Did Jesus Christ exist before his birth on Earth?

Baby Jesus

It seems that most who call themselves Christian belong to one of two camps. Jesus is either God or a mere created man. This debate has been raging since the days of Athanasius of Alexandria and Arius.

What the does the Bible say? Well it is quite clear on who Jesus is and his origin. Let’s take a look at what is written.

Scripture says the Word became flesh and dwelt among us and when Jesus returns, his name is called ‘The Word of God’.  (John 1 & Revelation 19:13)

It says that God created all things through THE WORD and nothing was created without him. (John 1:3)

It says that the universe was created through THE SON and he is before all things. (Colossians 1:15-17)

It says that all things were created through JESUS CHRIST. (Hebrews 2:9)

This is what the Bible says about Jesus Christ, the son of the living God, the one named: ‘The Word of God’ who was with God in the beginning.

He emptied himself, took upon himself our nature, was obedient to his God and our God, died for our sins as it is written, and is now in the glory he had with the Father before the cosmos.

Jesus is not God in the flesh, rather the Word who became flesh and dwelt among us. He was with God in the beginning. He was the first to be with God.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,161 through 1,180 (of 25,960 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #103920
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Sep. 03 2008,13:31)
    Hi t8

    Quote (t8 @ Sep. 03 2008,11:16)

    There is no scripture to support that Gabriel had a beginning either.


    All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. John 1:3


    I agree that this scripture answers that question, even though there is no specific mention of Gabriel being created.

    #103921
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Sep. 03 2008,13:31)
    I was appointed from eternity,

    from the beginning, before the world began. Proverbs 8:23

    Clearly before wisdom was brought forth he was from eternity.

    So one should ask, “was there ever a time God had no wisdom”? Wisdom is only born when it is revealed to angels or men.

    Wisdom always existed. Yeshua is made unto us the wisdom of God because all wisdom and knowledge is contained in him.

    In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge. Col 2:3


    Again it is the attribute versus identity issue which I don't think you have managed to grasp yet given your replies.

    God has always had wisdom as one of his attributes just as truth and grace are attributes of God.

    The difference is that the person of truth and the person of wisdom is not the same as the attribute of truth and wisdom in God, as one is as I said a person and the other an attribute.

    So yes your argument about the existence of wisdom being eternal is probably correct as I would imagine that God has always had wisdom. But there is no scripture that supports an eternal Wisdom as a person or identity that was with God in the beginning.

    It stands to reason that anyone who is born of God will contain or express his attributes to varying degrees. This goes along with the names we are given by God and his son. Jesus renamed Simon to Peter for example as a name is suppose to be descriptive of a persons character which if good, is also an attribute of God. Think of the name Grace for example. So if Jesus is called Wisdom, then that doesn't nullify the attribute of wisdom in God and neither does it prove that Jesus is eternal because wisdom has always been.

    As usual a reader needs to divest him self of the Nicene Creed in order to read the scriptures fairly and without bias.

    #103923
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 03 2008,14:51)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 04 2008,01:03)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 02 2008,15:07)
    Hi LU,
    No Abraham did not seek to kill ANY man who had come to tell the truth given him of God.


    Hi Nick,
    Can you recall what “men” or “man” gave Abraham words of God beside the “man” he called LORD?  I know that God spoke with Abraham directly many times.  
    LU


    Hi LU,
    It matters not except that he never did try to murder a servant of God, which seems to be the instinctive attitude of all men bending the knee to the God of this world. [Heb11]


    Hi Nick and Jodi,
    Again:
    John 8:40-41
    40 “But as it is, you are seeking to kill Me, a man who has told you the truth, which I heard from God; this Abraham did not do.
    NASU

    You may think that it does not matter but bear with me if you don't mind.

    In my research, I only find one instance where a man or better yet what appeared as a man and was called Yaweh, came to Abraham and gave him the “truth” that he heard from God. Only one time!!! That is in Gen 18

    Gen 18:1-4
    Now the LORD appeared to him by the oaks of Mamre, while he was sitting at the tent door in the heat of the day. 2 When he lifted up his eyes and looked, behold, three men were standing opposite him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them and bowed himself to the earth, 3 and said, ” My Lord, if now I have found favor in Your sight, please do not pass Your servant by….

