Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 12,321 through 12,340 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #268887
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,17:57)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 22 2011,10:30)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,17:11)
    :( ???


    EDJ

    Why are you question this ,you know that Mike and me do not believe that the holy spirit his the word,

    This believe of yours will prevent you to understand deeper thing in scriptures,

    Pierre


    Hi Pierre,

    Like what?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    edj

    I do not know

    but looking it this way;if you make a puzzle and if i take away a few pieces would you come to a complete view of the puzzel picture ?? NO

    Pierre

    #268889
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 22 2011,15:48)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,17:57)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 22 2011,10:30)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,17:11)
    :( ???


    EDJ

    Why are you question this ,you know that Mike and me do not believe that the holy spirit his the word,

    This believe of yours will prevent you to understand deeper thing in scriptures,

    Pierre


    Hi Pierre,

    Like what?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    edj

    I do not know

    but looking it this way;if you make a puzzle and if i take away a few pieces would you come to a complete view of the puzzel picture ?? NO

    Pierre


    Hi Pierre,

    So you admit that you don't understand deeper thing in scriptures?
    Yet you want to apply your lack of understanding to me?
    Seems a bit odd that you would believe this?

    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #268890
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 21 2011,21:52)

    Quote (t8 @ Dec. 22 2011,07:11)
    I John 1:1-3
    That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life—2 the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us—3 that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ.


    T8……….Maybe this will help you being you quoted it.

    ! John 1:1-3………>  I will paraphrase it for you and please notice what i put in Quotations marks.

    That which was from “THE” beginning  which we have “HEARD”, which we have Seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and touched with our hands, concerning the “WORD” of LIFE.- 2 and the “LIFE” was made manifest, (IN) Jesus Christ,  (now notice T8) and we have seen “IT”, and testify to “IT” and proclaim to you (THE) ETERNAL LIFE, which was “WITH” the FATHER and was made manifest “TO US” (IN) Christ Jesus- 3 that which we have seen and “HEARD” we proclaim “ALSO” to you, So that you too, may have fellowship is with the FATHER (AND) with his Son Jesus Christ.  Who GOD the FATHER who is the WORD that was (IN) the MAN Jesus.

    T8 notice the “IT”S there , John did not say He or Jesus now did he?,  The “IT” is the WORD of GOD that was (IN) the man Jesus . Remember when Jesus said the WORDS i am telling you (ARE) SPIRIT (AND) LIFE>  The Word or LOGOS which was God the FATHER was (IN) Jesus and the disciples understood that, That is the “IT” John was talking about there not Jesus as the “IT”. But the LOGOS that came to be (IN) the Flesh man Jesus. Another point is Jesus was Not from “THE” BEGINNING, GOD the FATHER was FROM the BEGINNING T8, Not Jesus.

    Forcing the text to say what in fact it is not truly saying is wrong T8. Reread it closely as see if what i am telling you is true or not brother. I know it goes against you preconceived learning and past teachings but look at it honestly and without being prejudiced. brother. T8 just believe what Jesus said many time “THE FATHER IS (IN) ME” , you have yet not come to see and believe that . IMO

    peace and love to you and yours………………………………….gene


    Gene,
    Sorry to intrude but I believe the 'it' is in reference to the 'life.' Read the passage in the NASB and that should help:

    1What was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands, concerning the Word of Life— 2and the life was manifested, and we have seen and testify and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was manifested to us— 3what we have seen and heard we proclaim to you also, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father, and with His Son Jesus Christ.

    As you can see, the NASB does not use the pronoun and therefore shows the intent of the passage more clearly. The pronoun is not in the Greek either but supplied by some translators from what I can tell anyway. If you need help to verify that then please ask.

    Kathi

    #268891
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,22:53)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 22 2011,15:48)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,17:57)

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 22 2011,10:30)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,17:11)
    :( ???


    EDJ

    Why are you question this ,you know that Mike and me do not believe that the holy spirit his the word,

    This believe of yours will prevent you to understand deeper thing in scriptures,

    Pierre


    Hi Pierre,

    Like what?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    edj

    I do not know

    but looking it this way;if you make a puzzle and if i take away a few pieces would you come to a complete view of the puzzel picture ?? NO

    Pierre


    Hi Pierre,

    So you admit that you don't understand deeper thing in scriptures?
    Yet you want to apply your lack of understanding to me?
    Seems a bit odd that you would believe this?

