‘Where is God exactly’ Introduction

Scientists believe that space is something. Even between electrons, there is something. They call it dark matter and dark energy because it cannot be seen.

If you took away all that was visible from the universe, except you and you were able to spin around, what would you be spinning around in relation to? Well that would be space itself. It is said that your arms would still fly out if you spun around because of space itself.

I sometimes think of the universe as layers. What would happen if we went down to the smallest layer what would we find? God? If we went the other way and traveled to the edge of the universe and took a peek, what would we find? God? (I understand that God is invisible, so you wouldn’t literally see him). So perhaps the physical realm is but that which sits between the smallest and the biggest. A certain state that God holds with his Word.

Interestingly enough, The Planck Length describes the limits of the physical realm because if you draw a line from A to B and do so in half distance increments, then you would mathematically be able to travel forever in a straight line and never reach the end. How could that be?

If you divide time or space and keep doing that would it also go forever? Apparently not. There is a length that is so small it is indivisible. When you drill down to the smallest of things, the laws of the physical universe are no longer what you see, thus why Quantum Physics is so hard to understand. Is that an edge or a boundary to the universe if the universe is defined as being governed by physical laws? Because you cannot keep dividing matter and still see matter forever, it stands to reason that there must exist something beyond that and that something would have to be everywhere.

Perhaps beyond this micro boundary and beyond the macro boundary is where God’s Spirit resides. He is the beginning and the end. The smallest and the biggest. He is bigger than the universe and can dwell inside the smallest atom. He dwells in the universe by his spirit and also outside the universe, because even the universe cannot contain him.

Just ideas, and a possible way to see how creation is sustained by God. Unlike the view that God doesn’t exist because we cannot see him, or that God is the Universe itself, this can explain why we can’t see God and  why he is not the atom itself. It also explains how God can be in everything and yet not be everything, rather he can reside in all things as well as be beyond the Universe itself.

Maybe the macro and micro is the place where God’s Spirit resides and he connects the two.

This post has now been compiled into a more extensive writing of the same name.

“Where is God exactly?”

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 101 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #808905
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    First listen to the Spirit and you will avoid the rest of their errors.

    #808915
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    So I am full of errors Nick?

    #808918
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    When you listen to the Spirit your misconceptions will be quickly sorted out.

    #808923
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Nick, you are not suppose to judge people this way. It is wrong.

    You were once a moderator here, and you of all people should know better. You realise that I cannot show favoritism but as a moderator I extend more grace to you and ask to please refrain from acting this way toward others here. The forums are for challenging teachings, not to cast stones at each other. Otherwise I have no option to impose a partial ban that has been imposed on a few for the same reason.

    #808927
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    Those who judge their own ideas and teachings to be sound need to have those things tested by the Word.

    #808933
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    I agree, but Nick, please judge my or other’s teachings only. Do not pass judgement on the state of my or other people’s soul or salvation. I encourage you to look at the rules of the forums. These rules are in place to stop the forums degenerating into a war of accusations and fiery darts. The purpose of these forums is not the latter even though that drives more traffic to the site. It is to challenge doctrines and teachings only. Please abide by the rules. If you cannot, then there are other forums out there that will cater for that kind of behaviour. This one is not meant to be for hurling accusations at each other. It wasn’t setup for that purpose. Please be respectful.

    #808948
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    Certainly.

    It is all about the work of The Spirit among men.

     

    That is basic and you agree.

    #808994
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Agreed it is about the Spirit. But a man can say he has the Spirit, but if the evidence is not there, then saying and having are two different things. Those who are born of God, love, and those who love are born of God. People can argue all day that they have the spirit, but there are many spirits that a person can receive. As people we are not entirely blind. We can see the fruit of the Spirit and we can see the evidence of love.

    Love

    • Love is patient,
    • love is kind.
    • It does not envy,
    • it does not boast,
    • it is not proud.
    • It does not dishonor others,
    • it is not self-seeking,
    • it is not easily angered,
    • it keeps no record of wrongs

    Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God; and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love.

    #808995
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi T8,

    How come you feel personally involved when it is your teachings that are under discussion?

    It was never about you.

     

    #809005
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Sorry Nick, you made it about me. You said I was not being led by the Spirit. Now you deny it? Shall I copy and paste your accusations against me here? But I am not even truly upset about it, God is my witness, I am secure in what I believe and have scripture to back it up. In fact it is simple, I just believe scripture. No, I have no problem when people accuse me of this or that if it is not true. I would only be upset if it were actually true because then I would need to change.

    I only brought your accusations up because I am a moderator and you were breaking the rules which state to not get personal. That rule is there because before the rules, the forums were degenerating into a slinging match where fiery darts of accusation were flying every which way. While that was good for the traffic on the site as it seems that people feel compelled to view such an event, when I banned it by imposing rules, yes the traffic in the site went down. Such is humanity. But the good people on the forums noticed a difference afterward as there were less hostilities.

