Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,221 through 4,240 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #102074
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 19 2008,10:11)
    Hi not3,
    You which is that Spirit-anointed or natural?
    WJ believes Christ is and always was a powerful Spirit God.
    WJ does not really believe in the anointing of one member of his trinity with another.

    But Christ Jesus was MADE a LIVING SPIRIT


    I am looking for what we have in common instead of what we do not.

    #102075

    Hello again,

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,09:36)
    There are clear scriptures where the Apostles call Yeshua God.

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,09:42)

    Perhaps, but they are not clear enough to silence the debate obviously.  So there must be something about the “clear” part that is not so clear.  :;):

    Maybe not to you. But how about the Father's own words.

    But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, [is] for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,09:36)

    Question is if he is God, did the Apostles mean he was “a god”?

    If he is God is he “true”.


    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,09:42)

    Even here it is not clear.  Jesus says there is only one true God and he points us to his Father as being THAT true God.

    1 John 5:20 is clear that Yeshua is “true God”. If the Father and the Apostles call him God then he is obviously True.

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,09:42)

    He says no one is good but HIM.  Again, not clear.  Should we separate ourselves from one another based on scripture that is not clear?


    He also said he was the “Good shephard” was he lying about himnself, or could it be that he is simply trying to provoke the one who spoke to him as to why did he call Yeshua good?

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,09:36)
    Scriptures also clearly state the Holy Spirit is God.


    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,09:42)
    I don't think any one in their right mind would deny this.  However, the debate is not whether the holy Spirit is God but rather is the Holy Spirit of separate person of God.


    Mandy no one has given me an explanation as to why Yeshua refers to the Comfortor as “another” and uses personal pronouns surrounded by clear verbs describing the Holy Spirit as a sentient being. John 16:13, 14 and John 14:16 are unambiguous in proving this point. Matt 28:19, 2 Cor 13:14 as well as others show there is three yet one.

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,09:42)
    Again, it is not clear. Should we say we are so far a part in our foundations when the foundations are not 100% clear?


    To me my foundation is clear and the Jesus I serve does not appear to be the same as yours. God will be the judge of our hearts.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,09:36)
    We know the Father is God.

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,09:42)

    Ah, we have the same God after all!  This is a sure foundation where scripture is absolutely clear.  The teachings of the disciples and Jesus himself will confirm this is true and right.

    Mandy


    It is clear though that our understanding of the nature of God is vastly different. However we can still Love one another.

    WJ

    #102076
    Not3in1
    Participant

    When two blocks go together you can begin to build a foundation. With everyone carrying only one block we will never stand on anything but our own ground.

    Jesus prayed for unity; I think it must be possible?

    #102077
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,10:14)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 19 2008,10:11)
    Hi not3,
    You which is that Spirit-anointed or natural?
    WJ believes Christ is and always was a powerful Spirit God.
    WJ does not really believe in the anointing of one member of his trinity with another.

    But Christ Jesus was MADE a LIVING SPIRIT


    I am looking for what we have in common instead of what we do not.


    Hi not3,
    So we can have in common the anointing Spirit of God.
    Is this what you mean when you agree the Lord is the Spirit?

    #102078

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 19 2008,10:11)
    Hi not3,
    You which is that Spirit-anointed or natural?
    WJ believes Christ is and always was a powerful Spirit God.
    WJ does not really believe in the anointing of one member of his trinity with another.

    But Christ Jesus was MADE a LIVING SPIRIT


    NH

    And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam [was made] a quickening spirit. 1 Cor 15:45

    Do you see the [brackets], [was made] was added by the translators.

    Yeshua was and is the “Eternal life” that was with the Father.

    Yeshua was not born again as you propose.

    WJ

    #102080
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    Was one member of the proposed trinity anointed by another with a third
    and yet only one called GOD?

    Acts 10
    38How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him.

    Was GOD with GOD in the beginning?

    #102083
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hey bro, listen, as long as you see us as being “vastly” different from one another there is no hope of unity for today. But I encourage you to look for what we do have in common and see if we cannot understand one another better. An open mind is a terrible thing to lose!

    Quote
    Mandy no one has given me an explanation as to why Yeshua refers to the Comfortor as “another” and uses personal pronouns surrounded by clear verbs describing the Holy Spirit as a sentient being. John 16:13, 14 and John 14:16 are unambiguous in proving this point. Matt 28:19, 2 Cor 13:14 as well as others show there is three yet one.

