Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2014,09:29)Quote (jammin @ April 15 2014,08:49)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 15 2014,11:32)Who or what does the SECOND word “God” refer to in that statement?any version that says in phil 2.6 Christ exist in the form of his own GOD?Also, question #2:  Are you aware that the Father Jehovah IS indeed the God OF Jesus?there…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2014,10:25)Quote (jammin @ April 15 2014,11:55)………you should understand that they have the same nature, God. that is the truth that you CANT accept because you accept what you only want to hearPerhaps we can't accept it because we have never read a scripture where the word “God” refers to a SPECIES or a NATURE,…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 16 2014,04:59)Jammin,What it tells us is that Jesus has a God and he calls that God his Father and the Father of believers. Put that with Philippians 2:6 and is tells us Jesus exists in the form of his Father and our Father,  the same one he calls his God.what version is that? can you read in phil 2.6 that Christ exists in…[Read more]

kerwin,Jesus is not a liar. if jesus said he is going to his faTHER and his God, it does not mean that he is not GOD by nature. we have God the father and God the only son. Jesus is the only SON and not the father but you should understand that they have the same nature, God. that is the truth that you CANT accept because you accept what you only…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 16 2014,04:28)Jammin,Quote any version that says in phil 2.6 Christ exist in the form of his own GOD? you CANT even prove to me your imagination.JESUS was not existing in the form of his OWN GOD. no versions will say that. phil 2.6 talks about nature or essence.Your words are nonsense.   “who, being in the form of God” is…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 15 2014,11:32)Quote (jammin @ April 14 2014,10:58)Quote (mikeboll @ 64)Quote (jammin @ April 09 2014,07:44)i believe that the word God in phil 2.6 refers to the nature or essence.Okay jammin,That takes care of the FIRST word “God” in verse 6.  But what about the second “God”?   Philippians 2:6 NET Biblewho though he e…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 12 2014,06:41)Quote (jammin @ April 11 2014,22:53)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 11 2014,09:36)Quote (jammin @ April 10 2014,07:45)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 10 2014,12:15)Quote (jammin @ April 09 2014,07:44)i believe that the word God in phil 2.6 refers to the nature or essence.Okay jammin,That takes care of the FIRST word “God”…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2014,03:52)Quote (jammin @ April 11 2014,10:53)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 11 2014,09:36)Quote (jammin @ April 10 2014,07:45)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 10 2014,12:15)Quote (jammin @ April 09 2014,07:44)i believe that the word God in phil 2.6 refers to the nature or essence.Okay jammin,That takes care of the FIRST word…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 11 2014,09:36)Quote (jammin @ April 10 2014,07:45)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 10 2014,12:15)Quote (jammin @ April 09 2014,07:44)i believe that the word God in phil 2.6 refers to the nature or essence.Okay jammin,That takes care of the FIRST word “God” in verse 6.  But what about the second “God”?   Philippians 2:6 NET B…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 11 2014,02:25)Quote (jammin @ April 09 2014,19:45)Quote (kerwin @ April 09 2014,07:40)Jamming,If I am among the wise then I exist in the form of God and therefore take on the form of a servant even as am am currently made in the likeness of mankind.  It is my hope to be found among the wise on that day.you still did not…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 10 2014,12:15)Quote (jammin @ April 09 2014,07:44)i believe that the word God in phil 2.6 refers to the nature or essence.Okay jammin,That takes care of the FIRST word “God” in verse 6.  But what about the second “God”?   Philippians 2:6 NET Biblewho though he existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 09 2014,07:40)Jamming,If I am among the wise then I exist in the form of God and therefore take on the form of a servant even as am am currently made in the likeness of mankind.  It is my hope to be found among the wise on that day.you still did not answer my question. do you exist in the form of MAN or do you exist in the…[Read more]

mike,your belief is not sufficient if you CANT give me a version. i believe that the word God in phil 2.6 refers to the nature or essence.Philippians 2:6New International Version (NIV)6 Who, being in very nature God,    did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;but ill give you a chance to prove your man-made d…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 09 2014,10:38)Quote (jammin @ April 08 2014,07:39)mike,i am asking you a version. can you give me one or not? i am existing in the form of MAN. i am NOT EXISTING IN THE FORM OF MY OWN MAN. that is not the correct way to say it.No jammin, I can't give you a version.  And I forgot that you don't think the “God” in Phil 2:6…[Read more]

kerwin,pls read my post. my post is according to phil 2.6

Quote (kerwin @ April 09 2014,02:59)Quote (jammin @ April 08 2014,19:40)kerwin,do you exist in the form of MAN? or do you exist in the form of your OWN MAN?Jammin,You forcing your opinion into Scripture as it clearly states Jesus was made in the likeness of mankind, Philippians 2:7 and yet you claim he was in the form of God-kind.The fact is that…[Read more]

kerwin,do you exist in the form of MAN? or do you exist in the form of your OWN MAN?

mike,i am asking you a version. can you give me one or not? i am existing in the form of MAN. i am NOT EXISTING IN THE FORM OF MY OWN MAN. that is not the correct way to say it. do you understand>? now i am asking you what version can you read that he was existing in the form of HIS OWN GOD. any version?

mike, i am existing in the form of MAN. i am MAN by nature. Christ was existing in the form of God. where can you read that he was existing in the form of his own God? where is that in phil 2.6?

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 06 2014,04:57)Quote (jammin @ April 04 2014,07:35)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 04 2014,11:52)It seems like you're trying to tell me that someone was both “limited” AND “unlimited” at the same time.But surely that must be a misunderstanding on my part, because no sensible person would ever make such a claim, right?1.  do you…[Read more]