Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,141 through 4,160 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #101386
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Adam and Mandy,
    2 Peter 1:1
    Simon Peter, a bond-servant and apostle of Jesus Christ, To those who have received a faith of the same kind as ours, by the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ:

    Peter, the very apostle of Jesus, the “rock” which the church is built on, calls the Son of God “our God and Savior, Jesus Christ.”

    Think about this you two, if you keep comforting one another in believing the error you are not really doing each other a favor. I appreciate the idea of comforting one another but Mandy, if Adam is dead wrong you are not helping him. Of course you must think he is right or you wouldn't purposefully enable him to stay blind would you? I don't think that you would do that.

    The verse in 2 Peter is the same in 3 of the earliest Greek manuscripts and shows no evidence of being tampered with. You can ignore it if you want.

    I think that is why we have 415 pages of this because of ignoring scriptures like this.

    IMO,
    Kathi

    #101393
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,

    Quote
    You can ignore it if you want.

    While your comment leads me to believe that you don't respect my ability to reason any scriptures out for myself (or with the help of the Spirit), I will acknowledge your condescending attitude towards me and other's, but I will leave it at that.

    I do not believe Adam is in error to believe there is One God (period). I believe scripture as we have it and perhaps how it has been handed down for even the manuscripts that we have available for comparison (remember even those are hand copied – copies!) could be in error. I do believe that strong passages of scripture that tell us God is One, and that he is the ONLY God should be heeded over the few that recognize any *other* as God or a god (including our dear Lord).

    Quote
    I think that is why we have 415 pages of this because of ignoring scriptures like this.


    Did you mean because we are ignoring your interpretation of these scriptures? Sister, it is not that clear-cut I'm afraid. You are not the first one to study the original languages, and you are certainly not the first one to have received a revelation regarding Jesus' preexistence! The curious thing that I find, however, is that you seem to think other's are in error if they do not stand behind you in your interpretations? I find many good interpretations here……yours is among them! :)

    Love,
    Mandy

    #101403
    RoyT01
    Participant

    Hello Mandy You said to lightenup referring to scripture “Sister, it is not that clear-cut I'm afraid. “Well the following are words directly from that one God you and Adam feel you are defending.
    Heb 1:8-12
    But about the Son he says,

    “Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
    and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
    9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
    therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
    by anointing you with the oil of joy.”

    10 He also says,
    “In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
    and the heavens are the work of your hands.
    11 They will perish, but you remain;
    they will all wear out like a garment.
    12 You will roll them up like a robe;
    like a garment they will be changed.
    But you remain the same,
    and your years will never end.”
    NIV

    You say I believe scripture as we have it and perhaps how it has been handed down for even the manuscripts that we have available for comparison (remember even those are hand copied – copies!) could be in error.

    Now I agree that there can be an error in scripture But are you trying to tell us that only you and Adam can decipher these errors That all the scriptures you and Adam have been given are spurious; including the three above?

    Of course the scripture was hand written even the Ten Commandments given to Moses were written by the hand of God.
    That one God you worship, in reference to his Son, is telling you above “”Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever,
    and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.
    Then in the very next verse The Almighty Father again destroys the foolishness of the trinity doctrine by saying “”…therefore God, YOUR GOD, has set you above your companions” Then in his own words the one God you worship is saying

    Heb 1:10
    “In the beginning, O Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
    and the heavens are the work of your hands. NIV
    What part of these three statements from the scriptures made by the one God you worship do you find unclear?
    Where do you find the documentation to back up your claim that these scripture are in error.

    Lets look at these scriptures from other versions
    Heb 1:8

    8 But to the Son He says:

    “Your throne, O God, is forever and ever;
    A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom.
    NKJV

    Heb 1:10
    You, LORD, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth,
    And the heavens are the work of Your hands.
    NKJV

    Heb 1:8

    8 But of the Son He says,

    “YOUR THRONE, O GOD, IS FOREVER AND EVER,
    AND THE RIGHTEOUS SCEPTER IS THE SCEPTER OF HIS KINGDOM.
    NASU

    Heb 1:10

    “YOU, LORD, IN THE BEGINNING LAID THE FOUNDATION OF THE EARTH,
    AND THE HEAVENS ARE THE WORKS OF YOUR HANDS;
    NASU

    Heb 1:8-10

    8 but of the Son (he saith,) Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever; And the sceptre of uprightness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

    9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee With the oil of gladness above thy fellows.

