Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 161 through 180 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #56199
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 22 2007,19:26)
    Hi Mandy,
    No problems. I didn't want the thread to fade out of sight, the way they sometimes do. I'm looking forward to engaging you on the issues.

    Blessings
    :)

    PS; the “incarnation” means that the Logos (who was in the form of God) emptied Himself, took on the form of a bond servant, and was found in the likeness of man.

     :;):


    Hi Is 1.18,
    Your view of the so called incarnation is one of many.
    J.Packer states
    “”Here are two mysteries for the price of one–the plurality of persons within the unity of God, and the union of Godhead and manhood in the person of Jesus. …Nothing in fiction is so fantastic as is this truth of the Incarnation,” writes contemporary theologian J.I. Packer.[1] What is the Incarnation? It is simply what Packer refers to here as “the union of Godhead and manhood in the person of Jesus.” It is, I would venture to say, the greatest and most stunning miracle that has ever been or ever will be. It is also the answer to the most important and relevant question in the universe: “Who is Jesus Christ?” The answer revealed by the truth of the Incarnation is: Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man in one Person. In other words, He is God incarnate.”

    It too does not read well with 2 Jn or 1 Jn4

    #56248
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 22 2007,19:57)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 22 2007,19:26)
    Hi Mandy,
    No problems. I didn't want the thread to fade out of sight, the way they sometimes do. I'm looking forward to engaging you on the issues.

    Blessings
    :)

    PS; the “incarnation” means that the Logos (who was in the form of God) emptied Himself, took on the form of a bond servant, and was found in the likeness of man.

     :;):


    Hi Is 1.18,
    Your view of the so called incarnation is one of many.
    J.Packer states
    “”Here are two mysteries for the price of one–the plurality of persons within the unity of God, and the union of Godhead and manhood in the person of Jesus. …Nothing in fiction is so fantastic as is this truth of the Incarnation,” writes contemporary theologian J.I. Packer.[1] What is the Incarnation? It is simply what Packer refers to here as “the union of Godhead and manhood in the person of Jesus.” It is, I would venture to say, the greatest and most stunning miracle that has ever been or ever will be. It is also the answer to the most important and relevant question in the universe: “Who is Jesus Christ?” The answer revealed by the truth of the Incarnation is: Jesus Christ is fully God and fully man in one Person. In other words, He is God incarnate.”

    It too does not read well with 2 Jn or 1 Jn4


    Thanks for sharing this, Nick.

    For me, to say that Jesus is God incarnate is to say too little of him……….

    #56252
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 21 2007,17:15)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 16 2007,18:33)

    Quote
    Are there explicit teachings of Jesus' preexistence?


    Yes. And one of them is Philippians 2:6-7.

    :)

    Not3,
    I thought we could start at Philippians 2:5-8 (since it's one of the plainest texts) and then move onto others. I gave a semantic range for “morphe”, if you like we could just use 'nature' which is not really contentious at all. Tell you what Not3, Greek words aside what do you think Phil 2:6-7 means in context? When in Jesus' natural life was He “in the form of God”? When did He take on the form of a bond servant? What did he empty Himself of? When was he “made in the likeness of man”?

    Also, here is what I believe to be a parallel verse to the Philippians passage:

    2 Corinthians 8:9
    9For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor, so that you through His poverty might become rich.

    When in Yeshua's earthly life, and in what sense, was he “rich”, when did he become “poor”?

    If these passages do apply to the natural life of Yeshua then people like me need to know. We need to be corrected from scripture.

    Blessings
    :)


    Hello Not3,
    I'm still waiting for you to answer these questions. What is your understanding?

    Blessings
    :)


    My understanding of the heavily quoted Phillipians passage:

    Isaiah, you assert that the word “form,” which is the Greek word “morphe,” refers to Christ's inner nature as God – right? The NIV believes this so strongly that it reads, “…being in the very nature God.” I do not believe that “morphe” refers to an “inner essential nature.” Different lexicons have opposing viewpoints about the definition of “morphe.”

    I'm new to this lexicon thing – it's cool.

    Vine's Lexicon has under “form”: “properly the nature or essence, not in the abstract, but as actually subsisting in the individual…ikt dos not include in itself anything 'acccidental' or separable, such as particular modes of manifestation.”