    Gen 18:12-14
    13 And the LORD said to Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, saying, 'Shall I indeed bear a child, when I am so old?' 14 ” Is anything too difficult for the LORD?
    NASU

    So, this is the ONLY reference that I found that was written where a “man” spoke the truth which He heard from God.

    My conclusion is that it was this ONE instance that Jesus is referring to in John 8 since at NO other time does a “man” give Abraham the truth which He heard from God.

    Now, a puzzle, Abraham calls this “man” Lord and the scriptures refer to Him as LORD. It never says that THIS “man” was an angel. The two “men” He was with are found to be angels and that is clear and they are not referred to as LORD.

    I suggest that this main “man” referred to as LORD is the pre-existent Christ who only appears as a man but isn't really a man. In the NT we are told that the words that Christ gives are not His but the Father's.

    John 14:24
    24 “He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine, but the Father's who sent Me.
    NASU

    Jesus isn't saying that Abraham didn't kill any men in general that gave the truth which they heard from God since there is no mention anywhere that any other men gave Abraham such truth. God spoke to Abraham directly, not through men except Gen 18 and the three only appeared as men.

    Jodi,
    The context of the verse in John is speaking of killing the man, not the truth.

    LU

    #103932
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Sep. 02 2008,15:28)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 01 2008,02:52)
    In the beginning was the word.  That does not say that the “word” was eternal, it just says that it was in the beginning.  A word has an origin, first it must be a thought.  Surely there must be something more than that for those of you who believe that the Son of God always existed especially if you believe those who don't believe that are “heretics”.

    LU


    Hi LU

    So are you saying that God's Word is not eternal or from everlasting to everlasting?

    Was there ever a time that God did not have a Word?

    The Word of God does not have to be spoken to be his Word.

    For the Word is Spirit. God is Spirit, God and his Word are One, in fact he has exalted his Word above his own name.

    If Yeshua is the “Wisdom of God” and “the Truth”, was there ever a time the Father did not have “Wisdom” or “Truth”?  ???

    Yeshua is the exact representation of the Father, (John 1:1, Heb 1:3, Phil 2:6) since the Father is eternal, so is Yeshua.

    He is the “eternal life”, (1 John 1:1,2) that was with the Father in the beginning.

    All things were made by and through him and without him nothing was made that was made. (John 1:3) He did not make himself. If he was a creation as some claim, or born, which scripturally there is no difference, then he would be included in the “All Things”, but he is not.

    Did God create or bring birth to his Word? ???

    Where is the scripture to support this theory?

    WJ


    Hello WJ,
    I hope you had a good holiday!

    First of all,
    A thought, when expressed becomes a word and not the other way around.  The thought comes first.  A word isn't eternal.  

    Also, when Jesus is called the “Word of God” that doesn't mean He is first expression of God's thoughts. The words Jesus speaks are not HIS, meaning that the origin of the words is not from Jesus's own thoughts but from what He hears from the Father.  

    John 14:24
    24 “He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine, but the Father's who sent Me.  
    NASU

    John 15:15-16
    15 “No longer do I call you slaves, for the slave does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all things that I have heard from My Father I have made known to you.  
    NASU

    So we see that the “Word of God” in Rev. was not the first expression of the thoughts of God but the name of the speaker who was given the word of God so that He could give it to others.