    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    edj

    I am glad you take it that way

    Pierre

    #268893
    Ed J
    Participant

    Hi Pierre,

    Is there any other way to take what you said?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #268906
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,23:15)
    Hi Pierre,

    Is there any other way to take what you said?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    EDJ

    Yes there is but not for you,

    :)

    #268965
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (abe @ Dec. 22 2011,15:46)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Dec. 22 2011,13:52)

    Quote (t8 @ Dec. 22 2011,07:11)
    I John 1:1-3
    That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life—2 the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us—3 that which we have seen and heard we proclaim also to you, so that you too may have fellowship with us; and indeed our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ.


    T8……….Maybe this will help you being you quoted it.

    ! John 1:1-3………>  I will paraphrase it for you and please notice what i put in Quotations marks.

    That which was from “THE” beginning  which we have “HEARD”, which we have Seen with our eyes, which we looked upon and touched with our hands, concerning the “WORD” of LIFE.- 2 and the “LIFE” was made manifest, (IN) Jesus Christ,  (now notice T8) and we have seen “IT”, and testify to “IT” and proclaim to you (THE) ETERNAL LIFE, which was “WITH” the FATHER and was made manifest “TO US” (IN) Christ Jesus- 3 that which we have seen and “HEARD” we proclaim “ALSO” to you, So that you too, may have fellowship is with the FATHER (AND) with his Son Jesus Christ.  Who GOD the FATHER who is the WORD that was (IN) the MAN Jesus.

    T8 notice the “IT”S there , John did not say He or Jesus now did he?,  The “IT” is the WORD of GOD that was (IN) the man Jesus . Remember when Jesus said the WORDS i am telling you (ARE) SPIRIT (AND) LIFE>  The Word or LOGOS which was God the FATHER was (IN) Jesus and the disciples understood that, That is the “IT” John was talking about there not Jesus as the “IT”. But the LOGOS that came to be (IN) the Flesh man Jesus. Another point is Jesus was Not from “THE” BEGINNING, GOD the FATHER was FROM the BEGINNING T8, Not Jesus.

    Forcing the text to say what in fact it is not truly saying is wrong T8. Reread it closely as see if what i am telling you is true or not brother. I know it goes against you preconceived learning and past teachings but look at it honestly and without being prejudiced. brother. T8 just believe what Jesus said many time “THE FATHER IS (IN) ME” , you have yet not come to see and believe that . IMO

    peace and love to you and yours………………………………….gene


    Hi Gene    Gal.3:16  Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, ” And to seeds,” as of many, but as of one. “And to your Seed,” who is Christ.                     Is Christ and Jesus the same?


    abe……………No they are not the Same The Christ or CHRISTOS is the Anointing SPIRIT that was ON Jesus producing the LOGOS or Words he spoke , they were not the same thing, Jesus was a human just you and I are, and the LOGOS or Spirit of GOD was truly (IN) him and can also be Just as equally (IN) YOU and I . Making Jesus the Being out himslef as being the LOGOS is the very greatest LIE ever Told in Christianity.

    abe…………this is what is meant by an the word became flesh, (IT) did when (IT) came into Jesus our Lord b ut better our Brother.

    peace and love to you and your abe……………………………….gene

    #268966
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,15:45)
    Hi Gene,

    2 Cor 5:18-19 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ,
    and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; 19 To wit, that God was in Christ,
    reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;
    and hath committed unto us The Word(HolySpirit) of reconciliation.

    1 Peter 1:23 Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but
    of incorruptible (Luke 8:11), by the word of God,
    which liveth and abideth for ever.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    ED J……………..Right on brother.

    peace and love to you and yours……………………………………gene

    #268967
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Lightenup……….Yes the (IT) is LIFE and (IT) is SPIRIT, just as Jesus said (IT) WAS. and that (IT) was (IN) Jesus. and the (IT) was the Father that was (IN) the MAN Jesus and can be (IN) us also. People want to make Jesus the (IT) that was (IN) Him . This is where false religion get its start. Jesus said, i don't know how many times, the the FATHER WAS TRULY (IN) him. but when are people going to start to truly believe him. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours……………………………………………gene

    #268977
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi Gene,
    Gene,
    Jesus said that He/Jesus was in the Father and that both of them would dwell in believers. A non-deity spirit cannot be at more than one place at one time or in another person. The Father and Son's can.

    God bless ya,
    Kathi

    #269071
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Dec. 23 2011,13:02)
    Hi Gene,
    Gene,
    Jesus said that He/Jesus was in the Father and that both of them would dwell in believers.  A non-deity spirit cannot be at more than one place at one time or in another person.  The Father and Son's can.

