Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 1,381 through 1,400 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #67571
    kejonn
    Participant

    Mr. Steve,

    We know all of that. He said he came from the Father. Yet that can be explained very simply: his conception was from above AND here on earth. That is, God's Spirit overshadowed Mary and she conceived.

    As far as being sent, I've already listed many verses that speak of Moses and various prophets being sent by God.

    BTW, have you said what form you thought Yeshua was in prior to his humanity? Angel, “God”, or some other? What basics do you have for the belief?

    #67582
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Kejonn and others;

    If you believe what Jesus said is ambiguous or can be explained otherwise, see what the apostles said and see if their interpretation is consistent with yours.

    Let's look at a statement Jesus said and see if any of the apostles confirmed your interpretation. Jesus said, “I came down from heaven.”

    You might argue that statement can be easily explained because the Holy Spirit came down from heaven and Christ was conceived. So did any apostles make that same interpretation or what did they say?

    Paul said that Christ was the second Adam and was the Lord from heaven. Paul even writes to the Colossians that Christ created all things in heaven and in earth. If he created all things he had to have been there. Think about it, could a stronger claim be made for pre-existence?

    It's also helpful to remember how were we born again. Did not the spirit of God descend upon them in the book of Acts in cloven tongues of fire? Are we not born of the incorruptible seed, the word of God?

    Based upon these facts, do any of the apostles claim that they came down from heaven or are returning to where they were before the foundation of the world with the Father? Do any of the apostles pray in a manner, which indicates they, or any believer was with the Father before the world was? In short, Jesus made claims that none of us can make because he pre-existed with the Father. It's not leaping off the pages to the untrained eye, but do you notice he says he was with the Father. If he is calling him Father, that makes Jesus his Son, not the Word, not an angel, not a spirit. When was he his Father? Before the world was. That makes Christ the Son of God before the world was.

    So if you conclude that Christ did not come down from heaven where he pre-existed, but only with respect to the Holy Spirit coming down from heaven, you are making a claim that was not held by the apostles or Christ.

    When Jesus spoke he didn't insult our intelligence. He made simple statements regarding his pre-existence that could be easily understood like sharing glory with the Father “he” had before the world was. If he didn't pre-exist, then there was no “he” to share glory with the father. This is a kindergarten analysis.

    There is no one scripture that contains all truths where Jesus says, I am the Son of God and I was with my Father in heaven as his Son and he is my Father who revealed himself as the Almighty and Jehovah in the Old Testament, and I was begotten of him before the world began and created all things by his power and was incarnated in the womb of Mary by the Spirit of God my Father, which is also known as the Holy Ghost. While all these truths are contained in scripture, they must be gathered together.

    Seek and ye shall find like as treasure “hid” in a field.

    Lets us look at what John the Baptist said regarding the pre-existence of Christ.

    John the Baptist said there is one coming after me who is preferred before me, the “shoelachets” of whom I am not worthy to unloose. Unless you believe the Father wears shoes, this could only be referring to the Son of God.

    When John says the shoelachets of whom I am not worthy to unloose he could only be referring to Jesus (as opposed to the Father in Jesus) because the Father did not appear in the flesh, but remained in heaven. The Father was in Christ by the Spirit, which was given to Christ without measure. The reference to the shoelachets makes it clear that John was referring to the person Christ Jesus, not his Father and not the Word, which is also God. Moreover, to bolster this truth it is written in all four gospels. This was the testimony of John the Baptist of Christ pre-existence.

    Jesus said I know from whence I came and I am returning to where I was before. If Christ wasn't in heaven before coming to earth, then he lied, which is impossible. He also asked his disciples, what and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up to where he was before? John 6:62 Here, Jesus is stating he, the son of man, was before in heaven, thereby, establishing his pre-existence as the Son of God. He wasn't the Son of Man until his incarnation.

    In John 8:58, Jesus said he existed before Abraham. The entire chapter centers on the truth that Jesus is the Son of God. Every time Christ refers to his Father and knowing him, he is proclaiming the inherent truth that he is the Son of God. By contrast, because they reject him, they know not God, but are children of the devil. His statement that he existed before Abraham is unambiguous. Jesus isn't stating the Father was before Abraham. That is never the issue. The entire issue is who Jesus is and where he's from. Jesus never declares the Holy Spirit conceived him about 33 years ago. Christ never even refers to his earthly birth because he was from above, not from this world. He stated he was sent from the Father in heaven and would return there.

