Ed J and his numbers

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,12:01)

Pretty obvious what I am saying Ed J. Hebrew, Greek, and other languages use their letters as numbers. This is not the case with English.

Hi T8,

That is false, and you should know it is false!
It is indeed done in English as well, and you would
know this is true if you have ever made an outline in school.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,12:01)

Ed J, what you are doing is making this stuff up. Also, if Jesus is 888 and Christ a multiple of 8 as well as saviour. Then why doesn't your English Gematria follow suit or at least make the same correlations. If it did, then that would be something. But English words that are grouped together by numbers doesn't match the original languages one.

Hi T8,

I have NOT made this up, YHVH orchestrated this pattern over large time-scales.
I have shown you that in the Greek, which you are apparently are calling legit,
has had the number 74 factor to both Jesus and Christ before the English:

“Jesus Christ” (74x32) also factors 74 in Greek Theomatically:
[Jesus] Ιησους=74(x12), [Christ] Χριστоς=74(x20).
[Son of Man] υιος τον ανθρωπου=74(x40).

I have also sufficiently illustrated that in “English”, Jesus does indeed Theomatically factor 74 as well (matching the original language).
               
                               Gematria=74

In English, the significant number (74) is attributed to “JOSHUA”=74 and “Messiah”=74; also
in the following: “JESUS”=74, “Cross”=74, “Gospel”=74; even the word “English”=74.

                    Prime Number Counterparts

“JESUS OF NAZARETH  THE KING  OF THE JEWS”=373 (John 19:19)
This most popular phrase curiously adds up to the 74th prime number: 373.
Furthermore: “The King” equals 74 as well, which is at the center of this verse.

See how the 74th prime number (373) also associates Theomatically to Jesus in the infamous Pilot plaque.
These are THE FACTS, you can  attempt  to dispute them of course, but that DOESN'T changes “the facts”.

Apparently you are closing your eyes to provable truth; but
it matters not to me whether you accept the truth or not; the facts are the facts.
What I will offer, is the facts. In my defense: maybe, just maybe, you might actually learn something.
“Joshua” is the name [יהשוע] (YÄ-shü-ă) translated directly into the “English” tongue. The rest of your post is irrelevant.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,12:53)

A list of words that equal 74. Jesus Messiah Gospel Parables Cross Jewish English Occult Tarot Gematria See how your predefined belief plays a part. If you believe it to be absolute truth and proof for the AKJV, then you can connect (Jesus / Messiah / Gospel). If you beleive it is divination or false, then you can equally correlate (Occult / Tarot / Gematria). Since I hear you making posts similar to the first example and others making posts that accuse you of something similar to the second example, then who is right? See how varying beliefs can easily be manipulated with English Gematria? It can pretty much be used to prove anything and let's face it, everything cannot be truth. I will say it again. Can you see that or not? Or are you willing to see that or will you remain blind to this fact?

Hi T8,

This post is completely irrelevant, but you apparently cannot see this;
you are, of course, free to continue wasting your time you know.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Hi T8,

I have a question for you: (as you say, this is a fair question)
Does The Bible center around “God the Father”?

[Proclaimer]

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 09 2013,18:30)

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,12:53) A list of words that equal 74. Jesus Messiah Gospel Parables Cross Jewish English Occult Tarot Gematria See how your predefined belief plays a part. If you believe it to be absolute truth and proof for the AKJV, then you can connect (Jesus / Messiah / Gospel). If you beleive it is divination or false, then you can equally correlate (Occult / Tarot / Gematria). Since I hear you making posts similar to the first example and others making posts that accuse you of something similar to the second example, then who is right? See how varying beliefs can easily be manipulated with English Gematria? It can pretty much be used to prove anything and let's face it, everything cannot be truth. I will say it again. Can you see that or not? Or are you willing to see that or will you remain blind to this fact? Hi T8, This post is completely irrelevant, but you apparently cannot see this; you are, of course, free to continue wasting your time you know. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

This post is irrelevant. Well that is one of the best explanations and rebuttals I have heard. Well done. You won the debate.

I should use that in every post from now on and I will be the undisputed winner.

“That post is irrelevant”.

Why didn't I think of that. It is brilliant.

And when you give an example of how words are linked, and then someone using the same method does the same to prove an opposite conclusion, you just say in return, “This post is irrelevant”.

Very clever.

[Proclaimer]

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 09 2013,18:29)

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,12:01) Pretty obvious what I am saying Ed J. Hebrew, Greek, and other languages use their letters as numbers. This is not the case with English. Hi T8, That is false, and you should know it is false! It is indeed done in English as well, and you would know this is true if you have ever made an outline in school. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Ed J.

You can also use colours in this way.

i.e., list things by colour. You see that in graphs for example and then looking at the key we know what the colour represents. What number is red?

And why do we use letters as you demonstrate, because usually numbers have already been used. It is not a key that equates A=1 B=2. No, it is used to show succession or to identify each item so that you can choose which one. It would be harder if it was a billeted list, which is what the letters are useful in doing.