    God bless ya,
    Kathi


    kathi

    you are wrong any true Christian will be in the father and so plan

    because they participate in it ,so they all can be one ,and no one as to climb in the other this is ridicule only people that do not understand scriptures says that .
    NU 14:15 “Now if You slay this people as one man, then the nations who have heard of Your fame will say

    JDG 20:11 Thus all the men of Israel were gathered against the city, united as one man.

    JDG 20:8 Then all the people arose as one man, saying, “Not one of us will go to his tent, nor will any of us return to his house.

    1SA 11:7 He took a yoke of oxen and cut them in pieces, and sent them throughout the territory of Israel by the hand of messengers, saying, “ Whoever does not come out after Saul and after Samuel, so shall it be done to his oxen.” Then the dread of the LORD fell on the people, and they came out as one man.

    NE 8:1 And all the people gathered as one man at the square which was in front of the Water Gate, and they asked Ezra the scribe to bring the book of the law of Moses which the LORD had given to Israel.

    see Kathi an whole nation can be one MAN ,

    Pierre

    #269073
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Lightenup…………..> Pierre is right about this God can be in all and through all. God the Father is spirit and indwells his creation , that is what Jesus meant when he said I (IN) You and YOU (IN) Me, if that one spirit exists in you and Jesus and others , then you would be (IN) Me and (IN) Jesus and (IN) the Father also and they and Me would be (IN) you also, by that ONE and that SAME Spirit (INTELLECT). It just that simple, Therefore it says God was (IN) Christ Jesus reconciling the World unto (HIMSELF) If that same spirit is in you that was (IN) The anointed Jesus that raised Jesus from the grave (IT) will also quicken you mortal (BODY). and again “Let this mind be (IN) you that was (IN) Christ Jesus our Lord “. (IT) is the SAME LOGOS that was (IN) Jesus the Anointed of GOD no different LOGOS but the same one and if it abides in you then you are accounted as a JOINT HEIR with Jesus our LORD and Better yet OUR BROTHER who is the FIRST “BORN” in the Family of GOD from among  Mankind.

    Remember when Jesus told the disciples that the comforter would be sent unto them to be (IN) them forever, He also said it was with them when he was there and would not come and be (IN) them becasue it was already there (IN) Jesus, Speaking through Him unto the World. This Spirit was Poured out one the World on the Day of Pentecost, Just as it says in Joel God said “I shall pour forth of my Spirit upon all Flesh” That is the LOGOS of GOD put into our Hearts by the same spirit that was (IN) Jesus our LORD and Better YET OUR BROTHER> IMO

    Peace and Love to you and yours……………………………gene

    #269103
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Dec. 21 2011,14:41)
    Frank

    Quote
    Pierre,

    How about searching the Scriptures to find the Scripture that says that Yahshua said he was a man and that he had the same origin as his brethren.

    I also take it that you completely ignored the article that I just posted previously entitled “YAHSHUA'S ORIGIN – One Among Many Brethren” by Voy Wilks, right?

    all the following scriptures are talking and saying that Christ was either send or came from God ,their are many more scriptures ,so I asck from you to respond to each of those scriptures and tell me that what it says is not what it means and that you have no scriptures to backup your theory but that it is logical to see it the way you see it because it make that much better sens,than what scriptures are saying ,
    Matthew 22:41-46 NIV
    41While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them, 42″What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?”
        “The son of David,” they replied.
    43He said to them, “How is it then that David, speaking by the Spirit, calls him 'Lord'? For he says,
    44″ 'The Lord said to my Lord:
        “Sit at my right hand
     until I put your enemies
        under your feet.” ' 45If then David calls him 'Lord,' how can he be his son?” 46No one could say a word in reply, and from that day on no one dared to ask him any more questions.

    John 1:1-3 NWT
    In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. 2 This one was in [the] beginning with God. 3 All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence.

    John 1:9-12 NIV
    9 The true light that gives light to everyone was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God—

    John 1:14 NIV
    14The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the only begotten, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

    John 1:15 NWT
    15 (John bore witness about him, yes, he actually cried out—this was the one who said [it]—saying: “The one coming behind me has advanced in front of me, because he existed before me.”)

    John 3:13 NIV
    13No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man.

    John 3:16-19 NIV
    16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because they have not believed in the name of God’s one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil.