    10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning didst lay the foundation of the earth, And the heavens are the works of thy hands:
    ASV

    Heb 1:7-11
    8 but of his Son he says, “Your Kingdom, O God, will last forever and ever; its commands are always just and right. 9 You love right and hate wrong; so God, even your God, has poured out more gladness upon you than on anyone else.”

    10 God also called him “Lord” when he said, “Lord, in the beginning you made the earth, and the heavens are the work of your hands. 1
    TLB

    Heb 1:8

    8 But of the Son He says,

    “Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever,
    And the righteous scepter is the scepter of His kingdom.
    NASB

    Heb 1:10

    10 And,

    “Thou, Lord, in the beginning didst lay the foundation of the earth,
    And the heavens are the works of Thy hands;
    NASB

    Heb 1:8

    8 But to his Son he says,

    “Your throne, O God, endures forever and ever.
    NLT

    Heb 1:10

    10 And,

    “Lord, in the beginning you laid the foundation of the earth,
    and the heavens are the work of your hands.
    NLT

    Heb 1:8

    8 But of the Son he says,

    “Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever,
    the righteous scepter is the scepter of thy kingdom.
    RSV

    Heb 1:10

    10 And,

    “Thou, Lord, didst found the earth in the beginning,
    and the heavens are the work of thy hands;
    RSV
    Are all of these versions in error on thes three scriptures or is it that you cannot see because you will not look. Now I know you to be inteligent so I cannot believe that you think you know more than the God we all worship.

    RoyT01

    #101409
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Are all of these versions in error on thes three scriptures or is it that you cannot see because you will not look.

    Heb 1:8

    KJ, NE, TEV, Dy, JB, NAB, RS all state something like:
    “Of the Son he says, ‘Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever.’”

    AT, Mo, TC, By, NWT all state something like:
    “But with reference to the Son: ‘God is your throne forever and ever.’”

    Which rendering is harmonious with the context? The preceding verses say that God is speaking, not that he is being addressed; and the following verse uses the expression “God, thy God,” showing that the one addressed is not the Most High God but is a worshiper of that God. Hebrews 1:8 quotes from Psalm 45:6, which originally was addressed to a human king of Israel. Obviously, the Bible writer of this psalm did not think that this human king was Almighty God. Rather, Psalm 45:6, in RS, reads “Your divine throne.” (NE says, “Your throne is like God’s throne.” JP [verse 7]: “Thy throne given of God.”) Solomon, who was possibly the king originally addressed in Psalm 45, was said to sit “upon Jehovah’s throne.” (1 Chron. 29:23, NW) In harmony with the fact that God is the “throne,” or Source and Upholder of Christ’s kingship, Daniel 7:13, 14 and Luke 1:32 show that God confers such authority on him.

    Hebrews 1:8, 9 quotes from Psalm 45:6, 7, concerning which the Bible scholar B. F. Westcott states: “The LXX. admits of two renderings: [ho the·os′] can be taken as a vocative in both cases (Thy throne, O God, . . . therefore, O God, Thy God . . . ) or it can be taken as the subject (or the predicate) in the first case (God is Thy throne, or Thy throne is God . . . ), and in apposition to [ho the·os′ sou] in the second case (Therefore God, even Thy God . . . ). . . . It is scarcely possible that [’Elo·him′] in the original can be addressed to the king. The presumption therefore is against the belief that [ho the·os′] is a vocative in the LXX. Thus on the whole it seems best to adopt in the first clause the rendering: God is Thy throne (or, Thy throne is God), that is ‘Thy kingdom is founded upon God, the immovable Rock.’”—The Epistle to the Hebrews (London, 1889), pp. 25, 26.

    #101417
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Roy,

    Quote
    Now I agree that there can be an error in scripture But are you trying to tell us that only you and Adam can decipher these errors That all the scriptures you and Adam have been given are spurious; including the three above?


    Heavens, no! Where would you get such an idea?

    I'm glad that you are willing to look at the fact that the bible as we have it before us *could* contain misinformation. The point that I am trying to make is that none of us have the decoder pin to make complete sense of it all. If we did, we would all be in harmony with one answer to the question! :;):

    Quote
    Now I know you to be inteligent so I cannot believe that you think you know more than the God we all worship.


