What I am saying is that Simon was saved and he allowed for sin to enter into his heart. And it was a most grievous sin that could lead to the loss of his salvation if he did not repent.

Acts 8:21 Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God.22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee.23 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.Read what it says. It says that his heart…[Read more]

Nick, what are you talking about? The outer vessel? That is just a house for the soul. If the soul leaves, the vessel returns to the earth. The outer vessel has nothing to do with salvation. Salvation is a spiritual matter, not a matter of the flesh.

Now, Nick said I said he was lazy, but if you read the above, I recanted by saying I didn't think it was laziness. He posted I said he was lazy, which I did, and that was true in a sense, but is not my saying I didn't think it was laziness saying that in truth, I did not really believe he was lazy? So Nick said I said he was lazy. I recanted, is…[Read more]

Dear Kenrch,Only those of the same spirit of God will understand the things of God. You and I know that the Holy Spirit is God. And that for any to say 1 John 5:7 is contrary to truth only means the truth is not in them. For Jesus was begat of the Father and by the unction of the Holy Spirit, which filled him completely, he was and is and always…[Read more]

——————————————————————————–As I have tried to explain to you numerous times before Nick, it is the baptism of blood that is being talked about in Romans 6. It is the baptism of blood. This is where we come to it again, I believe it is the blood of the Lamb that washes away our sins, you…[Read more]

Hi Debra and welcome. This will be resolved soon. Please be patient and it is wonderful to have you here. God bless sis.

This is where you can say that those who believe in the once save, always saved doctrine should take heed. For he received salvation and then was baptized by water. Yet sin enter in, and he tried to purchase the ability to lay hands in giving the baptism of the Holy Spirit. And this is not the first time I have answered you on this.

John 16:10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.Rev. 12:5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a…[Read more]

Only one baptism saves and that is the baptism of blood into Christ. Then we baptized by water in the name of Jesus. Then we are baptized in the Holy Spirit, in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. If you were of the same spirit you would know these things.

As for your last post Nick, I suggest you defend yourself with saying I said you were lazy. Deal with this one first before you have to deal with the rest. As I said, and I am relying on memory, I did say that Nick was lazy, but did recant saying it. He knows this. I will now go and find this if it is still there. As for getting banned, as I said…[Read more]

Now Nick, if I have the proof, would not your statement above be a lie.As for the laziness, accusation, I ask that Nick show all where this occured and to prove my memory is well and in tact, I am saying he is once again telling a lie. Because if you read the thread, I said he was lazy, but recanted and said he I did not believe he was lazy…[Read more]

Sorry t8, I did not go back far enough into the thread to see the you did answer my question as to how you would handle the situation given I posted the proof. Forgive me.

Quote (Cubes @ Sep. 22 2006,17:41)Quote (kenrch @ Sep. 20 2006,21:31)Quote (Cubes @ Sep. 19 2006,22:09)Hi Kenrch,Regarding Nick's sharing of the PM sent to him, I think in this case Nick was right to share it for the following reasons (and please don't think I am taking sides.  I consider both H & Nick as my brothers and friends):1.  The content o…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ Sep. 23 2006,10:32)Hi seekingtruth.Thanks for your post and your wisdom brother.I feel that we could spend our lives here defending ourselves against the accusations of others. I have been accused of being antichrist, and all sorts of other things. But yes you are right in that we can glorify God in the end. But I do prefer that these…[Read more]

And yet the doctrine I have post here that comes from the King James you cannot discredit Nick, but it has revealed who you really are and that is one who does not stand on the true Word of God.

Dear Mercy,The tongues that is for the prayer language is not going to be understood, for it is the Holy Spirit of God praying the perfect prayer. We who are imperfect cannot comprehend that which is perfect. This tongue is by faith. It is step in faith. Many consider it giberish, and it is because in some instances, where a church is not standing…[Read more]

t8 has removed my editting ability. A sign of his constitution. God Bless you brother. I still love you. I am sorry if I made you angry, but you should not be allowing the flesh to take control. That is what this is all about. I forgive you.

T8, what proof is there that you, who is Nick's friend is not involved? Can you prove you did not do any editting or change any conversation? At the time of the incident, I was not able to get on the forum for three to four days. When I was able to get back on, the converstation, as I recalled, did not read the same. Now, I was relying only on…[Read more]

There is two tongues mentioned in scripture. One is the gift of tongues that is for the edification of the Church. This tongue is always followed by interpretation and if there is not an interpreter present, then it is not to be allow occur. In other words, it is to be suppressed. The other tongue spoken of is not the gift of tongues, but the…[Read more]