- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- December 23, 2009 at 3:01 am#166071NickHassanParticipant
Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 23 2009,10:17) hi nick
when you are wrong you don't want to admid it ,but i understand ,i don't share your ego,it was not the Holy spirit it was Peter conclution as man to baptise Cornelius,in the same way that Peter was in doing what he should have not ,when Paul show him the beavior stand he took between Jews and gentiles.
in the case of cornelius it show s clearly who his the caller ,not men but God through Christ.
Hi t,
So all the actions and words of the anointed men of God are equally fallible or only those that do not align with your doctrines?Do you understand the anointing power of God's Spirit?
Scripture is not truth to you?
December 23, 2009 at 3:05 am#166073terrariccaParticipanthi nick
i believe you cannot explain in your on words what you understand by; Do you understand the anointing power of God's Spirit?could you explain it to me and also the connection with Peter and cornelius
December 23, 2009 at 3:07 am#166074NickHassanParticipantHi T,
Read the book of Acts believing it is the work of God done through fully submitted vessels.
Then stop judging and refusing to hear God.December 23, 2009 at 3:15 am#166077NickHassanParticipantHi T,
You should not speak against the Holy Spirit.December 23, 2009 at 3:22 am#166078terrariccaParticipanthi nick
you are in denial so their is no progress just repetition and asume you can not explain what is the Holy spirit ,or Christ spirit,how then can you say that i speak again the Holy spirit??something you do not understand and can not explain
December 23, 2009 at 4:07 am#166084NickHassanParticipantHi t,
The words and actions are the men of God anointed at Pentecost deserve more respect.
They spoke and acted in Christ for God.Judge them and you judge God.
December 23, 2009 at 4:42 am#166088terrariccaParticipanthi nick
could you show me were was it i judge the scriptures ? just show it do not give your interpretationDecember 23, 2009 at 4:46 am#166089terrariccaParticipanthi nick
i hope you are not a saint are you??December 23, 2009 at 5:09 am#166091NickHassanParticipantHi T,
Is your name not yet written in heaven?
You must be born again of water and the Spirit.December 23, 2009 at 6:26 am#166100terrariccaParticipanthi nick
no.
why you ask?December 23, 2009 at 7:10 am#166107NickHassanParticipantHi t,
Seems to be important.December 23, 2009 at 7:21 am#166110terrariccaParticipanthi nick
to whom?December 23, 2009 at 7:45 am#166113NickHassanParticipantHi T,
Jesus [Lk10]and the anointed brothers Paul [Phil4] and John [Rev20].
Perhaps not to you?December 23, 2009 at 5:45 pm#166142terrariccaParticipanthi nick
ok,
first who is Christ;we know but we have to see him through the eyes of the prophetes;I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.
1Pe 1:10 Of which salvation the prophets have enquired and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you:
1Pe 1:11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.
So it says that the Spirit of Christ are the elements who forms the clues to the total understanding of what would lead the prophetes to Christ ,and also the believers.
do you understand what i try to say to you nick?December 23, 2009 at 6:06 pm#166149NickHassanParticipantHi T,
Strictly speaking the Spirit of Christ is the Spirit of God in Christ
but because the Spirit is one the Spirit of the prophets is also the Spirit of Christ.December 23, 2009 at 8:39 pm#166161terrariccaParticipanthi nick
you did not understand this i know,you have things backward ,and your brain is stuk to the letter
it is no use for me to try to explain thing yet deeper than this,there are many scriptures to collaborate what i start to explain to you.December 23, 2009 at 8:53 pm#166163NickHassanParticipantHi T,
Seek first the kingdom.December 23, 2009 at 8:58 pm#166165NickHassanParticipantHi,
This thread is about a unique bible popularised by universalists.December 23, 2009 at 9:02 pm#166167terrariccaParticipanthi nick
i see sorry i made a mistake ,no heart feelings.December 29, 2009 at 5:49 am#166905chosenoneParticipantQuote (Nick Hassan @ Dec. 24 2009,07:58) Hi,
This thread is about a unique bible popularised by universalists.
This thread is popular because of the accuracy of the method of translation of the Concordant version. Almost all translations are really “interpretations”, not “translations”.Blessings.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.