    Using lexicons like Vines, Trinitarians boldly make the case that the “nature” underlying Jesus' human body was God. However, looking at the Critical Lexicon, “morphe” is given a one-word definition, “form.” Another lexicon by Walter Bauer has under “morphe,” “form, outward appearance, shape.” The Theological Dictionary of the NT has “form, external appearance.” Robert Thayer, in his well-respected lexicon, has under “morphe,” “the form by which a person or thing strikes the vision; the external appearance.”

    Thayer says that the Greeks said that children reflect the appearance (morphe) of their parents, something easily noticed in every culture. Thayer also notes that some scholars try to make “morphe” refer to that which is intrinsic and essential, in contrast to that which is outward and accidental, but says, “the distinction is rejected by many.”

    So, this shows that scholars disagree about the use of the word “morphe” in Philippians.

    However, other uses of “morphe” in the Bible support the position that morphe refers to outward appearance. Mark has a short reference to the well-known story in Luke 24 about jesus appearing to the two men on the road to Emmaus. Mark tells us that Jesus appeared “in a different form (morphe)” to these two men so that they did not recognize him. This is very clear. Jesus did not have a different “essential nature” when he appeared to the two disciples – did he? He simply had a different outward appearance.

    One more quick point about “morphe” before I have to go cook dinner (ha)…. If the point of the passage is to say that Jesus is God, then why not just say it? Of course God has the “essential nature” of God, so why would anyone make THAT point? This verse does not say, “Jesus, being God,” but rather, “being in the form of God.” Paul is reminding the Philippians that Jesus represented the Father in every possible way.

    Jesus Christ is the outward appearance of God (as God's Son), so much so that he said, “He who has seen me has seen the Father.” Christ always did the Father's will, and perfectly represented his Father in every way.

    More later…..

    #56272
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (kenrch @ May 30 2007,13:17)
    Heb 4:15  For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.

    If Jesus was a supernatural being more than any human walking the earth except for sin then His sacrifice is void.  Jesus himself was just as you and I except for sin.  All of the Father dwelt in Jesus that's why jesus said over and over that HE DOES NOTHING but He did and said what the Father told Him to do.

    Again we are forgiven of sin WE HAVE NO SIN we claim the sacrifice of Christ.  Other than the amount of the Holy Spirit we are the same as our elder Brother.  Satan has us deceived.  How could Jesus expect us to do greater works than He did if we think of ourselves as anything less that Christ.  

    Jesus is the Head of the body YES but His body is cripple thinking that “only Jesus could do that”.  Peter walked on water before the sacrifice of Christ.  When Jesus calmed the storm Jesus said “oh ye of little faith”.  Wasn't Jesus saying that the apostles could have calmed the storm if they believed.

    Jesus was the Son of man filled with the Spirit of God.  We are sons and daughters of man with some of the Spirit of God.

    Luk 10:21  In that same hour he rejoiced in the Holy Spirit and said, “I thank you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding and revealed them to little children; yes, Father, for such was your gracious will.

    Sounds very familiar.  This happens daily now around the world.  The Holy Spirit surely is visting someone somewhere on the earth.

    Jesus in Himself could do nothing by His own admission.

    Again, I'm certainly not taking anything away from Jesus the only begotten.  But if we don't realize just who we are then how are we to perform the miracles He said we would.  Unless you believe what some believe, that miracles were just for the first century church.

    The Word preexisted in the mind of God and was manifested flesh. The only Son like that all other of God's children were concieved with a fleshly father.  For us it's all spiritual. Before Jesus all beings were created through the Son by the Father just as Light was created by the Father through the Word.

    IHN&L,

    Ken


    kenrch> you are right, Jesus is our brother and was exactly like us. we need to exorcise our realation with the Father just like he did.

    #56273
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    to all > my take on Phil 2:6-7 is this .> Jesus who exists (present tense)in the form of God (as angles do or spirit being do even Like God does).

    throught not to rob God to be made equal with God. the true text was to show Jesus did not try to take away from God any glory to show himself equal to God.

    remenber when the spirit of God spoke through Jesus and said all who came before me were liars and thieves . that was God speaking through Jesus, but how were they liars and thieves ?.

