Gene,

Ro. 1:20, NASB:

“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.”

KJV: “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the thing…[Read more]

Gene,

Ro. 1:20, <i>NASB</i>:

“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and <b>divine nature</b>, have been <b>clearly</b> <b>seen</b>, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.”

<i>KJV</i>: “For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are <b…[Read more]

Kerwin, I believe musterion is in the neuter case, not masculine.  Therefore ὅς is referring to someone else.

Your Bible Hub, like many lexicons, lumps the relative pronouns ὅς, ἥ, and ὅ together. If you look a little closer at each one, though, you will find that ὅς is a masculine, singular pronoun. This means that, when referring to a person, it means “who” (masc.) or, in other words, “he who” or even just “he.”

The neuter relative pronoun ὅ wo…[Read more]

Your Bible Hub, like many lexicons, lumps the relative pronouns ὅς, ἥ, and ὅ together. If you look a little closer at each one, though, you will find that ὅς is a masculine, singular pronoun. This means that, when referring to a person, it means “who” (masc.) or, in other words, “he who” or even just “he.”

The neuter relative pronoun ὅ wo…[Read more]

Thank you t8.

Whoever wrote that Ignatius used “God” in a quote of 1 Tim. 3:16 is, I believe, completely wrong.

I would appreciate an answer to my question.

Why is there no name or information for the person who made that comment?

Christian:  The Codex Sinaiticus renders the verse to say “He”…

…And yet Ignatius, a first century apostolic father references the verse to say “God”.

Is there an explanation for this?

……………………………………

Tigger: I can’t find it.  Please give epistle name and chapter number.

 

The Codex Sinaiticus renders the verse to say “He”…

…And yet Ignatius, a first century apostolic father references the verse to say “God”.

Is there an explanation for this?

……………………………………

I can’t find it.  Please give epistle name and chapter number.

 

The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Zondervan, 1986, tells us:>

“The reason why judges are called ‘gods’ in Ps. 82 is that they have the office of administering God’s judgment as ‘sons of the Most High’. In context of the Ps the men in question have failed to do this…. On the other hand, Jesus fulfilled the role of a…[Read more]

The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Zondervan, 1986, tells us:>

“The reason why judges are called ‘gods’ in Ps. 82 is that they have the office of administering God’s judgment as ‘sons of the Most High’. In context of the Ps the men in question have failed to do this…. On the other hand, Jesus fulfilled the role of a…[Read more]

<span style=”font-size: large;”><i>The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology</i>, Zondervan, 1986, tells us:</span>

“The reason why judges are called ‘gods’ in Ps. 82 is that they have the office of administering God’s judgment as ‘sons of the Most High’. In context of the Ps the men in question have failed to do this…. On the…[Read more]

YHWH (Yahweh/Jehovah) is the Most High God – Ps 83:18.

YHWH (Yahweh/Jehovah) is the Father – Is. 64:8.

YHWH (Yahweh/Jehovah) is God alone – Is. 37:16.

Excellent point, Mike.

Have you ever heard an intelligent answer to the question of how Jesus can be equally God when he specifically said the Father is the only true God? – John 17:1, 3.

Wakeup,

See section #4 of this same study:

http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/09/ao-speaker-confusion.html

Hi, t8,
Yes, it’s one of my studies on my blog.

So who is He? Father? Son? Father and Son?

And who is YHWH? The Father? Jesus?

One of my personal studies concerns Alpha and Omega:

http://examiningthetrinity.blogspot.com/2009/09/ao-speaker-confusion.html

So exactly who is the great God we are discussing?