    Next,
    Prov 8:23-25
    23 “From everlasting I was established,
    From the beginning, from the earliest times of the earth.
    24 “When there were no depths I was brought forth,
    When there were no springs abounding with water.
    25 ” Before the mountains were settled,
    Before the hills I was brought forth;
    NASU

    The term “from everlasting” is the hebrew word `owlam
    OT:5769

    `owlam (o-lawm'); or `olam (o-lawm'); from OT:5956; properly, concealed, i.e. the vanishing point; generally, time out of mind (past or future), i.e. (practically) eternity; frequentatively, adverbial (especially with prepositional prefix) always:

    KJV – alway (-s), ancient (time), any more, continuance, eternal, (for, [n-]) ever (-lasting, -more, of old), lasting, long (time), (of) old (time), perpetual, at any time, (beginning of the) world (+without end).
    (Biblesoft's New Exhaustive Strong's Numbers and Concordance with Expanded Greek-Hebrew Dictionary. Copyright © 1994, Biblesoft and International Bible Translators, Inc.)

    The same word is in this verse:
    Josh 24:2

    2 And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods
    KJV

    It is translated “in old time”.  There are many other verses that clearly show that this hebrew word does not refer to things merely always existent.

    LU

    #103936
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Sep. 04 2008,09:00)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Sep. 03 2008,16:29)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Sep. 03 2008,09:10)
    Yahshua Came Down From Heaven

    The phrase “came down from heaven” is difficult for many to understand. The Jews did not understand either as we read in Jn. 6:42; “And they said, Is not this Yahshua, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?” There is no doubt that Yahshua was emphasizing his heavenly and paternal origin, but in what sense was he declaring this? We have already seen that the phrase “sent from Yahweh” does not necessarily mean to exist side by side with and then leave Yahweh's presence. Neither does “came down from” mean something similar. Was Yahshua a pre-existent spirit being living side by side with Yahweh that was transformed into an embryo placed in Miriam's womb or was he actually inside Yahweh, “in His loins” as it were, and later united with Miriam's egg through the power of the Holy Spirit? Jn.17:8 teaches the latter. It reads, “For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee , and they have believed that thou didst send me.” The Greek word “exerchomai” translated “came out” specifically means to go out of something that you were inside of. In this case, Yahshua existed inside of Yahweh in the same sense that Levi existed inside the “loins of his father” before he was born (Heb. 7:5-10).

    Yahshua declared this truth in Jn.16:27-30 as well. “For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from Yahweh . I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father. His disciples said unto him, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb. Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee: by this we believe that thou camest forth from Yahweh.” Yahshua could not come from Yahweh's side and from inside of Yahweh at the same time. Only one can be true.

    A verse that goes hand in hand with the phrase “came down from heaven” is Jn.6:62; “What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?” Yahshua's origin is not in question here. Those who reject the pre-existence doctrine should not reject Yahshua's heavenly origin or that his father was Yahweh. Yahshua was, at one time, in heaven. He existed in the loins of His Father Yahweh until the appointed time of his earthly birth. Through Yahweh's miraculous Holy Spirit power He then impregnated Miriam's egg with the seed that dwelt inside of Him. The belief that Yahshua was a spirit being that was miniaturized and placed directly into Miriam's womb without uniting with her egg is unscriptural. If that were true, Miriam would merely be a surrogate mother and Yahshua would not be from the blood line of David.

    Excerpt From:
    Did Our Savior Pre-exist?


    Hi brother F4Y,
    Good points on pre-existence of Yahshua.

    But I want to ask you whether God the immortal Spirit being can possess any mortal substance like sperm or DNA in Him to pass on to Jesus during his conception in Mary ?

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    I find no such teaching in Scriptuyre.


    Frank,

    Do you think that Mary supplied both sets of chromosomes needed to create a human being?

    Mandy

    #103940
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 04 2008,10:46)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 03 2008,14:51)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 04 2008,01:03)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 02 2008,15:07)
    Hi LU,
    No Abraham did not seek to kill ANY man who had come to tell the truth given him of God.


    Hi Nick,
    Can you recall what “men” or “man” gave Abraham words of God beside the “man” he called LORD?  I know that God spoke with Abraham directly many times.  
    LU


    Hi LU,
    It matters not except that he never did try to murder a servant of God, which seems to be the instinctive attitude of all men bending the knee to the God of this world. [Heb11]


    Hi Nick and Jodi,
    Again:
    John 8:40-41
    40 “But as it is, you are seeking to kill Me, a man who has told you the truth, which I heard from God; this Abraham did not do.
    NASU

    You may think that it does not matter but bear with me if you don't mind.

