- This topic has 6,414 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by
.
- Posts
What’s crappier, GE images of Antarctic or Greenland or Mike’s argument about it.
And let’s put you dumb argument about crappy photos to bed right now. Please read this slowly so we don’t have to listen to your long-winded pathetic rants about this.
If you zoom in to an area without close imaging to the ground like Antarctica, Greenland, and the area around my house, then what GE does is zoom in on the preceding higher image which results in pixelation. If you understand this simple fact, you will see how silly your argument about this is.
Diversions are ignored. What’s the answer to my last question? You said you don’t know. Find out. (Hint: Google Earth lists the source of the image at the bottom of the page.)
I await your answer.
Do your own homework and stop wasting my time. Just tell me what the answer is in your next line of reasoning or should I say lack of reasoning.
Do YOUR own homework! Only a blathering idiot would try to argue something he hasn’t even looked into. Or, in better words…
He who answers a matter before he hears it, It is folly and shame to him.
– Proverbs 18:13
He who answers a matter before he hears it, It is folly and shame to him.
Agreed. But this is not what is going on. I’m betting I spend ages on this only to find what I thought originally, that I wasted my time and my initial point is still the answer. Further, giving stupid arguments lots of my time risks the following:
Do not answer a fool according to his folly, or you yourself will be just like him.
Now let’s assume that I am going to answer these questions as you hope. Now what is your point? I’m betting it is not worthy, but let’s hear it now.
All that is going on is I’m trying not to waste time with silly questions. Cut to the chase, put your point in one or two paragraphs and assume all that camera crap is correct. And if you have a decent point, I will invest the time required and dissect your points if need be.
t8: Cut to the chase, put your point in one or two paragraphs and assume all that camera crap is correct. And if you have a decent point, I will invest the time required and dissect your points if need be.
Exactly how many times does Mike need to make his point before you even get a clue? It seems that you cannot comprehend what is being said. Why don’t YOU t8 go back and understand what is being said instead of asking to be spoon-fed the information? I sometimes have to reread a post several times to understand what the intended meaning was. I feel that’s the least I can do to respond as intelligently as possible. Hey, give it a try.
Resorting to a futile point is the inevitable death throes of an argument that never had a chance of winning
Diggy, Mike is making the case that Google should have every square inch of earth covered in high res photography even very close to the ground but they don’t because Flat Earth. Lol.
All his ranting about cameras is just ridiculous. Mike isn’t CEO of a multinational like Google so he understands zero about logistics. He is just wasting time with this point posting photos of deep sea fish etc. Nobody cares except you because I think Mike might be your apostle which if true is a worry.
Give me descent points worth responding to. Not this foolishness, but honestly you guys lost all credibility a long time ago, and this latest argument drops you down another level below that.
We both agree that Google does not have clear detail of the whole planet and it’s just very poor to conclude the earth is flat and Antarctic is hidden from the rest of the world because of that.
No amount of camera lens specs or bloated deep sea fish will change this foolishness into direct evidence. Foolishness is foolishness no matter how much lipstick you put on it.
Tater, they don’t have any of the footage that I mentioned above simply because you can’t have real footage of things that don’t exist. Maybe this will help
So you say. I guess Greenland doesn’t exist either or is not an island. Could they be hiding the entrance to the Hollow Earth Mike?
Yes / No.
Here is the evidence so far with Hollow Earth.
Lol.
This is an actual size comparison of Antarctica overlaid on a photo of the moon I took. The diameter of the moon is 2158 miles. The diameter of Antarctica is 2768 miles. So what you’re trying to sell us is that I, with my $500 camera that has a 28 mm² sensor can capture great detail of the moon which is 240,000 miles away from me… and NASA, with their million dollar camera that has a 31 cm² sensor CAN’T capture ANY kind of detail at all of Antarctica which is only 383 miles away from it.
Antarctica is a white sheet plain. What did you expect to see. When you zoom in on a white sheet you see a white sheet. Where there are mountains, geographic features that have contrast, and even slight variations then of course you see them clearer just like the moon. If there was no ice Antarctica then the same images would show all kinds of features and would be clearer to you Mike. Did this not cross your mind? Further, if you provide imaging and it just looks like a white sheet, then that is not excactly an incentive to provide up to date images is it? I mean on the moon, you get a pay off by seeing actual features. But Antarctica and Greenland much less so.
So why is Greenland in the same boat? Riddle me that one batman. Lol.
