Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,041 through 4,060 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #100692
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (theodorej @ Aug. 08 2008,02:35)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 06 2008,04:35)

    Quote (theodorej @ Aug. 06 2008,00:31)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 05 2008,18:21)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 05 2008,17:40)
    Hi not3,
    His birth?
    He was born of woman.
    Jb25
    4How then can man be justified with God? or how can he be clean that is born of a woman?

    5Behold even to the moon, and it shineth not; yea, the stars are not pure in his sight.

    6How much less man, that is a worm? and the son of man, which is a worm?


    Sure, birth is birth for most of us – no big deal.

    But what was growing inside of Mary was the only child of God Almighty.  No other child grew from conception that was of God.  No other.  

    When Jesus was born, it WAS a big deal.


    Greetings Mandi…..Jesus'birth was a big deal,in as much as it marked the beginning of his ministry and the fullfillment of prophesy….From a carnal point of view the scriptures never bothered to take note of the exact day he was born(eg.His Birthday)because in Gods eyes birthdays are not that important….


    Yes, agreed.

    That AND our heavenly Father had just had a bouncy, baby boy made in his image.

    Instead of passing out cigars he had a host of angels come and sing!  I bet that was some show!   :;):   I doubt that would have happened just to mark a ministry beginning, but maybe?


    Greetings Mandi…..Point well taken,however,the celebration of the birth of Jesus with respect to the singing angels were for the purpose of announcment….and after the celebration the date that all these things happened slipped into obsurity,never to be noted or celebrated….least of all at the time of the winter soltice…


    I imagine there were many things that were not recorded.  Besides, I believe they celebrated “birthdays” a little differently back then.  There is no doubt that days were counted and folks kept track of how long they lived.  For instance, we know how long Adam lived, Moses lived and so on.  So if nothing else, a “birthday” was probably acknowledged by writing it down in a log somewhere.

    I would not gloss over the heavenly announcement of the Son of God.  It's important and there is meaning there for those who ponder it.

    Thanks Theo,
    Mandy

    #100693
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 08 2008,08:05)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Aug. 08 2008,02:12)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Aug. 07 2008,07:39)
    Hi not3,
    So the Word was not with God but in Him?


    How many different ways do you suppose we could interpret, “…with him….”?  

    Was he physically with him?
    Was he spiritually with him?
    Was he a part of him and so with him?


    Hi not3,
    If it meant anything other than the simple meaning of WITH scripture would say so.


    I would challenge you to do a word study on “with”. I know you like to say, “With means with.” but it's a little more involved than that. The word allows for more than the obvious meaning of in the company of someone.

    #100694
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (RoyT01 @ Aug. 09 2008,04:57)
    Whenever someone attempts to rewrite the scriptures by using their own interpretations they get into trouble. To begin with the Almighty God we serve does not need any help with interpretations from us concerning that great majestic work of His word, which He has already accomplished quite superbly.


    Hi Roy,

    I was about to respond to a previous post of yours when I found the quote above – you were responding to Adam.

    With all due respect, even you bring unique interpretations here to the board (we all do). I certainly wouldn't chastize another brother for sharing his interpretations. To a large degree, we all “rewrite the scriptures” to skew left or right depending on whatever view we may have a the time.

    Take care,
    Mandy

    #100695
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (RoyT01 @ Aug. 08 2008,02:22)
    John 17:4-5
    4 I have brought you glory on earth by completing the work you gave me to do.
    5 And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

    And just to make sure we understand what he is saying he confirms that preexistence  in later verse in that same chapter of John


    Hello again,

    Roy, have you read through this thread?  It may be helpful for you to see which verses have been hotly debated.

    Your interpretation of the above passage is not convincing.  It proves nothing.  Really, if it was that cut-and-dry do you think we would even be having this discussion?  More study is needed on all of our parts.

    Have a great weekend,
    Mandy

    #100727
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi brother Roy,
    Thanks for your response on preexistence but you have not answered my question on why not Jesus was aksing for the glory just before his birth on earth if he was having one physically and literally?
    Why he was asking only the glory which was before the foundations of the world?
    Do you not see the logic behind these questions ?

    You have questioned my interpretations stating them they are of human but what about your ignorance and biased interpretations on Eph 1:4-5 and 1 Pet 1:20 ?

