed by May 19 1780 [The Dark Day], followed by 1833 [Falling Stars like a fig tree casting her figs] and the unprecedented and super storm of the Leonids [thousands per hour, coming from a single location]. Christ Jesus foretold these signs would happen as certain events were coming to a close… and would surround the year of 1798, the deadly wound given by France to the Papacy.
Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 01 2012,07:04) Hi Mr. Timothy VI, It really is not that long, compared with actual research papers and articles in journals, like Nature, Science, etc. There is no time limit in which you or any have to complete its reading.
I must say that this is always one of the very first two things which are used as an excuse to not so read…
…'color' and 'length'. And I have been on many forums and the excuses [but this is what it is] are always the same.
Hi AWHN,Are you suggesting that these are not valid reasons?
If everyone is telling you the same thing, why not change your presentation?“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” – Albert Einstein
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 01 2012,07:21) Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 01 2012,07:04) Hi Mr. Timothy VI, It really is not that long, compared with actual research papers and articles in journals, like Nature, Science, etc. There is no time limit in which you or any have to complete its reading.
I must say that this is always one of the very first two things which are used as an excuse to not so read…
…'color' and 'length'. And I have been on many forums and the excuses [but this is what it is] are always the same.
Hi AWHN,Are you suggesting that these are not valid reasons?
If everyone is telling you the same thing, why not change your presentation?“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” – Albert Einstein
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Quoting the exact same post in mulitple threads fulfills your own definition Ed J. And I also was pretty sure it is incorrect to do that.I hope all understand [no matter their background], that I am not their enemy [satan is, whether you believe in him or no, for simply not beleiving does not make him vanish, anymore than a blind person simply not believing in the sun, make it unreal, because he cannot see it], and I am not merely here to win some 'creationist' argument, to then say “Ha! you lose…” for that is childishness and foolishness, for if I have not gained you in brotherhood, what was accomplished? Nothing. Therefore, I do not care about those things of debate. I only care about the Truth, and that all may share in it, as it is beautiful and glorious. I freely give what I have been freely given… It is yours to accept or reject. Nothing is to be by force.
Do any think upon Eternal things? If you do, why not then consider the Person who is eternal, even who is Life.
Do any not realise than the 'ToE' is pantheistic [or panentheistic depending upon] in nature? An its implications are inherently religious? This can be demonstrated.
For example:
The 'ToE' is said to be able to 'come up with' a conscious being as we from mere matter and particles and forces, having through this 'process' gone from 'simple' to 'complexity'. They readily admit that we are more complex than say an ant. They readily admit and say that we are more complex than say a mouse. And so on and so forth, yet they [most] stop short at humans [others stop short at earth, Gaia hypothesis, etc], and do not then consider the universe itself as a whole. Is it more complex than humans? Then in a bizarre and sure result of the very 'ToE' itself is that it is pantheistic, for think, if you are conscious because of your complexity and structure, how much more so the entirety of the universe as taken as a whole. Would 'it' [pantheistically] be more intelligent than you?
While pantheism [and panentheism, who want a manifested consciousness of the universe before them] is dangerous and error, that is what the ultimate conclusion of the 'ToE' comes to.
Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 01 2012,07:38) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 01 2012,07:21) Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 01 2012,07:04) Hi Mr. Timothy VI, It really is not that long, compared with actual research papers and articles in journals, like Nature, Science, etc. There is no time limit in which you or any have to complete its reading.
I must say that this is always one of the very first two things which are used as an excuse to not so read…
…'color' and 'length'. And I have been on many forums and the excuses [but this is what it is] are always the same.
Hi AWHN,Are you suggesting that these are not valid reasons?
If everyone is telling you the same thing, why not change your presentation?“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” – Albert Einstein
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Quoting the exact same post in mulitple threads fulfills your own definition Ed J. And I also was pretty sure it is incorrect to do that.
Why are you not planning on changing?Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 01 2012,08:16) The 'ToE' is said to be able to 'come up with' a conscious being as we from mere matter and particles and forces, having through this 'process' gone from 'simple' to 'complexity'. They readily admit that we are more complex than say an ant. They readily admit and say that we are more complex than say a mouse. And so on and so forth, yet they [most] stop short at humans [others stop short at earth, Gaia hypothesis, etc], and do not then consider the universe itself as a whole. Is it more complex than humans? Then in a bizarre and sure result of the very 'ToE' itself is that it is pantheistic, for think, if you are conscious because of your complexity and structure, how much more so the entirety of the universe as taken as a whole. Would 'it' [pantheistically] be more intelligent than you?
