T8: One simple theory explains everything. What is the chance that a lie could do that. Further, it is more than a theory because we have seen the earth from space.

How can your theory explain everything when as Mike’s video so clearly pointed out that the most basic assumptions are wrong?

If you think your globe is simple keep on believing that if you wish.

Wouldn’t that require actually getting to space?

And you still haven’t answered what is the math equation they used.

“San Jacinto Peak above sea level: 10,834 feet
Geometric Hidden: 1.39 miles (7350.83 feet)
Visible amount: 3483.17 feet.”

120 x 120 = 14,400  14,400 x 8 = 115,200  115,200/12 = 9,600

There should be 9,600 hidden feet at 8” per miles squared, using your 120 mile distance.…[Read more]

What math did he use? Was it the 8” per miles squared? If not, then what? You can’t just make stuff up you must back it up!

Listen to the video and at the 7 minute mark he says “over a 170 miles away”.

The distance was 170 miles. No what you got?

So t8, you managed to dodge all my questions and challenges but found some videos. Great.

Oh and by the way, I gave it an elevation of 300 ft above sea level but in fact it is only 154 ft! So half the observer height.

That brings it to 15,974 ft of hidden height! That’s over 15,000 feet of hidden height on a globe earth according to the globe earth math!

Apparently the software this guy used does not use the standard 8” per mile squ…[Read more]

T8, did you do the math? It doesn’t work. Use your ball earth calculator and see for yourself. Using software that is obviously designed to try to debunk plane earth theory is not going to cut it. Here is a link to the earth curve calculator:

https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=170&h0=300&unit=imperial

Why not do your own research a…[Read more]

It’s the same video we have been discussing. It starts at the 6 1/2 minute mark and goes to about the 7 1/2 minute mark. Not very long but packed with power.

I’ve already looked at the math, according to the ball earth theory, and it isn’t even close.

Sounds like we are both in that situation. But to answer your question, yes, if there should be some part of the mountain visible and the globe earth math supported it that would be evidence for your position. And the same holds true for my side, if there should be no part visible and on top of that thousands of feet more coverage then that lends…[Read more]

First attempt to debunk this fact and then we will see if you can salvage the globe.

The mountain, according to globe earth math, should be hidden by around 4,000 ft! This is not a little difference, this is not something that you can dismiss. You can either attempt to disprove it, accept it, or keep on making excuses.

Now, what will happen when…[Read more]

San Jancinto was photographed from 170 miles away. This mountain range in Southern California begins at less than 1,100 feet above sea level and tops out at an elevation of approximately 10,800 feet.

You do the math and tell me if this should be visible from 170 miles away. If not then explain why it can be seen.

If I put the camera at 300 ft…[Read more]

How about the photos where there should be NO part of the mountain seen but you can see a large part of it? Be honest, how do you explain that?

Sounds like you’re in a hurry to get out of the IR photography. Interesting.

If you were honest you would have to admit that the photos he takes are of objects that should NOT be visible at all on a globe earth. That is IF you were honest.

Also the cities of LA and Palm Springs are 200 to nearly 300 ft above sea level and are much closer than the mountains. What that means is the angular perspective will cause the cities to block the view of the mountains which are much further in the background.

Debunked your debunk.

Remember I did ask for an “honest” response.

The mountain in Palm Springs he photographed tops out at 10,800 ft. It is 170 miles away from him and I guessed that his elevation was 200 ft. With these stats the hidden height should be 15,540 ft! How can we still see the mountain at all?

This IS evidence.

T8, you’re not even close with your black box theory. Try again.