Thanks Karmarie … but still no success.Perhaps the ones that were involved regarding the rider on the first white horse with crown and bow will step forth.Rev 6:2

Good to see you back Mike.May the Lord lead you to HIS truth, and not necessarily what you read here.You may be right about Wikipedia (I dont know) but the picture I have is about 100 persons all dressed in white all laying face down on the carpet facing … the Chair Of Peter.I am sure you know what the “Chair of Peter” represents.And no, it is…[Read more]

Any one know where some threads might be located regarding Rev 6:2 the rider on the first white horse with crown and bow?I tried “search” but not much helpthank you

Thanks Ed … after 30 years on one subject, you are bound to get one right.Careful Georg … you dont want to be NUMBERED with the transgressors.GEORG = 52

Hi Karmarie,EVERY  pope is “Holy Father' and EVERY priest is “Father”.I have pictures of “about to be priests” laying prostate before this “Holy Father”.Another crystal clear biblical identification of the great harlot church is found in 1 Timothy 4. Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry,…[Read more]

Karmarie … here is another biblical identification of the great harlot church.And call no man your father upon the earth:for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Matt 23:0Does that sound like Islam to you … or the Church of Rome?The following is from my unpublished booklet.And now dear Roman Catholic reader, you know the true meaning and…[Read more]

No Karmarie … I was commenting on Georg's remark:”Sorry folks, after reading all your comments, all I can say is; the blind leading the blind.”It appears that he painted us all with a broad brush.

Folks … I believe we may have struck a nerve!

Karmarie,Did you see what I was getting at from my post about the specific inspired word used to describe Jesus as being “numbered” with the transgressors?This is why I believe God designed the names Jesus Lucifer and Muhammad to each sum at 74.  HE knew it all in advance.Regarding the false harlot church in Revelation.We are told that it…[Read more]

Hi Karmarie,I do not believe quite the same as Georg, that the mark of the beast was the sign placed on the shields of Constantine's army.I believe that to be unbiblical as that is not located on the right hand and/or forehead as stipulated in scripture.I would think that 90% or more of any army is right handed.  Therefore, they would hold the…[Read more]

Hi Karmarie … you said in part in your recent post:”I just read the opening post again, about the number 74 and what puzzles me with the number 74 is that it also adds up to Lucifer in gematria? … …”Karmarie, have you ever considered the possibility of an underlying meaning to a scriptural passage?A spiritual discernment, or perhaps a “play…[Read more]

Mike,Regarding the question:  “can there be three “THE” antichrists?”Thank you Mike … your answer (no) is logical and common sense.I dont know why others find the question so difficult?Perhaps in time, others will begin to realize the futility of using the term “THE” antichrist if we are seriously attempting to discuss the Book of Revelation…[Read more]

Ed J,You quoted my post to Mike where I asked him if there can be three “THE” antichrists?You replied to that in part by saying the second beast (Rev 13:11) is identified by John as the 'false prophet' ……..I did not ask that question, so why would you provide that information, as I think everyone here knows very well that the second beast…[Read more]

Hi Mike,You believe that there is a first beast, a second beast, and a false prophet … three separate entities.I agree with you.My question to you Mike would be this:  If they are separate entities, can all three be “THE” antichrist?A yes or no answer is fine with me, no explanation needed.

Mike angel,Thanks for the encouragement about “74”.But you have me confused by your statement.You feel comfortable using the term antichrist when discussing Revelation, but then you state that Elvis is the first beast, the media is the second beast and Muhammed is the false prophet.In your mind, is Elvis “the antichrist”?Is the media “the…[Read more]

My whole post was about the use of “antichrist” rather than using one of the specific biblical terms that could be used instead, to make the discussion crystal clear as to the suspect or subject  identified in Revelation.  Image, mark, number first beast etc..I don't know if others are following this thread, but note the response of Ed J and G…[Read more]

Georg,My mistake about Israel becoming a nation, it was 1948 as you said, and I believe it was May 13 … is that correct?The EEC (EU) held its first meeting of the six original members in the Vatican in 1946.  The six consisted of France, W. Germany, Italy, Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg.The Treaty Of Rome (also held within the walls of the…[Read more]

………….. IS THERE A “THE” ANTICHRIST?Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.  1 John 2:18.Note that the Greek does not state “the” antichrist shall come.  The meaning could be the spirit of all those opposed to C…[Read more]

Georg,I have had to alter my scenario more than a few times over the last 30 years as things have developed.  You may have to do the same.I think most commentators would agree that the UN is weak and without teeth.Whereas the EU is far stronger and growing, and has a military arm within its structure.I believe it was formed in the same year that…[Read more]

Georg,If Obama is a key player as you say, what specific Revelation designation or identification do you believe he fits into?