Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,181 through 4,200 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #101990

    Quote (t8 @ Aug. 17 2008,23:26)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 14 2008,23:47)
    Hi Roy

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:1

    And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. John 20:28

    But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness [is] the sceptre of thy kingdom. Heb 1:8

    Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Titus 2:13

    God being with God kind of makes Henotheism, and Arianism and Unitarainism fall apart doesn't it, unless you are a Polytheist?

    WJ


    Sorry WJ, I think your words are arrogant.

    You are the one who has more than one person as God, whereas many here acknowledge the Father as the only true God an Jesus Christ as the one he sent.


    Hi t8

    Which satememt is arrogant?

    This one….?

    Quote (RoyT01 @ Aug. 14 2008,15:40)

    Notice that one third of the supposed trinity is telling us that His Father is the ONLY TRUE GOD. Which makes the trinity kind of fall apart doesn’t it.

    Or this One…?

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 14 2008,23:47)
    God being with God kind of makes Henotheism, and Arianism and Unitarainism fall apart doesn't it, unless you are a Polytheist?

    Or maybe it was this part of my post? ???

    In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1:1

    And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. John 20:28

    But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness [is] the sceptre of thy kingdom. Heb 1:8

    Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Titus 2:13

    WJ   :D

    #101991

    Quote (before Time @ Aug. 16 2008,13:50)
    Hi WJ

    Not so fast WJ you don’t get the prize until we iron this out. The challenge was to find one scripture where anyone except the Father is called the only true God. You said you found one. But let’s take a further look if you did.

    1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us insight to know58 him who is true, and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. “This one”59 is the true God and eternal life

    As you can see the predictor added the words “this one” which changes the scripture to suggest it referred to Christ. And yet the interpreters are “far” from sure if it refers to the Father or the Son. I got this from the source you presented in your last post. No need to post the rest because the words “it appears” and words of the equivalent nature run rampant to complete it.

    sn The pronoun “This one” (οὗτος, Joutos) refers to a person, but it is “far from clear” whether it should be understood as a reference (1) to God the Father or (2) to Jesus Christ

    We don’t find this problematic in John 17:3 with the Net Bible and other translations, where it is quite obvious it means the Father only.

    John 17:3 Now this7 is eternal life8 – that they know “you, the only true God”, and Jesus Christ,9 whom you sent “Net Bible”

    John 17:3 “This is eternal life, that they may know “You, the only true God”, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent. “NASU Bible”

    So the challenge remains and I get the prize if I can only find it. You can have the next one.

    We don't find this problematic in John 17:3 with the Net Bible and other translations, where it is quite obvious it means the Father only.

    Yet you do get the prize for finding a bible with the expression. Good Job.

    God Bless

    Hi BT

    OK. Lets take the “this one” out. So it reads…

    1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us insight to know him who is true, and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ the true God and eternal life

    An honest look at other translations reveal the same…

    NLT
    And we know that the Son of God has come, and he has given us understanding so that we can know the true God. And now we are in God because we are in his Son, Jesus Christ. He is the only true God, and he is eternal life.

    NIV – 1Jo 5:20 – We know also that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true. And we are in him who is true–even in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.

    ESV – 1Jo 5:20 – And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, so that we may know him who is true; and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.

    NASB – 1Jo 5:20 – And we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us understanding so that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life.

    RSV – 1Jo 5:20 – And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us understanding, to know him who is true; and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God and eternal life.

    ASV – 1Jo 5:20 – And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, [even] in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.

    Young – 1Jo 5:20 – and we have known that the Son of God is come, and hath given us a mind, that we may know Him who is true, and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus Christ; this one is the true God and the life age-during!

    Darby – 1Jo 5:20 – And we know that the Son of God has come, and has given us an understanding that we should know him that [is] true; and we are in him that [is] true, in his Son Jesus Christ. He is the true God and eternal life.

    Webster – 1Jo 5:20 – And we know that the Son of God hath come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, [even] in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.

    HNV – 1Jo 5:20 – We know that the Son of God has come, and has given us an understanding, that we know him who is true, and we are in him who is true, in his Son Yeshua the Messiah. This is the true God, and eternal life.

    In this same letter, in the first chapter verses 1 and 2 John clarifies who the “Eternal life” is…

    That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life; For the life was manifested, and we have seen [it], and bear witness, and shew unto you that **eternal life**, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us😉

    And as the 25 scholars who had access to over 60,000 translators notes emphasis mine states…

    Thus it appears best to understand the pronoun This one in 5:20 as a reference to Jesus Christ. The christological affirmation which results is striking, but certainly not beyond the capabilities of the author (see John 1:1 and 20:28): This One [Jesus Christ] is the true God and eternal life.