    John 5:19-20 NIV
    19 Jesus gave them this answer: “Very truly I tell you, the Son can do nothing by himself; he can do only what he sees his Father doing, because whatever the Father does the Son also does. 20 For the Father loves the Son and shows him all he does. Yes, and he will show him even greater works than these, so that you will be amazed.

    John 6:32-33 NIV
    32 Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”

    John 6:35 NIV
    35 Then Jesus declared, “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.

    John 6:38 NIV
    38 For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me.

    John 6:41-42 NIV
    41 At this the Jews there began to grumble about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven.” 42 They said, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How can he now say, ‘I came down from heaven’?”

    John 6:46 NIV
    No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.

    John 6:48-51 NIV
    48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, yet they died. 50 But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which anyone may eat and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.”

    John 6:62 NIV
    62What if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before!

    John 8:12 NIV
    When Jesus spoke again to the people, he said, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.”

    John 8:23 NIV
    23 But he continued, “You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world.

    John 8:38 NIV
    38 I am telling you what I have seen in the Father’s presence, and you are doing what you have heard from your father.”

    John 8:42 NET
    Jesus replied, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I have come from God and am now here. I have not come on my own initiative, but he sent me.”

    John 8:58 NWT
    58 Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to YOU, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.”

    John 9:5 NIV
    While I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”

    John 16:28 NIV
    “I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

    John 17:5 NRSV
    So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed.

    when you done doing just that then I will know where you standing in Gods word .

    thank you

    Pierre


    Pierre,

    I have already made it known in previous posts what these Scripture references mean. Following is a link to an article explaining this:

    Yahshua Came Down From Heaven
    By Voy Wilks
    1990 – Revised 1993

    #269104
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Dec. 21 2011,19:52)
    Pierre, apparently these are all translated wrong, well according to Frank and Gene.

    The oldest trick in the book is to say that it is wrong because it is all mistranslated. Let me see. The Atheist could teach that the bible teaches there is no God and all the verses that allude to a God are mistranslated. Or all the verses that teach that Jesus is the messiah are mistranslated.

    It is amazing what Gene and Frank think they can get away with using that lame excuse. Worse than that, they do not even provide evidence to show that all these verses are mistranslated.

    That is why I can't take them seriously. I gave Gene a chance but his evidence was very poor IMO, and Frank, well for all I know he is a rogue spambot program that scrapes other site's content and posts it to forums. The best contribution Frank supplies is the humour he exudes whether he intends it as humour or not, I do not know.


    t8,

    I have never said that these Scriptures are translated wrong! Please stop bearing false witness against what I have said.

    #269105
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,07:26)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 21 2011,12:00)
    Is Not Christ The Firstborn?

    At this point the reader might become a little impatient, and desire to press upon our attention Bible references that seem to give some support to the pre-existence theory.

    We are not ignorant of those passages, but claim that none of them give support to the theory if they are properly interpreted. It is unfortunately true, however, as the Bible itself states, that some take passages of Scripture that are “hard to be understood” and proceed to “wrest them unto their own destruction” (2 Peter 3:16).

    Such a reference is Colossians 1:15. It describes Jesus Christ as “the firstborn of every creature,” and some have advanced this in support of the pre-existence theory. If Jesus is firstborn, he must have existed before all others, they claim.

    But does not that set Scripture against Scripture? If he is literally “firstborn” in the sense implied by the theory, how can the Bible claim that he is the “son of Abraham and David” (Matthew 1:1)?

    And consider the statement itself: “firstBORN of every creature.” Does not that demand a mother? Who was the mother who gave birth to him before all others?

    These difficulties are solved, and the passage simply and beautifully explained, when the Bible doctrine of the “firstborn” is understood. In the Bible, “firstborn” is a legal term, describing pre-eminence of position or status, though not necessarily of birth. There were special privileges granted the legal firstborn in a family. He represented his father, he acted as a priest, he received a double portion of the family inheritance (see Deuteronomy 21:17).

    But the law of God provided that the eldest son of a family could forfeit his position as legal firstborn, if guilty of misconduct or inability to perform the necessary duties, and be supplanted by a younger son. In other words, it was not necessary for Jesus to be the first of God's creation to be eligible for the position of legal firstborn.

    For example, consider 1 Chronicles 5:1:

    “Reuben the firstborn of Israel . . . but forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph, and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright!”

    Reuben's lewd conduct earned the rebuke of his father, who deposed him from his legal status of firstborn, and gave the position to a much younger son: Joseph.

