Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 18 2010,11:17)Quote (Ed J @ June 18 2010,10:36)Hi WJ,You can claim whatever reason best 'suits face' for you, but the fact remains; at least you have admitted you ran.Kang also: at has not denied this provable fact.God blessEd J http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEDYou treat my words like you do the scriptures.You pick…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ June 18 2010,10:36)Hi WJ,You can claim whatever reason best 'suits face' for you, but the fact remains; at least you have admitted you ran.Kang also: at has not denied this provable fact.God blessEd J http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEDYou treat my words like you do the scriptures.You pick what you want and then throw this rest…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 18 2010,10:37)TO ALL:Mikeboll has dogmatically claimed that Jesus is a god who “came into being” after YHWH. Keith has corrected Mike about this many times but Mike has given Keith a deaf ear. Isaiah 43:10 explicitly says that before and after YHWH there was no God “formed.” The LXX uses the Greek “ginomai” for…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ June 18 2010,10:36)Hi WJ,You can claim whatever reason best 'suits face' for you, but the fact remains; at least you have admitted you ran.Kang also: at has not denied this provable fact.God blessEd J http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEDYou think way to high of yourself!WJ

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 18 2010,09:53)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 19 2010,01:02)Quote (Ed J @ June 17 2010,20:43)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 17 2010,13:39)Why can't we go question by question?  I ask one.  He answers and asks one of his own?  mikeHi Mike,That's exactly what I told WJ Here –>(Third Post). but he ran from me.”Bible Truth” is ha…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ June 17 2010,20:43)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 17 2010,13:39)Why can't we go question by question?  I ask one.  He answers and asks one of his own?  mikeHi Mike,That's exactly what I told WJ Here –>(Third Post). but he ran from me.”Bible Truth” is hard to refute, so the 'only option' is run. (James 4:7)God blessEd J <…[Read more]

Quote (JustAskin @ June 17 2010,14:50)WJ,Are you for real….? “Son of man is proof of Jesus' Deity”? Please can you explain that?Have the trinitarians run out of Trinity 'proofs' that you are even hijacking obvious “man” verses.Hi JADaniel was written at a time when this phrase had a specific and known meaning. In the context of Daniel 7:13, in…[Read more]

Quote (JustAskin @ June 17 2010,14:50)WJ,Are you for real….? “Son of man is proof of Jesus' Deity”? Please can you explain that?Have the trinitarians run out of Trinity 'proofs' that you are even hijacking obvious “man” verses.Hi JADaniel was written at a time when this phrase had a specific and known meaning. In the context of Daniel 7:13, in…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 17 2010,14:02)hi, Discussion has wandered away from the trinity. what trinity?NHNot really, because Jesus being the “Son of man” is proof of his Deity!WJ

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 17 2010,14:02)hi, Discussion has wandered away from the trinity. what trinity?NHNot really, because Jesus being the “Son of man” is proof of his Deity!WJ

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 17 2010,12:03)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 18 2010,03:26)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 15 2010,19:51)Hi WJ,You're getting closer to being completely honest.  You said:Quote What proof? That a questionable Arian supporter may have suggested that Jesus had a beginning.Now if you take the final leap and admit that there is…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 16 2010,22:59)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ June 17 2010,14:46)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 17 2010,12:22)Hi Dennison, Sorry, bro.  There is nothing in those scriptures that says Jesus is this “Son of Man” he keeps talking about in the third person.peace and love,mikeI didnt say that scripture specifically say that Jesus was the…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 16 2010,22:59)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ June 17 2010,14:46)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 17 2010,12:22)Hi Dennison, Sorry, bro.  There is nothing in those scriptures that says Jesus is this “Son of Man” he keeps talking about in the third person.peace and love,mikeI didnt say that scripture specifically say that Jesus was the…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 15 2010,19:51)Hi WJ,You're getting closer to being completely honest.  You said:Quote What proof? That a questionable Arian supporter may have suggested that Jesus had a beginning.Now if you take the final leap and admit that there is no doubt about what Eusebius DID suggest in his letter, you will be honest.  You don't h…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 16 2010,22:51)Quote (JustAskin @ June 17 2010,06:17)Thanks for that – I do think that it is time that these “blocking” issues are put to bed.Even if Jesus was speaking in some kind of a prophetic past tense,(which would seem weird since he also told Nicodemus that the Son of Man WOULD BE lifted up), you have to figure out…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 16 2010,22:35)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,05:44)What is being disputed is Mike and Kathi insist that the words “firstborn” (prōtotokos) and “begotten” (monogenes) in reference to Jesus is proof that he had a beginning or better yet that an asexual God brings birth to a god!Hi WJ,And isn't it funny how the “early…[Read more]

Hi MikeQuote (JustAskin @ June 16 2010,17:00)Is this concept repeated elsewhere in Scriptures?Can anyone, someone give one other example, please?Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 16 2010,22:32)Hi JA,It's repeated many times.  But what you fail to understand, even though it's been pointed out very clearly by Kathi, is that EVERY time this is the case, it's…[Read more]

Quote (JustAskin @ June 16 2010,15:01)Jack,I would hope that at this level of 'discussion' that any of us does NOT believe that Jesus 'PreExisted' in Spiritual form.But yet we know that Satan is never far with his mixing bowl.——————————————————————————————…[Read more]

Quote (JustAskin @ June 16 2010,13:39)To All,Can I ask what it is that is in dispute here?Excuse me if I seem to be failing to understand – but is it not perfectly obvious what is being spoken of here:”In fulfillment of his own purpose he gave us birth by the word of truth, so that we would become a kind of first fruits of his creatures.” (…and…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ June 16 2010,13:01)Quote (WorshippingJesus @ June 17 2010,04:41)Quote (Lightenup @ June 15 2010,00:46)It seems here in this verse that what Roo thinks Jesus is, the 'we' in this verse really are and not Jesus:James 1:18NET ©By his sovereign plan he gave us birth 1  through the message of truth, that we would be a kind of f…[Read more]