I found this covers some things that should be said, concerning micro and macro evolution.Creationism is not “against” modern science! In fact, the Biblical mandate to “subdue” the earth (Genesis 1:28) requires us to understand it, which is what science is all about. “Creation Science” is simply the practice of science with the assumption and…[Read more]

In 1856 workers quarrying for limestone in the Neander Valley near Duesseldorf, Germany came across a skull and bones. In the succeeding years many other specimens were found, not only in the Neander Valley, but in countries such as France, England, Italy, Iraq and as far south as Israel.Controversy surrounded the interpretation of these fossils.…[Read more]

In 1908 a workman at a gravel pit in Piltdown, England found a portion of a human skull and gave it to an amateur geologist by the name of Charles Dawson. Subsequent digging by Arthur Smith Woodward of the British Museum and Catholic paleontologist-priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin revealed more skull fragments and the lower jaw of Piltdown man.…[Read more]

The fossil record, our only documentation of whether evolution actually occurred in the past, lacks any transitional forms, and all types appear fully-formed when first present. We are still searching for the missing link. It's still missing. Hence the phrase, “missing link.”Over and over again, headlines are made. “Missing link discovered,”…[Read more]

In follow up to that article, I'd also like to mention that the age of “humans” continues to be shortened. We were millions of years old. Then we were hundreds of thousands of years old. Then a couple hundred thousand years old. Now, some say tens of thousands of years old. The universe had no beginning. Now science believes it does.…[Read more]

Quote “Science now corroborates what most great religions have long been preaching: Human beings of all races are . . . descended from the same first man.”—Heredity in Humans (Philadelphia and New York, 1972), Amram Scheinfeld, p. 238.“The Bible story of Adam and Eve, father and mother of the whole human race, told centuries ago the same truth t…[Read more]

Quote Genesis doesn't say epoch. It says day.\Genesis doesn't say “24 hour day.” It says “day.” many many times in the Bible the word “day” is used to mean “epoch” and in this specific case, both science and the context itself which uses the word “day” to refer to all 7 days here. Case closed.It says neither epoch nor 24 hour day. But the…[Read more]

Quote A potted summary of the scientific view of the Genesis Flood Myth:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_geologyMost of this seems to be arguing against the Young earth creationists, those that seem to miss that one definition of day “epoch” and also miss that all those days were lumped into one “day” at Gen 2:4 I believe.

Quote ++”NATURAL LAWThe universe is governed by laws, such as the law of gravity. The earliest known non-Biblical reference to physical laws was made by Pythagoras, who believed that the universe could be explained by numbers. Two thousand years later, Galileo, Kepler, and Newton finally proved that matter is governed by rational laws.About 1600 B…[Read more]

Quote ++”HEALTHYour list of health issues is an example of ancient people codifying their SCIENCE. In fact, it outlines a battle against natural selection pretty well. There is certainly no need for divine inspiration hereYou're right. It doesnt prove divine inspiration any more than Job somehow knowing that the earth is hanging upon nothing p…[Read more]

Quote How did the “kinds” accelerate the rate of evolution required to produce all the species now known over a few thousand years?Recently, a group was studying foxes. (for what purpose I don't remember) They kept mating the tamer foxes together. The result was that they had completely tame foxes. It only took 10 years to the surprise of eve…[Read more]

Quote all varieties of humans—Oriental, African, Caucasian, those as tall as the seven-foot Dinka in the Sudan and as short as the four-foot-four-inch Pygmies—stem from the one original pair, Adam and Eve.—Gen. 1:27, 28; 3:20.And science says this is wrong too.I didnt know science felt this way.“Science now corroborates what most great religio…[Read more]

Often, the problem lies in what people THINK the Bible says and what people THINK science has established as fact. The Bible is not a science textbook. Yet, when the Bible does refer to natural phenomena, it is consistently accurate. Biblical comments:(1) harmonize with scientific facts; (2) reflect knowledge that was beyond the available human…[Read more]

Quote David, why do you go on about human-designed and made meat grinders and cars and houses?Living things are not manufactured, and not designed, Um, I am suggesting that living things are largely designed. That is my argument and that is what I am suggesting. Hence, the illustrations and comparisons. So for you to say that the argument is…[Read more]

Science Digest states: “Evolutionary revisionists believe mutations in key regulatory genes may be just the genetic jackhammers their quantum-leap theory requires.” However, the magazine also quotes British zoologist Colin Patterson as stating: “Speculation is free. We know nothing about these regulatory master genes.” (February 1982, p. 92) In…[Read more]

The Bulletin of Chicago’s Field Museum of Natural History pointed out: “Darwin’s theory of has always been closely linked to evidence from fossils, and probably most people assume that fossils provide a very important part of the general argument that is made in favor of darwinian interpretations of the history of life. Unfortunately, this is no…[Read more]

According to New Scientist: “An increasing number of scientists, most particularly a growing number of evolutionists . . . argue that Darwinian evolutionary theory is no genuine scientific theory at all. . . . Many of the critics have the highest intellectual credentials.”—June 25, 1981, p. 828.Astronomer Robert Jastrow says: “To their chagrin…[Read more]

I would like to know the actual number or ratio of scientists who believe in God.Stu before suggested that 95% of scientists believe in evolution.I'm not sure this represents reality.

Quote Jesus’ existence is certainly debatable.Quote Educate me if you can.While you may doubt he was who he said he was, no one, not his enemies even, not those who wished his name disappeared questioned his existence.The New Encyclopædia Britannica states: “These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Chri…[Read more]

Quote It is not a fact that Moses wrote Genesis. It does not say anywhere in Genesis that it is written from an Earth-bound observer’s point of view;Well whoever wrote Genesis, they wrote it thousands of years before scientists figured out the order of creation, and he got it right, somehow. As for it being written from an Earth bound p…[Read more]