    Other examples could be multiplied. Ephraim was blessed as firstborn by Jacob, even though he was younger than Manasseh his brother (Genesis 48:14-19), and God endorsed the appointment by describing Ephraim as “His firstborn” (Jeremiah 31:9). Jacob was given the birthright over his older brother Esau (Genesis 25:32-34). Simri was appointed to the position even though he was younger in years than his brethren (1 Chronicles 26:10).

    These examples (and they could be multiplied) clearly show that it was often the practice for a younger son to be elevated to the position of legal firstborn in a family. In fact, this was so common that the Mosaic Law prohibited the elevation of a younger son to this position on the mere whim of his father, because of favoritism. It commanded:

    “It shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated . . . ” (Deut. 21:17).

    This prohibition shows that a legal firstborn could be a younger son, and therefore has a great bearing on the interpretation of Colossians 1:15.

    The Bible refers to two notable “sons of God”: Adam and Christ (see Luke 3:38). The “first Adam” forfeited the right of inheritance, the position of firstborn of the human race, because of sin; but God raised up a younger Son (called in 1 Cor. 15:45 “the last Adam”) whose complete obedience to the will of his Father proved him worthy of the preeminence. He was thus elevated to the position of firstborn of the human race, which means that he receives “a double portion of the inheritance,” and that he acts as priest in the family of God. The Lord Jesus Christ is firstborn, not by fact of longevity (which confers no merit) but by virtue of his moral excellence.

    His elevation was predicted in the Old Testament. God declared concerning him:

    “I WILL MAKE HIM My firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth” (Psalm 89:27).

    The use of the future tense in this prophecy shows that the Lord Jesus is not firstborn by birth but by appointment; otherwise God should have said, “He IS My firstborn.”

    The resurrection of Jesus was the seal of the Father's approval on the Son (Rom. 1: 1-4). This constituted him the Firstborn. Paul wrote: “He is . . . the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the pre-eminence” (Col 1:18), the “firstborn among many brethren” (Rom. 8:29). [The followers of the Lord are also described as a “kind of firstfruits” to God (James 1:18; Rev. 14:4), and as “the congregation of firstborns” (Heb. 12:23 – Greek. See Diaglott). Therefore, if the title “firstborn” teaches the pre-existence of Christ, it must do so also in relation to his followers. All the privileges of the firstborn that rest on the Lord, apply to a lesser extent to his followers. They will receive a double portion of inheritance in the Age to come, even immortality (1 Cor. 15:52-54), and they will act as a royal-priesthood (Rev. 5:9-10) in relation to the mortal population that will remain (see Zech. 14:16) during the period of Christ's millennial reign (Rev. 20:6).

    These expressions show conclusively that the apostle did not mean, by his use of the term, that Jesus pre-existed.


    Hi Frank,

    Did you write this one?
    Please let me know what you write,
    then I will likely read what it is that you post.

    Sometimes I don't bother read    L O N G   posts either.
    But since I'm interested in what you, Frank, believe I will,
    that is ONLY if it is YOUR WORDS, not 'propaganda material'.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Ed J,

    No, I did not write this. Is it not clear to you that I do not believe that Yahshua pre-existed his birth? If you do not like what it is that I post, I can only suggest that you from here on completley ingnore what it is that I post.

    #269108
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Dec. 22 2011,09:12)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 21 2011,13:39)
    Pastry,

    NOWHERE in Scripture does it EVER SAY “The Word of God is Jesus Christ.”


    Do you consider the Book of Revelation to be a fraud then, because it says:

    Revelation 19:13
    King James Version (KJV)
    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.

    Revelation 19:13
    New American Standard Bible (NASB)
    He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God.

    Revelation 19:13
    New International Version (NIV)
    He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.


    t8,

    No, I do not consider the book of Revelation a fraud! Closely note what I said:

    “NOWHERE in Scripture does it EVER SAY “The Word of God is Jesus Christ.”

    Note that that Revelation 9:13 does NOT SAY or PROCLAIM … and I QUOTE: “The Word of God is Jesus Christ.” You will not find such a foolish QUOTE in ANY translation of Scripture. This is nothing but a twisting (“wresting”) of what this verse ACTUALLY SAYS!

    #269109
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 24 2011,04:29)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,07:26)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 21 2011,12:00)
    Is Not Christ The Firstborn?

    At this point the reader might become a little impatient, and desire to press upon our attention Bible references that seem to give some support to the pre-existence theory.

