Nick,My spirit is not satisfied with your interpretation of Hebrews 6 because it condemns the God's words in Roman 6. If you do not think your interpretation does then you must see things differently but you are failing to communicate how you see them.In Romans 6 Paul is expounding on the philosophy of Christ centered around being immersed in the…[Read more]

Nick,I am not the one making Scripture fight itself you are. I am just pointing out your choice to do so then offering an alternative interpretation for Hebrews 6:1-3 that does not condemn Paul's words in Romans 6.

Quote (journey42 @ April 08 2014,17:03)Correction:  Title – One word of God only with a capital G.Journey,The “G” is for emphasis but the format of titles does does not allow for any letter but the first to be capitalized. Just state “the god” for emphasis or some other form that is allowed.

Nick,He was speaking in a different way than what you say unless you accuse him of engaging in philosophical debate over ethereal matters when he addresses Romans 6.My understanding is he was instructing them to grow up and get over issues being conceived, being formed in the womb, being born, and being a neonatal.

Quote (david @ April 06 2014,12:13)Quote (kerwin @ April 06 2014,08:45)David,My “weird  “ad hominem” serve a purpose as they are addressed at the modern feminist doctrine which is based on the principle of this world and not the principles of God.  There doctrine is clearly false as these creatures claim women were the slaves of men and yet men c…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 06 2014,21:42)Quote (kerwin @ April 05 2014,15:48)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 04 2014,08:35)The Israelites were also not allowed to sell their birthright land they inherited.  Was that land their “property”?Mike,I do not believe it was.  Basically they were given the use of it by God and could sell that use though I b…[Read more]

Quote (david @ April 06 2014,11:57)Quote (kerwin @ April 06 2014,09:00)Quote (david @ April 04 2014,11:08)Quote (david @ April 04 2014,09:51)Quote (kerwin @ April 04 2014,04:45)Slavery is a type of employment contract whose terms vary from age to age and culture to culture.  Death is sometimes the only way out of it but even then some have…[Read more]

Nick and Wakeup,Scripture does state Jesus ate and drank but it does not say he went bathroom though it is implied by the fact he is human. If we stated because it did not occur in Scripture it did not happen then we would speak what is false. If we stated since it is implied then it not proven we would be speaking an untruth.

Nick,Some interpret that this armor is used to battle demons.  I do not see that, unless you mean resisting them so they will run away.  Of course Satan's schemes show themselves in many ways such as the needy of this world being those he oppresses more than or in other ways than their neighbors.  Or as  a disaster, even way, that sweeps into the…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 08 2014,08:30)Jammin,Quote where can you read in phil 2.6 that he was existing in the form of his OWN GOD? any version?So who do you think Jesus called his Father and our Father, his God and our God if not God?Jammin,You did not answer my question?

Quote (jammin @ April 08 2014,19:40)kerwin,do you exist in the form of MAN? or do you exist in the form of your OWN MAN?Jammin,You forcing your opinion into Scripture as it clearly states Jesus was made in the likeness of mankind, Philippians 2:7 and yet you claim he was in the form of God-kind.The fact is that Jesus being the form of God “did not…[Read more]

Nick,So what did Paul mean considering he addressed those principles in a number of places?

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 08 2014,08:35)Good man, Nick.  It was your recent posts that got me really thinking about getting baptized.  I was baptized as a baby in a Catholic church – at a few days old.  But I don't count that as anything at all.You are correct that it is something we all need to do.  If Jesus himself did it, and then commanded it…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 08 2014,08:29)Quote (jammin @ April 07 2014,07:33)where can you read in phil 2.6 that he was existing in the form of his OWN GOD?Don't you believe the God in whose form Jesus was existing was “the Father”, jammin?I do.And isn't “the Father” Jesus' own God?  Yep.1+1=2, right?Mike.Trinitarian math does not work that…

Jammin,Quote where can you read in phil 2.6 that he was existing in the form of his OWN GOD? any version?So who do you think Jesus called his Father and our Father, his God and our God if not God?

Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 28 2014,11:36)Quote (Nick Hassan @ Mar. 28 2014,13:18)Hi ED, Quite so. Baptism is the new circumcision. col 2.9f Circumcision was very important to the jews but you think baptism is not relevant for followers of Jesus Christ?Hi Nick,Let me explain a little more clearly.Point  #1: “Water Baptism” symbolizes death to the law,…[Read more]

Ed,Quote 1) You seem to limit your conclusion both further and not as far as Scripture declares as the apostles also received the gifts of the Holy ghost in a like manner and of the Gentiles only Cornelius and his household are said to receive the gift like the apostles.Basically you are inadvertently adding to Scripture as you only have evidence…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 07 2014,07:02)Quote (Ed J @ April 06 2014,17:20)Hi Kerwin,I don't get what you are saying here……….I was thinking the same thing when I read Kerwin's response, Ed.  Mike,Replace limit with taken and perhaps it more understandable.

Ed,I am referring to several items that feel you are familiar with.One is Peter's words on Pentecost when he responded to the inquiry of the Jewish and Jewish converts to the event.Acts 2:37-38Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles,…[Read more]