.
Finally, a post one could read and interact with.Shame that this paragraph is a load of New Age bollocks.
Stuart
Having considered the Astronomy side, now let us move down to earth for a moment, and consider its creation and its foundation and pillar Rocks, the Created Bedrock Granite.
Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens [are] the work of thy hands. Psalms 102:25 [see also Hebrews 1:10]
Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: [when] I call unto them, they stand up together. Isaiah 48:13 [see also Zechariah 12:1]
This Bedrock Granite cannot be reduplicated in any lab, or in any natural setting. When this Granite is melted it does not, I repeat does not reform into the Granite, but rather Rhyolite, or something akin to it. No lab, nor earthly environ has ever been able to create this Granite in either realworld, or synthetic environs. This is scientifically demonstrated and documented:
[University Of Tennessee, Knoxville; Granite Synthesis Falsification Presentation, full – Dr. Robert V. Gentry, A Seventh Day Adventist, yes!]:
or see the clip of the specific Evidence itself, and proposed Falsification test: [Can granite be synthesized? “It only takes a week,” says Dr. Taylor.; part of the U.T. Lecture [above]]
Can granite be synthesized? “It only takes a week.” – Earth Science Associates
[The Young Age Of The Earth – Dr. Robert V. Gentry, A Seventh Day Adventist, yes!]:
[The Fingerprints Of Creation – Dr. Robert V. Gentry, A Seventh Day Adventist, yes!]:
For further video evidence see:
Video Evidence for Earth's Instant Creation – Polonium Halos in Granite and Coal – Earth Science Associates
[Home] Evidence for Earth's Instant Creation – Polonium Halos in Granite and Coal – ESAFor “Objections” refuted see [possibly more to come on this, if required]:
[Objections] Evidence for Earth's Instant Creation – Polonium Halos in Granite and Coal – ESASee also [Evolution Encyclopedia Vol. 1; Chapter 5 Appendix; Supplementary Material; CHAPTER FIVE – THE ORIGIN OF THE EARTH; – 1 – WHAT SCIENTISTS AND SCIENTIFIC WRITERS HAVE SAID ABOUT THE RESEARCH OF ROBERT GENTRY]:
Chapter 5 AppendixPlease take the time to actually watch the videos and also read in its entirety the Published Book, “Creation's Tiny Mystery” , as many objections are already addressed in this material. Any further objections may be replied to individually.
Credentials of Dr. Robert V. Gentry:
“Robert V. Gentry (born 1933) is a nuclear physicist and young earth creationist, known for his claims that radiohalos provide evidence for a young age of the Earth. He is a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.[1] … Gentry received a masters degree in physics from the University of Florida, and thereafter worked in the defense industry, in nuclear weapons research. … he entered the doctoral programme at Georgia Institute of Technology, but left when he was refused permission to work on the age of the Earth for his dissertation.[2]
…He continued to work on the subject at home using a small microscope, publishing his results (minus his creationist conclusions) in prestigious scientific journals. In 1969 while Gentry was affiliated with an Adventist college in Maryland, Oak Ridge National Laboratory invited him to use their facilities, as a guest scientist, in the hope that his work on radiohalos might lead to discovering super-heavy elements. This relationship was terminated as a result of his participation in McLean v. Arkansas.[1]” [Wikipedia; Robert V. Gentry – Robert V. Gentry – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Scientific papers, articles, etc by Dr. Robert V. Gentry as cited by the Book, “Creation's Tiny Mystery” – Creation's Tiny Mystery: Table of Contents
in the Reference section: Creation's Tiny Mystery, References
and: Creation's Tiny Mystery, References
also the Appendix: Creation's Tiny Mystery, Appendix: Contents
and his own reference page: Published Papers of Dr. Robert V. Gentry
and sister cosmological site: Orion Foundation: Exposing the Flaws in the Big Bang Theory
Gentry, R.V. 1966a. “Abnormally Long Alpha-Particle Tracks in Biotite (Mica).” Applied Physics Letters 8, 65. – ABNORMALLY LONG αâ€PARTICLE TRACKS IN BIOTITE (MICA) | Browse – Applied Physics LettersGentry, R.V. 1966b. “Alpha Radioactivity of Unknown Origin and the Discovery of a New Pleochroic Halo.” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 1, 453. – ScienceDirect.com – Earth and Planetary Science Letters – Alpha radioactivity of unknown origin and the discovery of a new pleochroic halo
Gentry, R.V. 1966c. “Anti-matter Content of the Tunguska Meteor.” Nature 211, 1071. – A
nti-matter Content of the Tunguska Meteor
Gentry, R.V. 1967. “Extinct Radioactivity and the Discovery of a New Pleochroic Halo.” Nature 213, 487. – Extinct Radioactivity and the Discovery of a New Pleochroic Halo
Gentry, R.V. 1968. “Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos.” Science 160, 1228. – Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive HalosGentry, R.V. 1970. “Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?” Science 169, 670. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/science-1970-giant-halos.pdf
Gentry, R.V. 1971a. “Radioactive Halos and the Lunar Environment.” Proceedings of the Second Lunar Science Conference 1, 167. Cambridge: MIT Press. – 1971LPSC….2..167G Page 167
Gentry, R.V. 1971b. “Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity.” Science 173, 727. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports….ios.pdf
Gentry, R.V. 1973. “Radioactive Halos.” Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports….541.pdfGentry, R.V. 1974. “Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective.” Science 184, 62. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/science-1974-radiohalos.pdf – Radiohalos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on “Spectacle Haloes.” Nature 258, 269. – Spectacle haloes (reply)