    By takeing credit for somthing that God was doing and many people still do that to day, when they have problems and pray and ask God for help and God does help them and others see it and show and give them praise in some way,they simply accept it, even though it was God who did it, not them.

    and if that person allows it he is robbing God of glory he is a thief .

    Jesus never did that He always gave God the credit and glory saying I have glorfied YOU on the earth. every merical that was done through Jesus was done by God not Him. Didn't he say the son of man could do nothing by himself.

    God said I give (MY) glory to no MAN. remember when Jesus said Father glorify your name and the voice from heaven said I both Have and Will.

    Yes Jesus never robbed God the Father to try to make himself equal with Him, this is what false teacher do Not Jesus.??? ???

    #56300
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 23 2007,12:14)
    My understanding of the heavily quoted Phillipians passage:


    Well, no….you actually gave me biblicalunitarian.com's understanding…..that's a little disappointing.

    Not3, let's assume for a moment that you are correct when you assert “morphe” refers to external appearance – how does that fit the context of the passage? Was Paul teaching the readers that Jesus, while on earth, actually looked like God, physically? And that He emptied Himself of something and took on the 'physical appearance' (morphe is also used in v7) of a bondservant?

    Seems completely implausible. Where was this described in the Gospels?

    #56307
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,16:20)
    Well, no….you actually gave me biblicalunitarian.com's understanding…..that's a little disappointing.


    Isaiah, you asked for my understanding and this is my understanding. I have a huge library that I make use of when I need to. Would you like me to always let you know when I am quoting from a source? Do you? You have lengthly posts of which you quote from many sources, I'm sure. It is not a crime to use a source by which you have gained understanding. Folks quote from dictionaries, lexicons, and many Greek sources here, I have noticed. I will not apologize for sharing a view that I am in full agreement with.

    #56308
    Not3in1
    Participant

    And by the way, thank you for sharing the website of the of the BU's…….they are good people. I hope other's visiting here will take a moment to look at their doctrine and see for themselves that it lines up with scripture very nicely. As nicely as any other ideas that I have read here.

    Isaiah, I am not here to convince you. I am not here for you to mock my contributions or understanding of the Word. I am here to share and to learn. Unlike many here, I do not have a degree in Theology or even a good working knowledge of the Greek. But what I do have is a love of God and his Son Jesus Christ. I see scripture very simply. And this little debate surrounding Philippians has shown my ignorance. That is perfectly OK with me. It's OK with me because I don't believe that most Christians who received Paul's letters were as smart as you, Isaiah. They were simple people – like me. The message is simple.

    Was Jesus in the form of God? Yes. He was God's Son. He was God's exact representation. Did Jesus have the essential nature of God? You bet he did – he was his Son. Did Jesus use his privileges as God's Son? Nope. He wouldn't have even thought about it! That's just who my Lord is —- humble. He was/is God's Son, but he humbled himself and continued on just like you, Isaiah; that is, a man. He thought of you and of me, more than he thought of himself. And that is the main thrust of the passage. To humble ourselves and think of the other above ourselves. By the way, that includes exposing one another….
    Have a great weekend, brother.

    #56311
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 24 2007,19:38)
    Isaiah, I am not here to convince you.  I am not here for you to mock my contributions or understanding of the Word.  I am here to share and to learn.  Unlike many here, I do not have a degree in Theology or even a good working knowledge of the Greek.  But what I do have is a love of God and his Son Jesus Christ.


    I haven't mocked you Not3.

    Quote
    I see scripture very simply.  And this little debate surrounding Philippians has shown my ignorance.  That is perfectly OK with me.  It's OK with me because I don't believe that most Christians who received Paul's letters were as smart as you, Isaiah.  They were simple people – like me.  The message is simple.


    To the contrary Not3, I think their grasp of Greek would have far surpassed mine, otherwise they would not have been able to read the letter.

    :)

    The nuances in the language would not have escaped their attention.

    Quote
    Was Jesus in the form of God?  Yes.  He was God's Son.  He was God's exact representation.  Did Jesus have the essential nature of God?  You bet he did – he was his Son.


    Well since that nature was absolute divinity it stands to reason that Jesus was (and is) God too. It is nature that defines the being.

