Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,281 through 4,300 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #102682
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 23 2008,12:07)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 23 2008,12:06)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 23 2008,11:51)
    Hi WJ,
    Surely the body is not your life?


    NH

    Will your natural (physical) life continue without your body?

    ???


    NH

    Or will you be considered dead?

    ???


    Hi WJ,
    Absolutely.
    According to human eys as dead as Abraham and David.
    But not dead to the eyes of God as we, like Christ and Abraham and David, will be yet alive in the Spirit.

    #102746
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,18:02)
    Hi Adam P,

    Quote
    Mandy, are you not aware that it was statements such as
    “Jesus is God's son therefore he is God of very God. … God begets God”;
    which became the very bedrock of trinitarianism in the 4th cent., in the first place?


    Oh sure, I'm aware.  But Paul admonishes us to grow in our depths of understanding.  I don't base my beliefs on some old, dead guys who thought they had it right centuries ago.  Since then there has been a lot of debate about what they “decided”.  I think the vast majority of those who seek truth realize there are errors in their conclusions.

    Quote
    The Holy Scriptures simply do not make such statements.
    So should we?


    You mean the “God begets God” part?  Right, we cannot find that in scripture but we are told that God begat a son – what else would the Son of God be if not God from God?

    Jesus is “of” God.  Did the Father not contribute anything to his boy?

    Quote
    In your desire for “unification”, I fear it can cause compromise & confusion!
    IMHO, I suggest you stick with scriptural language.


    Son of God is scriptural language.  What is a son?  The SON OF GOD would be God of God.  Jesus is of God.  Would God beget a human?  Would a dog beget an insect?  I believe folks take scriptural language and attach different meanings to certain words to fit their peculiar theology.

    Quote
    ONE-GOD believing Christians from the time of the early church simply would not speak of
    “Jesus is God's son therefore he is God of very God. … God begets God”;


    Perhaps not, you are right.  But then again our understanding is different from theirs.  They couldn't figure out why Jesus was able to calm the storms either.  The boys asked each other, “What manner of man is this?”  Clearly they understood Jesus was not merely a man.  To say he was merely a man, imo, is to say too little of him.  In my opinion, it also denies his Father's role in bringing him into the world!

    Quote
    Well there you go then Mandy.
    Seeing that “Jesus cannot be 100% God because both of his parents are not God;”

    Jesus therefore cannot be “God of God”.

    Surely, that is pretty clear!
    Do you not agree?


    No, I do not agree.  Jesus cannot be God of God because he had a human for a mother?  But what about GOD THE FATHER'S contribution?  Does it count for nothing?

    I still cannot figure out why no one wants to honor God by recognizing that he fathered one, unique Son (through conception).  It offends so many…..

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Sis Mandy,
    “God begets God” is really offending me. In fact it is aganst the Monotheism of the Bible. It is some thing to do with Paganism where gods have sex with human females and gave birth to gods or demi-gods, but it is some thing strange to Jewish Monotheism. Even many Jews and Mohammad who was the founder of Islam were really offended by this logic and hated Christianity to be of Paganist origin. Do you support such deviations from the One God existence in this whole creation ? Understanding Jesus as the Son of God has caused many people fumble in their Christian lives in two extremes ; One as 'God of very God' and the other as mere spirit which seemed to appear as man but not human. That's why there was always some stress given for Jesus being the flesh and blood like any human being in fact like Adam. During St John's times already Paganism had taken its routes to make Jesus as some demi-god or a spirit who seemed to appear like a human but not really a human but was a celestial being. Therefore the Antichrist has been defined as the one who make Jesus as a spirit or celestial being who actually not a flesh and blood. Remember one thing 'No God can be born to any human woman who is a created being'.

    Please come out from that dilemma of believing 'God begets God'.

    Thanks and love to you
    Adam

    #102757
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GM,
    I agree that it is not essential the we understand the origins of the man Jesus Christ in terms of salvation. He had to be a man for us to be saved but that does not deny that we can learn of Scripture about these other aspects.

    #102842
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Thanks for that understanding brother Nick.

    #102845
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Adam,

    I'm sorry that God having a Son offends you. You are not the first and you will not be the last, I'm afraid.