    Please come out from your comfortable zone and see the scriptures what exactly they mean and you will see wonders. You have to unlearn many things to learn truth from the scriptures.

    peace and blessings
    Adam

    #100743
    Irene
    Participant

    Quote (RoyT01 @ Aug. 08 2008,02:22)
    First, I would like to thank all those who welcomed me to Heaven net.  Second I have looked at the many comments on the debate of the preexistence of the only begotten Son of God. Everyone seems to have There own concepts and ideas concerning this event which took place before our universe was begun.  However, that debate was settled  By our Lord and Christ during a prayer to His father when he was here on earth completing what had been preordained by the Father before the creation of our  universe was even started  This is Christ speaking in a prayer to his Father

    John 17:4-5
    4 I have brought you glory on earth by completing the work you gave me to do.
    5 And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

    And just to make sure we understand what he is saying he confirms that preexistence  in later verse in that same chapter of John

    John 17:24
    24 “Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world.
    NIV

    Since or Lord is referring to his glory in a time before creation was instigated by his Father and himself why should we doubt his credabiliy  by saying we know more than he does about something only He an d His father were present for.

    I am happy to be here in heaven Net because you all seem to be looking to underststand What our Creator has told us in His wondrous word


    Welcome Roy! There are a few of us that do believe that Jesus preexisted before the world began. I am one of those. To me Col. 1:15 means firstborn of all creation. Also
    Rev. 3:14 … ” This things says the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, the beginning of the creation of God.”
    He is with God in the beginning John 1:1
    To me it is clear.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #100756
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Irene @ Aug. 08 2008,22:43)

    Quote (RoyT01 @ Aug. 08 2008,02:22)
    First, I would like to thank all those who welcomed me to Heaven net.  Second I have looked at the many comments on the debate of the preexistence of the only begotten Son of God. Everyone seems to have There own concepts and ideas concerning this event which took place before our universe was begun.  However, that debate was settled  By our Lord and Christ during a prayer to His father when he was here on earth completing what had been preordained by the Father before the creation of our  universe was even started  This is Christ speaking in a prayer to his Father

    John 17:4-5
    4 I have brought you glory on earth by completing the work you gave me to do.
    5 And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

    And just to make sure we understand what he is saying he confirms that preexistence  in later verse in that same chapter of John

    John 17:24
    24 “Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world.
    NIV

    Since or Lord is referring to his glory in a time before creation was instigated by his Father and himself why should we doubt his credabiliy  by saying we know more than he does about something only He an d His father were present for.

    I am happy to be here in heaven Net because you all seem to be looking to underststand What our Creator has told us in His wondrous word


    Welcome Roy!  There are a few of us that do believe that Jesus preexisted before the world began. I am one of those. To me Col. 1:15 means firstborn of all creation. Also
    Rev. 3:14 … ” This things says the Amen, the Faithful and True Witness, the beginning of the creation of God.”
    He is with God in the beginning John 1:1
    To me it is clear.
    Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Roy and Irene.
    I am happy to agree with you on the pre-existence of Christ. When we look at this verse:

    “Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was.”

    That is exactly what we read.

    It seems that others read that verse as if it were saying:

    “Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory YOU HAD FOR ME before the world was.”

    But it doesn't!

    Do they think that Christ didn't know how to get His message across? Couldn't He have said the other words if that is what He meant. Does He need their help to retranslate the verse? I don't think so.

    It means what is says it means.

    Blessings to you,
    Kathi

    #100760
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi all,
    I want to share some new thoughts on Jesus birth. We know God created Adam from the dust of the ground and the first woman Eve was created from Adam the first man. We also know Jesus became the second Adam who was the promised “Seed of woman”. I want to throw a question to you if God created first woman from Adam then why is it so difficult for Him to create the second Adam Jesus the man from woman alone a virgin ? I believe God can not be a biological Father of Jesus which can only possible in mythology like Hunduism not in Jewish Monotheism. But God can become Father of Jesus by His Holy Spirit which was full in Jesus by which He manifested God to us fully. The 'word of God' became flesh in man Jesus means God was in Jesus and spoken to us in these last dayes as per Heb 1:1-2

    1 “In times past, God spoke in partial and various ways to our ancestors through the prophets;
    2 in these last days, he spoke to us through a son”

    I also believe Jesus is the true image of the invisible and immortal God not another begotten God but was born(made) in a unique way through a woman by the Holy Spirit of God which is the creating agency of God (Gal 4:4).

