Please read the first 6 paragraphs of my post above (at least) and then click on the link.

Quote HE, because he is alive and powerful.We can not address the Holy spirit as IT.That would be blasphemous.wakeup. The only reason “he” and “him” are used here is because of the NT Greek requirement of gender agreement.  That is, if the noun to which the pronoun refers is masculine in the Greek, the pronoun must also be masculine in the Gree…[Read more]

Quote Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, **The everlasting Father**, The Prince of Peace.The son of God is called the everlasting Father?Can you explain?wakeup. Yes: See Tigger2 post: Dec. 02 2013,10:42 (page 8)

Quote 6In his days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely; and this is his name whereby he shall be called: Jehovah our righteousness.Jehovah says HIS name shall be called Jehovah our righteousness!! That would be the messiah's name, btw.None of that disproves the many facts presented in my last post. But here is more from my studies…[Read more]

The Most High God is Jehovah (YHWH) alone (Ps. 83:18). Jehovah is called the Father (but he is never called the Son, the Firstborn, the Only-begotten, the Christ or Messiah, etc.). Even many personal names of Israelites in the Bible actually said “Jehovah is the Father”: ‘Abijah,’ ‘Abiah,’ ‘Joab,’ etc. or “The Father is God”: ‘Abiel,’ ‘Eliab,’ e…[Read more]

Bad news for the Jehovah’s witnessesFrom the OP:Quote We all have seen the shallow argument which is put forth by the Jehovah's Witnesses. It goes like this, “The Father is the almighty God. But Jesus is lesser in power and is just a mighty God.”….“The JW's admit that Christ is el gibbor. The old testament says that nothing is too difficult for e…[Read more]

To look up ra in the Ben Chayyim Text click on the following link and go to the pages indicated below: http://pastorpauley.com/ancient/masoretic.pdf Ra ('adversity' – KJV) Ps 94:13 (p. 846, left end of :13)Ra ('evil' – KJV) Is. 45:7 (p. 543, next to last at left end)

the plagiarist

Are you referring to the scionofzion site?

“Aramaic Versions (the Targums): These are Aramaic paraphrases of the Old Testament … prepared for use in the synagogue,” – Eberhard Nestle, The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge. Vol. 2, pp. 130-132.“The Targums are interpretive renderings of the books of the Hebrew Scriptures … into Aramaic….“At first the oral Targum was a…[Read more]

Exactly!

Quote Ooh my, where is this thread all leading too?Angels being called Jehovah now?You guys are so messed up, and it's getting worse every day. “The Angel of the LORD…. Traditional Christian interpretation has held that this ‘angel’ was a preincarnate manifestation of Christ as God’s Messenger-Servant. It may be, however, that, as the Lord’s…[Read more]

Now that's what I like: a truly careful examination of all the evidence and a clear, intelligent reply which covers all the pertinent points.

If the KJV is true at Ps. 83:18, then it is misusing the personal name of God about 6000 times in the rest of the OT. This can be seen in any OT interlinear.  It can be seen in Strong’s Concordance which examines the KJV and its Hebrew OT source (the Masoretic Text).  Notice how many times this noted Concordance has found the personal name of God…[Read more]

wakeup,The same post above by me apparently applies to you as well. Why can't you confine your personal and organizational attacks to a new discussion instead of purposely distracting from this one?

Quote Journey42 wrote:Does the word Jehovah appear in the Greek text of the New Testatment?According to my research it says this;The NWT translates the Greek word “kyrios” as “Jehovah” more than 25 times in the New Testament (Mt 3:3, Lk 2:9, Jn 1:23, Acts 21:14, Rom 12:19, Col 1:10, 1Thess 5:2, 1Pet 1:25, Rev 4:8, etc.). Why is the word…[Read more]

Perhaps if you will answer the question: How can the KJV make the clear, definite statement that JEHOVAH is the only personal name of God, and yet misuse that same name 6000 times in the rest of the OT, I will answer your off-subject distracting questions?

Quote Tigger 2.That s right: you shall not missuse the name of your God.Specially not use it to promote a product.wakeup. From a list of fallacious arguments:Needling: simply attempting to make the other person angry, without trying to address the argument at hand. Sometimes this is a delaying tactic. Needling is also Ad Hominem if you insult…[Read more]

Is the KJV the best version of the Bible?Quote Journey42:“Tigger mentioned Jehovah. When one carries on about that, 99.9% they are Jehovah Witnesses. They believe theirs is the only true bible, and the rest corrupt.”How can the KJV be the best version if it misuses the only personal name of God thousands of times?  Notice what the KJV says abou…[Read more]

Thank you, Mike.I truly believe that my study proves that “a god” was intended by John at 1:1c. I know that it is very rare that anyone carefully reads it, so I am looking forward to your take on it.T2