- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- November 7, 2008 at 9:35 pm#111474ProclaimerParticipant
Quote (Stu @ Nov. 07 2008,16:04) I would never admit to being anything as grammatically incorrect as that. Stuart
Should be “I would never admit to being grammatically incorrect as that”.November 7, 2008 at 9:38 pm#111475ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Stu @ Nov. 07 2008,16:01) t8 the last vestiges of vitalism died with Wohler's urea experiment in 1828. Most of your arguments were last considered valid about then, so I salute your consistency at least. Stuart
Cool I made it to 1828.What about you? You need to figure out whether there was a God, something came from nothing, or something has always existed that can change.
You haven't even got off base one. You are still before the beginning.
November 7, 2008 at 9:40 pm#111476ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Stu @ Nov. 07 2008,16:01) t8 the last vestiges of vitalism died with Wohler's urea experiment in 1828. Most of your arguments were last considered valid about then, so I salute your consistency at least. Stuart
Now to move beyond 1928.Think of what happens when electricity is turned on in an electric machine.
November 8, 2008 at 3:15 am#111489StuParticipantQuote (t8 @ Nov. 08 2008,08:35) Quote (Stu @ Nov. 07 2008,16:04) I would never admit to being anything as grammatically incorrect as that. Stuart
Should be “I would never admit to being grammatically incorrect as that”.
To take your version, surely it is “I would never admit to being AS grammatically incorrect as that”.Stuart
November 8, 2008 at 3:19 am#111490StuParticipantt8
Quote Cool I made it to 1828.
Yes you still have 1859 to come.Quote What about you? You need to figure out whether there was a God, something came from nothing, or something has always existed that can change.
Why?Quote You haven't even got off base one. You are still before the beginning.
Do I get to learn a special handshake if I sign up for ChristianityTM?Quote Now to move beyond 1928.
You missed out 1859.Stuart
November 8, 2008 at 4:40 am#111494ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Stu @ Nov. 08 2008,14:15) Quote (t8 @ Nov. 08 2008,08:35) Quote (Stu @ Nov. 07 2008,16:04) I would never admit to being anything as grammatically incorrect as that. Stuart
Should be “I would never admit to being grammatically incorrect as that”.
To take your version, surely it is “I would never admit to being AS grammatically incorrect as that”.Stuart
Overuse of 'as' but I don't see a problem with that. Just not very elegant.November 8, 2008 at 8:18 pm#111521StuParticipantQuote (t8 @ Nov. 08 2008,15:40) Quote (Stu @ Nov. 08 2008,14:15) Quote (t8 @ Nov. 08 2008,08:35) Quote (Stu @ Nov. 07 2008,16:04) I would never admit to being anything as grammatically incorrect as that. Stuart
Should be “I would never admit to being grammatically incorrect as that”.
To take your version, surely it is “I would never admit to being AS grammatically incorrect as that”.Stuart
Overuse of 'as' but I don't see a problem with that. Just not very elegant.
Perhaps it is not elegant in your opinion, but because you are using a comparative the repetition of 'as' is required for logical syntax.Stuart
November 8, 2008 at 8:20 pm#111522StuParticipantHave you made it to 1859 yet?
Stuart
November 13, 2008 at 9:45 am#111813ProclaimerParticipantI would never admit to being grammatically incorrect.
The above is a complete sentence.
If I add on 'as that', then I am introducing the comparative.Anyway, I don't care whether I am right or you are because it is petty. I am more concerned about non-belief in God as that is a huge blunder for anyone.
November 13, 2008 at 9:47 am#111814ProclaimerParticipantQuote (Stu @ Nov. 09 2008,07:20) Have you made it to 1859 yet? Stuart
Have you made it to the cause of the Big Bang or the cause of the cosmos yet?November 13, 2008 at 11:40 am#111815StuParticipantQuote (t8 @ Nov. 13 2008,20:47) Quote (Stu @ Nov. 09 2008,07:20) Have you made it to 1859 yet? Stuart
Have you made it to the cause of the Big Bang or the cause of the cosmos yet?
Have you learned any cosmology yet or would it be more pearl casting on my part?Stuart
December 21, 2008 at 7:29 am#115027davidParticipanthas stu left the building?
December 31, 2008 at 11:38 am#116190StuParticipantQuote (david @ Dec. 21 2008,18:29) has stu left the building?
Is that your answer?Stuart
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.