    Could it be that perhaps this passage of scripture contains some error? I'm not saying it does, I'm not even sure I believe it does. All I'm asking is that is it possible? This may answer your question as to the reason no one has been able to give you a satisfactory answer. For myself, I see that you have listed several scriptures to determine that the there is three, yet one. With a teaching of this magnitude I don't believe we have to cut and paste to come to it's conclusion. It should be laid out as clear as the Father is God.

    Quote
    To me my foundation is clear and the Jesus I serve does not appear to be the same as yours. God will be the judge of our hearts.


    Yes, I suppose you are correct in that God will be the judge of our hearts. I was only hoping that we could move towards unity a little closer. But in order to do that we both have to realize that nothing is absolutely clear. If it were Keith, there would be no questions. You say that for you your foundation is clear and maybe you do not have any more questions – I guess that is good for you.

    Quote
    It is clear though that our understanding of the nature of God is vastly different. However we can still Love one another.


    I have always appreciated this about you – you love me anyway! But I don't think we are that far apart, after all we both believe that the Father is God!

    Love, Mandy

    #102084

    Quote (Irene @ Aug. 19 2008,10:02)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,09:27)

    Quote (Irene @ Aug. 19 2008,09:23)
    Now let me get in here.
    First I do believe that Jesus as the Word God was there in the beginning with Father God. But I see it as God being a tittle or a Family Name. Question did the Word have a beginning or was He always there with Father God? Here we have to go to other scripture to find this out.
    Col. 1:15 I hope that you W.J. and Mandy read this with an open mind.
    Col. 1:15 ” He is the image of the invisible God, THE FIRSTBORN OF ALL CREATION.”
    Verse 16 ” For by Him all things were created……………
    verse 17 ” And He was before all things and in Him all things consist.”
    cerse 18 I ratherfind it interesting, because it shows us that He was first in all. So that He will have preeminence, meaning first to be born and first to be resurrected from the dead.

    Rev. 3:14 “..These says the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, THE BEGINNING OF THE CREATION OF GOD.”  I find this verse also very important because it tells you that He indeed the Firstborn of all creation.

    Then when you go to Proverbs 8: 22-30  I love these verses especailly if you take it out of the James Moffat translation of the Bible.
    verse 22 ” The eternal


    Irene

    You have posted this a milllion times and we have read it and it is ambiguous.

    Firstborn does not necessarily mean the first to be born. The context of Colossians 1 shows this to be true for it also says he is the firstborn from the dead and we know Christ was not the first to rise from the dead. Paul used the same word in the context which simply means preeminence.

    WJ


    That is upsolutley bull. Look it up in the Dictonary. And Christ was the first that ever was resurrected and became a Spirit being.
    You telling me that I have put this up a million times, look in the mirrow about your trinity believe.
    The scriptures are not ambiguous they are clear cut, only to those that don't want to even look at them it is.
    Some are jsut blind, that is all. I really mainly wrote all of this down for You Mandy.
    You know I don't get angry to often, but you have just done so, thank you.


    Irene

    He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation, NET

    The Greek term πρωτότοκος (prwtotokos) could refer either to first in order of time, such as a first born child, or it could refer to one who is preeminent in rank. M. J. Harris, Colossians and Philemon (EGGNT), 43, expresses the meaning of the word well: “The ‘firstborn’ was either the eldest child in a family or a person of preeminent rank. The use of this term to describe the Davidic king in Ps 88:28 LXX (=Ps 89:27 EVV), ‘I will also appoint him my firstborn (πρωτότοκον), the most exalted of the kings of the earth,’ indicates that it can denote supremacy in rank as well as priority in time. But whether the πρωτό- element in the word denotes time, rank, or both, the significance of the -τοκος element as indicating birth or origin (from τίκτω, give birth to) has been virtually lost except in ref. to lit. birth.” In Col 1:15 the emphasis is on the priority of Jesus’ rank as over and above creation (cf. 1:16 and the “for” clause referring to Jesus as Creator).

    Source.

    Also see…

    Firstborn

    and

    Firstborn

    and

    Firstborn

    WJ

    #102086

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,10:33)

    Hey bro, listen, as long as you see us as being “vastly” different from one another there is no hope of unity for today.  But I encourage you to look for what we do have in common and see if we cannot understand one another better.  An open mind is a terrible thing to lose!

    Quote
    Mandy no one has given me an explanation as to why Yeshua refers to the Comfortor as “another” and uses personal pronouns surrounded by clear verbs describing the Holy Spirit as a sentient being. John 16:13, 14 and John 14:16 are unambiguous in proving this point. Matt 28:19, 2 Cor 13:14 as well as others show there is three yet one.