    Do you always take introductory statements as being the final conclusion in a topic?

    John 17:3 is ambiguous because John also calls Yeshua God in John 1:1, and records Thomas confession without any rebuke or correction by Yeshua or John in John 20:28.

    BTW, are you trying to say that the scritpures do not call Jesus God?

    If so is he True or false?  :)

    I get the feeling you just don't want to give a prize, but thats ok, you can just keep it. :)

    Blessings WJ

    #101995
    before Time
    Participant

    WJ

    If you compare John 17:3 where Jesus is speaking to his His Father in prayer and not to himself, it’s clear who the “Only” True God is. And in 1 John 5:20 where it refers in you mind to Father or Son not so clear. Other wise they conflict! Always take what is clear and address it to what is not so clear in interpreting scripture. Look at them again!

    As for what Thomas said, look at the last verse in that chapter in response to Thomas by Christ.

    You said take the prize! ok

    God Bless and keep up the good work

    #101998

    Hi LU

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 17 2008,01:57)
    WJ,
    You claim to be a trinitarian yet you do not believe in even the basics of the doctrine.


    I really do not care about labels. Trinitarian is just a title that is closest to describing my basic beliefs, just as Henotheism or Polytheism is to yours.

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 17 2008,01:57)

    You do not believe in an eternal “son” and in the trinity doctrine it states that the Father and Son are co-eternal.  It doesn't say the Father and the “word” are co-eternal.


    I think you are misrepresenting Trinitarians, maybe because you don't understand the view.

    The term “son of God” in itself implies a beginning, so to say the son is “co-eternal” or always existed as a son would be a paradox.

    The son only co-existed with the Father in the sense that the person Yeshua always existed eternally with the Father.

    Just as he was the Lamb of God before the foundation of the world, before he became the Lamb of God on Calvary.

    To say Yeshua was born as a son way back in time somewhere and then say he was born from Mary’s womb is to say Yeshua was born twice or born again.

    Scriptures clearly state that Yeshua became a son when he came in the flesh.

    He was not a son who was born a son.

    And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Luke 1:35

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 17 2008,01:57)

    You claim a triune God but the one you claim is not the one of the trinity doctrine.


    OK, that should be a good thing right?

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 17 2008,01:57)

    BTW, if your God is triune and is revealed in nature, well let’s just say that there are people that think they have multiple personalities also.  We refer to them as having a DISORDER.


    I am not sure if you are trying to insult me or not, but anyway yes there are many who would consider God as having a disorder or multiple personalities, especially when they read OT scriptures where God wipes out entire cities including innocent children. Yet this same God is claimed to be “Good”. Of course I do not agree with them and I do not think you do either.

    LU is it entirely possible that you and I may not understand everything about the nature of an infinitely complex God?  ???

    Apparently you and many others have limited him to just your understanding of him and his nature. If it doesn’t make sense to your human logic it must be wrong, Right? ???  :)

    All of creation reveals the Glory of God. The molecular structure of the Universe is the “atom”. The atom is protons, neutrons and electrons. Plurality of unity.

    Scientist still cannot explain what holds the atom together; scientifically they should just explode outward.

    LU, can you name one thing in all of creation that is singular and not plural?

    This is what I mean when I say all of creation reveals the Glory or nature of God.

    Blessings. WJ

    #102004

    Hi BT

    Quote (before Time @ Aug. 19 2008,00:28)
    WJ
    If you compare John 17:3 where Jesus is speaking to his His Father in prayer and not to himself, it’s clear who the “Only” True God is. And in 1 John 5:20 where it refers in you mind to Father or Son not so clear.  Other wise they conflict! Always take what is clear and address it to what is not so clear in interpreting scripture. Look at them again!


    Isn’t that amazing how to me it is clear and to you my view is not.

    In your mind John 17:3 would conflict with scripture that calls Yeshua “true God” if scriptures says so elsewhere.

    If you take John 1:1 and John 20:28 and 1 John 1:1, 2 and 1 John 5:20 which is clear and compare to John 17:3, then it is clear that Yeshua was not excluding himself as being God since he also says that knowing him and the Father is a prerequisite to having “Eternal Life”. Why would he do this?

    So let me see you want me too take four scriptures and interpret them by the One. How about taking the one scripture and interpreting it by the four, and others like Isa 9:6 or John 1:18 in the NIV and NET, or Hebrews 1:8 or 2 Peter 1:1 or Titus 2:13?

    Quote (before Time @ Aug. 19 2008,00:28)

    As for what Thomas said, look at the last verse in that chapter in response to Thomas by Christ.


