- This topic has 1,221 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 9 hours, 2 minutes ago by
.
- Posts
Where do I begin
If you don’t want to do what I tell you, then do what you want.
First, you don’t demand people to do what you want; you ask, you guide, you teach. It’s more pleasant that way.
But I won’t waste my time trying to convince you about Daniel 9
You wouldn’t be convincing me of anything; I wanted to know what you believe without having to spend more time trying to figure out you do believe when a simple summary would suffice or a simple explanation to a question asked. Instead one must take offense and throw out false accusations:
NOT WILLING TO LEARN ANYWAY. APPROPRIATELY YOU’VE FOUND YOUR WAY YOU DON’T REALLY WANT TO KNOW ANYTHING ELSE.
I am probably one of the few people you will ever speak with who does want to learn and expand what they know (never said we’d agree); BUT, how much time do you think I have in a day to study every aspect of every faith out there? Cut me some slack and simply answer a question concerning your faith; not every question is an attack.
Don’t know if you’re aware, asking questions IS a sign of one who is wanting and willing to learn; conversely, one has to be willing or wanting to teach by answering those questions? Saying go read a book isn’t teaching; is there a book for every question that can be asked?
If you would only take the time to read about Daniel 9 (the 70 weeks and the context) in Pastor Wieland’s book, you would understand something unique in the world and which goes hand in hand with the story.
🙏
Tell me, would it have hurt to write a simple response to what you believe the 70 week prophecy is? The first 483 years, most agree it’s about the temple being rebuilt; it’s the last seven where doctrines have been created and everyone disagrees…everyone with their own “truth.” How painful would it have been to write the first three and half years were the Jesus’ ministry the next three and half years were the ministry of the disciples ending with the death of Stephen.
In the midst of this last week sacrifices where to stop (the Jesus’ death), but sacrifices didn’t stop until the temple was destroyed. With sacrifices continuing after the Jesus’ death, where and how does Stephen factor into this?
You will then need to explain why the King Jimmy changed the text of Daniel 9:26 to “shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself” when virtually every other translation says “the Messiah will be cut off and will have nothing.” The Hebrew text says “the anointed one will be cut off, and he will be no more.” Something doesn’t match.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