    Quote
    Did Jesus use his privileges as God's Son?  Nope.  He wouldn't have even thought about it!  That's just who my Lord is —- humble.  He was/is God's Son, but he humbled himself and continued on just like you, Isaiah; that is, a man.


    Well it seems we agree here, although I would disagree with the inference that the humility was permanent. Jesus was made lower than the angels for a little while (Heb 2:9). He is the First and Last (Rev 1:17, 2:9), the Alpha and Omega (Rev 22:13), Not3. These are not a titles that someone would apply to themselves if in a humbled state. Nor would others designate them with titles like “Most High” (Dan 7:25), or “Lord of all” (Acts 10:36)….

    Quote
    He thought of you and of me, more than he thought of himself.  And that is the main thrust of the passage.  To humble ourselves and think of the other above ourselves.  By the way, that includes exposing one another….
    Have a great weekend, brother.


    Yes we agree that he humbled Himself, but how?….that's the issue here. Someone who existed in the essential nature of “God” and relinquished the privileges associated with this state to take on the lowly form (nature) of a human servant and suffer a horrific death is certainly humility in it's very essence. This type of sacrifice would make Christ the exemplar for us all to follow. But somone who looked like God and then changed appearance to look like a servant?…is this humility? I don't get it sister….

    Blessings
    :)

    #56315
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Is 1.18,
    You say
    “Well since that nature was absolute divinity”

    Are there natures that are not 'absolutely' divine?

    And

    “Well it seems we agree here, although I would disagree with the inference that the humility was permanent.”

    Is humility a state or an attitude?
    Matthew 18:4
    Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
    Luke 14:11
    For whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted.
    James 4:6
    But he giveth more grace. Wherefore he saith, God resisteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble.
    1 Peter 5:5
    Likewise, ye younger, submit yourselves unto the elder. Yea, all of you be subject one to another, and be clothed with humility: for God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble
    James 4:10
    Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up.
    1 Peter 5:6
    Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time:

    #56345
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    Well since that nature was absolute divinity it stands to reason that Jesus was (and is) God too. It is nature that defines the being.


    Please refer to the CONCEPTION thread.

    Jesus is a combination of his two parents. Jesus was truly conceived because the Word does not give us another definition of conception. The angel even declares to Mary that her relative is pregnant also.

    #56358
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    Well it seems we agree here, although I would disagree with the inference that the humility was permanent.


    Jesus is God's Son. Indeed he is humble before his God. He is reigning and ruling for his Father for a time….but then he will turn everything over to his God once again [1 Cor. 15].

    This is permanent humility – to let another who is greater rule above you.

    God – Jesus' God – will be all in all.

    Jesus is our prime example of what it means to be humble and put other's above ourselves.

    #56359
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    These are not a titles that someone would apply to themselves if in a humbled state.


    Surely Jesus' God has glorified him for what he has done.  Surely the God of Jesus has given him all authority (we must not forget though, that this full authority is temporary!).  

    Jesus is currently at the right hand of his God.  He is glorious.  He is ruling and reigning.  He is in heaven.  However, while he was on earth – he was humble.  He did not call himself anything other than the Son of Man and implied he was the Son of God.  He was not one for titles while on earth.

    #56360
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    Nor would others designate them with titles like “Most High” (Dan 7:25), or “Lord of all” (Acts 10:36)….


    They would if it was prophetic like in Daniel. Or if it was referring to Jesus' exhaulted state like in Acts.

    None of these titles were given to the man, Jesus.

    #56361
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    Yes we agree that he humbled Himself, but how?….that's the issue here. Someone who existed in the essential nature of “God” and relinquished the privileges associated with this state to take on the lowly form (nature) of a human servant and suffer a horrific death is certainly humility in it's very essence. This type of sacrifice would make Christ the exemplar for us all to follow. But somone who looked like God and then changed appearance to look like a servant?…is this humility? I don't get it sister….


    Isaiah, I don't totally get it either! :)

    But I do know that Jesus is God's Son. Therefore he shares God's essential nature/essence.