    In my research, I only find one instance where a man or better yet what appeared as a man and was called Yaweh, came to Abraham and gave him the “truth” that he heard from God.  Only one time!!!   That is in Gen 18

    Gen 18:1-4
    Now the LORD appeared to him by the oaks of Mamre, while he was sitting at the tent door in the heat of the day. 2 When he lifted up his eyes and looked, behold, three men were standing opposite him; and when he saw them, he ran from the tent door to meet them and bowed himself to the earth, 3 and said, ” My Lord, if now I have found favor in Your sight, please do not pass Your servant by….

    Gen 18:12-14
    13 And the LORD said to Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, saying, 'Shall I indeed bear a child, when I am so old?' 14 ” Is anything too difficult for the LORD?
    NASU

    So, this is the ONLY reference that I found that was written where a “man” spoke the truth which He heard from God.

    My conclusion is that it was this ONE instance that Jesus is referring to in John 8 since at NO other time does a “man” give Abraham the truth which He heard from God.

    Now, a puzzle, Abraham calls this “man” Lord and the scriptures refer to Him as LORD.  It never says that THIS “man” was an angel.  The two “men” He was with are found to be angels and that is clear and they are not referred to as LORD.  

    I suggest that this main “man” referred to as LORD is the pre-existent Christ who only appears as a man but isn't really a man.  In the NT we are told that the words that Christ gives are not His but the Father's.

    John 14:24
    24 “He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine, but the Father's who sent Me.  
    NASU

    Jesus isn't saying that Abraham didn't kill any men in general that gave the truth which they heard from God since there is no mention anywhere that any other men gave Abraham such truth.  God spoke to Abraham directly, not through men except Gen 18 and the three only appeared as men.

    Jodi,
    The context of the verse in John is speaking of killing the man, not the truth.

    LU


    Hi LU,
    Of Cours eJesus was never called YHWH.
    He is Yahshua.

    So you must claim it was God Himself, the God that creation cannot contain, that met Abe if this is your approach.

    #103965
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi Nick,
    Can you prove that Jesus was never called “Yahweh”?

    I believe that I can show that two are called Yahweh.
    Here goes:
    Ex 6:2-3
    2 God also said to Moses, “I am the LORD. 3 I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them.
    (from New International Version)

    hmmmmm…

    Here we have the LORD speaking to Isaac and Isaac called upon the name of the “LORD”:
    Gen 26:23-25
    24 The LORD appeared to him the same night and said,

    ” I am the God of your father Abraham;
    Do not fear, for I am with you.
    I will bless you, and multiply your descendants,
    For the sake of My servant Abraham.”

    25 So he built an altar there and called upon the name of the LORD, and pitched his tent there; and there Isaac's servants dug a well.
    NASU

    In this passage, the LORD is speaking to Jacob in a dream as “LORD”:
    Gen 28:12-17
    13 And behold, the LORD stood above it and said, “I am the LORD, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie, I will give it to you and to your descendants. 14 “Your descendants will also be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south; and in you and in your descendants shall all the families of the earth be blessed. 15 “Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” 16 Then Jacob awoke from his sleep and said, ” Surely the LORD is in this place, and I did not know it.” 17 He was afraid and said, ” How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.”
    NASU

    Yahweh does not lie. I figure there are two that are called that name. One, the Most High God and the other, His Son that represents Him on earth.

    LU

    #103969
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi brother F4Y,
    Thanks for that clarification then goahead in your more revelations I am with you in those understandings. I hope our Sis Mandy also realise this truth.

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam

    #103984
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 04 2008,15:39)
    Hi Nick,
    Can you prove that Jesus was never called “Yahweh”?