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam

    #100764
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 09 2008,00:32)
    Hi all,
    I want to share some new thoughts on Jesus birth. We know God created Adam from the dust of the ground and the first woman Eve was created from Adam the first man. We also know Jesus became the second Adam who was the promised “Seed of woman”. I want to throw a question to you if God created first woman from Adam then why is it so difficult for Him to create the second Adam Jesus the man from woman alone a virgin ? I believe God can not be a biological Father of Jesus which can only possible in mythology like Hunduism not in Jewish Monotheism. But God can become Father of Jesus by His Holy Spirit which was full in Jesus by which He manifested God to us fully. The 'word of God' became flesh in man Jesus means God was in Jesus and spoken to us in these last dayes as per Heb 1:1-2

    1 “In times past, God spoke in partial and various ways to our ancestors through the prophets;
    2 in these last days, he spoke to us through a son”

    I also believe Jesus is the true image of the invisible and immortal God not another begotten God but was born(made) in a unique way through a woman by the Holy Spirit of God which is the creating agency of God (Gal 4:4).

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Hi Adam,
    Wasn't the act of creation completed by day seven of the creation week? Anything said to be “created” after that was more like “regenereated” as in “create in me a new heart”. So, I do not think He created the second Adam since the act of creating was finished.

    Now, I want to throw a question to you, is it so hard for God to reproduce another like himself, a true image of the invisible and immortal God?

    Kathi

    #100770
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Reproduce  by which means by creation as mentioned in Gen 1 & 5 or in what way?

    “This is the book of the generations of Adam.   In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him.   Male and female created he them;  and blessed them and called their name Adam,  in the day when they were created”

    Do you think the one who is born to a creation is not a creation ?

    So you are not a part of this creation ? How do you interpret the meaning of Jesus being the first born of all creation as mentioned in Col 1, if he is not part of this creation?

    You first answer them my Sis.
    Thanks
    Adam

    #100772
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 09 2008,15:55)
    It seems that others read that verse as if it were saying:

    “Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory YOU HAD FOR ME before the world was.”

    But it doesn't!

    Do they think that Christ didn't know how to get His message across? Couldn't He have said the other words if that is what He meant. Does He need their help to retranslate the verse? I don't think so.

    It means what is says it means.


    Hi Kathi,

    I'm always a bit disappointed when I hear you using snide remarks to get your point accross. You really don't need to, do you?

    Of course Jesus could have used different words to describe the glory he had with the Father, but he really didn't need to. We are told of the glory of Jesus in John:

    John 1:14

    14The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[a] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

    Jesus' glory is that of the Son. Jesus was with the Father in the beginning. This does not prove preexistence. As I have pointed out to Nick, “with” has a variety of meanings when taken out all the way. A little word with big meaning.

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #100773
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 09 2008,16:32)
    I want to throw a question to you if God created first woman from Adam then why is it so difficult for Him to create the second Adam Jesus the man from woman alone a virgin ?


    Hi Adam,

    Let me ask you something, brother. Why is it so offensive to you that perhaps God contributed to his Son like you have contributed to your son?

    Mandy

    #100778
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Because God is not a man or a son of man to be treated like that. 'God begets God' is some thing to do with mythology not for Jewish monotheism. Please understand that who is born to creation like Mary can not be another God but can only be another man as Paul rightly says as “there is one God and one mediator Christ Jesus the man between men and God. There can never be a demi-god or God/man as often quote. Please say Jesus is the man in perfect image of True God being not himself is that God.

    Love to you
    Adam

    #100797
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Welcome RoyT01.

    I look forward to hear what you have to say.

    So far I agree with 2 of your posts I read in this discussion, regarding Jesus being the literal firstborn of all creation.

    #100803
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi Mandy,
    I am sorry to disappoint you if my boldness lessens my effectiveness with you. I stand up for the truth as I feel God has shown me and I try to give reasons as best I can. I will never please all people when I am standing up for a truth that doesn't jive with what others believe, nevertheless, I will stand up for it by God's strength. I can only hope to be more effective with you for the sake of truth.

    Please pray for me in that regard,
    Kathi

    #100805
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 09 2008,02:57)
    Reproduce  by which means by creation as mentioned in Gen 1 & 5 or in what way?

    “This is the book of the generations of Adam.   In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him.   Male and female created he them;  and blessed them and called their name Adam,  in the day when they were created”

    Do you think the one who is born to a creation is not a creation ?

    So you are not a part of this creation ? How do you interpret the meaning of Jesus being the first born of all creation as mentioned in Col 1, if he is not part of this creation?