    We are not ignorant of those passages, but claim that none of them give support to the theory if they are properly interpreted. It is unfortunately true, however, as the Bible itself states, that some take passages of Scripture that are “hard to be understood” and proceed to “wrest them unto their own destruction” (2 Peter 3:16).

    Such a reference is Colossians 1:15. It describes Jesus Christ as “the firstborn of every creature,” and some have advanced this in support of the pre-existence theory. If Jesus is firstborn, he must have existed before all others, they claim.

    But does not that set Scripture against Scripture? If he is literally “firstborn” in the sense implied by the theory, how can the Bible claim that he is the “son of Abraham and David” (Matthew 1:1)?

    And consider the statement itself: “firstBORN of every creature.” Does not that demand a mother? Who was the mother who gave birth to him before all others?

    These difficulties are solved, and the passage simply and beautifully explained, when the Bible doctrine of the “firstborn” is understood. In the Bible, “firstborn” is a legal term, describing pre-eminence of position or status, though not necessarily of birth. There were special privileges granted the legal firstborn in a family. He represented his father, he acted as a priest, he received a double portion of the family inheritance (see Deuteronomy 21:17).

    But the law of God provided that the eldest son of a family could forfeit his position as legal firstborn, if guilty of misconduct or inability to perform the necessary duties, and be supplanted by a younger son. In other words, it was not necessary for Jesus to be the first of God's creation to be eligible for the position of legal firstborn.

    For example, consider 1 Chronicles 5:1:

    “Reuben the firstborn of Israel . . . but forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph, and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright!”

    Reuben's lewd conduct earned the rebuke of his father, who deposed him from his legal status of firstborn, and gave the position to a much younger son: Joseph.

    Other examples could be multiplied. Ephraim was blessed as firstborn by Jacob, even though he was younger than Manasseh his brother (Genesis 48:14-19), and God endorsed the appointment by describing Ephraim as “His firstborn” (Jeremiah 31:9). Jacob was given the birthright over his older brother Esau (Genesis 25:32-34). Simri was appointed to the position even though he was younger in years than his brethren (1 Chronicles 26:10).

    These examples (and they could be multiplied) clearly show that it was often the practice for a younger son to be elevated to the position of legal firstborn in a family. In fact, this was so common that the Mosaic Law prohibited the elevation of a younger son to this position on the mere whim of his father, because of favoritism. It commanded:

    “It shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated . . . ” (Deut. 21:17).

    This prohibition shows that a legal firstborn could be a younger son, and therefore has a great bearing on the interpretation of Colossians 1:15.

    The Bible refers to two notable “sons of God”: Adam and Christ (see Luke 3:38). The “first Adam” forfeited the right of inheritance, the position of firstborn of the human race, because of sin; but God raised up a younger Son (called in 1 Cor. 15:45 “the last Adam”) whose complete obedience to the will of his Father proved him worthy of the preeminence. He was thus elevated to the position of firstborn of the human race, which means that he receives “a double portion of the inheritance,” and that he acts as priest in the family of God. The Lord Jesus Christ is firstborn, not by fact of longevity (which confers no merit) but by virtue of his moral excellence.

    His elevation was predicted in the Old Testament. God declared concerning him:

    “I WILL MAKE HIM My firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth” (Psalm 89:27).

    The use of the future tense in this prophecy shows that the Lord Jesus is not firstborn by birth but by appointment; otherwise God should have said, “He IS My firstborn.”

    The resurrection of Jesus was the seal of the Father's approval on the Son (Rom. 1: 1-4). This constituted him the Firstborn. Paul wrote: “He is . . . the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the pre-eminence” (Col 1:18), the “firstborn among many brethren” (Rom. 8:29). [The followers of the Lord are also described as a “kind of firstfruits” to God (James 1:18; Rev. 14:4), and as “the congregation of firstborns” (Heb. 12:23 – Greek. See Diaglott). Therefore, if the title “firstborn” teaches the pre-existence of Christ, it must do so also in relation to his followers. All the privileges of the firstborn that rest on the Lord, apply to a lesser extent to his followers. They will receive a double portion of inheritance in the Age to come, even immortality (1 Cor. 15:52-54), and they will act as a royal-priesthood (Rev. 5:9-10) in relation to the mortal population that will remain (see Zech. 14:16) during the period of Christ's millennial reign (Rev. 20:6).

    These expressions show conclusively that the apostle did not mean, by his use of the term, that Jesus pre-existed.