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. “Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?” International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. – Robert V. Gentry reports – 1978 Super Heavy ElementsGentry, R.V. 1978b. “Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks.” Nature 274, 457. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/nature-1978-scandinavian.pdf
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. “Reinvestigation of the α Activity of Conway Granite.” Nature 273, 217 – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/nature-1978-reinvestigation.pdf
Gentry, R.V. 1979. “Time: Measured Responses.” EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 60, 474. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/eos-1979-forum.pdf
Gentry, R.V. 1980. “Polonium Halos.” EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/eos-1980-forum.pdf
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13. – Creationism discussion continues | Print Edition – Physics Today
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3. – Creationism still again | Print Edition – Physics Today
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124. – Galactic red shifts | Print Edition – Physics Today
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. “Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective.” Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division. American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. – see articles given under: Science Mag Search
Gentry, R.V. 1984b. “Lead Retention in Zircons” (Technical Comment). Science 223, 835. – Lead Retention in Zircons
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108. – Polonium halos | Print Edition – Physics Today
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No 12, 92. – Polonium halos redux | Print Edition – Physics Today
Gentry, R.V. 1986. “Gentry Responds to Dalrymple's Letter to Kevin Wirth.” See Appendix Contents of this book. – Creation's Tiny Mystery, Appendix: Brent Dalrymple's Letter to K. H. Wirth
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. “Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation.” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism Vol. II, 89.
Gentry, R.V. 1987b. Letter to F. Press, President, National Academy of Sciences, dated March 24, 1987.
Gentry, R.V. 1987c. Letter to K.R. Walker, Head, Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of Tennessee, dated July 7, 1987.
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1973. “Ion Microprobe Confirmation of Pb Isotope Ratios and Search for Isomer Precursors in Polonium Radiohalos.” Nature 244, 282. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/nature-1973-ion-microprobe.pdf
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1974. ” 'Spectacle' Array of 2l0Po Halo Radiocentres in Biotite: A Nuclear Geophysical Enigma.” Nature 252, 564. [p. 355] – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/nature-1974-spectacle.pdf – http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v252/n5484/pdf/252564a0.pdf
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1976a. “Radiohalos and Coalified Wood: New Evidence Relating to the Time of Uranium Introduction and Coalification.” Science 194, 315. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/science-1976-coalified-wood.pdf – Radiohalos in Coalified Wood: New Evidence Relating to the Time of Uranium Introduction and Coalification
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1976b. “Evidence for Primordial Superheavy Elements.” Physical Review Letters 37, 11. – Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 11 (1976): Evidence for Primor
dial Superheavy Elements
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1982a. “Differential Lead Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste Containment.” Science 216, 296. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/science-1982-lead-in-zircons.pdf
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1982b. “Differential Helium Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste Containment.” Geophysical Research Letters 9, 1129. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/grl-1982-helium-in-zircons.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 1997. “A New Redshift Interpretation.” Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 12, No. 37, 2919. Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: astro-ph/9806280.) – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/arxiv-1998-redshift.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 1998. “The Genuine Cosmic Rosetta.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: gr-gc/9806061. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/arxiv-1998-rosetta.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 1998. “The New Redshift Interpretation Affirmed.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/9810051. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/arxiv-1998-affirmed.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “Is the Scientific Community in for a Big Surprise about the Big Bang?” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102092. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-1.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “Is the Scientific Community Aware of the Extraordinary Confusion over Big Bang's Expansion Redshifts?” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102093. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-2.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “Galaxies Point to Flaws in Big Bang's Expanding-Balloon Illustration and to Smoking Gun Signatures of GENESIS.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102094. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-3.