    Jesus existed “with” the essential nature of God as “part” of who and what his was/is. That is the major difference between my Jesus and your Jesus. For it is impossible for your Jesus to empty himself and be humble when he IS God incarnate. It is not impossible, on the other hand, for God's literal Son to humble himself when he is the one and only Son to the one and only God!! He simply chose not to use his privileges. He emptied himself of the RIGHT to be a King on earth (this time around :) ) He will most assuredly claim that right the next time around. Praise God and worthy are you, Jesus!

    Jesus told his disciples that he could call on his Father and have angels at his disposal (the only Son of God has this right and more) but he didn't use those rights, did he? That, my brother, is what Jesus emptied himself of. The right to be who he truly was on earth. But he'll get his time to be who he really is…….oh, yes!

    :)

    #56486
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Isaiah, I can't remember now – did I answer the questions you had? Oh, ya, there was one more about the verse “…..though he was rich yet was he made poor….” (not sure where that is just now).

    Well, I would say that my answer is consistent with what I've been saying all along regarding Jesus' true conception and sonship: Jesus is the only begotten of God, himself! He is more than a prince of a King, he is God's personal, exact represenation and heir! As such, he was born rich in all things, just as a prince of a King would be considered “rich.”

    Jesus was rich, yet he *became* poor for you and me. Meaning, as I have said before – he did not take advantage of his rights, instead he emptied himself of those God-given rights! Thank you, Jesus!

    If I have missed any other questions you have asked of me, please let me know. Thanks, Isaiah!

    #56491
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Not3,
    I agree.
    Is 1.18 said of Jesus
    “Nor would others designate them with titles like “Most High” (Dan 7:25), or “Lord of all” (Acts 10:36)….
    Dan 7.25 in context.
    “21 I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;

    22Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.

    23Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.

    24And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.

    25And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

    26But the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and to destroy it unto the end.

    27And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to the people of the saints of the most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and all dominions shall serve and obey him. “

    The Saints of the Most High are the saints of God, the Ancient of days.
    Christ has indeed been made Lord of all.

    #56570
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 25 2007,08:07)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    Well it seems we agree here, although I would disagree with the inference that the humility was permanent.


    Jesus is God's Son.  Indeed he is humble before his God.  He is reigning and ruling for his Father for a time….but then he will turn everything over to his God once again [1 Cor. 15].

    This is permanent humility – to let another who is greater rule above you.

    God – Jesus' God – will be all in all.  

    Jesus is our prime example of what it means to be humble and put other's above ourselves.


    Sorry, I was unclear in what I meant by humility, I was making reference exclusively of “kenoō” in Phil 2:7. I wasn't speaking of an attitude of humility….

    Not3, how do you understand this verse?

    Hebrews 2:9
    9But we do see Him who was made for a little while lower than the angels, namely, Jesus, because of the suffering of death crowned with glory and honor, so that by the grace of God He might taste death for everyone

    Did Jesus, the man, at one occupy a position that was higher than, or equal to, the angels?

    ???

    #56572
    Is 1:18
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 25 2007,08:30)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    Nor would others designate them with titles like “Most High” (Dan 7:25), or “Lord of all” (Acts 10:36)….


    They would if it was prophetic like in Daniel.  Or if it was referring to Jesus' exhaulted state like in Acts.

    None of these titles were given to the man, Jesus.


    That's besides the point, they were given to the resurrected Jesus (who remained a man). Did Jesus get an ontological upgrade after his death?

    #56574
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 26 2007,16:54)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ June 25 2007,08:30)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 24 2007,20:06)
    Nor would others designate them with titles like “Most High” (Dan 7:25), or “Lord of all” (Acts 10:36)….


    They would if it was prophetic like in Daniel.  Or if it was referring to Jesus' exhaulted state like in Acts.

    None of these titles were given to the man, Jesus.


    That's besides the point, they were given to the resurrected Jesus (who remained a man). Did Jesus get an ontological upgrade after his death?


    Actually it isn't beside the point – it is the point!

    While on earth, Jesus was not referred to as anything but the Son of Man and hoped to be the Messiah (which he agreed to with the Samaritan women by the well).

    He WAS all of the wonderful things you say (Lord of Lords), but he emptied himself of those rights.

    Now as the glorified Son at the Father's right hand, those rights are enjoyed.

Viewing 20 posts - 161 through 180 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account