    You first answer them my Sis.
    Thanks
    Adam


    Hi Adam,
    I understand creation as something that is a first of its kind. I understand a reproduction as a second or third or billionth of its kind. Granted some things like stars were created as a group and all at once existed.

    I am from someone that was created, Eve yet I came by the process of reproduction, not creation. We are all a part of that creation but none of us are the first man or woman.

    I believe that the “holy one” came from someone that was not created. I believe the Son of God came by the process of reproduction, not creation and that happened before anything was in heaven or on earth.

    I see the “firstBORN” of creation different than the “first created” of creation. I believe that the Son of God was not the first of His kind but the first reproduction and last reproduction of His kind. The first reproduction will never be equal to the original of its kind and will never be less than the first reproduction of its kind. I believe that the “only” begotten God is the first and last reproduction of His always existent Father, the only true God, the Father is the first of His kind, the Son is the second and last of His kind. The Son will be the firstborn of many brothers and sisters but His brothers and sisters will be adopted by the Father and not reproduced of the Father.

    God's Son was the firstborn and only born God of all creation, in otherwords of all living things. Cain was the firstborn man of creation. Adam was not the firstborn man of creation although Adam was the first man. Cain came by reproduction, not creation. Adam came by creation, not reproduction. Do you see the difference, Adam?

    I don't mind your questions at all but please consider my anwers.
    Kathi

    #100808
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 10 2008,02:15)
    I can only hope to be more effective with you for the sake of truth.


    Thanks, Kathi.

    I appreciate your willingness to try and understand my and other's feelings.

    Remember that you are sharing the truth that you believe God has shown you. Other's also believe that God has shown them truth. We all believe we have heard from the same Spirit of God. Therefore it is a good thing to treat other's with respect and kindness.

    One thing I do hold against orthodox believer's and those who are staunch in their thinking is that they leave no room for other's to potentially be correct, or even partially correct. It's usually all or nothing. This does not fit in with the truth of God that mercy triumphs over judgement! I've said this recently and it bears saying again – many will be surprised to see who is standing next to them on that Day and being counted, along with them, as children of God.

    Love,
    Mandy

    #100819
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Mandy,
    Yes it is good to treat others with respect and kindness but tough love doesn't always look like that. Jesus didn't come across too respectful and kind when He approached those buying and selling in the temple. Still He did love them.

    Mark 11:15-18

    Then they came to Jerusalem. And He entered the temple and began to drive out those who were buying and selling in the temple, and overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those who were selling doves; 16 and He would not permit anyone to carry merchandise through the temple. 17 And He began to teach and say to them, “Is it not written, 'MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED A HOUSE OF PRAYER FOR ALL THE NATIONS'? But you have made it a ROBBERS'DEN.”
    NASU

    Love,
    Kathi

    #100821
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Aug. 09 2008,16:32)
    Hi all,
    I want to share some new thoughts on Jesus birth. We know God created Adam from the dust of the ground and the first woman Eve was created from Adam the first man. We also know Jesus became the second Adam who was the promised “Seed of woman”. I want to throw a question to you if God created first woman from Adam then why is it so difficult for Him to create the second Adam Jesus the man from woman alone a virgin ? I believe God can not be a biological Father of Jesus which can only possible in mythology like Hunduism not in Jewish Monotheism. But God can become Father of Jesus by His Holy Spirit which was full in Jesus by which He manifested God to us fully. The 'word of God' became flesh in man Jesus means God was in Jesus and spoken to us in these last dayes as per Heb 1:1-2

    1 “In times past, God spoke in partial and various ways to our ancestors through the prophets;
    2 in these last days, he spoke to us through a son”

    I also believe Jesus is the true image of the invisible and immortal God not another begotten God but was born(made) in a unique way through a woman by the Holy Spirit of God which is the creating agency of God (Gal 4:4).

    Thanks and blessings
    Adam


    Hi GM,
    So Jesus did not have human genes but only genes from his mother? If so then no matter what you call him he was not a man.

    We know he was only fully baptised in the Spirit of God at the Jordan but you say that was when he BECAME the Son of God?

    #100876
    RoyT01
    Participant

    [QUOTE]With all due respect, even you bring unique interpretations here to the board (we all do). I certainly wouldn't chastize another brother for sharing his interpretations. To a large degree, we all “rewrite the scriptures” to skew left or right depending on whatever view we may have a the time.[QUOTE]

Viewing 20 posts - 4,041 through 4,060 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account