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “How Will the Scientific Community React to Big Bang's Vast Nonconservation-of-Energy Losses?” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102095. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-4.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “Relativistic Operation of the GPS Exposes the Fatal Flaw in Big Bang's Cornerstone Expansion Postulate.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102096. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-5.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “Ultimate Disproof of the Big Bang Cosmos from Its Bizarre Prediction that Photons Are Permanently Inscribed with H's Value at Time of Origin.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102097. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-6.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “Discovery of a Nearby Universal Center Is the Smoking Gun Signature of GENESIS that Overturns Big Bang's Cosmological Principle.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102098. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-7.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “GENESIS Is Strongly Affirmed because Its (m, z),(∆θ, z) and Apparent Brightness Relations Are Consistent with Observations.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102099. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-8.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2001. “Disproof of Big-Bang Cosmology Points to Seven Smoking Gun Signatures of GENESIS' Astrophysical Framework.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102100. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-9.pdfGentry, R. V. 2001. “The Absence of Pop III Stars and Prior Discovery of Short Half-Life Extinct Primordial Radioactivity Disprove Big Bang's Nucleosynthesis Scenario and Substantiates GENESIS' Rapid Creation Postulate.” Los Alamos National Lab E-Print arXive: physics/0102101. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/papers/arxiv-10.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2003. “Discovery of a Major Contradiction in Big Bang Cosmology Points to the New Cosmic Center Universe Model.” CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-021. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/ext-2003-021.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2003. “New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's Major Predictions Without the F-L Paradigm.” CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-022. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/ext-2003-022.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2004. “Collapse of Big Bang Cosmology and the Emergence of the New Cosmic Center Model of the Universe.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 56, 4. – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports….ang.pdf
Gentry, R. V. 2006. “Flaws in Big Bang's Central Assumption Leads to Discovery of Nearby Center and Associated Cosmic Model with Its Vacuum Energy a Dark Energy Candidate.” – http://www.robertvgentry.com/reports/ejtp-11-30-2006.pdf
… many of which may be seen in full PDF here: Published Papers of Dr. Robert V. Gentry
Thus here is the falsification test [as Proposed by Dr. Robert V. Gentry, not only in the Peer-reviewed literature, and on the witness stand, but also in His book, “Creation's Tiny Mystery”]:
“This was the basis of the laboratory-based test presented to the scientific community in my response to Damon's letter in the May 29, 1979, issue of EOS. Two excerpts from my response show how this test was stated:
. . . Therefore I regard the failure to resolve the long-standing controversy in geology which concerns the origin of the Precambrian granites to be because such rocks are primordial and hence not necessarily explainable on the basis of conventional principles. Even though I think they further qualify for that role in their association as basement rocks of the continents, nevertheless I would consider my thesis essentially falsified if and when geologists synthesize a hand-sized specimen of a typical biotite-bearing granite and/or a similar size crystal of biotite.
I will likewise relinquish any claim for primordial 218Po halos when coercive evidence (not just plausibility arguments) is provided for a conventional origin. … and in this respect I will consider my thesis to be doubly falsified by the synthesis of a biotite which contains just one 218Po halo (some of my natural specimens contain more than 104 Po halos/cm3). … (Gentry 1979, 474)” [Dr. [Hon.] Robert V. Gentry; Creation's Tiny Mystery; page 65] – Creation's Tiny Mystery, Chapter 5: Reverberations from Scientists, Part A
Dr. Robert V. Gentry stands unrefuted in the scientific literature…
…thus we have evidence of the Created Rocks of God:
Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof. Job 38:6
Before the mountains were brought forth, or ever thou hadst formed the earth and the world, even from everlasting to everlasting, thou [art] God. Psalms 90:2
Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens [are] the work of thy hands. Psalms 102:25
[Who] laid the foundations of the earth, [that] it should not be removed for ever. Psalms 104:5
Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: [when] I call unto them, they stand up together. Isaiah 48:13
The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him. Zechariah 12:1
For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I [am] the LORD; and [there is] none else. Isaiah 45:18
…let's take a look at more Evidence in the Rocks…
[Tip-Toe Through The Tapeats, Fossil Footprints That Ain't Supposed To Be There According to the 't-o-e'… – Ian Juby; aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
…do any realize what those footprints found in the Tapeats Sandstone just did to the so-called timescale of evolution?
