A similar subject.https://www.heavennet.net/cgi-bin….t=2907;

Quote You have david trying his best to convince people that JWs are the Church, with no consideration that he is helping confuse those who seek the truth; there have been a number of Catholics who have tried to convince people here that they are the exclusive Church; and we have you who is trying to convince people that Islam is the truth. Of…[Read more]

Quote You have david trying his best to convince people that JWs are the Church, –t8When is the last time I did this T8? Maybe 3 years ago. Please go find a quote. Can you? No. More than that, I don't even really mention JW's until someone like you attacks them. Go check. I'll wait. You know I'm right. The truth as you know T8, is I…[Read more]

Quote JWs are just another group unto themselves and have buildings and money schemes–t8T8, for literally the 6th or 7th time, I know that in the past, religion took your money or your relatives money. I understand that you have issues with this. But JW's don't have money schemes. We don't tithe, as you have also hinted at numerous times.…[Read more]

Quote David,You are by far more intelligent than all the other anti-trinitarians here. So why the mental block? The people of God have only ONE God.thinkerAre you saying i'm more intelligent because of the question I asked. If so, why not answer it?Or are you saying I'm more intelligent as a sort of mock flattery, as if to say, I should be smart…[Read more]

Ed, I already responded to his first post. Please check the first page. I personally find the “i am” argument about as ridiculous as they come.

Quote My Husband thinks that the N.W.T. has errors in it, more then any other. Unfortunately, Elizabeth, your husband did not come to that conclusion based on a comparitive study. My guess is, he doesn't believe what JW's believe and so rejects what he must assume causes their beliefs.Also, a lot of trinitarians reject the NWT only because of…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 02 2010,07:23)Quote (david @ Feb. 01 2010,01:45)Anyway, my question is pretty much a yes or no type question.  If you cannot answer it with the words “true God” or “False gods” then there must be some other category that you deny exists.DavidYour question is a foolish attempt to support your belief in…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 02 2010,06:58)Quote (david @ Feb. 01 2010,01:49)WJ, Bible, Bible, WJ.  There, you are introduced.  Now get acquainted.  Perhaps you could read my very first post.DavidWhy do you not give us a single scripture that supports your belief! Where is the scriptures that proves Angels or men are Gods.You show a bunch of co…[Read more]

Quote (bodhitharta @ Feb. 03 2010,16:49)Quote (t8 @ Feb. 03 2010,15:23)Quote (bodhitharta @ Feb. 03 2010,10:23)Quote (Stu @ Jan. 30 2010,08:09)Schism.You know, like sunni, shia, sufism, ibadism, ahmadism (and bahá'ísm!).StuartThese all have no disagreement about ALLAH or the nature of Christ.Christianity is older and bigger than Islam, so there w…[Read more]

As I stated in the first post, Just because it sounds strange to our modern ears is no reason to ignore the facts. And no reason to take advantage of that fact by claiming that only two understandings of the words theos and elohim are possible: “God” and “false gods.”The idea that anyone called by the word “god” is either “The God” or a “false…[Read more]

Quote DavidThe Angels are not Gods at all!–wjWJ, Bible, Bible, WJ. There, you are introduced. Now get acquainted. Perhaps you could read my very first post.Quote Some of these trinitarian sources which admit that the Bible actually describes men who represent God (judges, Israelite kings, etc.) and God's angels as gods include:1. Young's…[Read more]

Quote The Angels are not Gods at all!The word “Eloyim” can be interpreted as kings, judges, men, or angels depending on context!Is this seriously your defence, WJ?I think you have it quite backward. Kings, judges, men, and angels have been called “gods.” Even Moses was made a “god” to Pharoah. But the word “eloyim” does not mean king or judge,…[Read more]

Quote (david @ Jan. 30 2010,17:57)Were the angels “The God” or “false gods”? Were the angels “The God” or “false gods”? Were the angels “The God” or “false gods”? Were the angels “The God” or “false gods”? Were the angels “The God” or “false gods”? Were the angels “The God” or “false gods”? Were the angels “The God” or “false gods”? Were the…[Read more]

Quote reasonably be expected to look–stuHere's the thing, stu. People see that picture that you posted, and they think it is proof of something. All I'm saying is, that with each picture like that, is should very clearly be explained that this is what scientists 'reasonably expect' them to look like, and that their appearance is not based on…[Read more]

Did you have a question for me Ed?You know Ed, there's like 6 or 7 topics started on the NWT.  It does indeed seem to be a popular Bible, given that other than the NWT, I think only the KJV has it's own threads.  I'm sure whatever answers you want could be found in one or more of those threads.  But if you have an actual question (why not start wi…[Read more]

Quote (kejonn @ Jan. 31 2010,21:35)Quote (david @ Jan. 29 2010,23:48)Quote (kejonn @ Jan. 29 2010,03:56)What of the Rigveda? Avesta?I literally have never heard of them.  So my point stands.  What about the Quran? Predictions are that Islam will one day either catch up to or overtake Christianity as the #1 religion. Will that mean that you will b…[Read more]

Anyway, instead of sidestepping this topic and hurling accusations as the NWT, why not discuss the actual topic here: The “coptic” version. Why do we want to avoid this?

Quote Yet David wants to accuse the translators of the major translations of our day of being biased.–WJQuote Wikipedia has it right. The NWT is “incoherently polytheistic.”–thinkerWikipedia also says:In its review of Bible translations released from 1955 to 1985, The HarperCollins Bible Dictionary listed the New World Translation as one of the…[Read more]

Answering the question above (which people here tend to not want to do) will prove that there is a third option….it will prove that the very idea that everyone called “god” is either “the Almighty God” or “a false god.”Many on here don't want to touch this question. It's almost like they can't see it. I'm doing my best to make it more visible.…[Read more]