    In John 8:41 the Jews state that they have one Father, even God. They believed that they were sons of God, too. The irony was that they claimed that Christ should be crucified for making the same claim they made themselves.

    The entire essence of being sent from God requires that Christ be with the Father to be sent by him. Just as the disciples had to be with Jesus before being sent into the world by him.

    When Christ said he came down from heaven he stated he was in heaven prior as the Son of God. Otherwise, whom is “he” referring to? The Word is not a person, it is the seed of God, the life of God, which was, is and is to come. The word is unchangeable. The word remains with God and is God.

    All of us are born of the word. We are born from above. Christ was sent from above, that's the difference. Hence, if Christ did not pre-exist as the Son of God, then he is no different than any of us with respect to being born from above.

    Jesus said the bread of God is he (Jesus the Son of God) which cometh down from heaven and giveth life unto the world. John 6:33

    Jesus also said in John 6:38 that he came down from heaven not to do his own will, but the will of him who sent him. This scripture is huge. It contains the truths that Christ was in heaven prior to coming to earth, that he had a will in heaven, thereby establishing himself as the Son of God in Heaven, unless you believe that the Son of God changed from being someone or thing other than the Son of God. Christ does not change. Hebrews 13:8 Here, we see that Jesus had a will in heaven. A word does not have a will. The word is life. Those who are born and created by God have wills.

    The scriptures are very expressive regarding Christ pre-existence as a person, not an angel, not a spirit, and not the Word which is God.

    Steven

    #67585
    kejonn
    Participant

    Steve,

    If Yeshua is the second Adam (and he is according to Paul), do you then accept that the first Adam came down from heaven as well?

    #67586
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 04 2007,19:31)
    Hi kejonn.

    I wrote a post for you on the previous page.
    Not sure if you got it.
    I don't necessarily agree with it, but I gave it as food for thought.

    :)


    I have worked on it some. I have the rest saved for later :;):.

    #67587
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 05 2007,11:25)
    Although it is debatable too whether he preexisted regarding the coming again of Elijah. But that is another discussion.


    I realize that this topic would indeed be another subject, but just as a quick thought – if JTB was really Elijah coming again, wouldn't that be reincarnation?

    To a large degree, I believe that if Jesus preexisted as a spirit son prior to his true conception in Mary, he also would be considered a sort-of reincarnation.

    God begets a spirit son.
    God impregnates Mary and Mary conceives (adding her DNA).
    Spirit son is now altered from original state in heaven.

    Thoughts?

    #67592
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    To say that Christ didn't preexist is to say that Christ didn't humble himself and come down from Heaven and return to the glory that he had before with the Father.

    Instead it would be assume that he was born through Mary as a man, and did the job of the second Adam (for even the first Adam's dad was God), and he died and was taken up for the first time into heaven and is seated at the right hand of his Father as a perfect man.

    Personally however, I find that the scriptures are overwhelmingly swayed toward Christ's preexistence. I also find the arguments against the scriptures used to show the preexistence of Christ to be weak. Although I am keeping an open mind.

    For example, a while ago I quoted this scripture to a member here who held that Christ didn't preexist and gave that person the following verse:

    Revelation 22:16
    “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

    Which is similar to:

    Romans 15:12
    And again, Isaiah says, “The Root of Jesse will spring up, one who will arise to rule over the nations; the Gentiles will hope in him.”

    This person said that root can also mean branch. So in that case we render the verse as saying that he is the branch and offspring. I agree that branch can be used, but I would assume that the branch is still a preceding branch or a source and not one that grows afterward.

    So I looked up other uses of that word and root was used in a sense that we understand it today. i.e., the source or origin of a thing.

    E.g., “The love of money is the root of all evil”.

    That said, I remain open to the possibility that Christ didn't preexist as I do not want to end up like a die hard stubborn Trinitarian who cannot be swayed by scripture.

    But therein lies what will sway me, namely scripture. To date I haven't seen good teaching using scripture to support the view that Christ came into existence, first as a man born from Mary and I find the arguments against the preexistence scriptures to be a little hard to swallow.