[Footprints Step On Evolution… Ian Juby; aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[A Fishy Story… Ian Juby; aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[Still A Fishy Story… Ian Juby; aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[Layers Of Time… Ian Juby; aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[The Delk Track; Evidence Of Dinosaur And Human Co-Existence… Ian Juby; aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were] [see also additonal: Welcome to Ian Juby's Home Page ]:
…more to come, and there is always discussion of whatever is presented in any video or publication or documentation or comment.
Now let us also consider the Fossil Record itself, based upon the known facts, and what the scientific findings reveal themselves, and what the evolutionist's say:
Further evidences from the Creation:
[The Fossil Record – Dr. Don Patton – not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[Real Studies About Fossil Men – Dr. Don Patton – not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[Extraordinary Evidence That Dinosaurs Live With Man – Dr. Don Patton – not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[What Is Creation Science? – Dr. Don Patton – not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:[How Old Is The Earth? – Creation Or Evolution? – Dr. Don Patton – not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[A Fossil Record Debate: Creation or Evolution? Dr. Don Patton & Skeptic Mr. John Blanton]:Now let us consider some other Science, and the Law of Thermodynamics:
Implications of the Law of Thermodynamics – Thomas Kindell, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
Scientific Evidences:
Scientific Evidences For A Young Earth – Thomas Kindell, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wishe he were]:
Is There A Monkey In Your Family Tree? – Thomas Kindell, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
Here is a summary of his ['Mr.' Don Patton's] qualifications, for those interested:
“Professional Profile of Dr. Don Patton:
Professional membership affiliation:
1.American Association For The Advancement Of Science
2.Geological Society of America (Spoke at annual convention)
3.The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
4.Society for Sedimentary Geology
5.National Speleological Society
6.International Who’s Who, Honored Member
Lectured on college campuses, including:
1.Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN
2.Fresno State University, Fresno, CA
3.Lamar University, Beaumont, TX
4.Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
5.McMaster University, Hamilton, OT, Canada
6.Ogelthorpe University, Atlanta, GA
7.Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
8.Texas A&M University, Galveston, TX
9.Texas A&M University, Commerce, TX
10.University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR
11.University of Southwestern Missouri, Joplin, MO
Additional experiences include:
1.Conducted up to twelve Creation/Evolution Seminars a year for thirty years
2.Numerous public debates on creation/evolution including radio and TV debates
3.Appeared on NBC Special w/Charlton Heston: “Mysterious Origins of Man”
4.Testified three times before Texas State Textbook Committee, Austin, TX
5.Staff geologist of Creation Evidence Museum, Glen Rose, TX
6.Vice Chairman of Metroplex Institute of Origin Science
7.Preached the gospel as an evangelist for over 40 years
Education:
1.Florida College, Temple Terrace, FL (Bible) 1959-1963
2.Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN (Geology) 1973-1974
3.Indiana Univ./Purdue Univ., Indianapolis, IN (Geology) 1974-1976
4.Pacific School of Graduate Studies, Melbourne, Australia (Geology) 1989-1991
5.Pacific School of Graduate Studies, Melbourne, Australia (Education) 1992-1993
6.Ph.D. in Education granted 12/10/1993 (Pacific School of Graduate Studies)”Hi AWHN,
Most of us don't read your posts because of the excessive length.
You post a lot of cool videos though. And I hope you don't mind
if I re-post them onto other forums. Because they “Can Help”!Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgOne of the biggest claims by the opposing to Scripture and its claims as an Historical source, is that they say that there is no way to falsify the Creation account. Really? Besides Dr. Robert V Gentry's work which indeed has given a falsification test, which has not been falsified to this day, let us consider these texts, and then the evidence. Consider…
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.
Gen 1:4 And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness.
Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.
Gen 1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
Gen 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
Gen 1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Gen 1:9 And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
Gen 1:10 And God called the dry land Earth; and the gathering together of the waters called he Seas: and God saw that it was good.
