Quote (t8 @ April 05 2011,18:40)I think Mike is only trying to get people to answer honestly.If people were more honest, then perhaps Mike would not have to try and squeeze out honest answers from others.Hi t8Well he should practice what he preaches. You see those big bolded questions in my post above.I have asked Mike for an answer severall times.WJ

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 05 2011,18:03)Hi Keith,I've answered your first post via pm, so as not to diffuse the point of this thread.  To your second point I say, don't work too hard.  In other words, don't bother listing a million scriptures to flood the thread as you so often do.  I will just ignore them and keep going back to the bolded qu…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ April 04 2011,11:19)Hi Keith,I thought that you did and yes, I know that you disagree with them, so do I.  I don't think Mike saw the post where you admitted that according to the scholars' quote, they said that it was grammatically possible.  Mike just missed that, I guess.  It is not hard to miss a post when there are so ma…[Read more]

This is not all of my answer. I have been busy but I am putting together the facts for you Mike.WJ

MikeWhatever you think you are doing is immoral and IMO is nothing but gangster mentality.You try and force others to agree with you and when they don't then they are lying or misleading or dishonest.To show your hypocrosy is that when I point out to you that scholars say Jesus is God or the word God (theos) definition means the Father, Son and…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 04 2011,20:03)I would like to know how Jesus already had the glory of an ONLY BEGOTTEN Son from the Father when he was flesh if he wasn't “begotten” until after he died.Sure MikeAs soon as you can show us a scripture that says his Glory as the Only begotten Son was before he came in the flesh.WJ

Quote (Lightenup @ April 04 2011,17:07)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 04 2011,15:41)Quote (Lightenup @ April 04 2011,14:30)Or 'today' could be according to eternity where there is only today, just an eternal one.Do you have a scripture for that because “yown” is the first time days are mentioned and it is mentioned as the “first day” in…[Read more]

MikeWhatever you think you are doing is immoral and IMO is nothing but gangster mentality.You try and force others to agree with you and when they don't then they are lying or misleading or dishonest.To show your hypocrosy is that when I point out to you that scholars say Jesus is God or the word God (theos) definition means the Father, Son and…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 04 2011,21:47)And I'll tell you what else:  You go ahead and show us all “how it went down”, and then I'll show us all the many “NO!” answers you gave to the same question.mikeI don't have time right at this moment but you better look again because my answer never changed because the answers were to 2 different…[Read more]

Quote (Istari @ April 04 2011,16:47)WJ,Ha ha ha ha ha ha….. Sorry to laugh at you! oh, no I'm not !Ok, so why did the poor man go to heaven – just for being poor?The parable doesn't tell us except that we can assume in the context that the rich man didn't recieve the words of Moses or the Prophets and repent and Lazurus…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ April 03 2011,00:49)So we know that we can partake in divine nature.Case closed.Now that Istari/JA is posting again, does he want to continue his debate with WJ?t8Sure. The title of the debate “Is there a Trinity in the Bible” is the subject and Matt 28:19 is proof that “a Trinity” is in the Bible.WJ

Quote (Istari @ April 04 2011,16:11)Jack,Please tell me what the point of the story was – what does Ot say to you – what is it's point?The point of the parable is to show death does not mean “cease to exist”.WJ

Quote (Lightenup @ April 04 2011,14:30)Or 'today' could be according to eternity where there is only today, just an eternal one.Do you have a scripture for that because “yown” is the first time days are mentioned and it is mentioned as the “first day” in Genesis.Does the word “first” mean anything?WJ

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 03 2011,21:11)He has still NOT said “Yes” to this day.  Nor has Jack or mikeangel.  They have all dug their heels in and stuck with “NO!”.  So please vote Kathi.mikeMikeThis is a not true and you shall see.WJ

Quote (terraricca @ April 04 2011,15:25)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 05 2011,09:24)Ask Mike since he insist only “2” scholars are right yet those two scholars translated John 1:1c “The Word was God” without the like the NWT translated it.WJWJhow is it wen you are invited to show other scholars that may have taken a different view and see what…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ April 04 2011,15:10)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 04 2011,11:33)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 31 2011,12:58)“How can Jesus still be the High Priest if he is not a man?”For “EVERY HIGH PRIEST IS TAKEN FROM AMONG THE PEOPLE” and appointed to represent them before God, to offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins.Well, Jes…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ April 04 2011,15:18)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 05 2011,07:14)Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ April 04 2011,14:57)It is not said that it was allegorical.Jack even allegories are based on literal facts or a literal event.This is not a parable because Jesus mentions a name.If what you say is not true then Jesus was teaching…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ April 04 2011,14:57)It is not said that it was allegorical.Jack even allegories are based on literal facts or a literal event.This is not a parable because Jesus mentions a name.If what you say is not true then Jesus was teaching lies using an allegory. WJ

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 03 2011,19:25)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 31 2011,12:58)“Is there a scripture anywhere that says Jesus is no longer a man or human?”Yes, many.  But this should suffice:11 I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that the gospel I preached is not of human origin. 12 I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught…[Read more]

MikeYES!!! Both the Father and Jesus are mentioned in the verse as our “One God and One Lord”!Prove that it is not so.WJ