    E.g., How do you render the fact that Christ said, “before Abraham, I am” to mean that he didn't preexist?

    #67594
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 06 2007,09:10)

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 05 2007,11:25)
    Although it is debatable too whether he preexisted regarding the coming again of Elijah. But that is another discussion.


    I realize that this topic would indeed be another subject, but just as a quick thought – if JTB was really Elijah coming again, wouldn't that be reincarnation?

    To a large degree, I believe that if Jesus preexisted as a spirit son prior to his true conception in Mary, he also would be considered a sort-of reincarnation.

    God begets a spirit son.
    God impregnates Mary and Mary conceives (adding her DNA).
    Spirit son is now altered from original state in heaven.

    Thoughts?


    Reincarnation also alludes to karma etc.

    Jesus is coming again, in a body for the second time. That is our hope, although not in the same fashion that he came as a man the first time.

    #67595
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 05 2007,15:26)
    Kejonn and others;

    If you believe what Jesus said is ambiguous or can be explained otherwise, see what the apostles said and see if their interpretation is consistent with yours.  

    Let's look at a statement Jesus said and see if any of the apostles confirmed your interpretation.  Jesus said, “I came down from heaven.”

    You might argue that statement can be easily explained because the Holy Spirit came down from heaven and Christ was conceived.  So did any apostles make that same interpretation or what did they say?  

    Paul said that Christ was the second Adam and was the Lord from heaven. Paul even writes to the Colossians that Christ created all things in heaven and in earth.  If he created all things he had to have been there.  Think about it, could a stronger claim be made for pre-existence?


    So it seems. But the context of that whole chapter is in reference to the new creation, i.e., the new heaven and new earth. The first clue is this first verse:

    Col 1:13  He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son,

    When was the original creation referred to as Yeshua's kingdom? But we know he will be Lord over the new heaven and new earth. The rest of the chapter also points to the new creation.

    Quote
    It's also helpful to remember how were we born again.  Did not the spirit of God descend upon them in the book of Acts in cloven tongues of fire?  Are we not born of the incorruptible seed, the word of God?


    Was this not similar to Yeshua's baptism? The difference is that his physical birth was by man and Spirit while ours is purely human.

    Quote
    Based upon these facts, do any of the apostles claim that they came down from heaven or are returning to where they were before the foundation of the world with the Father?  Do any of the apostles pray in a manner, which indicates they, or any believer was with the Father before the world was?  In short, Jesus made claims that none of us can make because he pre-existed with the Father.  It's not leaping off the pages to the untrained eye, but do you notice he says he was with the Father.  If he is calling him Father, that makes Jesus his Son, not the Word, not an angel, not a spirit.  When was he his Father? Before the world was.  That makes Christ the Son of God before the world was.


    But he called Him Father while he walked the earth, correct?

    You have a large dilemma in your statement. Like begets like. If the Father is pure spirit and God, and Yeshua is begotten before the earth and not created, then he too is God. There is no escaping this. He is not YHWH, but he is God nonetheless. So either you accept the Trinity or some form of poly or henotheism. Henotheism is just another form of polytheism that says there is one big God and one or more little gods. Your speculation can only be reconciled with one of these scenarios. That is why WJ says the Trinity is the only way to reconcile scripture. And it IS a way if you think that it escapes poly or henotheism. I still think that the Trinity is polytheistic though, so its just a fancy way to avoid an unbecoming label.

    Quote
    So if you conclude that Christ did not come down from heaven where he pre-existed, but only with respect to the Holy Spirit coming down from heaven, you are making a claim that was not held by the apostles or Christ.


    Are you certain? Perhaps, but at this point it is more like I hold to a different view of what they said than you do. Why did they not make it abundantly clear that Yeshua was something else before he came to earth? If Yeshua was “wisdom” why did he have to grow in wisdom? If he was the Word why would he only say what he hears the Father say?

    Quote
    When Jesus spoke he didn't insult our intelligence.  He made simple statements regarding his pre-existence that could be easily understood like sharing glory with the Father “he” had before the world was.  If he didn't pre-exist, then there was no “he” to share glory with the father.  This is a kindergarten analysis.


    Haha, a few underhanded insults don't become you. The glory he had was in the plan of the Father. The Messiah has been foreordained from the beginning. Let me ask you, if Yeshua had glory with the Father because he pre-existed, what does this verse say to you?

