You see Berean, if you have a different opinion with “some” on this site then you are branded unintelligent, unteachable or worse yet unsaved.

Do you have an opinion why NASA and other agencies would use a flat non-rotating earth for scientific calculations?

t8, please stop your condescending attitude. We are here to discuss.

Mike, you are 100%. correct about the gyroscope. In fact I watched an expert in the field talk about it yesterday. I’ll put a link below.
To suggest that a pilot doesn’t need to even worry about a constant drop in altitude is ludicrous. But that is the defense being offered.

So a 813 mile drop over several thousand miles is not something that should be calculated in the scientific papers? We’re not talking about course correction here, we’re talking about calculations in a scientific paper. Now answer the question please, should this calculations be addressed in a scientific paper concerning aeronautics and space fli…[Read more]

OK, my favorite! The Vacuum of space!!!

We all know how powerful even a small vacuum is here on earth. In fact a relativity weak vacuum is used to lift thousands of pounds of material! When a steel railroad car is exposed to a relativity weak vacuum it collapses like a soda can!  We’ve all seen the videos so this isn’t theory. This is obse…[Read more]

t8: “Well yeah, you have a point. You don’t see for example instructions about avoiding or surviving the coronavirus also including breathing even though it is essential to do so.”

So then would you conclude that it should not even be in the medical journal? Just as the curve over thousands of miles should be accounted for in NASA’s et al sci…[Read more]

Q1: <i>Does the sun change speed throughout the year to compensate for the fact that each circuit by the sun is completed in the same amount of time</i>?

Also part of your question was this: “<i>Given that, the sun when travelling the Tropic of Capricorn must be a longer circuit than the prime meridian and a lot longer than the Tropic of C…[Read more]

From article: “The pilot will never be conscious of pushing the nose down to follow curvature as the necessary change in attitude occurs simply by the action taken to maintain a constant altitude.”

So there is a “necessary change in attitude” but somehow it is not worth putting into the math by rocket scientists. Even though the above quote a…[Read more]

t8, your answer doesn’t seem logical. Here’s why:

If you were to drop a ball in your lounge it would be reasonable to assume that the ball was a tennis ball. I could have picked a larger one like a basketball but let’s give you all the benefit of the doubt.

The ball would be dropped from a distance of about 4 to 5 feet (normal human height at ar…[Read more]

Yep, I live here in North Carolina.

Welcome Berean.

It’s not a new question it’s one that you have been ignoring since I posted it.

NASA, et al, documents using flat earth as a go-to for equations.

In case you need to refresh yourself with the facts here’s a helpful reminder: (I would refresh yourself so you don’t look ill informed)

And yet you are still trying to dodge the questions. Anybody can see through that!

Thank’s for the confirmation that you can’t even give a reasonable response to my challenges. Others are understanding this as well.

t8, why do you always forget about the firmament?

Here’s a few more things you have elected to forget about.

NASA, et al, documents using flat earth as a go-to for equations

Vacuum of space against the tinfoil of NASA

Using our own eyes and God-given senses to evaluate the distance of objects in front of the horizon with the horizon behind t…[Read more]

And in all that you did not deny that you held to cartoons rather than the Word of God. How sad.

t8, you do know that’s not a real video of space right? It’s all make believe, CGI or whatever you want to call it.
However, you choose to reject the Word of God which says specifically that the sun has a circuit and that the sun was commanded to stop for a time.

Well, I’ll leave you to your cartoons.

What!? We can see objects that are supposed to be beyond the curve AND we can even see the horizon beyond these objects?!

What kind of magic is this or is it just normal science? Can’t really say it’s coming up and over the horizon because the horizon is in view behind the objects. Can’t say it’s just not that far because these are verified dista…[Read more]

Righto! Let’s make that 3 topics!

NASA, et al, documents using flat earth as a go-to for equations

Vacuum of space against the tinfoil of NASA

Using our own eyes and God-given senses to evaluate the distance of objects in front of the horizon with the horizon behind them (disproving by mathematical means the curve we’ve been lied to abo…[Read more]