Quote (Istari @ April 20 2011,14:18)Keith,Out of interest only:Can you name three things that 'Jesus the God' did?Be as creative as you like but reference from Scriptures, please.And there are also many other things which “Jesus did”, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 19 2011,22:16)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 19 2011,14:48)But now let me ask you the same question and see how your own words answer it. This again is your question…What I want to know is, out of the “many gods” Paul mentions in verse 5, which god in particular does he say is OUR “one God” in verse 6?According to the w…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 19 2011,22:16)  In 1 Corinthians 8:6, who exactly does Paul refer to using the words “one god”?  He lists that one by name/title.  Who is it Keith?mikeMikeFinally we have an accurate question. The answer is the Father. So what have you proved?  You see I had already answered you because as I said the way I read the ver…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 19 2011,22:25)No more excuses and diversions, just answer the question, okay?Please!!! What a Joke!I have answered you on every point, where are the diversions? You are creating diversions and confusion by reinventing your questions over and over. I guess you are expecting something different.How many points of mine have…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 19 2011,22:25)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 19 2011,15:03)The Bible is a Monotheistic book inspired by GodKeith, Although I've posted the definition of “polytheism” many times for you, you still don't accept what it really means.MikeWhy are you always reinventing words and definitions to fit your own theories?This is…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 19 2011,22:38)The “OUR image” would HAVE to be Jesus IMO, because mankind wasn't yet there, and no one else is said to share God's image.MikeThen why do you say Jesus was an “angel”?WJ

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 19 2011,20:28)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 19 2011,12:26)If Jesus is a literal “Angelic” being……………Where is this particular “species” mentioned in scripture, Keith?MikeA Species? I don't know, but there is a class of being called Angels which are not men, but are ministers to the heirs of salvation.Are not…[Read more]

Quote (Baker @ April 19 2011,14:51)Yes, He is God, but not as great as His Father.IreneSo you believe in more than one God also?You say Jesus is “God”, but is Jesus “YOUR” God? WJ

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2011,22:07)Face it dude, it's not meant to be taken as LITERALLY THE ONLY ONE IN EXISTENCE, PERIOD.MikeI know you do not want to take the scriptures literally when it is not in your favor, but when you make statements like this it just shows the weakness in your manmade doctrine and theories.So you are saying…The…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 18 2011,21:27)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 18 2011,15:22)Hi MikeIf I answer the question “Yes” then that would mean that the Father is the “Only god” spoken of in 1 Cor 8:6, right?Hi Keith,What I want to know is, out of the “many gods” Paul mentions in verse 5, which god in particular does he say is our “one God” in…[Read more]

MikeEarlier in this thread Jack posted some pertinent information on this subject of John 1:1…Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 10 2011,10:03)TO ALL,Please note that the bias of the NWT translators in John 1:1 becomes clear when we see that they did not apply their grammatical rule anywhere else but John 1:1The first point Jehovah Witnesses often…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ April 19 2011,09:02)Mike,Not all heavenly spirit messengers were created.  There are the angels and then there is the Son and the Spirit, both eternal…not created.  God always was a Father.Hi KathiTrue! If Jesus is the “Only Begotten Son of God” then that would mean that “angels” could not be “EXACTLY” in nature what the Son i…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 18 2011,22:12)Based on their own translation, it is clear which of the two remaining possibilities they PREFER, but they don't ever rule out “a god” AS a possibility, do they?  YES or NO?MikeYou will have to clarify your question with proof that the Net notes say it is a possibility, because as I read their notes I see…[Read more]

Hi MikeQuote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2011,19:18)Do you really want to do this?  Because unlike you, I have many, many written words of Paul that make very clear that he understood that Jesus is not the God he is the Son of, including this one, also from Romans:Same ole tired straw man argument “Jesus is not the God he is the son of”. So what? “…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2011,19:18)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 12 2011,14:09)So the answer to your question is “YES” Jesus is the one that by (dia) or through (dia) all things come Very good, Keith.  So all things are FROM One in that scripture, and that ONE is our “one God, the Father”.  And all things are THROUGH another in that s…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 15 2011,21:52)Hi Keith,I prefer “a god” in John 1:1, because I know that Jesus is a god who was with the God in the beginning, but who was not that God he was with.  Kathi agrees with this, but for some reason feels the capitalized “God” in part c says this just the same as using “a god” would.    You, Keith, seem to pr…[Read more]

I am not a liar Mike, nor was I being dishonest!WJ

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2011,17:11)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 16 2011,15:44)Did I lie or was I being dishonest when I answered the question “ONCE” incorrectly?Your untruthful answer could have been an oversight.Exactly Mike. And as God is my witness and may I be cursed by God if what I say is a lie…I did not see the question had…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2011,17:07)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ April 16 2011,15:44)Now why in the world would I make that statement if I knew the question had changed or if I knew that I was lying knowing that the facts were there for all to see?Why in the world didn't you give the HONEST answer to the question you previously answered…[Read more]

MikeNope that is not proof that I was dishonest or a liar because in fact my comment was focused on your accusation that I was a Liar, this is what I said in response to your question…Quote I see Mike.I am a liar because I do not accept the testimony of a couple of scholars.You are the liar by lying against me.Now why in the world would I make…[Read more]