Gen 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
Gen 1:12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Gen 1:13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.
Gen 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
Gen 1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.
Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
Gen 1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth,
Gen 1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good.
Gen 1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day.
Gen 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Gen 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth.
Gen 1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day.
Gen 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
Gen 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
Gen 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
Gen 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
Gen 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Gen 2:1 Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.
Gen 2:2 And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made.
Gen 2:3 And God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. …
Now let us test these… and look at some evidence…
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/
[Genesis Conflict 01 – The Earth in Time And Space – Walter J. Veith]
[Genesis Conflict 02 – A Universal Flood – Walter J. Veith]
[Genesis Conflict 03 – Bones In Stones – Walter J. Veith][Genesis Conflict 04 – Where Mammals Reigned – Walter J. Veith]
[Genesis Conflict 05 – The Genes Of Genesis – Walter J. Veith]
[Total Onslaught Mini – The World According To Darwin – Walter J. Veith][Genesis Conflict 06 – Creation To Restoration – Walter J. Veith]
[Genesis Conflict 07 – A Day To Be Remembered – Walter J. Veith]
[Genesis Conflict 08 – A Spade Unearths The Truth – Walter J. Veith]
Also see Professor Walter J Veiths original Testimony of How and Why He went from Athiesm to believing in Creation and becoming a Seventh Day Adventist…
[From Evolutionist To Creationist – Professor Walter J. Veith, a onetime atheist/occultist evolutionist, now Creationist, A Seventh Day Adventist]
…or see the story of the Richest Caveman…
[The Story Of “The Richest Caveman” – Doug Batchelor, a one time atheistic/agnostic evolutionist, now Creationist, A Seventh Day Adventist, see how the true Science of the Cross of Calvary changed Him]:
About Professor Walter J Veith [see also: http://walterveith.com/ or see his Resume here: http://pdf.amazingdiscoveries.org/Veith_Curriculum_Vitae.pdf ]:
“Professor Walter Veith obtained his doctorate in zoology from the University of Cape Town in 1979. He believes that the theory of evolution does not provide a plausible explanation of our origins, and that the geological and paleontological data do not support evolution over long periods of time, but rather imply catastrophism, which is consistent with the Genesis account. He lectures internationally on this topic and has undertaken extensive tours to Europe, Africa, and North America.
Professor Veith's research field is nutritional physiology, concentrating on the effect of modern animal husbandry on the incidence of disease transferal to humans. This highly controversial topic is of vital significance in view of the increase in epidemics such as mad cow disease. His research concentrates on degenerative diseases caused by incorrect nutrition and particularly diseases such as osteoporosis, arthritis, and cancer. Professor Veith is also concerned about the impact of antibiotic use in producing a new breed of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which are causing food poisoning epidemics around the world.
Professor Veith and his team have presented numerous lectures on the topic. Their research has been presented at international conferences on nutrition and disease, and their findings have proved that diet has a direct impact on numerous degenerative diseases.
Professor Veith is one of only five scientists in South Africa honored with the Royal Society London Grant for the Reconstruction and Development Program to establish a research climate in post-apartheid South Africa.
Professor Veith has written a number of books on the above topics:
Diet and Health presents the latest insights on health, including Professor Veith’s research. Diet and Health is published by the prestigious scientific publisher Stuttgart Scientific Publishers (Stuttgart Wissenschaftlicher Verlag), which publishes books for the medical profession and the pharmaceutical industry. …” – http://amazingdiscoveries.org/speakers-WalterVeith1
…evidence, so much to see yet… and now we are going to come to Abiogenesis and more evidence that it is scientifically invalid…
Notice what words are specifically said, thus revealing the complete and total lack of ANY verifiable, demonstrable, experiemental, repeatable evidence for the so named abiogenesis…
“Abiogenesis (pronounced /ˌeɪbaɪ.ɵˈdʒɛnɨsɪs/ AY-by-oh-JEN-ə-siss) or biopoiesis is the study of how biological life would arise from inorganic matter through natural processes. …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ],a process which is not scientific, and violates scientific laws, like biogenesis.
