The link above didn't work for me this time. It should have been this:http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2013….-a.html

From Part B of my “Seven Lessons for John 1:1c”  linked in my Nov. 06 2013,08:24 post above which wakeup refused to examine:Some of the trinitarian sources which admit that the Bible actually describes men who represent God (judges, Israelite kings, etc.) and God's angels as gods include: 1. Young's Analytical Concordance of the Bible, “Hints and…[Read more]

Sorry, I tend to ignore willful ignorance.

Quote T.But God disagree wiyh you. Isaiah 45:22 Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth: ***for I am God, and there is none else***. Meaning: there is not **A GOD** beside him.KEPP ON CONTRADICTING THE SCRIPTURESTO SATISFY YOURSELF.wakeup. There is no God beside him, but there are gods (including angels and…[Read more]

As for John 1:1c, which should be restricted to a new discussion of that clause only, see my study of it:http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2013….-a.html

I see that we have been successfully derailed from the important discussion of why the KJV uses the only personal name of God, JEHOVAH, at Ps. 83:18 and not in nearly 6000 uses of the same Hebrew word in the rest of scripture.I suppose the same tactic will be used to avoid the KJV's inclusion of the spurious ending of Mark 16:9-19. It is this…[Read more]

Where have I promoted “my” Bible??If you want to discuss John 1:1c, I suggest you open a new discussion confined to that single clause.Meanwhile I thought we were discussing the KJV (and 'JEHOVAH' found within it.)

What does all that have to do with “which Bible should I believe”??

Quote Quote JW's are not allowed to discuss the bible with anon jw; without an elder.They are well protected within themselves.And also watch each other. Quote any men made organization will and have to do this ;it is called self preservation Actually the above is called completely false. What do you think all those 7 million ordinary people are…[Read more]

I am not now digressing from the importance of God's name for all persons and the KJV's (and many following its tradition) misuse of God's ONLY personal name.“You shall not misuse the name of Yahweh your God, for Yahweh will not leave unpunished anyone who misuses his name.” – Ex. 20:7, NJB.But if you carefully and honestly discuss the study I&#…[Read more]

Apoplanesis: Digression or evasion

My study of the importance of God's name in scripture:http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2010….od.html

Quote Exodus 3:15 And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, The LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: ****this is my name for ever****, ***and this is my memorial unto all generations***.Would anyone deny this statement? Yes, 'LORD' is…[Read more]

Psa 83:18 That men may know that thou, whose name alone is JEHOVAH , art the most high over all the earth. – KJV.KJV believers, do you not see what your translation is telling you?  God's name ***ALONE*** is JEHOVAH!!!This is his ONLY personal name to be used for all time.  All other 'names' are merely titles or descriptions.And yet this p…[Read more]

If anyone believes the KJV is the most accurate English translation of God's word, he should then believe what Ps 83:18 states:Psa 83:16 Fill their faces with shame; that they may seek thy name, O LORD.Psa 83:17 Let them be confounded and troubled for ever; yea, let them be put to shame, and perish:Psa 83:18 That men may know that thou, whose name…[Read more]

Quote Hi Tigger2.God's Word is a *living* Word.God is always in charge of his Word.Just as you are always in charge of your word.Only God can bring out his Word next to him,and give him a shape as his own image.AND THE WORD WAS  *WITH* GOD.FOR HE BROUGHT HIM FORTH OUT OF HIMSELF.Only God can make his Word flesh,which he did.Jesus was a living…[Read more]

I finally noticed t8's helpful post. Thanks, t8!

Somehow I thought you were saying that Jesus is God.  Your answers, though, don’t seem to be defending such an idea.  I’ll continue by still assuming that is your intent (until you state otherwise).“There is no mystery in john 17:1.3.and the rest.Jesus is straight forward.We are to know *the truth* about God/Father and, Jesus,whom he had send.”…[Read more]

I have some disagreement with parts of the translation you used, but I agree that it refers to the Word who was with God.  Most early Christians (and many today also agree).However, before going into the translation itself, I would prefer that you specifically answer each one of the scriptures I gave first.Thanks,T2

Hey, wakeup,I think I finally figured out a way to use the font modifiers.I still don't know how to use the iB code buttons, however.