Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 16 2008,23:08)Quote (david @ Oct. 16 2008,03:00)Quote Just because Lot couldn't read the fine print (the law) doesn't mean he wasn't accountable.  I'm just saying that the law, leviticus etc, came later, after Lot's time.How did Noah know which animals were clean and unclean if the law came later?Hi KevinHow did the animals…[Read more]

Quote (epistemaniac @ Oct. 11 2008,00:19)Quote (malcolm ferris @ Oct. 07 2008,22:16)Quote A particularly glaring error you make is where you say “The fact that he was GOD’s son meant he could not stay dead, GOD raised him up again” While this is partly true, it is, unfortunately, only partly true. God's word also tells us, that is, Jesus Himself t…[Read more]

Hi LUQuote (Lightenup @ Oct. 11 2008,05:26)In conclusion, the word theos represents more than one type.  What remains important is that we worship the One True God and the One whom He has sent, Jesus Christ.3 “This is eternal life, that they may know You, the ONLY TRUE GOD, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent.LU    Found here…Yes the word “The…[Read more]

Hi t8Quote (t8 @ Oct. 15 2008,22:19) As most of you are probably aware, I see these as qualitative.Adding the definite article is just reckless in my opinion, and adding the indefinite article is perhaps not as bad, but implies that there is a second god, or in Judas's case, another devil creature.Yes it is your opinion which defies hundreds of…[Read more]

Hi DavidQuote (david @ Oct. 15 2008,14:13) Since there is no indefinite article in the greek language, where the context demands it, the translator adds the , otherwise there would be no “a's” in the New testament.Who says John 1:1 demands an indefinite article except your own theology?John 1:1 should be interpreted in light of the Gospel of John…[Read more]

Hi WMSince our discussion is a little off topic as not3 has pointed out, I moved it to here…I Hope as time permits to get to the rest of your response. Gonna be out of town for a week starting Tuesday.Keith

Hi MFSorry for the delayed reply. I have been away. I see there has been quite a bit of discussion going on in the John 1:1 thread. Since our discussion is a little off topic I brought it over from here…Quote (malcolm ferris @ Oct. 10 2008,14:50)Thanks for pointing out that MISTAKE – I must have been tired when I wrote this, don’t have as muc…[Read more]

Hi KenQuote (epistemaniac @ Oct. 10 2008,10:51)While I know that it is convenient to concoct such a weak unbiblical definition in order to be able to try and refute others views, unfortunately however, according to your definition, there must be literally millions of gods… and you still have a problem of the Bible saying that there is only one…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 10 2008,08:41)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Oct. 09 2008,04:45)Hi DavidQuote (david @ Oct. 09 2008,11:52)IT IS FALSE LOGIC AND JUST WRONG THINKING TO ASSUME THAT BECAUSE THERE IS “ONLY ONE TRUE GOD” THAT EVERYONE ELSE THAT IS CALLED GOD IS EITHER A PART OF THAT GODHEAD OR FALSE. Ok, but I have asked you and t8 to present your…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ Oct. 09 2008,15:34)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Oct. 07 2008,07:31)I am Glad that you admit the Father who is Spirit is invisible and Yahshua is the “visible image of God”.What?You have got to be kidding.I have been preaching this since the beginning and repeatedly.You are either not listening or you just come up with phrases like that to…[Read more]

Hi MFYou say…Quote (malcolm ferris @ Oct. 07 2008,01:11) Omnipotence – Jesus does not have omnipotence of himself – he was given it by GODThen you say…Quote (malcolm ferris @ Oct. 07 2008,15:57) 1 – I did not say 2 separate beings were omnipotent. That is the point – Jesus can hardly be called omnipotent if he needed to have all authority h…[Read more]

Quote (epistemaniac @ Oct. 08 2008,13:25)have studied theology extensively, and since I am disabled, I have more time on my hands than the average person, I therefore study the bible and theology (which includes historical theology) far more than the average person. Further, aside from my extensive individual studies, I have a degree in Biblical…[Read more]

Hi EQuote (epistemaniac @ Oct. 08 2008,11:17)as soon as you can tell me how Jesus is god, but not the true God, and yet not therefore a false God… perhaps I will read your verses. I agree!I have been waiting for those verses also!Blessings. WJ

Hi t8Quote (t8 @ Oct. 09 2008,15:50)What does that prove? It proves that the God in scripture is not a Trinity, therefore the Trinity is a derived understanding and not taught in scripture. Interestingly enough, if you believe that God the Father is the Most High God, then substituting God with Father doesn't break the verses like the word Trinity…[Read more]

Hi DavidQuote (david @ Oct. 09 2008,11:52)IT IS FALSE LOGIC AND JUST WRONG THINKING TO ASSUME THAT BECAUSE THERE IS “ONLY ONE TRUE GOD” THAT EVERYONE ELSE THAT IS CALLED GOD IS EITHER A PART OF THAT GODHEAD OR FALSE. Ok, but I have asked you and t8 to present your unambiguous scriptural evidence for this statement without any reply.Here Ill post…[Read more]

Quote (david @ Oct. 09 2008,11:32)While in the ministry, I've only met a few priests, ministers, etc.  Rather than discuss scripture, they often seem to like to state what they believe and then point to the pile of books they've read as confirmation that what they believe is right.At that point, I feel like suggesting that perhaps he had been…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 08 2008,15:24)Hi WJ,I just wanted to clear something up.  If I understand you correctly, you do not believe in all the statements of the trinity doctrine, right?  If so, then you would agree that the trinity doctrine is false, right?  If it is only partly correct and not completely correct, it has to be false, IMO.LUHi LU…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 07 2008,12:54)Hi WJ, Do you think your constant use of inference produces foundational truths that you can teach from?Why not just let scripture teach you as it is sacred?NHHeckle, Heckle, Heckle.It would help if you presented some dialogue here rather than just act like a badger.Or maybe you do not have a response.WJ

Quote (david @ Oct. 07 2008,12:40)Quote So how many Gods or gods are there for you brother David;one is almighty and other is small 'god' or mighty god. Am I correct ?Golli, I think if we understood what “god” means, this would be easier to understand.  It is a word that means “strong one” or “powerful one.”And while many have certain degrees of…[Read more]

Quote (david @ Oct. 07 2008,12:42)Quote I have written on this topic here.WJ, I'm confused by this.  Is that your website?Hi DavidNo!That is the writers quote, I just included his own link to his quote.WJ