“…abiogenesis, how living things originally arose from non-living material …” [Wikipedia; Spontaneous Generation – Spontaneous generation – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…The sequence of chemical events that led to the first nucleic acids is not known. …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…Classical notions of abiogenesis, now more precisely known as spontaneous generation, held that certain complex, living organisms are generated by decaying organic substances. …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; subsection, “Spontaneous Generation” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…In 1861, Louis Pasteur performed a series of experiments which demonstrated that organisms such as bacteria and fungi do not spontaneously appear in sterile, nutrient-rich media. …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; subsection, “Spontaneous Generation” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…There is no truly “standard model” of the origin of life. …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; subsection “Current Models – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“… No one has synthesized a “protocell” using basic components which would have the necessary properties of life …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; subsection “Current Models” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…Whether the mixture of gases used in the Miller–Urey experiment truly reflects the atmospheric content of early Earth is a controversial topic. …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; sub-subsection “reducing atmosphere” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]“… The “soup” theory relies on the assumption proposed by Darwin that in an environment with no pre-existing life, organic molecules may have accumulated and provided an environment for chemical evolution. …” [Wikiepdia; Abiogenesis; sub-subsection “Regarding monomer accumulation” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…The spontaneous formation of complex polymers from abiotically generated monomers under the conditions posited by the “soup” theory is not at all a straightforward process. Besides the necessary basic organic monomers, compounds that would have prohibited the formation of polymers were formed in high concentration during the Miller–Urey and Oró experiments. The Miller experiment, for example, produces many substances that would undergo cross-reactions with the amino acids or terminate the peptide chain.
More fundamentally, it can be argued that the most crucial challenge unanswered by this theory is how the relatively simple organic building blocks polymerise and form more complex structures, interacting in consistent ways to form a protocell. For example, in an aqueous environment hydrolysis of oligomers/polymers into their constituent monomers would be favored over the condensation of individual monomers into polymers. …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; sub-subsection “regarding further transformation” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…Some process in chemical evolution must account for the origin of homochirality, i.e. all building blocks in living organisms having the same “handedness” (amino acids being left-handed, nucleic acid sugars (ribose and deoxyribose) being right-handed, and chiral phosphoglycerides). Chiral molecules can be synthesized, but in the absence of a chiral source or a chiral catalyst, they are formed in a 50/50 mixture of both enantiomers. This is called a racemic mixture. Clark has suggested that homochirality may have started in space, …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; subsection “Models to explain Homochirality” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ], that's right, when all else fails to be able to produce it on earth, they move it “off world”… nope not done here, but maybe a long time ago in a galaxy far far away…
“…The question “How do simple organic molecules form a protocell?” is largely unanswered …” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis; subsection “From organic molecules to protocells” – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“…Possible role of bubbles…” [Wikipedia; Abiogenesis – Abiogenesis – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ], this is science?
“Spontaneous generation or Equivocal generation is an obsolete principle regarding the origin of life from inanimate matter … The disproof of ongoing spontaneous generation is no longer controversial … It is generally accepted to have been ultimately disproven in the 19th century by the experiments of Louis Pasteur, expanding upon the experiments of other scientists before him (such as Francesco Redi who had performed similar experiments in the 17th century). … Louis Pasteur's 1859 experiment put the question to rest.” [Wikiepdia; Spontaneous Generation – Spontaneous generation – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]
“Spontaneous generation refers to both the supposed process by which life would systematically emerge from sources other than seeds, eggs or parents and to the theories which explained the apparent phenomenon. The first form is abiogenesis,
in which life emerges from non-living matter. This should not be confused for the modern hypothesis of abiogenesis, in which life emerged once and diversified. …” [Wikipedia; Spontaneous Generation; subsection “Description” – Spontaneous generation – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ], the “modern version” simply has supposedly more steps, but it is merely a re-worked version of “spontaneous generation”, which has been shown to be invalid, and they even call it as such.Dealing with more rocks, etc…
Three Great [older, but still great] Videos:
No Evolution:
No EvolutionStratification:
No Evolution: StratificationPhilosophy:
No Evolution: Philosophy…and now again from another angle…
[The Population Problem – Ian Juby, aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:[Problem Solved… Increase in information in DNA… uhhh… never mind… – Ian Juby, aka “Wazooloo” Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[Response to “8th Foundational Falsehood” – Ian Juby, aka “Wazooloo”, Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[Origin of Life by evolution? Noooope!… – Ian Juby, “Wazooloo”, Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
[Something from Nothing? – Ian Juby, “Wazooloo”, Youtube, not a Seventh Day Adventist, though I wish he were]:
Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 02 2012,15:57) Hi AWHN, …
You post a lot of cool videos though. And I hope you don't mind
if I re-post them onto other forums. Because they “Can Help”!Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J
All are welcome to them. Take them, post them everwhere. Any discussion or questions, any may freely ask.Quote (AWHN @ Dec. 02 2012,16:46) Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 02 2012,15:57) Hi AWHN, You post a lot of cool videos though. And I hope you don't mind
if I re-post them onto other forums. Because they “Can Help”!Your brother
in Christ, Jesus.
