You guys have the problem!You are the ones that dont believe the scriptures. Over 600 scholars interpreted the text as you read it. Thousands of the most ancient copys have it there.Just like John 1:1. The burden of proof is on you. There is “NO EVIDENCE” that the text was altered.Simply speculation and rumer.Believe the scriptures. Our Fathers…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 28 2007,16:00)Hi W, Is irrefutable LOGIC equal in validity to scripture?No.But it is better than just pure stupidity!

Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 27 2007,12:26)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 27 2007,10:55)But the scriptures say “Only God” created all things “by himself!”Your doctrine teaches that God made everything through a “lesser god” or “lessor being”.You are denying the Hebrew scriptures. Look!Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the…[Read more]

Hello!Eusebius never said that Matt 28:19 was not in the Ancient text! He simply said that the RCH changed there baptismal formula.Matt 28:19 is “Unambiguous” and is in thousands of the ancient copys.The following is some info on the subject……………………………………………………………………Ploughman next shifts to…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 26 2007,09:34)Hi W, Trinity theory is extraneous to scripture.We cannot add to scripture. Abhor it.NHYou are guilty of what you preach!These are your own words…Quote Scripture does not say the Word WAS a man but WAS rather God with God.What do you think?He certainly was not the God he was with.But the scriptures say…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 27 2007,07:07)Hi W, Sorry but it is not a valid option to add to scripture.God's challenge is for you to use scripture only.Then to admit ignorance when you fail. Back to the drawing boards.NHExactly!Look again at these scriptures…Your doctrine teaches that God made everything through a “lesser god” or “lessor…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 27 2007,05:36)Hi W, Can you resolve these matters without adding trinity theory to scripture?NHNo you cant!

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 26 2007,09:31)Hi W,How do you resolve it without adding to scripture?NHAdd to scripture?   You say “Jesus was a Son of God” before his birth as a man.Scripture please!You say “God created all things through this Son of God”, a lessor being.Whos is adding to scripture?Your doctrine teaches that God made everything…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 26 2007,09:35)Hi W,You cannot explain these things without adding TRINITY THEORY to scripture?Surely you can?NHYou cant resolve it with a Henotheistic view!Your doctrine is a contradiction and diabolically apossed to the Hebrew scriptures!Look again…Your doctrine teaches that God made everything through a “lesser god”…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 22 2007,17:12)Hi W, We are not allowed to add in clever inventions like trinity. We have to let scripture speak and interpret itself.NHYou say…Quote We have to let scripture speak and interpret itself.Look again…Quote (Cult Buster @ June 22 2007,00:12)Psa 102:24  I said, O my God, take me not away in the midst of my…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 26 2007,09:16)Hi W, No matter what difficulties you may find aligning versesthere is NO EXCUSE FOR INTRODUCING EXTRANEOUS THEORIES, developed by men from outside scripture, to try and resolve them.NHIs that all you have to my “sincere questions?.Is there anything about my post “outside of scripture”?Please, show me where,…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ June 22 2007,10:49)<!–QuoteBegin–WorshippingJesus+June 22 2007,10:06–>Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 22 2007,10:06)t8You say…Quote They are 2 because God has a son. That is 2. The only true God sent his son, that is 2. Even a child can understand that.2 what? “A God” and  “a smaller god”? or “a God” and “another divine being”?The…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ June 21 2007,15:40)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2007,17:30)t8Theos and Elohim are not synonymous!Meditate on this.1336 times the word “Theos” is found in the New Testament scriptures.All were translated “God” referring to the Father and Yeshua, exept 13 times for “False gods” including satan and the man of sin and man, and eight…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ June 24 2007,22:47)Hi WorshippingJesus.Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 20 2007,12:08)HelloThe Arians and the Henotheist would read Jn 1:1 as…In the begining was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was “A” God!John 1:1c doesn't have a definite article and in Greek there is no indefinite article. So you are right about the…[Read more]

Quote (Cult Buster @ June 22 2007,00:12)Psa 102:24  I said, O my God, take me not away in the midst of my days: thy years are throughout all generations. Psa 102:25  Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens are the work of thy hands. Psa 102:26  They shall perish, but thou shalt endure: yea, all of them shall wax old li…[Read more]

DavidYes run to watch tower and post some more of their distorted truth!How many pages do we have to endure this time?

Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 21 2007,22:17)Titus 2:13looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ JesusI assert that this is an explicit declaration of Yahshua’s deity. Here are my two pieces of substantive evidence:1. GrammarGranville Sharp's rule 1 applies here. Basically, the rule states that in a G…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ June 21 2007,22:39)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 21 2007,13:34)We should trust the translators to know more about Greek, Hebrew, and Aramaic than you and I.We have the Holy Spirit of truth to guide us into all truthIf you dont trust the translations then what do you have?Another mans “Intelinear”.Again, My intelinear differs than…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 22 2007,10:02)Hi W, You say”Jesus “Is” the Express Image of the Invisible God!The “Exact representation of his substance”.AND”How can this be t8, seeing Jesus is the “exact representation of his substance” and the “Express Image of the invisible God”?” And yet you worship the image and the representation of God. What…[Read more]