    Thank you for the back-handed compliment, I think? And of course you would be correct that I do not think I know more than the God we all worship. Key idea here: we all worship the same God! :)

    Love,
    Mandy

    #101423
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Aug. 15 2008,09:40)
    B. F. Westcott states: “The LXX. admits of two renderings: [ho the·os′] can be taken as a vocative in both cases (Thy throne, O God, . . . therefore, O God, Thy God . . . ) or it can be taken as the subject (or the predicate) in the first case (God is Thy throne, or Thy throne is God . . . ), and in apposition to [ho the·os′ sou] in the second case (Therefore God, even Thy God . . . ). . . . It is scarcely possible that [’Elo·him′] in the original can be addressed to the king. The presumption therefore is against the belief that [ho the·os′] is a vocative in the LXX. Thus on the whole it seems best to adopt in the first clause the rendering: God is Thy throne (or, Thy throne is God), that is ‘Thy kingdom is founded upon God, the immovable Rock.’”—The Epistle to the Hebrews (London, 1889), pp. 25, 26.


    Thank you, David. You have proved my point quite nicely and that is that everyone has ideas about what certain passages of scripture should (or does) say. Who is correct?

    With this uncertainty, should we strut about thinking that we have the ONLY interpretation possible and other's are completely misled, or worse, not a child of God at all? I dare say that more patience and tolerance for other's is needed.

    Mandy

    #101501
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi Mandy,
    I know people are trying to prove that Bible talks about Polytheim in believing more than one God. Let them interpret scriptures as per their wish. Even many biblical recorders have done in the past in the history of christianity which made this religion a mess than any other religion. If Bible controdicts its own I don't need such scriptures at all. What is that we are proving here our dogma or the truth ? If Paul or any biblical writer says two things which controdict each other I don't need such religion at all. I came here to understand the God of the Bible as it says every where there is only One God but I see here there are lot of mindblowing debates to prove more than one God. One says satan is also god and other says no no Jesus is also God. Which one I have to believe ? If one or two scriptures differ with what the hundreds of scriptures say on One God should I have to ignore those hundred scriptures to take the meaning of one or two scriptures ? or should have to interpret them in the light of those hundred scriptures which establish the Jewish Monotheism ?

    The Christianity in the past struggled for proving or disproving those two or few scriptures and killed many who opposed their dogma. I see utter confusion here. May the Only God the Father help us to know Him and His Son Jesus properly.

    Thanks and love to you
    Adam

    #101577
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 15 2008,19:20)
    I see utter confusion here. May the Only God the Father help us to know Him and His Son Jesus properly.


    Dear brother,

    This is nothing new. There has been confusion since Adam and Eve. Did Eve really know the consequences of her decision to eat the apple?

    It's my personal belief that we have been given the outer bits of the puzzle but some of the inside pieces are missing….. We can speculate, debate, accuse and point finger's, we can give-up, press on, hope….. But we won't know for certain until the Day comes when we see him face-to-face. What a glorious Day that will be.

    Take comfort in knowing that God rewards those who earnestly seek him. You are doing this, Adam. He didn't say that he rewards those who figure it all out or who find the ultimate truth. He rewards those who seek him with all their hearts. In my opinion the answers are optional, faith is required however.

    Have faith my brother. Don't worry if you don't have all the answers or if the bible seems to have holes in it (it indeed does) – God knows our situation. He knows we are but mud-men.

    Love to you,
    Mandy

    #101579

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 15 2008,04:17)
    Hi Kathi,

    Perhaps Adam is pointing out the fact that the Almighty has told us that there is no God beside him?

    Deuteronomy 32:39
    “See now that I myself am He! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand.

    Isaiah 44:8
    Do not tremble, do not be afraid. Did I not proclaim this and foretell it long ago? You are my witnesses. Is there any God besides me? No, there is no other Rock; I know not one.”

    I'm wondering, if Jesus is the “begotten God”, would God have said, “There is no God beside me except for my Son who is the begotten God.”  I'm not sure about this.

    Sometimes I wonder if we put scriptures together based on various translations (that *could be* tampered with) and determine that Jesus is a “god/God”?  That is why I was asking you about the Greek before to see if it panned out or not.

