- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Some of you may have noticed just how upset a member of this site known as Stu gets with me for posting articles against evolution and how he mocks me for not adding my own unnecessary input believing it is through lack of understanding. But that’s just Stu, may God have mercy on him.
I found this very interesting and enlightening. Hope you do too.
So for Stu’s sake, i will use my own understanding/words on the subject of falsifications within theories of which i needed to learn from another source, just like Stu does with “his” understanding, for he, like me, neither is the founder/source of the information he also divulges.
For you…Stu.
Falsifications,
Every theory has them. In short, falsifications is what is described to a failed prediction within a theory which fails to match the emerging data/facts. Every theory is allowed a percentage of falsifications before the theory itself is discarded as unworkable.
The thing with evolution is this, it is such a broad umbrella, that under its shadow are many sub groups, so we have a great depth of “space” within this theory to soak up falsifications, that, “it’s” eventual demise, which is statistically assured by it’s constant falsification accumulation, is going to take a little more time. But take heart, that time is picking up pace as technologies expose more and more falsifications in evolutionary theory than at any time in its history.
You see, as falsifications accumulate, any said theory has only two paths to take…one, is the consignment of said theory into the rubbish bin. This is the most logical and honest/integral outcome for a theory heavily laden in falsifications. One long overdue for atheistic self glorifying evolution, and the other path is exactly what we have been witnessing with evolution since it’s inception, and that is an ever increasing burden of a theories complexity to accommodate said falsifications.
In other words, said theory must constantly change to meet the emerging/conflicting outcomes/data to said failed theoretical predictions. We see this on a scale within evolution that if it were any other theory, it would quickly find itself suffering the fate of the first path out of the two paths theories must travel in the aforementioned, that is, evolution-meets rubbish bin. The reason why this hasn’t happened? There is no other viable theory to explain life except one…and God forbid that we go down that path right!!
What is happening is this, evolution has become so utterly complex due to it’s “evolving” nature in keeping up with its burdensome load of falsifications, that it no longer resembles it’s original Darwinian inception. You see, facts are meant to confirm or deny a theory, what evolutionary science has been doing all these years is changing their “facts/data/theories/predictions” to fit into the ever emerging cold hard (non theorized) data…aka “cheating” of which they call “good science”. Remembering this important truth: facts are facts and not subject to change. But evolution’s “facts” are constantly overturned for new “facts” to take their place!! Again, definition of fact please anybody? Anybody?
You might have heard of geocentrism? Geocentrism:the planets etc revolved around the earth. It too suffered a heavy load of falsifications causing it to become so complex compared to its first theoretical state, that, in the end, after quite some time at that, it was no longer geocentrism. Just like today’s evolution is no longer Darwinian evolution.
And geocentrism did indeed meet rubbish bin after some time, and btw, this theory had greatly….greatly….greatly less “depth/wriggling space” than evolution enjoys. So we need to be patient for the soon coming death of evolution, because as knowledge increases rapidly, as is occurring, evolutions falsifications will not too far down the road..drown it once and for all.
Just take note of the latest explanations coming out of, for example, biological’s sub groups…just one example btw, keep that in mind…the language is of perfectly designed natural machines with the word evolution thrown in very rarely if at all and often as a passing unrelated lip service to a dying theory in its death throes.
To which all the evolutionary “scientists” defiantly and through clenched teeth scream…Long live the king. (king? more like king of fools).
Well, good on you for being original, but now it appears you are too lazy to bother learning what “falsification” actually means.
Is anyone else reading this thread? Are you interested enough to know what falsification actually is, and how it applies to biology?
Maybe you have already done what Devolution hasn't, and have actually learned what the word means.
Stuart
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
