Hi Davidbfun.First, hello.Second, now that there are two “David's” things are going to get confusing.And finally, as noted above by Barley and Terraricca, there is a much simpler explanation than the one that you propose. I'm wondering what your response would be.David.

Hi Davidbfun.First, hello.Second, now that there are two “David's” things are going to get confusing.And finally, as noted above by Barley and Terraricca, there is a much simpler explanation than the one that you propose. I'm wondering what your response would be.David.

Quote Why do you discount Mary's mothers lineage from the tribe of Levi?–edEd, I do not discount anything.Perhaps you could address my comments as I have yours.

Quote Why do you discount Mary's mothers lineage from the tribe of Levi?–edEd, I do not discount anything.Perhaps you could address my comments as I have yours.

Mike to KJ:Quote First, I'm not a JW and disagree with some of their interpretations of scripture. I think, however that they have most of it correct, IMO. . . . Stop misrepresenting – it makes you look stupid.Mike, you are right. We do agree on some things.

“. . . Matthew 28:19 is unambiguous evidence that the early Apostles and Church Fathers believed in a Trinity.”–WJWJ, once again, I created this thread to point out the obvious delusion in the statement above. It's the words “unambiguous evidence” that is literally insane.

Quote This thread was created by a JW to deny the authenticity of the verse, yet there is no evidence that this verse was added, but only some scant rumors.–WJWJ, are you mad? You do realize that Matthew 28:19,20 is used by JW's all the time? I guess you don't. “Go therefore and make disciples of people of all the nations….” Ya, we use this…[Read more]

Quote Perhaps you need to read your bible a bit more; huh?–EdAren't the Israelites geneological tables based on Jewish males?Anyway, Mary was of the tribe of Judah and a descendant of David. Hence it could be said of her son Jesus that he “sprang from the seed of David according to the flesh.” (Ro 1:3) Your KJ or whatever version of “thy cou…[Read more]

Quote Perhaps you need to read your bible a bit more; huh?–EdAren't the Israelites geneological tables based on Jewish males?Anyway, Mary was of the tribe of Judah and a descendant of David. Hence it could be said of her son Jesus that he “sprang from the seed of David according to the flesh.” (Ro 1:3) Your KJ or whatever version of “thy cou…[Read more]

Hi JA. I just read the first couple pages really. So I missed your post. Was your post answered?

Hi JA. I just read the first couple pages really. So I missed your post. Was your post answered?

Quote (Is 1:18 @ July 08 2010,16:13)Quote (davidbfun @ July 08 2010,06:24)However, since Jesus is not God, but is the son of God, the true description of God should be the Biunity (Father and Holy Spirit).Hello David,I think you have comitted a fallacy of logic here, you've created a false dichotomy. Using this logic it could also be argued that…[Read more]

Quote (Is 1:18 @ July 08 2010,16:13)Quote (davidbfun @ July 08 2010,06:24)However, since Jesus is not God, but is the son of God, the true description of God should be the Biunity (Father and Holy Spirit).Hello David,I think you have comitted a fallacy of logic here, you've created a false dichotomy. Using this logic it could also be argued that…[Read more]

Quote If you answered “No” then who else could this person be?He is “Melchizedek, king of Salem,” and “priest of the Most High God,” Jehovah. (Ge 14:18, 22) He is the first priest mentioned in the Scriptures.Being the king of “Salem,” which means “Peace,” Melchizedek is identified by the apostle Paul as “King of Peace” and, on the basis of his…[Read more]

Quote If you answered “No” then who else could this person be?He is “Melchizedek, king of Salem,” and “priest of the Most High God,” Jehovah. (Ge 14:18, 22) He is the first priest mentioned in the Scriptures.Being the king of “Salem,” which means “Peace,” Melchizedek is identified by the apostle Paul as “King of Peace” and, on the basis of his…[Read more]

We have to remember the conclusion and the point of what is said about him not having a geneology, etc:”In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.”The point of what was said, was that Jesus, will be a priest f…[Read more]

We have to remember the conclusion and the point of what is said about him not having a geneology, etc:”In being fatherless, motherless, without genealogy, having neither a beginning of days nor an end of life, but having been made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.”The point of what was said, was that Jesus, will be a priest f…[Read more]

ANOTHER POSSIBILITY“For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him and to whom Abraham apportioned a tenth from all things, is first of all, by translation, ‘King of Righteousness,’ and is then also king of Salem, that is, ‘King of Peace.’ In being fat…[Read more]

ANOTHER POSSIBILITY“For this Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings and blessed him and to whom Abraham apportioned a tenth from all things, is first of all, by translation, ‘King of Righteousness,’ and is then also king of Salem, that is, ‘King of Peace.’ In being fat…[Read more]

KJ, I don't know where to begin. First, I would say you should visit one of the “fallacies” in thinking threads. (I created one of them precisely because of posts like this and people like you.)Did you know that calling something a fallacy when it is not is itself a fallacy?You falsely state:Quote The JW's mean to say that Christ has nothing to…[Read more]