    I guess when one or two scriptures counter what other's are saying, it deserves some care.  Clearly the OT scriptures above are telling us that there is NO GOD BESIDE THE ALMIGHTY GOD, this would include a begotton God, imo.

    Thanks,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy

    You are exactly right.

    Hebrew monotheism doesn't allow for other God's.

    YHWH clearly states that we are not to even mention the name of such.

    And in all things that I have said unto you be circumspect: and make no mention of the name of other gods ('elohiym), neither let it be heard out of thy mouth. Exod 23:13

    YHWY has not changed his mind and given us a “begotten God”.

    The NASB stands alone in the interpretation of John 1:18.

    Sorry LU. The NET, NIV, ESV has the correct interpretation.

    The NET reads reads John 1:18…

    No one has ever seen God. The only one, himself God, who is in closest fellowship with the Father, has made God known.

    The NET written by 25 scholars who had access to over 60,000 translators notes explains why John 1:18 should be interpreted that way.

    45tc The textual problem μονογενὴς θεός (monogenh” qeo”, “the only God”) versus ὁ μονογενὴς υἱός (Jo monogenh” Juio”, “the only son”) is a notoriously difficult one. Only one letter would have differentiated the readings in the mss, since both words would have been contracted as nomina sacra: thus qMs or uMs. Externally, there are several variants, but they can be grouped essentially by whether they read θεός or υἱός. The majority of mss, especially the later ones (A C3 Θ Ψ �1,13 � lat), read ὁ μονογενὴς υἱός. �75 א1 33 pc have ὁ μονογενὴς θεός, while the anarthrous μονογενὴς θεός is found in �66 א* B C* L pc. The articular θεός is almost certainly a scribal emendation to the anarthrous θεός, for θεός without the article is a much harder reading. The external evidence thus strongly supports μονογενὴς θεός. Internally, although υἱός fits the immediate context more readily, θεός is much more difficult. As well, θεός also explains the origin of the other reading (υἱός), because it is difficult to see why a scribe who found υἱός in the text he was copying would alter it to θεός. Scribes would naturally change the wording to υἱός however, since μονογενὴς υἱός is a uniquely Johannine christological title (cf. John 3:16, 18; 1 John 4:9). But θεός as the older and more difficult reading is preferred. As for translation, it makes the most sense to see the word θεός as in apposition to μονογενής, and the participle ὁ ὤν (Jo wn) as in apposition to θεός, giving in effect three descriptions of Jesus rather than only two. (B. D. Ehrman, The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture, 81, suggests that it is nearly impossible and completely unattested in the NT for an adjective followed immediately by a noun that agrees in gender, number, and case, to be a substantival adjective: “when is an adjective ever used substantivally when it immediately precedes a noun of the same inflection?” This, however, is an overstatement. First, as Ehrman admits, μονογενής in John 1:14 is substantival. And since it is an established usage for the adjective in this context, one might well expect that the author would continue to use the adjective substantivally four verses later. Indeed, μονογενής is already moving toward a crystallized substantival adjective in the NT [cf. Luke 9:38; Heb 11:17]; in patristic Greek, the process continued [cf. PGL 881 s.v. 7]. Second, there are several instances in the NT in which a substantival adjective is followed by a noun with which it has complete concord: cf., e.g., Rom 1:30; Gal 3:9; 1 Tim 1:9; 2 Pet 2:5.) The modern translations which best express this are the NEB (margin) and TEV. Several things should be noted: μονογενής alone, without υἱός, can mean “only son,” “unique son,” “unique one,” etc. (see 1:14). Furthermore, θεός is anarthrous. As such it carries qualitative force much like it does in 1:1c, where θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος (qeo” hn Jo logo”) means “the Word was fully God” or “the Word was fully of the essence of deity.” Finally, ὁ ὤν occurs in Rev 1:4, 8; 4:8, 11:17; and 16:5, but even more significantly in the LXX of Exod 3:14. Putting all of this together leads to the translation given in the text.

    tn Or “The unique one.” For the meaning of μονογενής (monogenh”) see the note on “one and only” in 1:14.

    Source.

    One thing to note is even if Yeshua was the begotten god as LU states, John did not use the term in John 1:1. This term “the begotten god” is translated by the NASB in a post incarnation setting, after Yeshua came in the flesh.