    I believe that I can show that two are called Yahweh.
    Here goes:
    Ex 6:2-3
    2 God also said to Moses, “I am the LORD. 3 I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them.
    (from New International Version)

    hmmmmm…

    Here we have the LORD speaking to Isaac and Isaac called upon the name of the “LORD”:
    Gen 26:23-25
    24 The LORD appeared to him the same night and said,

    ” I am the God of your father Abraham;
    Do not fear, for I am with you.
    I will bless you, and multiply your descendants,
    For the sake of My servant Abraham.”

    25 So he built an altar there and called upon the name of the LORD, and pitched his tent there; and there Isaac's servants dug a well.
    NASU

    In this passage, the LORD is speaking to Jacob in a dream as “LORD”:
    Gen 28:12-17
    13 And behold, the LORD stood above it and said, “I am the LORD, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie, I will give it to you and to your descendants. 14 “Your descendants will also be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south; and in you and in your descendants shall all the families of the earth be blessed. 15 “Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” 16 Then Jacob awoke from his sleep and said, ” Surely the LORD is in this place, and I did not know it.” 17 He was afraid and said, ” How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.”
    NASU

    Yahweh does not lie.  I figure there are two that are called that name.  One, the Most High God and the other, His Son that represents Him on earth.

    LU


    Jesus is either the son of YHWH or he is YHWH. He is not the son of himself.

    Proverbs 30:4
    Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!

    #103985
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 04 2008,12:38)
    Hi LU,
    Of Cours eJesus was never called YHWH.
    He is Yahshua.

    So you must claim it was God Himself, the God that creation cannot contain, that met Abe if this is your approach.


    But how does anyone see an invisible God who is eternal?

    Through an image?

    So those who saw God see his representative. They see the son, a Cherub, Seraph, etc. In other words they see God's glory.

    Acts 7:30
    “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.

    Acts 7:55
    But Stephen, full of the Holy Spirit, looked up to heaven and saw the glory of God, and Jesus standing at the right hand of God.

    #103998
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi t8,
    I don't think that God is referred to as the invisible God because He has no form or body type. In fact, He let Moses see His “form”. Also, Jesus saw Him.

    Num 12:6-8

    “Hear now My words:
    If there is a prophet among you,
    I, the LORD, shall make Myself known to him in a vision.
    I shall speak with him in a dream.
    7 “Not so, with My servant Moses,
    He is faithful in all My household;
    8 With him I speak mouth to mouth,
    Even openly, and not in dark sayings,
    And he beholds the form of the LORD.
    Why then were you not afraid
    To speak against My servant, against Moses?”
    NASU

    Notice that God didn't show His “form” to the assembly of Israelites:

    Deut 4:12
    12 “Then the LORD spoke to you from the midst of the fire; you heard the sound of words, but you saw no form–only a voice.
    NASU

    One reason that God doesn't let Himself be seen is so men don't make graven images of Him. Like we have in action figures nowadays.

    Deut 4:15-17

    15 “So watch yourselves carefully, since you did not see any form on the day the LORD spoke to you at Horeb from the midst of the fire, 16 so that you do not act corruptly and make a graven image for yourselves in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female,
    NASU

    John 6:46
    “Not that anyone has seen the Father, except the One who is from God; He has seen the Father.

    The word translated as “has seen” is written in the “perfect” tense which is explained here:
    Perfect
    The perfect tense in Greek corresponds to the perfect tense in English, and describes an action which is viewed as having been completed in the past, once and for all, not needing to be repeated.

    Jesus' last cry from the cross, TETELESTAI (“It is finished!”) is a good example of the perfect tense used in this sense, namely “It [the atonement] has been accomplished, completely, once and for all time.”

    Certain antiquated verb forms in Greek, such as those related to seeing (eidw) or knowing (oida) will use the perfect tense in a manner equivalent to the normal past tense. These few cases are exception to the normal rule and do not alter the normal connotation of the perfect tense stated above.

    It is also written in the “indicative” mood which is explained here:
    Indicative
    The indicative mood is a simple statement of fact. If an action really occurs or has occurred or will occur, it will be rendered in the indicative mood.