Now we both agree that numbers in Greek go up in differing units. Ones, then tens, and hundreds, (but base 8 I think). Not just ones like your fabricated English number system. Thus if we did the same thing in Greek, and we ended up using all the Greek letters, would the last point equate exactly to the value of omega, even though the list only contained 24 listed items for example?

[Proclaimer]

Occult, Tarot, Gematria
74 + 74 + 74

74 x 3.

Divination Trinity?

T8biblecode.org

[Proclaimer]

[Ed J]

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 09 2013,15:39)

Hi T8, I have a question for you: (as you say, this is a fair question) Does The Bible center around “God the Father”? “Yes” “No” “I don't know” Note: you are only allowed one choice. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

T8?

[Ed J]

Do your rules apply to you as well?

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,10:03)

Hi T8,

Excellent movie! Did you see it?
Glad you don't have any religious hang-ups~!

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,09:47)

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 09 2013,18:30) Quote (t8 @ Feb. 09 2013,12:53) A list of words that equal 74. Jesus Messiah Gospel Parables Cross Jewish English Occult Tarot Gematria See how your predefined belief plays a part. If you believe it to be absolute truth and proof for the AKJV, then you can connect (Jesus / Messiah / Gospel). If you beleive it is divination or false, then you can equally correlate (Occult / Tarot / Gematria). Since I hear you making posts similar to the first example and others making posts that accuse you of something similar to the second example, then who is right? See how varying beliefs can easily be manipulated with English Gematria? It can pretty much be used to prove anything and let's face it, everything cannot be truth. I will say it again. Can you see that or not? Or are you willing to see that or will you remain blind to this fact? Hi T8, This post is completely irrelevant, but you apparently cannot see this; you are, of course, free to continue wasting your time you know. God bless Ed J (Joshua 22:34) http://www.holycitybiblecode.org This post is irrelevant. Well that is one of the best explanations and rebuttals I have heard. Well done. You won the debate. I should use that in every post from now on and I will be the undisputed winner. “That post is irrelevant”. Why didn't I think of that. It is brilliant. And when you give an example of how words are linked, and then someone using the same method does the same to prove an opposite conclusion, you just say in return, “This post is irrelevant”. Very clever.

Hi T8,

OK, chalk it up in the results thread then.  

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Proclaimer]

What rules?

And regarding your question. I prefer to stick to the topic.
Ask me in a related thread by all means.

[Proclaimer]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,12:57)

And why do we use letters as you demonstrate, because usually numbers have already been used. It is not a key that equates A=1 B=2. No, it is used to show succession or to identify each item so that you can choose which one. It  would be harder if it was a bulleted list, which is what the letters are useful in doing.

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 30 2013,21:35)

Hi Georgie, Numbers (1, 2, 3, ect.) play a roll in identification – here's what they identify:                         1. Identify a quantity.                         2. Identify a person.                         3. Identify a thing.

[Ed J]

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 09 2013,15:39)

Hi T8, I have a question for you: (as you say, this is a fair question) Does The Bible center around “God the Father”? “Yes” “No” “I don't know” Note: you are only allowed one choice. God bless Ed J

This question relates to my case IN THIS THREAD – so I would appreciate and answer.

[Proclaimer]

I would guess that it is the Father, since there is not much reference to Jesus in the OT.
But I think that the central message of the NT is that we must honour the son as we honour the Father.

So my guess is the Father, although depending on the Book it might well be the son.

Overall, my guess is the Father.

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,10:36)

What rules? And regarding your question. I prefer to stick to the topic. Ask me in a related thread by all means.

Hi T8,

If you are going to play childish games,
I'll ask in another thread and then
import your answer back here.

But it will be easier on both of us if you will just play by your own rules and
answer my question. You wouldn't want others believing you are a hypocrite.

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Proclaimer]

Hi Ed J.

I noticed in the other topic that you mentioned the Beauty, Jesus, and 74 connection again.

Just thought I would like to say this which is also 74.

Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 30 2013,21:36)

Jesus(74)  =   Beauty(74)

Occult (74) = Tarot (74) = Gematria (74)

Amazing what patterns arise.

Do you think these words with the numerics of 74 are linked?

And if not, then why not. I am using the same method as you.

[Ed J]

Quote (t8 @ Feb. 11 2013,10:48)

I would guess that it is the Father, since there is not much reference to Jesus in the OT. But I think that the central message of the NT is that we must honour the son as we honour the Father. So my guess is the Father, although depending on the Book it might well be the son. Overall, my guess is the Father.

Hi T8,

Is that a “Yes” then?

God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

[Proclaimer]

Quote (Ed J @ Feb. 11 2013,13:48)

But it will be easier on both of us if you will just play by your own rules and answer my question. You wouldn't want others believing you are a hypocrite.

Is that short for hypocritter?

[Author]

Posts