- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 4 months ago by
Proclaimer.
- AuthorPosts
- November 2, 2025 at 12:51 pm#947691
ProclaimerParticipantHawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing”.
Let’s challenge this statement.
It is difficult for the human mind to grasp the idea of something existing without a beginning, yet logic requires that something must be eternal. If not, everything would have arisen from nothing, which is an impossibility. This leaves only two options: eternal laws or an eternal God, the latter already believed in by billions in one form or another. Consider which is more reasonable, that eternal laws exist without cause or purpose, and created a perfectly working universe , or that an eternal God exists, even if such a being is challenging for some to imagine, and all universal laws came from him.
The fact that we exist implies that life itself did not emerge from absolute nothing. The presence of a universe, of DNA, of love, of consciousness, all point toward a source beyond any temporal beginning. If we are honest with ourselves, we find that belief in an eternal God is not only plausible but the most coherent explanation available.
Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