    But remember, this is just my understanding from the scriptures. Let not my understanding be a stumbling block to you. You must learn what the scriptures say for yourself as it seems that you have done. Hold fast to what you have learned and what you believe God is telling you and I will do the same.

    Much love to you,
    Mandy

    #102851
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Thanks and love to you Sis
    Adam

    #102958
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 23 2008,23:03)
    Hi Sis Mandy,
    “God begets God” is really offending me. In fact it is aganst the Monotheism of the Bible. It is some thing to do with Paganism where gods have sex with human females and gave birth to gods or demi-gods, but it is some thing strange to Jewish Monotheism. Even many Jews and Mohammad who was the founder of Islam were really offended by this logic and hated Christianity to be of Paganist origin. Do you support such deviations from the One God existence in this whole creation ? Understanding Jesus as the Son of God has caused many people fumble in their Christian lives in two extremes ; One as 'God of very God' and the other as mere spirit which seemed to appear as man but not human. That's why there was always some stress given for Jesus being the flesh and blood like any human being in fact like Adam. During St John's times already Paganism had taken its routes to make Jesus as some demi-god or a spirit who seemed to appear like a human but not really a human but was a celestial being. Therefore the Antichrist has been defined as the one who make Jesus as a spirit or celestial being who actually not a flesh and blood. Remember one thing 'No God can be born to any human woman who is a created being'.

    Please come out from that dilemma of believing 'God begets God'.

    Thanks and love to you
    Adam


    Call it whatever, but God allows us to partake of divine nature. So how much more the son? Or is he exempt and only a being of flesh for eternity?

    I know that I have a flesh body and then I will have a spirit body and that I will be like him, that is Christ. It is a mystery, but I would be careful to not say that Jesus was created as a man with no divine origin and no divine nature and spirit body now.

    Is it really hard to believe that God shares his nature, spirit, and character with us. In fact I would go as far as to say that he absolutely wants us to seek all of the above. After all are we not his sons, his children, his image?

    #102961
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi brother T8,
    You are absolutely right in saying that God shares His Spirit nature with His Children including Jesus, you and me but that doesn't mean God begets another God. then it will be utter confusion in saying there can be more than one God in this creation. God shares His nature and glory with His creation that is what we are going to be His creation in Christ Jesus. Please see Rom 1:
    19 For what can be known about God is evident to them, because God made it evident to them.
    20 Ever since the creation of the world, his invisible attributes of eternal power and divinity have been able to be understood and perceived in what he has made. As a result, they have no excuse;
    21 for although they knew God they did not accord him glory as God or give him thanks. Instead, they became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds were darkened.
    22 While claiming to be wise, they became fools
    23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for the likeness of an image of mortal man or of birds or of four-legged animals or of snakes.

    The above verses infer that God is visible through His creation but no part of His creation can be equal to Him.

    Peace to you
    Adam

    #102989
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Hi Adam.

    If the first man was called Adam and all who shared his nature are called adam and if the Devil shares his nature with fallen beings who are called devils, then what are beings called when God shares his nature with them?

    If your surname was Jones, and your children are called Jones, does that make them you?

    Jesus said of the Judges “ye are theos”. He wasn't saying they were the Most High God, nor was he saying that they were worthy to be called “theos”. He was acknowledging that the ministry they were given was from God. It matters not in this instance that they were not fruitful in that ministry, but that their authority was given by God. Now what about Christ? Is he less worthy of such a title when angels and judges were called theos?

    So perhaps it is or isn't as wrong as you think? If you take away the capitalization or the definite article with Theos, you are left with a differing meaning that may just be applicable. I just think an open mind is better than a closed one, that is all.

    I am not saying that I go along with Theos begetting Theos. But you could make the argument that THE Theos begets theos, just as the Spirit begets spirit, or The Divine begets divinity. All I am saying is that it is quite likely that the context of these early writers could be that  God wasn't begetting God, but that God begets all good things from himself including his nature.

    If anything, it could be that the Trinity doctrine took hold from people who didn't understand Greek language and the use of the definite article with Theos versus not using it. It could be quite possible that you are making that same mistake, even though you are not promoting the Trinity doctrine in response.