Ed J
All are welcome to them. Take them, post them everwhere. Any discussion or questions, any may freely ask.
Hi AHWN,Thank you for your blessings in this!
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgAncient Man was not evolving upwards into more intelligent beings, but becoming more and more degraded from sin, Ancient Man in the Past was far superior in intellect than we, here is the evidence… they built things we cannot duplicate:
http://www.hopevideo.com/Creation_Seminar.htm
http://www.yourvideos.net/hopevid….Man.wmv
More on the Dangerous Deceptions promoted 'as' science…
http://amazingdiscoveries.org/C-deception-chance-design-science
Well, since, we started off with Histrorical Records, let us move back momentarily into the Archeological, and see the History itself from the dirt, rocks and hidden treasures:
Francois du Plessis Bible Characters in Archaeology 5-13-2011 [A 7th Day Adventist, Archeologist; the old Embed Code is not present for these and the Iframe does not properly function in this forum, so here are the Links Instead]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLFwZavs69k
Francois du Plessis Evidence of Various Biblical Characters and Places 5-20-2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GadddhfnNAg
Francois DuPlessis Nebuchadnezzar Part1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRIVZIB507Q
Francois DuPlessis Nebuchadnezzar Part2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA9EXgcdZfQ
01 (Egypt 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNWLfGCxa_0
02 (Egypt 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JZuNq7B2QM
03 Assyria 1 Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmmzWStYqPI
04 (Assyria 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zmGGiSQPtk4
05 (Babylon) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sXjoWy8J44
06 (Medo-Persia) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6_YMEH-1ts
07 (Space Invasion) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgKD48cZI68
08 (Petra) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3M4surcIpM
09 (Jerusalem) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rorsZQni1N0
10 (Little Horn 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceBwOpL-wQU
11 (Little Horn 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyQV5J5B3Ro
12 (Little Horn 3) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed4RfkajZww
13 (Lamb, Priest, King 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M3F3YN1NVE
14 (Lamb, Priest, King 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBlv2_pa1Mk
15 (Seven Seals) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eX6RVZN3vY
16 (Seal of God) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=az8XqYiJgco
17 (Woman and Dragon) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKp1bA_JdqI
18 (Land Beast) Discoveries from Ancient CivilizationsThe Judgement
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhAcYIdOJTs
19 (Revelation 14) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvws055XyPA
20 (7 Last Plagues – Armageddon) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4ZO4Cjp7RU
21 (Revelation 17) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgpBC7fk4wY
22 (Revelation 20 – Millenium) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-beaeO5E3Q
23 (Revelation 10 – Angel Little Roll) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_pszoSbZzg
24 (Revelation 11 – Two Witnesses) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtNQv0lKZcg
25 (Seven Trumpets 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx8qPfo_HlY
26 (Seven Trumpets 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQ5DtqiuOxM
27 (Matthew 24, part 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9xewm_yro4
28 (Matthew 24, part 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ThnKRzn0B8
29 (Seven Churches 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GY1bxTFEp7E
30 (Seven Churches 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WW23xh8726c
31 (Seven Churches 3) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCbcBwH-Tzk
32 (Phonecia) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O710PTwn4YM
33 (Qumran) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf0_dNsyRFw
34 (Health – how to postpone your funeral) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuSO1YbkHqg
35 (Revelation 20 – Millenium) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fG28MPFjc0
36 (Death) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCqwL_R5fUA
37 (Spiritism) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lauZ8qQm9mw
38 (Baptism) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op72b6zIPUw
39 (Ellen G. White – Part 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR6cE5m75To
40 (Ellen G. White – Part 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjHwkoYq-oU
41 (Tithes) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWDfah0qTDU
42 (Law and Grace) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pv5u3nzpkpI
43 (Cosmos 1) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMHP1JgWGmQ
44 (Cosmos 2) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfstJOIwmGA
45 (Sunday – Missing Text) Discoveries from Ancient Civilizations
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