    Hi Frank,

    Did you write this one?
    Please let me know what you write,
    then I will likely read what it is that you post.

    Sometimes I don't bother read    L O N G   posts either.
    But since I'm interested in what you, Frank, believe I will,
    that is ONLY if it is YOUR WORDS, not 'propaganda material'.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Ed J,

    No, I did not write this. Is it not clear to you that I do not believe that Yahshua pre-existed his birth? If you do not like what it is that I post, I can only suggest that you from here on completley ingnore what it is that I post.


    Hi Frank,

    You have made it abundantly clear that you do not believe in any pre-existence.
    But there are many other points that get discussed on this and other threads.
    Besides the only threads that you seem to post on are similar to this thread.

    Sorry if my asking you questions seems to bother you, but I cannot
    extrapolate what you believe through the words others.
    Perhaps it is only me that has this difficulty?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #269111
    Ed J
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 24 2011,04:45)

    Quote (t8 @ Dec. 22 2011,09:12)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 21 2011,13:39)
    Pastry,

    NOWHERE in Scripture does it EVER SAY “The Word of God is Jesus Christ.”


    Do you consider the Book of Revelation to be a fraud then, because it says:

    Revelation 19:13
    King James Version (KJV)
    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.

    Revelation 19:13
    New American Standard Bible (NASB)
    He is clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God.

    Revelation 19:13
    New International Version (NIV)
    He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.


    t8,

    No, I do not consider the book of Revelation a fraud! Closely note what I said:

    “NOWHERE in Scripture does it EVER SAY “The Word of God is Jesus Christ.”

    Note that that Revelation 9:13 does NOT SAY or PROCLAIM … and I QUOTE: “The Word of God is Jesus Christ.” You will not find such a foolish QUOTE in ANY translation of Scripture. This is nothing but a twisting (“wresting”) of what this verse ACTUALLY SAYS!


    Hi Frank,

    Excellent point, and I agree with you on this!

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

    #269113
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Dec. 22 2011,10:50)
    1 Peter 3:15
    But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,

    Titus 1:9
    He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it.

    2Titus 4:2
    Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.

    1 Thessalonians 5:21
    test everything; hold fast what is good.

    2 Timothy 3:16
    All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    Frank, are you listening?


    t8,

    I certainly do not listen to you, since YOUR OWN WORDS are no profit to me! I receive my instruction from Father Yahweh's inspired prophetic word (Scripture) “rightly divided” for reproof and correction concerning rightious and profitable doctrine. Scripture clearly teaches me to live by everey word that proceeds out of the mouth of Father Yahweh, not the perverted words that proceed out of the mouth of t8!

    #269117
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 24 2011,04:47)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 24 2011,04:29)

    Quote (Ed J @ Dec. 22 2011,07:26)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Dec. 21 2011,12:00)
    Is Not Christ The Firstborn?

    At this point the reader might become a little impatient, and desire to press upon our attention Bible references that seem to give some support to the pre-existence theory.

    We are not ignorant of those passages, but claim that none of them give support to the theory if they are properly interpreted. It is unfortunately true, however, as the Bible itself states, that some take passages of Scripture that are “hard to be understood” and proceed to “wrest them unto their own destruction” (2 Peter 3:16).

    Such a reference is Colossians 1:15. It describes Jesus Christ as “the firstborn of every creature,” and some have advanced this in support of the pre-existence theory. If Jesus is firstborn, he must have existed before all others, they claim.

    But does not that set Scripture against Scripture? If he is literally “firstborn” in the sense implied by the theory, how can the Bible claim that he is the “son of Abraham and David” (Matthew 1:1)?

    And consider the statement itself: “firstBORN of every creature.” Does not that demand a mother? Who was the mother who gave birth to him before all others?

    These difficulties are solved, and the passage simply and beautifully explained, when the Bible doctrine of the “firstborn” is understood. In the Bible, “firstborn” is a legal term, describing pre-eminence of position or status, though not necessarily of birth. There were special privileges granted the legal firstborn in a family. He represented his father, he acted as a priest, he received a double portion of the family inheritance (see Deuteronomy 21:17).

    But the law of God provided that the eldest son of a family could forfeit his position as legal firstborn, if guilty of misconduct or inability to perform the necessary duties, and be supplanted by a younger son. In other words, it was not necessary for Jesus to be the first of God's creation to be eligible for the position of legal firstborn.

    For example, consider 1 Chronicles 5:1:

    “Reuben the firstborn of Israel . . . but forasmuch as he defiled his father's bed, his birthright was given unto the sons of Joseph, and the genealogy is not to be reckoned after the birthright!”

