@berean,

I can only surmise what you wrote was intended for me with the bold and increased font size; there is nothing prideful nor haughty in what I write.

Answer the questions! When will you or anyone verify what they are told is truth? The Jesus can’t be G-d because he said he wasn’t; yet, you post someone else’s words and believe them…[Read more]

@Berean,

So the Jesus is G-d?!?!? G-d is G-d and there is NO other. Even you said G-d “needed” the Jesus for the forgiveness of sin because HE is to small and unable to forgive; meaning there MUST be a separation of the two. The Jesus even states he is the “son of G-d”, another separation. Further, the Jesus says he doesn’t know the day or hour…[Read more]

@Berean,

@DT

YOU

If you follow Paul, showing honor to the elderly is a sin. Should I disrespect the older in our society and treat them like dirt? Do you still NOT get it?!?!

Me

Where did you read that Paul said that?

I have never read that from Paul.…

Please read the following words from Paul lips:

Rom 3:20 “Therefore by the deeds of the…[Read more]

@Berean,

My guess you still haven’t looked up the provided passages concerning to whom the “arm of the Lord” was revealed. What are you afraid of?

It’s never to late to turn back to Hashem! HE is always waiting for you with out stretched arms, because HE loves HIS creation.

@Berean,

The question was for you to expound and clarify what your opinion is, not for me to seek out the “truth” on how the Leviticus passage relates to the Isaiah. You made a statement, now clarify. My guess is you are unable to because you really don’t know why you believe what you believe. My guess is someone told you this and you belie…[Read more]

@Berean,

In what respect does the Leviticus 10:17 passage have anything to do with Isa 53? To say it relates with no explanation says nothing! How am I to know what you’re talking about when you never explain anything?

Then refusing to answer who the “our” is only further proves how entrenched in religion and doctrines you are and how they take…[Read more]

@Berean,

Your point? And does this have to do with the “our” in Isa 53 being the prophets?

@Berean,

You quote man’s thoughts and accept that as proof for what you believe?!?!? You make my point and settle my case of christians believing what they are told to believe!

Let’s examine this commentary to see if Isaiah is really referring to himself and the other prophets or “possibly Isaiah’s own disciples” (did you notice the indecisiv…[Read more]

@Berean,

Nowhere in anything you wrote did you say who the “our” is; our is a plural pronoun and would signify multiple people who are owning what they did to the “servant.” Who does the voice represent/speaking in verses 1-9?

I do appreciate the response, but can you support with the Tanakh what you are claiming Isaiah is “antici…[Read more]

@Berean,

Who’s the “our”? It’s the same “our” who begins speaking in verse one about a “report” no one will believe.

What does chapter 52 say, the chapter that leads into 53 and puts what is written into context (specifically the last three verses)? Do you know what chapter 54 says?

I’ll ask again, can you start in the middle of a novel and k…[Read more]

@Berean,

Moses used blood to seal the covenant between God and the Israelite’s and nothing more; to keep asking the same question isn’t going to change my response. The plain words written say only that. It’s christianity that wants there to be more to help support its idolatry; I say idolatry, because anything that comes between you and God I…[Read more]

@Berean,

You: For me this blood symbolized the blood of Christ for the erasure of sins (ultimate goal)

Me: This is a fascinating response, your personal belief overrides the words written. Even though the sprinkling of the blood was to solidify a vow, a covenant between God and the Israelite’s and has nothing to do with atoning for anything, y…[Read more]

@Berean,

Let me point out, in nothing you wrote did you explain anything; you asked three questions and exclaimed “THE POINT IS THERE” as if by reading one verse I now have the full understanding of what you’re trying to convey. Has the intelligence of people really dropped this much? Do we not understand a conversation is a series of answe…[Read more]

@Berean,

You copy and pasted a bunch of verses, offered zero explanation or what they mean to you, AND most importantly, you asked no question. Explain what exactly am I suppose to respond to? Your pointy fingers!??! I have said in the past “pointy fingers” do NOT explain what is going on in your mind and I cannot interpret them to know what your…[Read more]

@Berean,

Once again you have given nothing to refute or explain why I am wrong. I have explained why you’re wrong and have shown why you’re wrong; and every time you “counter” with cherry picked verses taken out of context. If you cannot substantiate what you believe, why do you believe it?

Because Jesus claimed Isa 61:1 was about himself,…[Read more]

@Berean,

You: I believe that Christ fulfilled all that was written in ISAIAH 61:1

Me: But the passage has nothing to do with Jesus; so you believe a lie…understood! What I find fascinating is you believe something you’re unable to explain.

If Jesus was the fulfillment of this, then Jesus would have brought the message God was going to do t…[Read more]

@Berean,

You: For Jesus, when he read in the synagogue, he read the scroll that was in that synagogue.
This is what Luke relates.

Me: The point Berean is Jesus wouldn’t have been reading from a Greek translation in a synagogue. This is a corruption of the text and you don’t question it. Never mind the fact “Jesus” completely takes out of context…[Read more]

@Berean,

You: I just pointed out that the Septuagint was used by Luke, so that’s all.

Me: Are you okay with a corrupt version being used as truth? The question still remains unanswered, why would Jesus be reading from a Greek translation and not the original Hebrew? This doesn’t cause you pause and question the veracity of what Luke wrote?

@Berean,

Nice try; HOWEVER, wasn’t it you who stated the Septuagint was a corrupt translation?!?! Since you believe the only true translation is the King James, why are you using the Septuagint in this particular situation? Explain why the Septuagint is the only translation that uses this language in Isaiah? Even the translators of the King James…[Read more]

@Berean,

Wow! You can’t even defend what you believe! You remind me of a Jehovah’s Witness repeating what you have been told to say and anything beyond that, you’re lost. You can’t explain Isa 53 since all you know are a few verses you have been told mean the Jesus. You cited Ps 22:16, but are unable to explain the context of the chapter. I laugh…[Read more]