- This topic has 6,414 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 1 week ago by
.
- Posts
Why do the astro-nots test underwater rather than a vacuum? It is the exact opposite enviornment they will be working in. (pressure/vacuum).
The only test that I’ve seen, and there was only one, was a big failure! The suit could not deal with the vacuum (weak as it was) and sprung a leak and the astronaut immediately passed out and fell over backwards. He later said that he could feel the saliva on his tongue bubble.
Any answers?
My guess is testing underwater simulates floating in zero gravity. Also, I imagine it prepares astronauts for existing in an environment that is life threatening and alien. I’m not sure pressure has anything to do with it.
My guess is that the underwater exact replica of the ISS is where they actually film the spacewalks. Of course mine is supported by official NASA footage showing bubbles in space and even a guy wearing a scuba tank. 😁
Of course the official NASA explanation is that they are flakes of paint or debris that fell off the ISS during the space walk. So once again, here’s where discernment comes in. If the ISS is traveling 17,500 mph through the vacuum of space, an astronaut can step outside for a space walk without even ruffling his sleeve – since there is no atmosphere. And he can fly around the earth keeping perfect pace with the ISS forever if he wants to. So a flake of paint CAN’T “fall off” the ISS in the first place, since even if it became unattached from the ISS, it would still just float right along with it in the same position it has always been. But if something else KNOCKED the flake of paint off, it would take off on one particular trajectory – which it would remain on until something else acted upon it and changed that trajectory.
So in the video D4T showed, it’s not just that the flakes of paint (actually air bubbles) are moving freely about when nothing knocked them off the ISS… they’re also zigging and zagging all over the place without coming into contact with anything else. That is absolutely impossible! A paint flake in space cannot head upwards, then take a hard right, then do a u-turn, etc.
This video does a great job of pointing this out…
Here’s one of the scuba divers in space…
Here’s another. Look inside the hatch at the 1:58 mark to see the scuba tank as clear as day. Then watch a few seconds and see a very clear bubble rising up through the entire screen…
There are many other videos as well. Just search YouTube for “scuba divers in space” or “bubbles in space”.
T8, if it takes 8 feet thick concrete walls to contain a fairly powerful vacuum on earth, how thick would the walls of the ISS have to be to keep out the MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more powerful vacuum of outer space?
The Sun is 109 times the diameter of Earth & 150 million km away
Thus your diagram is not accurate. You need to show the sun as much bigger.
Of course from our perspective the sun and moon look the same size, but a sun that is 109 times bigger and 150 million km away may not match the angles you have used in your video below:
What we can verify through observational science is that the sun and the moon are the same angular size. You are claiming facts not in evidence, as nobody has measured the sun, or knows what it is, or how far away it is.
That being said, feel free to make the sun in my diagrams as large as you want. Just remember to center it on the earth. And remember that my yellow and red lines must both run directly through the CENTER of your huge sun for the model to work.
Can you make that work?
Hi Mike,
If at the south poll they were to have days with no darkness
during the peak in summer, like the North Poll,
would that not be game over or no?How long is it daylight in NZ during the peak of summer?
In the US it stays daylight for over 9 hours.
How long is the longest day in NZ?How can you have longer summers in NZ on the flat Earth model?
____________
God bless
Ed JEd: If at the south poll they were to have days with no darkness
during the peak in summer, like the North Poll,
would that not be game over or no?Not necessarily. Do you have evidence of a 24 hour sun at the South Pole? Read paragraphs 49-58 (each one takes less than 30 seconds)… http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html
Then try this 2 minute video…
Ed: Fake moon-landings and fake space-station don’t necessarily mean flat Earth.
Agreed. But why fake space if it was real? Besides, there are now thousands of photos online showing objects much farther away than could be seen on a ball earth. Lighthouses, mountains, city skylines… all of which would be hundreds to thousands of feet behind the curve if we lived on a ball. I’m in the process of making a video right now that centers around the Joshua Nowicki Chicago skyline photo. To me, it is the line in the sand – and the one single thing that finally pushed me clearly over to the flat earth side. Since then I’ve discovered hundreds of other things, but this one was powerful for me. Hopefully you’ll watch the video when I’m done. I’ll link it here.
Hi Mike,
Thank you for addressing my points 1 and 2 of my “3” points:
1. Fake moon-landings and fake space-station.
A Why might they not be able to go to moon?
Van Allen belt, lack of lethal radiation protection,
and protection from the non-pressures of a vacuum.Why would they fake moon-landings?
A. One reason is: to make the Soviets believe
that war against the west would not end well for them.Why would they fake space-station?
B. Keep the money chain going, a space-station hoax
could easily accomplish this. Preventing a NASA shut-down.____________
God bless
Ed JHi Mike,
In a flat Earth model you cannot have a 24 hour sun at the south poll. <– we both agree here
That brings us to point #3:
This is where you personally can come in.
You live in NZ, and can make Scientific Observations.How can you have longer summer daylight hours on a flat-earth model?
It would seem to me on a flat earth, in the southern hemisphere,
(please excuse the expression) the nights would be longer in both seasons.How is this explained?
____________
Your Brother
in Christ
Ed JYes, the further south you head in NZ the more sunlight you get in summer and the less you get in winter. It is a no brainer that if you travelled further south again which is where Antarctica is, that it would be even more extreme. Way more extreme in fact because of the great distance. There are islands in NZ called the Subantarctic Islands that are at the doorstep of the frozen continent. While they are extremely isolated, the effect of sunlight in different seasons is way more pronounced there and no one will stop you from sailing there.
I also observed this phenomenon in the Northern Hemisphere in Norway. There was daylight at 3:00 am and I found it hard to sleep. Both hemispheres have this same effect.
A Flat Earth model begs to differ. Problem is, this is my experience, not some guess.
You’ve got it the wrong way round Mike.
The ISS is like a car tyre. It has higher pressure inside and is surrounded by lower pressure.
Car tyres are not that strong, but they can hold 18 extra PSI compared to outside.
An empty container being crushed by 14 PSI or a submarine being crushed or breached by tons of water above is not the same.
Mike, think for a minute.
The sun is huge compared to Earth.
Take the top and bottom points of the sun, (if there is such a thing). Draw multiple lines between these points to Earth.
Do the lines match the angles you have proposed? DO they not cover the whole face of the Earth pointing toward the sun?
Do the lines go above and below the top and bottom points of the Earth?
That is your answer.
Again, 2D diagrams and the limitation of not being able to show true distance and scale is the problem.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