    There is no such term refering to Yeshua found anywhere else in scriptures pre-incarnation or post incarnation which makes it more ambiguous.

    As far as Yeshua being the “firstborn of creation” in which she as well as others claim that somewhere way back in time Yeshua was born out of an aesexual God as a God is also ambiguous, since the word “firstborn” can also mean preeminence and not the first to be born.

    There is only one way to reconcile scriptures like 2 Peter 1:1 and Titus 2:13 and John 1:1-3 and John 20:28 and Col 1:16 and Hebrews 1:10 Etc, and you know what I believe.

    Unitarianism would be closer to reconciling the scriptures IMO, however that would mean Yeshua is not “theos” at all.

    I believe what the Apostles like Thomas and John and Paul and Peter had to say, he is my Lord and my God, my Great God and my o
    nly Saviour and I am not a Henotheist, but a follower of my only master Yeshua…

    For certain men have secretly slipped in among you – men who long ago16 were marked out for the condemnation I am about to describe – ungodly men who have turned the grace of our God into a license for evil and who deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ. Jude 1:4

    Yeshua said you can only have one master!

    Blessings WJ :)

    #101602
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    Isn't it strange to tell Mandy she is “exactly right” when your one God “Yeshua” is NOT her one God. You might as well congratulate her for making your God less than your “God” because that is what is being said.

    And then there is my understanding of who God is and He doesn't talk to Himself or refer to Himself as being His own son or His own Father.

    LU

    #101604
    before Time
    Participant

    Hi All

    There is one scripture which should satisfy this madness. Just kidding! Its John 17:3

    “This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent. NASU

    Here Jesus is praying to His Father, not himself, saying the expression “The only true God” for the Father. I challenge anyone to go to their bibles and find one instance where that expression is given to our Lord Jesus Christ or anyone else.

    Roy I found the card to get to heaven, and you can't have it. It's locked in a safe with two pit bulls guarding it in a location unknown to you or anyone else. Yicks I forgot where it is.  I’m going to spend my time looking for that map. Gota go!

    “Kathi do I get a prize for entering the 4150th post”

    Before Time

    #101606
    Irene
    Participant

    before time The last post was 417 not 4150 Post. Was that a typing error or did you really think 4150 post.
    Peace and Love Irene :D :( :D

    #101608

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 16 2008,10:25)
    Hi WJ,
    Isn't it strange to tell Mandy she is “exactly right” when your one God “Yeshua” is NOT her one God.  You might as well congratulate her for making your God less than your “God” because that is what is being said.

    And then there is my understanding of who God is and He doesn't talk to Himself or refer to Himself as being His own son or His own Father.

    LU


    Hi LU

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 16 2008,10:25)
    Isn't it strange to tell Mandy she is “exactly right” when your one God “Yeshua” is NOT her one God.

    Not at all. When Mandy reads scriptures that say there is only “One God” and “None other”, she has a right to be concerned when someone tells her there is also another god.

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 16 2008,10:25)
    You might as well congratulate her for making your God less than your “God” because that is what is being said.


    She has been around enough to know what I believe.

    Ha. It seems to me that you are the one making your “god”, Yeshua less than your God. That is not at all what I am saying.

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 16 2008,10:25)
    And then there is my understanding of who God is and He doesn't talk to Himself or refer to Himself as being His own son or His own Father.

    LU

    LU, I understand your frustration for not understanding my view, and I am sure this is why you resort to mimiking a Modalist view as if to say I am a Modalist.

    Could it be entirely Possible that God is Triune? After all the building blocks of all of creation is triune.

    You reject this concept because as you have shown by your statement above you do not logically understand it.

    I do give you credit though for going out on a limb with your Henotheistic view by calling Yeshua your Lord and God, unlike others who find it hard to call Yeshua “theos” for fear of Polytheism.

    Blessings WJ

    #101613

    Quote (before Time @ Aug. 16 2008,11:00)
    Hi All

    There is one scripture which should satisfy this madness. Just kidding! Its John 17:3

    “This is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent. NASU

    Here Jesus is praying to His Father, not himself, saying the expression “The only true God” for the Father. I challenge anyone to go to their bibles and find one instance where that expression is given to our Lord Jesus Christ or anyone else.

