Mikeboll’s belief in a flat world

Viewing 20 posts - 2,821 through 2,840 (of 6,415 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #843452
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    Why do the astro-nots test underwater rather than a vacuum? It is the exact opposite enviornment they will be working in. (pressure/vacuum).

    The only test that I’ve seen, and there was only one, was a big failure! The suit could not deal with the vacuum (weak as it was) and sprung a leak and the astronaut immediately passed out and fell over backwards. He later said that he could feel the saliva on his tongue bubble.

    Any answers?

    #843457
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    My guess is testing underwater simulates floating in zero gravity. Also, I imagine it prepares astronauts for existing in an environment that is life threatening and alien. I’m not sure pressure has anything to do with it.

    #843458
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    My guess is that the underwater exact replica of the ISS is where they actually film the spacewalks.  Of course mine is supported by official NASA footage showing bubbles in space and even a guy wearing a scuba tank. 😁

    #843467
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    Here’s about ten or more bubbles in “space” in about a minute!

     

     

     

    #843473
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Of course the official NASA explanation is that they are flakes of paint or debris that fell off the ISS during the space walk.  So once again, here’s where discernment comes in.  If the ISS is traveling 17,500 mph through the vacuum of space, an astronaut can step outside for a space walk without even ruffling his sleeve – since there is no atmosphere.  And he can fly around the earth keeping perfect pace with the ISS forever if he wants to.  So a flake of paint CAN’T “fall off” the ISS in the first place, since even if it became unattached from the ISS, it would still just float right along with it in the same position it has always been.  But if something else KNOCKED the flake of paint off, it would take off on one particular trajectory – which it would remain on until something else acted upon it and changed that trajectory.

    So in the video D4T showed, it’s not just that the flakes of paint (actually air bubbles) are moving freely about when nothing knocked them off the ISS… they’re also zigging and zagging all over the place without coming into contact with anything else.  That is absolutely impossible!  A paint flake in space cannot head upwards, then take a hard right, then do a u-turn, etc.

    This video does a great job of pointing this out…

    #843474
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Here’s one of the scuba divers in space…

    Here’s another.  Look inside the hatch at the 1:58 mark to see the scuba tank as clear as day.  Then watch a few seconds and see a very clear bubble rising up through the entire screen…

    There are many other videos as well.  Just search YouTube for “scuba divers in space” or “bubbles in space”.

    #843475
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8, if it takes 8 feet thick concrete walls to contain a fairly powerful vacuum on earth, how thick would the walls of the ISS have to be to keep out the MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more powerful vacuum of outer space?

    #843549
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    I’m very satisfied with this one.  Only 5 minutes…  https://youtu.be/_ahqgVESZVA

    #843564
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    The Sun is 109 times the diameter of Earth & 150 million km away

    Thus your diagram is not accurate. You need to show the sun as much bigger.

    Of course from our perspective the sun and moon look the same size, but a sun that is 109 times bigger and 150 million km away may not match the angles you have used in your video below:

    #843566
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    What we can verify through observational science is that the sun and the moon are the same angular size.  You are claiming facts not in evidence, as nobody has measured the sun, or knows what it is, or how far away it is.

    That being said, feel free to make the sun in my diagrams as large as you want. Just remember to center it on the earth. And remember that my yellow and red lines must both run directly through the CENTER of your huge sun for the model to work.

    Can you make that work?

    #843592
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    If at the south poll they were to have days with no darkness
    during the peak in summer, like the North Poll,
    would that not be game over or no?

    How long is it daylight in NZ during the peak of summer?
    In the US it stays daylight for over 9 hours.
    How long is the longest day in NZ?

    How can you have longer summers in NZ on the flat Earth model?

    ____________
    God bless
    Ed J

    #843593
    Ed J
    Participant

    Fake moon-landings and fake space-station don’t necessarily mean flat Earth.

    #843606
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Ed:  If at the south poll they were to have days with no darkness
    during the peak in summer, like the North Poll,
    would that not be game over or no?

    Not necessarily.   Do you have evidence of a 24 hour sun at the South Pole?  Read paragraphs 49-58 (each one takes less than 30 seconds)… http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html

    Then try this 2 minute video…

    Ed:  Fake moon-landings and fake space-station don’t necessarily mean flat Earth.

    Agreed.  But why fake space if it was real?  Besides, there are now thousands of photos online showing objects much farther away than could be seen on a ball earth.  Lighthouses, mountains, city skylines… all of which would be hundreds to thousands of feet behind the curve if we lived on a ball.  I’m in the process of making a video right now that centers around the Joshua Nowicki Chicago skyline photo.  To me, it is the line in the sand – and the one single thing that finally pushed me clearly over to the flat earth side.  Since then I’ve discovered hundreds of other things, but this one was powerful for me.  Hopefully you’ll watch the video when I’m done.  I’ll link it here.

     

    #843609
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Thank you for addressing my points 1 and 2 of my “3” points:

    1. Fake moon-landings and fake space-station.

    A Why might they not be able to go to moon?
    Van Allen belt, lack of lethal radiation protection,
    and protection from the non-pressures of a vacuum.

    Why would they fake moon-landings?

    A. One reason is: to make the Soviets believe
    that war against the west would not end well for them.

    Why would they fake space-station?

    B. Keep the money chain going, a space-station hoax
    could easily accomplish this. Preventing a NASA shut-down.

    ____________
    God bless
    Ed J

    #843610
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Point #2:
    Ok, fair enough…

    A 24 hour sun at the south poll could be a hoax

    #843611
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    In a flat Earth model you cannot have a 24 hour sun at the south poll. <– we both agree here

    That brings us to point #3:
    This is where you personally can come in.
    You live in NZ, and can make Scientific Observations.

    How can you have longer summer daylight hours on a flat-earth model?

    It would seem to me on a flat earth, in the southern hemisphere,
    (please excuse the expression) the nights would be longer in both seasons.

    How is this explained?

    ____________
    Your Brother
    in Christ
    Ed J

    #843617
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Ed J,

    Do you believe the moon landing is a hoax?

    #843618
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Yes, the further south you head in NZ the more sunlight you get in summer and the less you get in winter. It is a no brainer that if you travelled further south again which is where Antarctica is, that it would be even more extreme. Way more extreme in fact because of the great distance. There are islands in NZ called the Subantarctic Islands that are at the doorstep of the frozen continent. While they are extremely isolated, the effect of sunlight in different seasons is way more pronounced there and no one will stop you from sailing there.

    I also observed this phenomenon in the Northern Hemisphere in Norway. There was daylight at 3:00 am and I found it hard to sleep. Both hemispheres have this same effect.

    A Flat Earth model begs to differ. Problem is, this is my experience, not some guess.

    #843619
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    You’ve got it the wrong way round Mike.

    The ISS is like a car tyre. It has higher pressure inside and is surrounded by lower pressure.

    Car tyres are not that strong, but they can hold 18 extra PSI compared to outside.

    An empty container being crushed by 14 PSI or a submarine being crushed or breached by tons of water above is not the same.

    #843620
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Mike, think for a minute.

    The sun is huge compared to Earth.

    Take the top and bottom points of the sun, (if there is such a thing). Draw multiple lines between these points to Earth.

    Do the lines match the angles you have proposed? DO they not cover the whole face of the Earth pointing toward the sun?

    Do the lines go above and below the top and bottom points of the Earth?

    That is your answer.

    Again, 2D diagrams and the limitation of not being able to show true distance and scale is the problem.

Viewing 20 posts - 2,821 through 2,840 (of 6,415 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account