    To verify this info, you can go here:
    http://www.studylight.org/isb….=1&l=en
    and then click on “(5758)” listed in the Greek verse.

    Also, God speaks of doing things with His hands like spreading out the heavens. Also, He “sits” on the throne.

    In summary, I think that God can be seen but He just hasn't allowed us to see Him and thus, He remains invisible to us. The only man that has truly seen Him is Jesus. Moses only saw His form, He hasn't seen Him like Jesus has.

    LU

    #103999
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Sep. 04 2008,05:39)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Sep. 04 2008,15:39)
    Hi Nick,
    Can you prove that Jesus was never called “Yahweh”?

    I believe that I can show that two are called Yahweh.
    Here goes:
    Ex 6:2-3
    2 God also said to Moses, “I am the LORD. 3 I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them.
    (from New International Version)

    hmmmmm…

    Here we have the LORD speaking to Isaac and Isaac called upon the name of the “LORD”:
    Gen 26:23-25
    24 The LORD appeared to him the same night and said,

    ” I am the God of your father Abraham;
    Do not fear, for I am with you.
    I will bless you, and multiply your descendants,
    For the sake of My servant Abraham.”

    25 So he built an altar there and called upon the name of the LORD, and pitched his tent there; and there Isaac's servants dug a well.
    NASU

    In this passage, the LORD is speaking to Jacob in a dream as “LORD”:
    Gen 28:12-17
    13 And behold, the LORD stood above it and said, “I am the LORD, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac; the land on which you lie, I will give it to you and to your descendants. 14 “Your descendants will also be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east and to the north and to the south; and in you and in your descendants shall all the families of the earth be blessed. 15 “Behold, I am with you and will keep you wherever you go, and will bring you back to this land; for I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” 16 Then Jacob awoke from his sleep and said, ” Surely the LORD is in this place, and I did not know it.” 17 He was afraid and said, ” How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God, and this is the gate of heaven.”
    NASU

    Yahweh does not lie.  I figure there are two that are called that name.  One, the Most High God and the other, His Son that represents Him on earth.

    LU


    Jesus is either the son of YHWH or he is YHWH. He is not the son of himself.

    Proverbs 30:4
    Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


    t8,

    You wrote:

    “Jesus is either the son of YHWH or he is YHWH. He is not the son of himself.”

    I agree that Jesus is not the son of Himself. I do think that the Father and the Son might both be referred to as Yahweh as I pointed out in my post. I don't claim to understand it all but I do know that in the NT, Jesus says that He has come in the name of His Father. I think that He has come in the name of His Father in the OT also.

    John 5:43-45
    43 “I have come in My Father's name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, you will receive him. 44 “How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another and you do not seek the glory that is from the one and only God?
    NASU

    LU

    #104012
    Frank4YAHWEH
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Sep. 04 2008,12:09)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Sep. 04 2008,09:00)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Sep. 03 2008,16:29)

    Quote (Frank4YAHWEH @ Sep. 03 2008,09:10)
    Yahshua Came Down From Heaven

    The phrase “came down from heaven” is difficult for many to understand. The Jews did not understand either as we read in Jn. 6:42; “And they said, Is not this Yahshua, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?” There is no doubt that Yahshua was emphasizing his heavenly and paternal origin, but in what sense was he declaring this? We have already seen that the phrase “sent from Yahweh” does not necessarily mean to exist side by side with and then leave Yahweh's presence. Neither does “came down from” mean something similar. Was Yahshua a pre-existent spirit being living side by side with Yahweh that was transformed into an embryo placed in Miriam's womb or was he actually inside Yahweh, “in His loins” as it were, and later united with Miriam's egg through the power of the Holy Spirit? Jn.17:8 teaches the latter. It reads, “For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee , and they have believed that thou didst send me.” The Greek word “exerchomai” translated “came out” specifically means to go out of something that you were inside of. In this case, Yahshua existed inside of Yahweh in the same sense that Levi existed inside the “loins of his father” before he was born (Heb. 7:5-10).