    Roy I found the card to get to heaven, and you can't have it. It's locked in a safe with two pit bulls guarding it in a location unknown to you or anyone else. Yicks I forgot where it is.  I’m going to spend my time looking for that map. Gota go!

    “Kathi do I get a prize for entering the 4150th post”

    Before Time

    Hi BT

    Quote (before Time @ Aug. 16 2008,11:00)

    I challenge anyone to go to their bibles and find one instance where that expression is given to our Lord Jesus Christ or anyone else.

    John recorded the words in John 17:3. I think he more than anyone knew what they meant.

    This same John who recorded John 17:3 also recorded John 1:1 and John 1:18 and John 20:28 and 1 John 5:20.

    Compare…

    And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us insight to know him who is true, and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. This one is the true God and eternal life. NET 1 John 5:20

    The NET Bible is a completely new translation of the Bible with 60,932 translators’ notes! It was completed by more than 25 scholars – experts in the original biblical languages – who worked directly from the best currently available Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts.

    This is what they say about 1 John 5:20, Emphasis mine…

    The pronoun This one (οὗτος, Joutos) refers to a person, but it is far from clear whether it should be understood as a reference (1) to God the Father or (2) to Jesus Christ. R. E. Brown (Epistles of John [AB], 625) comments, “I John, which began with an example of stunning grammatical obscurity in the prologue, continues to the end to offer us examples of unclear grammar.” The nearest previous antecedent is Jesus Christ, immediately preceding, but on some occasions when this has been true the pronoun still refers to God (see 1 John 2:3). The first predicate which follows This one in 5:20, the true God, is a description of God the Father used by Jesus in John 17:3, and was used in the preceding clause of the present verse to refer to God the Father (him who is true). Yet the second predicate of This one in 5:20, eternal life, appears to refer to Jesus, because although the Father possesses “life” (John 5:26, 6:57) just as Jesus does (John 1:4, 6:57, 1 John 5:11), “life” is never predicated of the Father elsewhere, while it is predicated of Jesus in John 11:25 and 14:6 (a self-predication by Jesus). If This one in 5:20 is understood as referring to Jesus, it forms an inclusion with the prologue, which introduced the reader to “the eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us.” Thus it appears best to understand the pronoun This one in 5:20 as a reference to Jesus Christ. The christological affirmation which results is striking, but certainly not beyond the capabilities of the author (see John 1:1 and 20:28): This One [Jesus Christ] is the true God and eternal life.

    Source.

    Now that your challange has been met, do I get a prize? :)

    Blessings WJ

    #101616
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 16 2008,05:21)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 15 2008,19:20)
    I see utter confusion here. May the Only God the Father help us to know Him and His Son Jesus properly.


    Dear brother,

    This is nothing new.  There has been confusion since Adam and Eve.  Did Eve really know the consequences of her decision to eat the apple?  

    It's my personal belief that we have been given the outer bits of the puzzle but some of the inside pieces are missing…..  We can speculate, debate, accuse and point finger's, we can give-up, press on, hope…..  But we won't know for certain until the Day comes when we see him face-to-face.  What a glorious Day that will be.

    Take comfort in knowing that God rewards those who earnestly seek him.  You are doing this, Adam.  He didn't say that he rewards those who figure it all out or who find the ultimate truth.  He rewards those who seek him with all their hearts.  In my opinion the answers are optional, faith is required however.

    Have faith my brother.  Don't worry if you don't have all the answers or if the bible seems to have holes in it (it indeed does) – God knows our situation.  He knows we are but mud-men.

    Love to you,
    Mandy


    Hi Sis,
    Thank you very much for your comforting words for me. Really God's Spirit is in you when you said “Take comfort in knowing that God rewards those who earnestly seek him”. What else I need than His consoling words from my loving sister.

    May God continue to bless you with such love and compassion for distressed souls.

    Thanks and love to you
    Adam

    #101617
    before Time
    Participant

    Hi WJ

    Not so fast WJ you don’t get the prize until we iron this out. The challenge was to find one scripture where anyone except the Father is called the only true God. You said you found one. But let’s take a further look if you did.