    #103041
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 26 2008,23:34)
    So perhaps it is or isn't as wrong as you think? If you take away the capitalization or the definite article with Theos, you are left with a differing meaning that may just be applicable. I just think an open mind is better than a closed one, that is all.

    I am not saying that I go along with Theos begetting Theos. But you could make the argument that THE Theos begets theos, just as the Spirit begets spirit, or The Divine begets divinity. All I am saying is that it is quite likely that the context of these early writers could be that God wasn't begetting God, but that God begets all good things from himself including his nature.


    t8,

    I agree with you. When I say that God begets God what I am really saying is that “a God had a son”. That son is part God. It doesn't make him THE God, but as you say, perhaps “god”.

    Anyway, I'm still fine-tuning what I believe here.

    Love,
    Mandy

    #103046
    Tiffany
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 27 2008,11:53)

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 26 2008,23:34)
    So perhaps it is or isn't as wrong as you think? If you take away the capitalization or the definite article with Theos, you are left with a differing meaning that may just be applicable. I just think an open mind is better than a closed one, that is all.

    I am not saying that I go along with Theos begetting Theos. But you could make the argument that THE Theos begets theos, just as the Spirit begets spirit, or The Divine begets divinity. All I am saying is that it is quite likely that the context of these early writers could be that  God wasn't begetting God, but that God begets all good things from himself including his nature.


    t8,

    I agree with you.  When I say that God begets God what I am really saying is that “a God had a son”.  That son is part God.  It doesn't make him THE God, but as you say, perhaps “god”.

    Anyway, I'm still fine-tuning what I believe here.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Mandy! Are you not coming closer to believing that Jesus as the Word was there before the world was? Little by little, line upon line.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #103059
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Tiffany @ Aug. 27 2008,12:21)
    Jesus as the Word


    What does this mean to you exactly?
    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #103207
    gollamudi
    Participant

    So Sis Mandy,
    You are also going into that trap of calling Jesus 'god' or small god not BIG 'GOD' ?
    If Jesus is the Son of God, you and me also are son and daughter of God whether this right make us God or gods. Brother T8 should realise that there is no God but one who is the Father in this whole universe. Jesus is Messiah and Son of God being the one who is under the God's Authority and can be called Theos or Elohim. But that doesn't make him God of this universe which there can be only One.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam

    #103212
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 27 2008,11:53)

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 26 2008,23:34)
    So perhaps it is or isn't as wrong as you think? If you take away the capitalization or the definite article with Theos, you are left with a differing meaning that may just be applicable. I just think an open mind is better than a closed one, that is all.

    I am not saying that I go along with Theos begetting Theos. But you could make the argument that THE Theos begets theos, just as the Spirit begets spirit, or The Divine begets divinity. All I am saying is that it is quite likely that the context of these early writers could be that  God wasn't begetting God, but that God begets all good things from himself including his nature.


    t8,

    I agree with you.  When I say that God begets God what I am really saying is that “a God had a son”.  That son is part God.  It doesn't make him THE God, but as you say, perhaps “god”.

    Anyway, I'm still fine-tuning what I believe here.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Or in nature, theos.

    Philippians 2:5-8
    5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
    6 Who, being in very nature God,
         did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
    7 but made himself nothing,
         taking the very nature of a servant,
         being made in human likeness.
    8 And being found in appearance as a man,
         he humbled himself
         and became obedient to death—
            even death on a cross!

    #103213
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 28 2008,20:10)
    So Sis Mandy,
    You are also going into that trap of calling Jesus 'god' or small god not BIG 'GOD' ?
    If Jesus is the Son of God, you and me also are son and daughter of God whether this right make us God or gods. Brother T8 should realise that there is no God but one who is the Father in this whole universe. Jesus is Messiah and Son of God being the one who is under the God's Authority and can be called Theos or Elohim. But that doesn't make him God of this universe which there can be only One.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Brother T8 has been treaching since the beginning of these forums that there is only one God the Father, who is the only true God.

    Brother T8 also recognises that theos can be used in a qualitative way too because brother T8 reads scriptures like Philippians 2:5-8 and recognises that angels and judges were called theos.

    Bother T8 likens it to the way Spirit and spirit can be used. We know there is one Spirit, but we also know that God is the Father of spirits. It is not a contradiction and it is what is written anyway.

