epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (Cubes @ July 22 2006,19:29)Quote (epistemaniac @ July 22 2006,07:51)Quote (Cubes @ July 21 2006,21:09)Also, in direct refutation then to your OP, I cite Matt 1:1 to say no human can conceive and give birth to God. Matt begins by associating the Christ with human birth . We have to agree that it is preposterous and needless for the God of…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (t8 @ July 22 2006,12:08)Quote (seminarian @ July 22 2006,22:43)See when you tell one lie, you have to keep making up more to support the first one. That's howI knew what E-maniac was going to write even before HE did. You know if someone wants to keepbeing deceived, Satan is all too happy to oblige.Yes it is interesting to me that most, n…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (seminarian @ July 22 2006,03:17)E-Maniac,You did NOT answer my questions using any scriptures whatsoever, only your own opinion.Razzzz! Oh, so sorry but you also used a qualifier in your answer which has no scripturalbasis. Here are your answers again:E-maniac answers:Does our Lord Jesus have a God? As to touching His human nature, y…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (t8 @ July 22 2006,00:27)The LORD is the only saviour. He sent his son and his son even asked for that cup to be removed if there was another way. But the son said “Not MY will but YOUR will”. Even here we see that Jesus received our punishment because he did what his Father wanted, not necessarily what he wanted to do.So the LORD saved us…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (kenrch @ July 22 2006,03:12)Mat 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found with child of the Holy Spirit. Mat 1:19 And Joseph her husband, being a righteous man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away p…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (Cubes @ July 21 2006,21:09)Also, in direct refutation then to your OP, I cite Matt 1:1 to say no human can conceive and give birth to God. Matt begins by associating the Christ with human birth . We have to agree that it is preposterous and needless for the God of all to become an offspring of his own creation. The universe and all in i…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (Cubes @ July 21 2006,21:38)Quote (epistemaniac @ July 22 2006,02:17)Quote (Cubes @ July 21 2006,21:03)Quote (epistemaniac @ July 22 2006,01:58)cube, I thought we were talking about Matthew?Hi E,I thought we could use scripture to interpret scripture from any part, in other words, study Matthew but since his belief is not isolated from the…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (seminarian @ July 21 2006,21:24)Quote (Cubes @ July 21 2006,21:09)Also, in direct refutation then to your OP, I cite Matt 1:1 to say no human can conceive and give birth to God. Matt begins by associating the Christ with human birth . We have to agree that it is preposterous and needless for the God of all to become an offspring of his…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
Quote (Cubes @ July 21 2006,21:03)Quote (epistemaniac @ July 22 2006,01:58)cube, I thought we were talking about Matthew?Hi E,I thought we could use scripture to interpret scripture from any part, in other words, study Matthew but since his belief is not isolated from the whole bible, that we could draw on other texts as you have to expound or…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
cube, I thought we were talking about Matthew?
epistemaniac replied to the topic Matt 1 21 as evidence for the Trinity in the forum Truth or Tradition 18 years, 4 months ago
now wait a minute… what does the Bible say?(Isa 43:11 NASB) “I, even I, am the LORD; And there is no savior besides Me.”No trace here of saving through anyone else…. and yet in Mattew Jesus is said to be the Savior, saving His people from their sins….. so YHWH is the only Savior, and Jesus is the only savior…. which one is true?
epistemaniac replied to the topic First born of creation in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Quote (ruko @ Sep. 08 2005,18:04)My Bible says Jesus was the first born of every creature. Doesn't this mean Jesus was created? Or am I missing something?yeah… you might be missing something…. hopefully, we can agree that the Bible is free from contradiction…the Bible says “Joseph called the name of the firstborn Manasseh. For, he said, God…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Amen SS! great post.. I will be saving that list….blessings
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 08 2006,02:28)Quote (epistemaniac @ June 08 2006,02:05)Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 08 2006,00:35)Hi e, I agree. You may not regard yourself as catholic but those are her teachings you espouse here. Indeed the Roman worldly government did hijack the church and the Emperor organised and supervised the early councils at which…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 08 2006,02:26)Hi e, Hoorah, That is the first plank of salvation. Mind you the demons also believe.But do they fear God enough to treat the Word of God with utmost respect, and not speculate about the nature of God and then teach those speculations? Trinity was not taught by Jesus or the prophets and apostles yet men feel…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Nick, the Roman Catholic church believes in the existence of God…. therefore should we/you deny the existence of God?blessings
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 08 2006,00:35)Hi e, I agree. You may not regard yourself as catholic but those are her teachings you espouse here. Indeed the Roman worldly government did hijack the church and the Emperor organised and supervised the early councils at which changes to the true doctrines occurred. Are you happy that this spiritual…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 07 2006,03:49)Nice to see you're back e-man. Quote Nice to see you're back e-man. you just never can tell when I might show up…. blessings,Ken
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 07 2006,22:58)Quote (epistemaniac @ June 06 2006,22:05) “Whoever wills to be in a state of salvation, before all things it is necessary that he hold the catholic faith, which except everyone shall have kept whole and undefiled without doubt he will perish eternally. Now the catholic faith is that we worship One God…[Read more]
epistemaniac replied to the topic Unity in the forum Scriptural Teachings 18 years, 5 months ago
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 06 2006,21:54)Hi e, So “Son of God” is only a title for God? Jesus is not and never was the true Son of God? Does that not worry you that our salvation depends on the Son of God?errrr? what? I said the title was the Son's, not God the Father…. and that the title “the Son” was only one of Jesus' titles…. and to focus…[Read more]
- Load More