    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,10:33)

    Could it be that perhaps this passage of scripture contains some error?  I'm not saying it does, I'm not even sure I believe it does.  All I'm asking is that is it possible?  This may answer your question as to the reason no one has been able to give you a satisfactory answer.  For myself, I see that you have listed several scriptures to determine that the there is three, yet one.  With a teaching of this magnitude I don't believe we have to cut and paste to come to it's conclusion.  It should be laid out as clear as the Father is God.

    So in other words you doubt what I am saying when I say to me it is clear who the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit is? No, I do not believe the scriptures mentioned have errors. If I thought this then what scripture could I trust? Would I only pick out the ones that agree with me or what I like? Or what I say “God showed me”? Scriptures should be the final test in what we believe God is showing us or else we would make ourselves greater than the witnesses who wrote them and the Spirit who inspired them.

    Quote
    To me my foundation is clear and the Jesus I serve does not appear to be the same as yours. God will be the judge of our hearts.


    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,10:33)
    Yes, I suppose you are correct in that God will be the judge of our hearts.  I was only hoping that we could move towards unity a little closer.  But in order to do that we both have to realize that nothing is absolutely clear.  If it were Keith, there would be no questions. You say that for you your foundation is clear and maybe you do not have any more questions – I guess that is good for you.

    We can have and should endevour to have unity in the Spirit, until we come to the unity of the faith.

    Quote
    It is clear though that our understanding of the nature of God is vastly different. However we can still Love one another.

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,10:33)

    I have always appreciated this about you – you love me anyway!  But I don't think we are that far apart, after all we both believe that the Father is God!

    Love, Mandy

    See above.

    Blessings WJ

    #102087
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    1Cor15
    45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made [1519]a quickening spirit.

    Number 1519
    Transliteration:
    eis {ice}
    Word Origin:
    a primary preposition
    TDNT:
    2:420,211
    Part of Speech:
    prep
    Usage in the KJV:
    into 573, to 281, unto 207, for 140, in 138, on 58, toward 29, against 26, misc 321

    Total: 1773
    Definition:
    into, unto, to, towards, for, among Wigram's frequency count is 1770 not 1773.
    “For” (as used in Acts 2:38 “for the forgiveness…”) could have two meanings. If you saw a poster saying “Jesse James wanted for robbery”, “for” could mean Jesse is wanted so he can commit a robbery, or is wanted because he has committed a robbery. The later sense is the correct one. So too in this passage, the word “for” signifies an action in the past. Otherwise, it would violate the entire tenor of the NT teaching on salvation by grace and not by works.

    #102088
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Keith,

    Quote
    Scriptures should be the final test in what we believe God is showing us or else we would make ourselves greater than the witnesses who wrote them and the Spirit who inspired them.


    This sounds good in theory, but we what we do know is that the scriptures have been tainted by scribes and God knows who else! We also know that information they had from ancient times was given new light by the scrolls found not too long ago.

    Yes, scriptures should be the final test. However have you noticed how many tests have been written from the same scriptures? Further have you noticed how the answer's are vaired depending on how the test-taker interprets the test?

    I'm not saying we should let doubt rule (Lord knows I've been there), but I am proposing that we use caution when dividing one another over words that may have been altered. So how do we know what to trust and what is true? Of course there is no final answer to that question – but we do know that when we love one another and tend to the log in our own eyes that we are better able to encourage and help one another towards the goal (instead of going opposite directions and calling names). Right?

    Mandy

    #102090
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi not3,
    So which Spirit is the one which is the Lord?
    Was the Lord appointed or was he always Lord?

    Acts 2:36
    “Therefore let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord and Christ–this Jesus whom you crucified.”

    #102091
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Nick,

    Did we have this conversation with Kathi not too long ago? It sounds familiar….

    Anyway, just as a prince is the son of a King and does not need to be “appointed” to the office of Prince – I feel the same of Jesus.

    However there is a ceremony by which the King does dub the young Prince as such. It's purely ceremonial as the Prince was a Prince by birth-right.

    Mandy

    #102092
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi not3,
    So was Jesus working in his own powers or in the anointing of the Spirit of God?

    #102093

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,11:07)
    Hi Keith,

    Quote
    Scriptures should be the final test in what we believe God is showing us or else we would make ourselves greater than the witnesses who wrote them and the Spirit who inspired them.


    This sounds good in theory, but we what we do know is that the scriptures have been tainted by scribes and God knows who else!  We also know that information they had from ancient times was given new light by the scrolls found not too long ago.