    #103215
    gollamudi
    Participant

    So brother T8, who is Jesus in your theology a god, demi-god, a spirit or an angel if he was not a man like Adam, you and me ?

    #103234
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 28 2008,20:44)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 27 2008,11:53)

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 26 2008,23:34)
    So perhaps it is or isn't as wrong as you think? If you take away the capitalization or the definite article with Theos, you are left with a differing meaning that may just be applicable. I just think an open mind is better than a closed one, that is all.

    I am not saying that I go along with Theos begetting Theos. But you could make the argument that THE Theos begets theos, just as the Spirit begets spirit, or The Divine begets divinity. All I am saying is that it is quite likely that the context of these early writers could be that  God wasn't begetting God, but that God begets all good things from himself including his nature.


    t8,

    I agree with you.  When I say that God begets God what I am really saying is that “a God had a son”.  That son is part God.  It doesn't make him THE God, but as you say, perhaps “god”.

    Anyway, I'm still fine-tuning what I believe here.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Or in nature, theos.

    Philippians 2:5-8
    5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
    6 Who, being in very nature God,
         did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
    7 but made himself nothing,
         taking the very nature of a servant,
         being made in human likeness.
    8 And being found in appearance as a man,
         he humbled himself
         and became obedient to death—
            even death on a cross!


    What else would Jesus' nature be if it wasn't divine?

    His Daddy is the Almighty, after all! :;):

    #103235
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 28 2008,20:10)
    So Sis Mandy,
    You are also going into that trap of calling Jesus 'god' or small god not BIG 'GOD' ?
    If Jesus is the Son of God, you and me also are son and daughter of God whether this right make us God or gods. Brother T8 should realise that there is no God but one who is the Father in this whole universe. Jesus is Messiah and Son of God being the one who is under the God's Authority and can be called Theos or Elohim. But that doesn't make him God of this universe which there can be only One.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Adam,

    I think I've asked you this before but I'm not certain.

    If you have a son is he human?

    Likewise, if God has a son what would he be?

    Love,
    Mandy

    #103243
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi t8,
    Just wondering what you thought here. Did the angels or judges have the “nature of God” like the Son has? If not, that would make Him the only theos with the nature of God, right.
    LU

    #103314
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 29 2008,00:39)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 28 2008,20:10)
    So Sis Mandy,
    You are also going into that trap of calling Jesus 'god' or small god not BIG 'GOD' ?
    If Jesus is the Son of God, you and me also are son and daughter of God whether this right make us God or gods. Brother T8 should realise that there is no God but one who is the Father in this whole universe. Jesus is Messiah and Son of God being the one who is under the God's Authority and can be called Theos or Elohim. But that doesn't make him God of this universe which there can be only One.

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Adam,

    I think I've asked you this before but I'm not certain.

    If you have a son is he human?

    Likewise, if God has a son what would he be?

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    Thanks for your response to my post. I believe Jesus is the human Messiah and the Son of God is the title given to human beings not to any angels. Please see Heb 1:5

    “For to which of the angels hath he said at any time: Thou art my Son, to-day have I begotten thee? And again: I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son?”

    How do you understand these verses in Heb 2 if you believe Jesus is another diety like God Himself ?

    5 “For God hath not subjected unto angels the world to come, whereof we speak. 6 But one in a certain place hath testified, saying: What is man, that thou art mindful of him? Or the son of man, that thou visitest him? 7 Thou hast made him a little lower than the angels: thou hast crowned him with glory and honour and hast set him over the works of thy hands. 8 Thou hast subjected all things under his feet. For in that he hath subjected all things to him he left nothing not subject to him. But now we see not as yet all things subject to him. 9 But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels, for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour: that, through the grace of God he might taste death for all”.

    The above passage in heb 2 talks about son of man not any diety as you often quote. God has exalted Jesus a son of man as He has promised in the O.T that He would exalt son of man above all power and authority even above all angels and give him a place next to Him on His throne. We also being the children of God will be kings and queens along with our Lord Jesus in the millennial rule in God's kingdom. This privillege has not been given to any angels but to men who are God's children including Jesus.

    Please see the difference what I believe about Jesus.
    Thanks and love to you
    Adam

Viewing 20 posts - 4,281 through 4,300 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account