    1 John 5:20 And we know that the Son of God has come and has given us insight to know58 him who is true, and we are in him who is true, in his Son Jesus Christ. “This one”59 is the true God and eternal life

    As you can see the predictor added the words “this one” which changes the scripture to suggest it referred to Christ. And yet the interpreters are “far” from sure if it refers to the Father or the Son. I got this from the source you presented in your last post. No need to post the rest because the words “it appears” and words of the equivalent nature run rampant to complete it.

    sn The pronoun “This one” (οὗτος, Joutos) refers to a person, but it is “far from clear” whether it should be understood as a reference (1) to God the Father or (2) to Jesus Christ

    We don’t find this problematic in John 17:3 with the Net Bible and other translations, where it is quite obvious it means the Father only.

    John 17:3 Now this7 is eternal life8 – that they know “you, the only true God”, and Jesus Christ,9 whom you sent “Net Bible”

    John 17:3 “This is eternal life, that they may know “You, the only true God”, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent. “NASU Bible”

    So the challenge remains and I get the prize if I can only find it. You can have the next one.

    We don't find this problematic in John 17:3 with the Net Bible and other translations, where it is quite obvious it means the Father only.

    Yet you do get the prize for finding a bible with the expression. Good Job.

    God Bless

    #101619
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi BT,
    Welcome to this wonderful family of Heavennet. I think you started a new debate on knowing the “Only True God” It is my favourite topic too. Bible can not controdict itself nor Jesus' words can not controdict themselves. I believe Father is only the True God as per Jesus' words as in Jn 17:3, but you have to remmber that Jesus is the True image of that “only True God the Father”. He is the perfect dwelling for that One and Only God bodily as per Col 2:9

    “For in him dwells the whole fullness of the deity  bodily”

    Of course that doesn't make himself as the One God. When I see Jesus I see the True God in him not any lesser diety or a god as many are claiming here. He is true representation of One God in three-dimentional image so that we can understand the invisible God. We see God in the face of Jesus as per 2 Cor 4:
    3 “And even though our gospel is veiled, it is veiled for those who are perishing,
    4 in whose case the god of this age has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, so that they may not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.
    5 For we do not preach ourselves but Jesus Christ as Lord, and ourselves as your slaves for the sake of Jesus.
    6 For God who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to bring to light the knowledge of the glory of God on the face of (Jesus) Christ”.

    This is what I believe about God and Jesus. God gave Jesus equal status in the plan of Salvation of mankind. That's why John says in Jn 17:3
    “Now this is eternal life, that they should know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ”.

    For our Salvation both are important God always liked His son in this whole creation and Salvation plan.

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam

    #101628
    Irene
    Participant

    Adam I find it interesting that you quote John 17:3 First it talks about God the Father and then ONE WHOM YOU SENT, JESUS CHRIST.
    You say that God sent Jesus but do not believe in the preexisting of Jesus Christ. Question is were did God sent Jesus from?
    Peace and Love Irene

    #101634
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Aug. 16 2008,06:26)
    One thing to note is even if Yeshua was the begotten god as LU states, John did not use the term in John 1:1. This term “the begotten god” is translated by the NASB in a post incarnation setting, after Yeshua came in the flesh.

    There is no such term refering to Yeshua found anywhere else in scriptures pre-incarnation or post incarnation which makes it more ambiguous.


    Hi Keith,

    Interesting point you have made here. I'll ponder this some more.

    Thanks, bro.
    Mandy

    #101635
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Kathi,

    Quote
    Isn't it strange to tell Mandy she is “exactly right” when your one God “Yeshua” is NOT her one God.


    There's really no need to speak for me. I do believe that Jesus is the Son of God and so does Keith. I believe that the One true God is the Father and so does Keith. To my knowledge, Keith's God IS my God!

    How he understands Jesus' role in the Godhead is a bit different from how I currently understand it. But I am not as exclusive in my belief system as you are. I would say that Keith and I indeed DO serve and glorify the same God Almighty.

    Quote
    And then there is my understanding of who God is and He doesn't talk to Himself or refer to Himself as being His own son or His own Father.


    A patronizing spirit will not gain any converts, I'm afraid. If your message is indeed given to you via personal revelation and you are to proclaim it, I'm only left to assume you will recognize that making fun of other's beliefs is not part of the equation below. Instead, I encourage you to encourage other's and remain considerate towards other's.

    James 3:17
    But the wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere.

    Love,
    Mandy

Viewing 20 posts - 4,141 through 4,160 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account