Let’s take a look at all seven gentile kingdoms that ruled the biblical world in succession. Note: this is history (not opinion) and it happens to perfectly match the revelation given to John. The seven are:

Egypt – 3100 to 677 BC (Genesis 12:10)
Assyria – 677 to 626 BC (Genesis 2:14)
Babylon – 626 – 539 BC (Daniel 1:1)
Medo-Pe…

[Read more]

Only if your view is that the head of god had nothing to do with Babylon at all and was simply about Nebuchadnezzar only. I would understand your view but still wouldn’t agree with it.

So is this how you view it. That the golden head of the statue had nothing to do with Babylon the empire?

Sorry you are still in the dilemma of equating Danielic v…[Read more]

The King of Babylon was the head of gold. How many other kings were there in Babylon? Look it up on Wikipedia. Are you saying that the golden head of the statue had nothing to do with Babylon?

That is the reason why I stated that Danielic visions are different from those of Revelation. You are confusing Danielic Kingdoms with Revelation’s Kings.…[Read more]

I believe they are empires. Five had fallen and one was and one was yet to come. 200 or so years later. the one that was, has also fallen. That is Rome.

Hi Proclaimer, You can believe anything and every thing. But you should quote the texts of the book you are interpreting. I can’t find what you are quoting here for the support of your Seven…[Read more]

There are a lot of holes in your commentary. The 4 arguably 5 kingdoms of Daniel match Revelation. But before I explain, I am not really trying to talk you into anything. I write for the benefit of readers who come here looking for truth. These people can rightly divide the word of God and can see things when they are not right. You are merely…

[Read more]

…..The mark of the beast,  is about the System that comes to rule in the future,  it’s not about a vaccine the is proven to knock out cove-19.

Hi brother Gene, I agree with you on the COVID19 Vaccine. I even don’t think that there will be any Mark of the Beast in future as the book of Revelation was talking about its own time, the First Cen…[Read more]

Adam……Rome haven’t even existed since 476 AD.   SORRY BUT YOU LISTENING TO FALSE PROPHETS.

IF YOU DON’T HAVE THE TIMELINE RIGHT , ’that I gave you’ , ITS JUST ALL SPECULATIONS.

Hi brother Gene, yes the book of Revelation is not talking about the present nation Italy or Rome but it certainly was talking about the First Century Rome at the time of…[Read more]

The mystery of the Woman and the beast of Revelation 17

The seven heads of the beast are also seven kings, five of whom have fallen, one is, and one has not yet come. The simplest answer would be that the angel is referring to a series of Roman emperors and pointing out that one more must rule for a short time before the final advent of the…[Read more]

This was how the NT writers altered the Hebrew scriptures to prove Jesus as Messiah….

That statement is about as intelligent as saying that the Flat Earth system is another myth of Science.

Hi Proclaimer, you are so much interested in Flat Earth Science?

I see your posts on this subject on other threads too.

Hi Sis Karmarie, thanks for your interest on this topic Parousia of Jesus.

But the so called Mark of the beast is COVID19 Vaccine is another myth by the Christianity which is not supported by the scientific data. If you are really interested you should see the expert videos like the following…

THE FALL OF BABYLON (17:1-19:5)

Chapters 17 and 18 portray the judgment of God on the great (read “notorious”) prostitute, Rome, that
citadel of pagan opposition to the cause of Christ. From a literary point of view the two chapters are
distinct. In chapter 17 the harlot appears in a vulgar display of the trappings of wealth and power, and…[Read more]

It is clear that interpretations of Daniel and Revelation are a dime a dozen. What is clear to me is that both are talking of the same beast, except that Revelation shows us more of the picture.

The reason for that greater revelation is that as time progresses, knowledge shall increase.

Eventually all will he known and we are heading toward that…

[Read more]

Again, your not counting the kingdom that Daniel was in at the time he prophesied the Four ‘”MORE”,  to come.

ADAM it is simple and it fits exactly with what is written in REV 17.  WHY do you think Revelations say this is the mind that has wisdom, it’s because you have to understand you can’t understand what it it saying unless you get the tim…

[Read more]

Adam……problem is you teacher did not recognize the FIFTH KINGDOM , but runs it into the  forth kingdom of Iron,  no scripture shows that. It shows the forth OF IRON,  as the Roman Empire, and the FIFTH KINGDOM AS THE ONE THAT IS “MIXED” with “IRON AND CLAY”  , THAT  IS THE KINGDOM THE ROCK STRUCK, IT DID NOT STRIKE THE LEGS, BUT THE FEET,  All…

[Read more]

Daniel 2

One of the most famous images in the Book of Daniel, and indeed in all of apocalyptic literature, is the statue that Nebuchadnezzar sees in his dream in Daniel chapter 2. This statue has a head of gold, its chest and arms of silver, its middle and thighs of bronze, its legs of iron, its feet partly of iron and partly of clay. The statue…[Read more]

There are Many scholar that say there are actually Five kingdoms,  Daniel was prophesying about., in fact there are images that show Five,  POSTED ON THE INTERNET everywhere.

Hi brother Gene, yes they are all Christian biased interpretations on the book of Daniel. You should read the critical exegetical commentaries on Daniel and not any C…[Read more]

So it seems your biggest problem Adam is that Christians were promised a quick second coming. Would that be correct?

Hello Proclaimer, that is not my problem but was the crisis of the NT writers which started with Paul. Please study the NT texts carefully with respect to Hebrew Bible you will understand the real problem.

Proclaimer…….Question , does Roman have any influence along the nations today, please tell us, i ow od none at all, no body cares what Rome says or does, they are not a world power at all.  As I said the Roman Empires were compels destroyed around 476 AD. ROME WAS SACKED AND BURNT TO THE GROUND BY THE INVADING ARMIES, BOT THE EAST AND THE WEST…

[Read more]

Possible Early Form of Daniel 2
Because of the nature of the book of Daniel (its mix of Hebrew and Aramaic, its anachronisms, and its apocalyptic flavor), most scholars date it to the Hellenistic era of Israel; usually about 170-164 BC because of the many clear references to Antiochus IV Epiphanes in chapters 8, 9, and 11.

But despite this late…[Read more]