    2Ti 1:9  who saved us and called us to a holy calling, not because of our works but because of his own purpose and grace, which he gave us in Christ Jesus before the ages began,

    This verse says we had grace before the ages began! So that means that all who have come to a saving knowledge of Christ must have pre-existed. I wish I could remember that past life…

    Not only that, but why didn't Yeshua speak of the other things he did in the previous 4000 years? Did he sit back and wait until he had to come to earth? And if he was begotten by God without Mary before he came, he was God, and could not have been tempted, neither could he die. Those 2 things are impossible for with God.

    Getting back to the growing in wisdom part, what more wisdom would a heavenly creature over 4000 years old need to aquire? Surely he wouldn't gain any more in just a few short years than he did waiting on his earthly arrival.

    Quote
    There is no one scripture that contains all truths where Jesus says, I am the Son of God and I was with my Father in heaven as his Son and he is my Father who revealed himself as the Almighty and Jehovah in the Old Testament, and I was begotten of him before the world began and created all things by his power and was incarnated in the womb of Mary by the Spirit of God my Father, which is also known as the Holy Ghost.  While all these truths are contained in scripture, they must be gathered together.  


    Indeed.

    Quote
    Seek and ye shall find like as treasure “hid” in a field.

    Lets us look at what John the Baptist said regarding the pre-existence of Christ.

    John the Baptist said there is one coming after me who is preferred before me, the “shoelachets” of whom I am not worthy to unloose.  Unless you believe the Father wears shoes, this could only be referring to the Son of God.


    Yes, he is preferred before him. But what does that have to do with pre-existance? Its quite obvious that this would be the case with the Messiah.

    Quote
    When John says the shoelachets of whom I am not worthy to unloose he could only be referring to Jesus (as opposed to the Father in Jesus) because the Father did not appear in the flesh, but remained in heaven. The Father was in Christ by the Spirit, which was given to Christ without measure.  The reference to the shoelachets makes it clear that John was referring to the person Christ Jesus, not his Father and not the Word, which is also God.   Moreover, to bolster this truth it is written in all four gospels.  This was the testimony of John the Baptist of Christ pre-existence.


    No. It spoke of his pre-eminance, not pre-existance. Did Yeshua not say that John the Baptist was the least in heaven? We already know that Yeshua is second only to his Father, so its plainly obvious to see who was greater in God's eyes.

    Quote
    Jesus said I know from whence I came and I am returning to where I was before.  If Christ wasn't in heaven before coming to earth, then he lied, which is impossible.   He also asked his disciples, what and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up to where he was before?  John 6:62  Here, Jesus is stating he, the son of man, was before in heaven, thereby, establishing his pre-existence as the Son of God.  He wasn't the Son of Man until his incarnation.


    Already explained. His parentage was from above. Where does it say humans go when they die? Back to the earth. But did we come from the earth? Adam did, but we all came from our parents. So our bodies return the ground that the first man was made from, but our spirits will reside with God and the Lamb in heaven. Yeshua's heritage is from above, so he ascended to heaven and does not wait on the resurrection like we all will. 

    Quote
    In John 8:58, Jesus said he existed before Abraham.  The entire chapter centers on the truth that Jesus is the Son of God.  Every time Christ refers to his Father and knowing him, he is proclaiming the inherent truth that he is the Son of God.  By contrast, because they reject him, they know not God, but are children of the devil.  His statement that he existed before Abraham is unambiguous.  Jesus isn't stating the Father was before Abraham.  That is never the issue.  The entire issue is who Jesus is and where he's from.  Jesus never declares the Holy Spirit conceived him about 33 years ago.  Christ never even refers to his earthly birth because he was from above, not from this world.  He stated he was sent from the Father in heaven and would return there.  


    Why would he have to talk about his birth? It is already recorded for us. The origins of the Messiah preceded Abraham. The promise was given to Abraham thousands of years prior, so the plan was already in place. Abraham was promised that his seed (the Messiah) would bless the nations. That is why Abraham is specifically mentioned.

    Quote
    In John 8:41 the Jews state that they have one Father, even God.  They believed that they were sons of God, too.  The irony was that they claimed that Christ should be crucified for making the same claim they made themselves.