    But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. John 20:31

    Isn't that amazing how John says that Thomas calling Yeshua his “Lord and God” is a sign that was written that we might believe? So just what is John implying when he says “The Son of God”?

    John commentates on another incident that happened earlier in the ministry of Yeshua…

    But Jesus answered them, My Father worketh hitherto, and I work. Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God. John 5:17, 18

    Notice John never states the Jews were lieing!

    The highlighted words are John's words simply repeating the Jews who believed that for a man to claim to be “The Son of God” was making himself equal to God, for it would mean he came directly from God, which of course was Jesus claim, and which of course John claims in the very first chapter and verse of this book.

    Yeshua's claim is you cannot come to God or know God unless you come to him, and he that has seen him (Yeshua) and knows him has also seen and known the Father also.

    Many distort this truth saying Yeshua wasn’t crucified for claiming to be “The Son of God”, but that the Jews were lying and accusing Yeshua for claiming to be equal to God.

    By claiming to be “The Son of God” Yeshua was claiming to be equal to God and agreeing with Paul in Phil 2. This is why they crucified him.

    The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God. John 19:7

    Wow! It must have been a serious thing to claim to be “The Son of God”.

    Quote (before Time @ Aug. 19 2008,00:28)
    You said take the prize!  ok

    God Bless and keep up the good work


    If the prize is to give less honor to Yeshua than to the Father, or to view Yeshua the visible image of God as less than God, you can have it!

    Blessings

    WJ

    #102015
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,00:52)
    The term “son of God” in itself implies a beginning, so to say the son is “co-eternal” or always existed as a son would be a paradox.

    The son only co-existed with the Father in the sense that the person Yeshua always existed eternally with the Father.

    Just as he was the Lamb of God before the foundation of the world, before he became the Lamb of God on Calvary.

    To say Yeshua was born as a son way back in time somewhere and then say he was born from Mary’s womb is to say Yeshua was born twice or born again.

    Scriptures clearly state that Yeshua became a son when he came in the flesh.

    He was not a son who was born a son.

    And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Luke 1:35


    I find myself saying, “Yes!” to all your statements above. Isn't it curious that we can be so united and yet have a bit of variance in our belief systems? I think it's neat. It means that we are not far from the goal. I think when we can see similarities instead of differences we are closer to God than we know.

    Love,
    Mandy

    #102020

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,03:41)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,00:52)
    The term “son of God” in itself implies a beginning, so to say the son is “co-eternal” or always existed as a son would be a paradox.

    The son only co-existed with the Father in the sense that the person Yeshua always existed eternally with the Father.

    Just as he was the Lamb of God before the foundation of the world, before he became the Lamb of God on Calvary.

    To say Yeshua was born as a son way back in time somewhere and then say he was born from Mary’s womb is to say Yeshua was born twice or born again.

    Scriptures clearly state that Yeshua became a son when he came in the flesh.

    He was not a son who was born a son.

    And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God. Luke 1:35


    I find myself saying, “Yes!” to all your statements above.  Isn't it curious that we can be so united and yet have a bit of variance in our belief systems?  I think it's neat.  It means that we are not far from the goal.  I think when we can see similarities instead of differences we are closer to God than we know.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy

    I suppose this is why I feel that “Unitarians” may be closer to the truth IMO, because they believe that Christ beginning as a Son was his natural birth as a man.

    Unitarians have the 100% man down.

    However, to be honest Mandy one of my statements you do not agree with and in fact put us worlds apart.

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,00:52)
    The son only co-existed with the Father in the sense that the person Yeshua always existed eternally with the Father.


    I believe he “literally” existed as a person before he came in the flesh. He is the Word that was with God and the Word that was/is God.

    Blessings WJ

    #102022
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,04:01)
    I believe he “literally” existed as a person before he came in the flesh. He is the Word that was with God and the Word that was/is God.


    Nah…not worlds apart. Maybe just accross the street! :;):

    I believe that Jesus literally existed with the Father, too. I could even stretch to say that I believe he existed as the potential person – his future Son.

    I know what you believe – because I believed it too.

    To be honest, I truly think there are only about a half a dozen scriptural interpretations that separate us! And even those lend themselves, imo, to both our views. So, the gap gets even shorter for me.
    Love,
    Mandy

    #102023

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,04:14)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 19 2008,04:01)
    I believe he “literally” existed as a person before he came in the flesh. He is the Word that was with God and the Word that was/is God.


    Nah…not worlds apart.  Maybe just accross the street!   :;):

    I believe that Jesus literally existed with the Father, too.  I could even stretch to say that I believe he existed as the potential person – his future Son.  

    I know what you believe – because I believed it too.