    Yahshua declared this truth in Jn.16:27-30 as well. “For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from Yahweh . I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father. His disciples said unto him, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb. Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee: by this we believe that thou camest forth from Yahweh.” Yahshua could not come from Yahweh's side and from inside of Yahweh at the same time. Only one can be true.

    A verse that goes hand in hand with the phrase “came down from heaven” is Jn.6:62; “What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?” Yahshua's origin is not in question here. Those who reject the pre-existence doctrine should not reject Yahshua's heavenly origin or that his father was Yahweh. Yahshua was, at one time, in heaven. He existed in the loins of His Father Yahweh until the appointed time of his earthly birth. Through Yahweh's miraculous Holy Spirit power He then impregnated Miriam's egg with the seed that dwelt inside of Him. The belief that Yahshua was a spirit being that was miniaturized and placed directly into Miriam's womb without uniting with her egg is unscriptural. If that were true, Miriam would merely be a surrogate mother and Yahshua would not be from the blood line of David.

    Excerpt From:
    Did Our Savior Pre-exist?


    Hi brother F4Y,
    Good points on pre-existence of Yahshua.

    But I want to ask you whether God the immortal Spirit being can possess any mortal substance like sperm or DNA in Him to pass on to Jesus during his conception in Mary ?

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    I find no such teaching in Scriptuyre.


    Frank,

    Do you think that Mary supplied both sets of chromosomes needed to create a human being?

    Mandy


    There is no teaching in Scripture that leads me to believe that Miriam supplied both sets of chromosomes needed to create a human being?

    #104016
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    Do you work in the name of Jesus.
    Does that make you him?

    Jesus is the Son of the living God
    Yahshua

    #104017
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Frank,

    Exactly. Mary, Maria or Miriam (as she has been called here) could not of supplied both sets. Where did the second set come from if it was not from God?

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #104019
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,

    If God will not share his glory with another, wouldn't you think that would include his name as well? Just a thought…

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #104023
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 04 2008,15:17)
    Hi LU,
    Do you work in the name of Jesus.
    Does that make you him?

    Jesus is the Son of the living God
    Yahshua


    Nick,
    I do not think you are following along or I am not making myself clear.
    LU

    #104027
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    I have one to follow.
    He is the son of YHWH.

    #104028
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    You say
    “I believe that I can show that two are called Yahweh.”

    This is a favourite play of trinitarians desperate to amalgamate the Father with His Son.
    Jesus never said he had visited earth before so we should not speak for him.

    #104036
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Sep. 04 2008,16:47)
    Hi LU,
    You say
    “I believe that I can show that two are called Yahweh.”

    This is a favourite play of trinitarians desperate to amalgamate the Father with His Son.
    Jesus never said he had visited earth before so we should not speak for him.


    Hi Nick and Mandy,
    Well, you know that I am not a trinitarian, right? You know that I think there is one that is the Most High God and that He is our one true God, right? Do you also know that I believe that His Son is different than Him and not equal and not eternal either. Right?

    Don't be worried, I am not leading you down trinity road here.
    It seems likely to me that Exodus 6:3 has a clue for us though. How do you explain that Jacob was told from God that He who was speaking to Him was the LORD in Gen 28:13 but the speaker says to Moses in Ex 6:2-3 “I am the LORD. 3 I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself known to them.
    (from New International Version)

    Isn't it possible that there are two represented by the name LORD?

    John 17:12
    12 “While I was with them, I was keeping them in Your name which You have given Me;
    NASU

    Luke 10:22
    22 “All things have been handed over to Me by My Father, and no one knows who the Son is except the Father, and who the Father is except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal Him.”
    NASU

    John 16:15
    15 “All things that the Father has are Mine; therefore I said that He takes of Mine and will disclose it to you.
    NASU

    Could “all things” include His name?

    If you disagree then you must have a better explanation and I am willing to hear it.

    Nick, where is it written that Jesus never visited the earth before? If it is not written then should we assume that?
    LU

Viewing 20 posts - 1,161 through 1,180 (of 25,960 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account