If you want to continue with this folly, then I will play your little game, but on one condition. Whatever research you put me on with Antarctica, I want it matched by you with Greenland. You want me to disprove that Antarctica imaging is hiding the dome and the wall of military lizards protecting the edge of the disc, thus I require that you disprove Greenland imaging is a white sheet because someone doesn’t want us to see the entrance to the Hollow Earth.
BTW, did you watch the Hollow Earth video? Did you think that those who believe this are fools or deceived? Well that is what most people think about you. Except you guys have been given way more debunks than the Hollow Earth, so that makes Hollow Earth believers not as foolish IMO because I’m betting that if they had the same amount of debunks, then many would have abandoned that theory by now.
Debunks on a daily basis and still zero footage of the Flat Earth or dome
At 1:33pm EST, @Astro_Jessica and @Astro_Christina concluded today's spacewalk. After working 6 hours and 58 minutes the two successfully completed the battery upgrade for one channel on one pair of the station’s solar arrays. #AskNASA | Read more… https://t.co/GQfO9zyIGP pic.twitter.com/e3mHSeM8l3
— Intl. Space Station (@Space_Station) January 20, 2020t8: Debunks on a daily basis…
Who would design a vessel that requires the crew to risk their lives doing basic maintenance? I single microscopic meteoroid hitting a space suit would mean curtains for the astronaut. It’s like putting the equipment to raise and lower the sails of a boat on the bottom of it… underwater! 😁😂🤣
Werner Von Braun, who basically started NASA with Jack Parsons, said that these micro-meteors were so ubiquitous that anyone who landed on the moon would have to run for their lives from the capsule to a cave to avoid getting hit by these constant little bullets. Of course these “space bullets” travel 100 times faster than bullets from a gun, and would pierce the exterior of the ISS like a knife cutting through warm butter. And in reality, if there did exist such a thing as the ISS in outer space, it would have been hit by these space bullets about a billion times in the last 20 years.
But, YAY! Go ISS! We Love You!
😅
Back to the drawing board
Lol. Hold on to your hats. More debunking coming up
You missed the point. You say if it is small, then why so hard to remove? That’s like saying an atom is so small you should be able to pick it up with your hands.
Being tiny is the difficult part Mike. Pick up an atom and then photograph it, then post it here. Oh, you can’t without increasingly amazing technology. Enough said. Lol.
Did I really need to explain that?
What?
Take your time. Read my post and think about it. I know you have the capacity to grasp it. If you cannot, let me know tomorrow.
How about starting with what I said was small so we all know what you’re even talking about? Micro-meteors? My vacuum video?
Tater: Nothing outstanding from what I can tell. Anything new?
Again, I can only guess at what you’re referring to. My video?
Everything has been debunked
Ruapehu, buildings, etc from long distance prove the globe not flat earth.
Marble on the table disappears bottom up, debunked. It does no such thing if experiment is conducted correctly.
Photos and videos of the globe, zero of the disc and dome.
Earth’s atmosphere sucked out by space, false. The atmosphere thins out till zero. So there is no great disparity of atmosphere and vacuum at any point.
Tor is a measurement on an absolute scale. Thus sucking out molecules to create a vacuum is only hard because small things are generally hard to deal with. Nothing to do with it being logarithmic. For example, carrying an atom in my hand is hard not because it is heavy, but because it is too small to pick it up.
Bubbles in space? They are air molecules which freeze in space. Water bubbles go in one direction, toward the surface of the water. Bubbles in space go in different directions. This argument has popped.
Eclipses easily visualized in heliocentric model. Flat earth has no visual model to explanation apart from LEDs turning on and off to give that effect. Even if it were LEDs, what’s the chance that the heliocentric model visualises correctly all the predictions of the Led light sequence. Eclipses prove the heliocentric model.
Travelling distances in Southern Hemisphere prove the globe and debunk the flat earth. I have personally verified this. No lizards have lied to me about this because I have travelled from NZ to South America and on flat earth, the distance is at least 3 times longer than what I travelled.
Visitors to South Pole are either lying lizards who blink funny or are real people who have been there. Likely the latter. I even indirectly know someone who has been there.
The sun doesn’t speed up when it is over the Tropic of Capricorn compared to the Tropic of Cancer. Simple fact. This alone puts the Flat Earth into serious disrepute.
Either millions of lizards work in the space, satellite, and airline industries and are lying to us about the disc, or these are real people who send things into space, have been in space, or travel around the globe everyday. Likely the latter. Not one of the millions of people involved in the conspiracy have come forward.
The Bible teaches a flat earth has been debunked. It talks about the curve of the Earth which is appropriate language for a globe.
So many more points have been debunked, but cannot remember them all. Only a willing blind person would deny it.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