    To be honest, I truly think there are only about a half a dozen scriptural interpretations that separate us!  And even those lend themselves, imo, to both our views.  So, the gap gets even shorter for me.  
    Love,
    Mandy


    Mandy

    Thanks. But I think that seeing Yeshua as God does put us quite aways apart in our foundational beliefs.

    I am not sure what scriptures yoiu are refering to which can be seen both ways unless you are talking about John 1:1 and even then Greek grammer IMO reveals Yeshua as God.

    We can agree to disagree.

    Blessings WJ

    #102027
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Sure, we can agree to disagree but why so fast?

    I think that Jesus is God in that he is God's only begotten son.  Let me clarify by saying I don't think Jesus is “a” god separate from the Father.  I think Jesus is God of very God.

    The verses that I am ref'ing are those where, for instance, grammar is in question. Rather, where the grammar makes Jesus God instead of the context.

    Love,
    Mandy

    #102028

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,06:27)
    Sure, we can agree to disagree but why so fast?

    I think that Jesus is God in that he is God's only begotten son.  Let me clarify by saying I don't think Jesus is “a” god separate from the Father.  I think Jesus is God of very God.

    The verses that I am ref'ing are those where, for instance, grammar is in question.

    Love,
    Mandy


    ???

    #102029
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Can you elaborate?

    :laugh:

    #102030

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,06:30)
    Can you elaborate?

    :laugh:


    Hi Mandy

    I was hoping that you would!

    :)

    #102032
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Now you have me laughing.

    Well, what is it that has you puzzled? Let's start from there….

    #102033

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,06:36)
    Now you have me laughing.

    Well, what is it that has you puzzled?  Let's start from there….


    Hi Mandy

  • 1.

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,06:27)
    I think that Jesus is God in that he is God's only begotten son.

  • 2.
    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,06:27)

    I think Jesus is God of very God.

  • 3
    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,06:27)
    The verses that I am ref'ing are those where, for instance, grammar is in question.

    WJ :)

#102036
Not3in1
Participant

1. God begets God.

2. See #1

3. Verses where grammar dictates Jesus is God instead of the context dictating that Jesus is God (Almighty). For instance:

Romans 9:5
Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen

#102038
Not3in1
Participant

Hi Keith,
I kinda waited around to see if you might repsond but now I see your light is off. So I'll check back later.

It's really not about disecting Romans 9:5 at all (that's been done about a zillion times), my point was just that verses like this one can lend themselves to different views based on grammar and context.

OK, chat later.
Mandy

#102041
Adam Pastor
Participant

Well, Personally, I am totally puzzled.  :(
Mandy what are talking about? What do you mean?

Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug 2008)
I think Jesus is God of very God.

What do you mean by that statement?

The Nicene Creed of AD325 speaks of “God of God, … very God of very God”.
Is this what you now believe?
Please explain what you mean by the above statement.

Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug 2008)
1. God begets God.

What do you mean by that statement?

Please explain what you mean by the above statement.

Like I said, you have now confused me.  :(
Please elaborate.

Thanks

#102042
Not3in1
Participant

Hi brother Adam,

Wow, considering you asked me “what do I mean” 5 times in a single post, I guess I certainly have confused you – sorry! :)

I'm trying to find places where we can be unified instead of running in opposite directions (I think we might actually get somewhere quicker in understand who Jesus is if we are more united). Keith believes that Jesus is God, I am trying to narrow the gap between us by conceeding that I also believe Jesus is God by confirming that he is indeed the Son of God.

Jesus is God's son therefore he is God of very God. Nathan is Dan's son therefore he is human of very human.

God begets God (it's not just for trinitarians anymore) :;):
Just as humans beget humans and animals beget animals….

Love,
Mandy

#102044

Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 19 2008,08:19)
Hi brother Adam,

Wow, considering you asked me “what do I mean” 5 times in a single post, I guess I certainly have confused you – sorry!  :)

I'm trying to find places where we can be unified instead of running in opposite directions (I think we might actually get somewhere quicker in understand who Jesus is if we are more united).  Keith believes that Jesus is God, I am trying to narrow the gap between us by conceeding that I also believe Jesus is God by confirming that he is indeed the Son of God.

Jesus is God's son therefore he is God of very God.  Nathan is Dan's son therefore he is human of very human.

God begets God (it's not just for trinitarians anymore)  :;):
Just as humans beget humans and animals beget animals….

Love,
Mandy


Hi Mandy

Personally I do not see where your theology is any different than LUs then?

Is there a scripture that says “God begat God”?

If Yeshua is God of gods, then how is he not “a” god?

???

Viewing 20 posts - 4,181 through 4,200 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account