    Well, there is one large difference. They called God their Father, but you never see them say they were the sons of God like Yeshua did. I know this sounds odd, but it was in the title.

    Quote
    The entire essence of being sent from God requires that Christ be with the Father to be sent by him.  Just as the disciples had to be with Jesus before being sent into the world by him.


    What of all the other prophets sent by God?

    Quote
    When Christ said he came down from heaven he stated he was in heaven prior as the Son of God.  Otherwise, whom is “he” referring to?  The Word is not a person, it is the seed of God, the life of God, which was, is and is to come.  The word is unchangeable.  The word remains with God and is God.  


    If you say that Yeshua has always been the Son and he is not the Word, then what does it mean “and the Word became flesh”?

    Quote
    All of us are born of the word.  We are born from above.  Christ was sent from above, that's the difference.  Hence, if Christ did not pre-exist as the Son of God, then he is no different than any of us with respect to being born from above.  


    How many of us were conceived by one human parent and one parent of Spirit? We are children by adoption, not physical birth. So none of us can make the same claim regardless as our heritage is purely human.

    Quote
    Jesus said the bread of God is he (Jesus the Son of God) which cometh down from heaven and giveth life unto the world.  John 6:33


    Ditto.

    Quote
    Jesus also said in John 6:38 that he came down from heaven not to do his own will, but the will of him who sent him.  This scripture is huge.  It contains the truths that Christ was in heaven prior to coming to earth, that he had a will in heaven, thereby establishing himself as the Son of God in Heaven, unless you believe that the Son of God changed from being someone or thing other than the Son of God.  Christ does not change. Hebrews 13:8  Here, we see that Jesus had a will in heaven. A word does not have a will.  The word is life.  Those who are born and created by God have wills.  


    But He DID change: he took on flesh. He was carried in a womb and born. He died. How can none of those things be considered a change?

    Quote
    The scriptures are very expressive regarding Christ pre-existence as a person, not an angel, not a spirit, and not the Word which is God.

    Steven


    And by that very last claim you have now accepted the trinity. The trinity says that Yeshua is a person of God. You say he is a person, and that he was begotten, not created, of the Father before his humanity. Thus, that which is begotten purely of God must be God, and WJ is correct. To accept this you must accept the Trinity.

    #67599
    chipwhite
    Participant

    I agree with kejonn on his last part that the trinity explains all this in a neat little package (ha ha) but that is another thread.:p :p :p

    #67602
    kejonn
    Participant

    Yes Chip, you are right to some extent. Here is the scenario for pre-existance:

    • Eternally begotten of God – Yeshua is God. The result therefore is henotheism, polytheism, or the Trinity
    • Created by God – Yeshua is an angel or some similar being, but of higher rank. But this does not fit verse where God said made all things by Himself.
    • An extension of the power of God – Yeshua is not a separate entity, but an entension of God's nature. Would this actually be pre-existing as an extension of God would not have a free will?

    That pretty much sums it up. I cannot think of any other possible explanation.

    #67605
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    What about God > Christ > Man > Woman

    So Christ came from God, the woman from man, and man from Christ in the sense that all things were created through him.

    Except Christ was the first of God's works and he then created all creation through him and for him.

    Christ was begotten in eternity and then created all things through him.

    Whether he was the Word (as a person) and angel/messenger, son, spirit, or whatever, he existed before all things, but obviously after God himself.

    Christ isn't created because creation is defined as deriving from Christ by God. So Christ is the only begotten from God and creation is derived thereafter.

    This makes Christ a son and the only begotten son.

    #67607
    chipwhite
    Participant

    The paradox is simply this. That God always has and always will exist. We strive to find beginings and endings what we think is a staight line confined within time(for now we are temporary) God is a circle there is no right or left no start or end that you can plainly see on a straight line. Not getting to heady and getting of on some tangent I believe that Christ was only a Son (of man or God) while he was on the earth. Before that he was the same as our new state or adams created state before the fall within the Father. When we recieve our new body (and that is promised) I imagine it will be the way adam's was originally when it was created perfect by God.(For God would not have anything impure or corrupt before him.) and say that it was good. I agree with t8 that Christ is not created, and all things were created by Him, also that all is for Him. We probably part ways on the begotten from eternity I believe begotten from birth hope this helps Chip

