Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 14 2011,10:48)WJ cited Mikeboll:Quote He has not specifically been called “THE god” of anything in particular, but knowing that “god” only means “ruler”, I can honestly say that “HE IS MY GOD”.Keith,I can't make any sense of this man! If the word “god” only means “ruler” as Mike says, then this would be true in…[Read more]

Quote (david @ Mar. 14 2011,02:40)As many trinitarian scholars agree, it is of course grammatically possible to translate John 1:1 as “a god.”  It is simply not preferred by the trinitarians.  I wonder why.DavidMainly because of Polytheism. They understand that the Bible is a monotheistic book that teaches “Only One True God” and none others.WJ

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 10 2011,21:28)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 09 2011,20:24)Is it GRAMMATICALLY POSSIBLE to translate the Greek words in John 1:1c into English as “and the Word was a god”?Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 10 2011,16:31)NOBecause John was not a Polytheist and the Bible is not a Polytheistic book.But Keith, let me remind you once…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,16:45)Hi WJ,No deal!   what you are proposing is 'the LIE' that Francis believes in.He believe you can agree (according to Francis) to disagree; but that is to agree to 'a lie'!   …which I cannot do!Sorry,  EDWell do me a favour and leave me alone, for I am tired of your insults and accusations. If you keep on then it…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,16:56)Hi WJ,Sorry that my words seem harsh to you,but I'm glad you do understand now!Your brother in Christ, Jesus!EdAny understanding I have didn't come from you sir.WJ

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 12 2011,01:46)Thanks for your reply WJ.I will address each point or each point worthy of a reply in due time.You are welcome t8.Worthy of reply? Ha Ha! Does that mean you will not answer the questions after that huge lecture about those on this board not answering questions?WJ

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,16:27)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,09:06)Quote (t8 @ Mar. 12 2011,16:01)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,08:59)Really?Is there any other “ONLY BEGOTTEN (MONOGENES) SON” T8?wjHe is the firstborn among many.Ye are elohim, you are all sons of the Most High.t8You didn't answer the question!I will try again.Is…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,16:34)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,09:23)Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,16:01)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,08:16)Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,15:10)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,07:57)Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,14:52)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 13 2011,07:33)Keith and Jack,I apologize for the…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 12 2011,16:20)Adam is adam but adam is not Adam unless you are indetifying the right particular individual.Exactly, like identifying the Father and the Son who both are equally God just as adam is equally adam to Adam.To simple for you I guess.WJ

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 12 2011,16:20)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 10 2011,09:05)You cannot seperate “adam” from Adam. Adam is part of adam.Adam is adam but adam is not Adam unless you are indetifying the right particular individual.Again, it is the difference of identifying a specific individual as opposed to talking about substance/flesh/nature.The…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,16:01)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,08:16)Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,15:10)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,07:57)Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,14:52)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 13 2011,07:33)Keith and Jack,I apologize for the dishonesty claim.  I'm pretty sure I'm aware of your intent, but I can't claim to…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 12 2011,16:01)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,08:59)Really?Is there any other “ONLY BEGOTTEN (MONOGENES) SON” T8?wjHe is the firstborn among many.Ye are elohim, you are all sons of the Most High.t8You didn't answer the question!I will try again.Is there or will there be any other “Only Begotten (Monogenes) Son?”WJ

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 12 2011,15:59)Eve is adam qualitatively speaking, but she is not and never will be Adam.t8They were “One Flesh” which means they are qualitatively human or mankind.The Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are qualitativley God or Godkind.Why is that so hard to understand?WJ

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 12 2011,15:56)Theos and elohim are applied to others in the same manner.Really?Is there any other “ONLY BEGOTTEN (MONOGENES) SON” T8?wj

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 12 2011,15:18)Keith, if the word “god” meant to us today what it meant to the people of Biblical times, I would gladly call Jesus “my god”.But you already called him “your god” for you said “he is the god of all believers in heaven and in earth”.Do you let the present day world dictate to you Biblical truth?Are you ashamed…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 12 2011,15:18)Jesus is A god, who right now has been granted by his own God to be THE god (ruler, as in King) of heaven right now.  He is still UNDER his own God (Ruler, as in King to his Prince), but his God has let him rule for the time being.More Greek Mythology.This is scripturally false, because the scripture never…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 12 2011,15:18)But even then, Jesus will be THE god who rules over all from the right hand of THE Most High God of all gods, who is also HIS God.Hi allThis is pure Polytheism or Henotheism taken straight out of Greek Mythology!WJ

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,15:10)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 13 2011,07:57)Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,14:52)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 13 2011,07:33)Keith and Jack,I apologize for the dishonesty claim.  I'm pretty sure I'm aware of your intent, but I can't claim to KNOW that for sure, and so I shouldn't have implied dishonesty or lying.I'M…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 12 2011,15:04)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 11 2011,10:21)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 10 2011,19:05)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 10 2011,17:58)MikeIt seems altogether unlikely that immediately after Christ had solemnly promulgated the trinitarian formula of baptism, the Apostles themselves would have substituted another.…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 12 2011,14:52)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 13 2011,07:33)Keith and Jack,I apologize for the dishonesty claim.  I'm pretty sure I'm aware of your intent, but I can't claim to KNOW that for sure, and so I shouldn't have implied dishonesty or lying.I'M SORRY.mikeThanks Mike!See WJ, my technique worked!   …You don't influence f…[Read more]