    Regardless, I have posted a definition of love. And love is a requirement of the Spirit. So if you keep telling us that we need the Spirit or to be born again as you do, then yes we all need the Spirit. But if you say it because you imply that we have not the Spirit, then I will remind you about the evidence of that Spirit so that you have to judge yourself and not others.

    Those who are born-again love others and are kind and will not dishonor others.

    #809007
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    God is love and those that are born of God love others and do not dishonor them. Love is the greatest even greater than hope and faith because God is love and his children have his nature.

    #809008
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    Neither is it about me.

    there is much we all have to learn.

    let’s start with the ESSENCE-the work of the Spirit of God

    #809012
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Correct. It is not about you. We do not fight against flesh and blood.

    If a person teaches that Jesus Christ wasn’t born in a manger (or came in the flesh), or that Jesus is just a man and not the Christ, then then it is the spirit behind that teaching that needs to be tested. Once the spirit is tested and found to be Antichrist, then any victims of the teaching have a chance to recognize the spirit and come out of that spirit’s influence.

    If it is one thing that has been done in this site since the beginning, it is to test the teachings and to test the spirits. This site is a place defined by that. All is able to be tested, even so-called sacred doctrines. You know this from the days when many came here teaching the Trinity.

    #809013
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    And how will you test these things?

    Against a natural view of spiritual things?

     

    Since you have consecrated your own ideas as truth could it be fair?

    #809031
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Scripture will reproof and correct, even rebuke. I will continue doing that.

    I do not subscribe to secret hidden meanings in verses, especially ones that draw opposite conclusions to what is written. I believe they mean what they say and will use them to expose false teachings when they appear here. So the following verse:

    Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord

    means that a baby called Jesus was born as the Savior , the Messiah, and the Lord.

    Whereas the hidden secret you seem to have is the text is actually saying that he is not the Messiah and Lord, but that would only happen a few years before he died, around thirty or so years after his birth.

    #809054
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    It is your site and you can do what you will.

    The Spirit of God has never been welcomed among men of the earth.

    #809058
    Miia
    Participant

    Just a heads up.

    Apparently, the adoptionist view was common in the early church more so than today.

    From Wikipedia:

    The Shepherd of Hermas (Greek: Ποιμὴν τοῦ Ἑρμᾶ, Poimēn tou Herma; sometimes just called The Shepherd) is a Christian literary work of the late 1st or mid-2nd century, considered a valuable book by many Christians, and considered canonical scripture by some of the early Church fathers such as Irenaeus.[1][2] The Shepherd was very popular amongst Christians in the 2nd and 3rd centuries.[3] It was bound as part of the New Testament[1][4] in the Codex Sinaiticus, and it was listed between the Acts of the Apostles and the Acts of Paul in the stichometrical list of the Codex Claromontanus.

    In parable 5, the author mentions a Son of God, as a virtuous man filled with a Holy “pre-existent spirit” and adopted as the Son.[7] In the 2nd century, adoptionism (the view that Jesus Christ was at least initially, only a mortal man) was one of two competing doctrines about Jesus’ true nature, the other being that he pre-existed as a divine spirit (Logos); Christ’s identity with the Logos (Jn 1:1) was affirmed in 325 at the First Council of Nicaea.[8] Bogdan G. Bucur, however, notes how widely accepted the Shepherd of Hermas was among “orthodox” Christians, yet was never criticized for apparently exhibiting an adoptionistic Christology.

     

    #809074
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Miia, I read that parable.

    But couldn’t see where it references Jesus as a mortal man made immortal by the Spirit.

    What I read was a story about a servant who upon not only obeying the commandments did extra good works to please the LORD. Upon inspection of the LORD at what he had done to turn a weed filled field into a vineyard, he was so pleased that he decided to make him a son and share the inheritance of his already existing son.

    Perhaps I read the wrong parable or something. Maybe you can guide me to the exact place.

    The Shepherd of Hermas

    Try CTRL F and type in ‘Parable/Similitude V’ once you are there. That is what I read.

    #809075
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    It is your site and you can do what you will.

    The Spirit of God has never been welcomed among men of the earth.

    It helps to keep to the discussion at hand and not make random negative comments that help no one.

    You should be able to prove your doctrine with scripture. If you cannot, then no amount of negative feedback will change the fact that you haven’t supported your view with scripture and that you have not been able to argue against the scriptures given you.

    #809079
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi t8,

    Do we need to prove to you that Jesus of Nazareth was anointed with the Holy Spirit and power and went about doing good?

    scripture says that

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 101 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account