    #67615
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    chipwhite Why is it that it is so hard to understand that Jesus was before the World was? When we have scripture to prove and also that the Father is greater then the Son that out rules the trinity as far as I can see. One does not have to do with the other. The Son is begotten from the Father, that can never make Him all like the Father. He is the image of the invisible God. Then He gave up that Glory and became a Man. By God's Holy Spirit He was implanted into the womb of Mary. So He had the mind of the Father and I believe that is why H did not Sin, He knew what was at stake, He had been taught by our Heavenly Father and knew what it was like to be a spirit being. All scriptures already given.
    Chipwhite please read t8 post again, I think that t8 beliefs that Jesus did preexisted. unless I am not reading that right, please set that straight t8.
    Peace and Love Mrs.:D :D :D

    #67621
    elaine1809
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 06 2007,09:43)
    Steven[/quote]
    And by that very last claim you have now accepted the trinity. The trinity says that Yeshua is a person of God. You say he is a person, and that he was begotten, not created, of the Father before his humanity. Thus, that which is begotten purely of God must be God, and WJ is correct. To accept this you must accept the Trinity.


    overanalizing? :( confused: “that which is begotten purely of God must be God” How do you conclude that?

    #67622
    elaine1809
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 06 2007,09:10)
    To a large degree, I believe that if Jesus preexisted as a spirit son prior to his true conception in Mary, he also would be considered a sort-of reincarnation.

    God begets a spirit son.
    God impregnates Mary and Mary conceives (adding her DNA).
    Spirit son is now altered from original state in heaven.

    Thoughts?


    Reincarnation: Jesus preexistence was not “carnal' He was a spirit being; so He could not reincarnate.incarnation would be the right term. It is pretty well documented that Jesus was with GOD His FATHER in heaven. That does not mean or is the same as “Jesus was GOD”[trinity]. That would be an assumption not a deduction. It only means what it says : That he was WITH GOD. Not that he was GOD. :)

    #67623
    kejonn
    Participant

    Elaine,

    If a human begets, he begets another human. If a dog begets, he begets another dog. On and on. With the earthly conception of Yeshua, you have Spirit Father and human mother. You get the Messiah. But if God begets without the human factor, the only choice is God. This has nothing to do with overanalysis, it is common sense. Unless so say Yeshua was created, than he could be an angel or something similar. If he is begotten, he is God.

    #67626
    elaine1809
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 06 2007,16:40)
    Elaine,

    If he is begotten, he is God.


    Ok now I am really confused ??? Do you believe in the trinity? the word BEGOTTEN is said by GOD right ? somewhere in the scriptures? If it is used by GOD then based on your statement JESUS Is GOD? I tought you did not believe in trinity. are these postings too complicated for my knowledge? I am not a scholar and never will be, but I think I have common sense. I know somewhere in the scriptures it talks about human wisdom being stupid at GOD's eyes. maybe we are overanalizing? I do not mean to put anybody down you or nobody I am just being very honest. I am confused by all of these statements from you brothers and sisters they go over my head. :D

    #67627
    elaine1809
    Participant

    is not all possible with GOD? then why we come to these ilogical conclusions when we should know that our human understanding is nothing compare to Jehovas wisdom?:O

    #67628
    elaine1809
    Participant

    Kejohn I did not mean any cinisism by my comments. I am sincerely confused. maybe I should read this from the beginning. maybe I did not catch the right thought. Love and peace, elaine

    #67633
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (elaine1809 @ Oct. 06 2007,16:35)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 06 2007,09:10)
    To a large degree, I believe that if Jesus preexisted as a spirit son prior to his true conception in Mary, he also would be considered a sort-of reincarnation.

    God begets a spirit son.
    God impregnates Mary and Mary conceives (adding her DNA).
    Spirit son is now altered from original state in heaven.

    Thoughts?


    Reincarnation:  Jesus preexistence was not “carnal' He was a spirit being; so He could not reincarnate.incarnation would be the right term. It is pretty well documented that Jesus was with GOD His FATHER in heaven. That does not mean or is the same as “Jesus was GOD”[trinity]. That would be an assumption not a deduction. It only means what it says : That he was WITH GOD. Not that he was GOD. :)


    Elaine,

    Where is it documented that “Jesus” was with God, his Father, in heaven? Thanks.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,381 through 1,400 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account