    Reuben's lewd conduct earned the rebuke of his father, who deposed him from his legal status of firstborn, and gave the position to a much younger son: Joseph.

    Other examples could be multiplied. Ephraim was blessed as firstborn by Jacob, even though he was younger than Manasseh his brother (Genesis 48:14-19), and God endorsed the appointment by describing Ephraim as “His firstborn” (Jeremiah 31:9). Jacob was given the birthright over his older brother Esau (Genesis 25:32-34). Simri was appointed to the position even though he was younger in years than his brethren (1 Chronicles 26:10).

    These examples (and they could be multiplied) clearly show that it was often the practice for a younger son to be elevated to the position of legal firstborn in a family. In fact, this was so common that the Mosaic Law prohibited the elevation of a younger son to this position on the mere whim of his father, because of favoritism. It commanded:

    “It shall be, when he maketh his sons to inherit that which he hath, that he may not make the son of the beloved firstborn before the son of the hated . . . ” (Deut. 21:17).

    This prohibition shows that a legal firstborn could be a younger son, and therefore has a great bearing on the interpretation of Colossians 1:15.

    The Bible refers to two notable “sons of God”: Adam and Christ (see Luke 3:38). The “first Adam” forfeited the right of inheritance, the position of firstborn of the human race, because of sin; but God raised up a younger Son (called in 1 Cor. 15:45 “the last Adam”) whose complete obedience to the will of his Father proved him worthy of the preeminence. He was thus elevated to the position of firstborn of the human race, which means that he receives “a double portion of the inheritance,” and that he acts as priest in the family of God. The Lord Jesus Christ is firstborn, not by fact of longevity (which confers no merit) but by virtue of his moral excellence.

    His elevation was predicted in the Old Testament. God declared concerning him:

    “I WILL MAKE HIM My firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth” (Psalm 89:27).

    The use of the future tense in this prophecy shows that the Lord Jesus is not firstborn by birth but by appointment; otherwise God should have said, “He IS My firstborn.”

    The resurrection of Jesus was the seal of the Father's approval on the Son (Rom. 1: 1-4). This constituted him the Firstborn. Paul wrote: “He is . . . the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the pre-eminence” (Col 1:18), the “firstborn among many brethren” (Rom. 8:29). [The followers of the Lord are also described as a “kind of firstfruits” to God (James 1:18; Rev. 14:4), and as “the congregation of firstborns” (Heb. 12:23 – Greek. See Diaglott). Therefore, if the title “firstborn” teaches the pre-existence of Christ, it must do so also in relation to his followers. All the privileges of the firstborn that rest on the Lord, apply to a lesser extent to his followers. They will receive a double portion of inheritance in the Age to come, even immortality (1 Cor. 15:52-54), and they will act as a royal-priesthood (Rev. 5:9-10) in relation to the mortal population that will remain (see Zech. 14:16) during the period of Christ's millennial reign (Rev. 20:6).

    These expressions show conclusively that the apostle did not mean, by his use of the term, that Jesus pre-existed.


    Hi Frank,

    Did you write this one?
    Please let me know what you write,
    then I will likely read what it is that you post.

    Sometimes I don't bother read    L O N G   posts either.
    But since I'm interested in what you, Frank, believe I will,
    that is ONLY if it is YOUR WORDS, not 'propaganda material'.

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Ed J,

    No, I did not write this. Is it not clear to you that I do not believe that Yahshua pre-existed his birth? If you do not like what it is that I post, I can only suggest that you from here on completley ingnore what it is that I post.


    Hi Frank,

    You have made it abundantly clear that you do not believe in any pre-existence.
    But there are many other points that get discussed on this and other threads.
    Besides the only threads that you seem to post on are similar to this thread.

    Sorry if my asking you questions seems to bother you, but I cannot
    extrapolate what you believe through the words others.
    Perhaps it is only me that has this difficulty?

    God bless
    Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
    http://www.holycitybiblecode.org


    Ed J,

    Your asking questions of me does not bother me in the least. I will never post anything from someone elses article that I do not agree with. In fact, I believe that there was one point the author made in the last article that I excerpted from that I did not agree with. This is why I had only made an excerpt from the article in part.

    I am sure that you are aware that Yahshua did not speak his own words, but that he spoke the words that his and our Father Yahweh instructed him to speak, right?

Viewing 20 posts - 12,321 through 12,340 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account