Nick,

Hi KW,

Are physical or can be physical when God chooses?

Stop applying your simplistic rules to the ways of God

There are those that claim that angels can become physical beings but are by nature immaterial beings. The same is said of Jesus because he passes through his walls. Passing through walls is not evidence as things that…[Read more]

Nick,

Reason alone will lead to understanding of the nature of God as it is Spiritually discerned. I believe God chooses to reveal it to some by inspiration but clearly not to those that hear the word from others or find it in Scriptures.

Nick,

Hi davidl,

The nature of God does not have to be found by reasoning.

God is one.

God has a Son.

You are just preaching to the choir as DavidL believes that the truth of God cannot be found by reason. I tend to believe people because their teachings are not in agreement with the sound and valid reasoning God uses in Scripture.…[Read more]

Charles,

I find your arguments lacking in reason and so hard to follow. It may be the result of you leaving evidence and the work you did reasoning out. You claim God creates things in three and yet humanity is a unique creation. The flaw within your basic causes the rest of what you argue based on it to become unsound.

That you choose to…[Read more]

Nick,

Hi KW,

“The bottom line is that humanity bears the likeness of angels.”

Really?

So easily convinced?

Them please tell us how the angelic cherubim described in Ez 1-10 with their wheels etc resemble men.

They are not called angels though they are called living creatures. None of the living creatures look like men though they may par…[Read more]

Nick,

Thin evidence for such brave statements.

It is not thin evidence unless you consider the word of Scriptures thin evidence.

Jesus used to test to show he was not an immaterial being after his resurrection. The first is he allowed himself to be touched and the second is that he ate. Either you believe Jesus was being honest in proposing…[Read more]

t8,

Oh I see Kerwin. You say that ‘us’ is God x the Angels.

Yet that is your assumption only. You cannot prove that man was made after the likeness of angels. But this is what is written:

What you say is an assumption as your premises themselves are controversial. Neither I, Nick, or others agree with your premises. On the other hand, no one…[Read more]

Nick,

 

Hi KW,

Angels are not physical.

At times they do look like men.

Have you have concluded that from Scriptures?

In Scripture they have been touched and have eaten and therefore they are physical.

The immaterial can not be touched nor does it eat, for example ghosts.

Nick,

<div class=”bbp-reply-content”>

Hi KW,

Angels are not physical.

At times they do look like men.

</div>

<div class=”bbp-reply-content”>

They have been touched and eat and therefore they are physical.

The immaterial can not be touched nor does it eat, for example ghosts.

</div>

T8,

Your chosen teaching and David L’ were just not taught at the time of Jesus..  They are teachings of a new religion and Jesus did not come to teach a new religion.  All he came to do is teach a new covenant and bring it into being.

David L,

Even trinitarians are getting wise to the fallacies of this argument on Genesis 1:26.  At the time Jesus walked the earth it was believed God is speaking to his angels.  He and they are all on the same team after all.  His job is to do and there’s is to watch and celebrate.

Angels look like human beings according to the ones that vi…[Read more]

@t8,

What point are these individuals making that takes an hour?

Nick,

Flesh is no more and we will be like the angels.

The only passage that can be used to make that case is where Paul writes that “flesh and blood will not inherit the reign of God …”.  That interpretation is based on assuming that the words “flesh and blood” are literal while at same assuming the “flesh” in the words “no flesh would be…[Read more]

Nick,

Flesh is no more and we will be like the angels.

The only passage that can be used to make that case is where Paul writes that “flesh and blood will not inherit the reign of God …” and that interpretation is based on assuming that the “flesh and blood” are literal while at same assuming the “flesh” in the words “no flesh would be saved” in…[Read more]

miia,

What do you mean by “test them”?

Honestly testing teachings repetitively breeds confidence in them when they do not fail the tests.

miia,

What do you mean by “test them”?

Honestly testing teaching repetitively breed confidence in them when they do not fail the tests.

@t8,

T9 is what t8 is called when my fingers do the talking and misspeak.

Nick,

Now that I look back I see other posts you could have been addressing.  Could you please be more specific about what you are addressing in the future.  Thank you.

Nick,

It is clearly better than guesswork which abounds on this subject.

Judaism and Christianity are essential the same religion with their major difference being the Jews looks forward to the birth of the Christ while Christians view it as history and look forward to his return from heaven.

I do not see it as gospel  but it does address an…[Read more]

t8,

There were others resurrected when he was.  The people in Jerusalem saw them and then they are no longer mentioned in Scripture.