    Yes, scriptures should be the final test.  However have you noticed how many tests have been written from the same scriptures?  Further have you noticed how the answer's are vaired depending on how the test-taker interprets the test?

    I'm not saying we should let doubt rule (Lord knows I've been there), but I am proposing that we use caution when dividing one another over words that may have been altered.  So how do we know what to trust and what is true?  Of course there is no final answer to that question – but we do know that when we love one another and tend to the log in our own eyes that we are better able to encourage and help one another towards the goal (instead of going opposite directions and calling names).  Right?

    Mandy


    Mandy

    Yes I realize that many take this view and because of this the tendency is to doubt all scripture.

    Not me. If the evidence is found in most of the credible translations found on Biblegateway.com and blueletterbible.org then I believe that is the inspired word of God to me.

    Blessings WJ

    #102094
    Irene
    Participant

    Mandy! I really do wish too that we would all be united in the word of God, but I also have come to the conclusion that it is almost impossible. I really had a hard couple of days. First with our Son on Sunday, He believes in the trinity. He and Georg got into discussing the trinity. If God does not show a person, we cant do so, that I have said before, but I too try and try again. So has Georg. We Love each other in spite of it, tho. And so maybe that is what we have to do here also. I have fallen short of it, I must confess again, hopefully this is the last time for me. I will put this on my prayer list. May God have mercy on me.(us)
    Peace and Love Irene

    #102095
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    Inspired true
    But it does not mention any trinity.
    Should we regard as equally true what is not written?

    Matthew 15:3
    And He answered and said to them, “Why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?

    #102096
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,11:17)
    If the evidence is found in most of the credible translations found on Biblegateway.com and blueletterbible.org then I believe that is the inspired word of God to me.


    I wonder how many in generations before you felt this way about the KJV and 1 John 5:7? I'm sure at the time all the evidence pointed to the fact that the information they had was credible. But now we know different, don't we? :;):

    As I said before, an open mind is a terrible thing to lose.

    I'm not encouraging you to doubt or not to trust scripture, I'm mainly encouraging you not to put gulfs inbetween brother's and sister's for not interpreting scripture as you do. There *may be* other ways to understand it?

    Love,
    Mandy

    #102097
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Irene @ Aug. 19 2008,11:22)
    Mandy! I really do wish too that we would all be united in the word of God, but I also have come to the conclusion that it is almost impossible. I really had a hard couple of days. First with our Son on Sunday, He believes in the trinity. He and Georg got into discussing the trinity. If God does not show a person, we cant do so, that I have said before, but I too try and try again. So has Georg. We Love each other in spite of it, tho. And so maybe that is what we have to do here also. I have fallen short of it, I must confess again, hopefully this is the last time for me. I will put this on my prayer list. May God have mercy on me.(us)
    Peace and Love Irene


    Sister,
    You make me smile. It probably won't be the last time of falling short…..we're human and dang it! we want to be right! :laugh: So often I am right there with you. We all are!

    But if we try for unity every now and then, you just never know what might happen? Perhaps even if just a little tolerance for one another grows in our hearts it will be worth it all.

    #102099

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,11:25)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,11:17)
    If the evidence is found in most of the credible translations found on Biblegateway.com and blueletterbible.org then I believe that is the inspired word of God to me.


    I wonder how many in generations before you felt this way about the KJV and 1 John 5:7?  I'm sure at the time all the evidence pointed to the fact that the information they had was credible.  But now we know different, don't we?   :;):

    As I said before, an open mind is a terrible thing to lose.  

    I'm not encouraging you to doubt or not to trust scripture, I'm mainly encouraging you not to put gulfs inbetween brother's and sister's for not interpreting scripture as you do.  There *may be* other ways to understand it?

    Love,
    Mandy


    Mandy

    Yes of course this is always incited for reason to doubt the written scriptures.

    Interesting that 1 John 5:7 was found in some manuscripts and it does not contradict the scriptures. It only added validity to the Trinitarian view. There are 66 books and 1000s of manuscripts from many different times and places, yet they could only find fault or discrepencies in one or two verses.

    There is no written literature in the world that even comes close to having this kind of witness or validity.

    Jesus said “I am the Way, the Truth and the Life, no man comes to the Father but by me” John 14:6

    Many would accuse Yeshua of not having an open mind. But when you know the truth and it makes you free, you do not need to be open to anything else. IMO.

    WJ

Viewing 20 posts - 4,221 through 4,240 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account