Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Sep. 19 2010,12:11)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Sep. 19 2010,02:31)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Sep. 17 2010,19:57)A. Again What translation are you using, and if you would like lets go back to the hebrew of this passage.im going to post KJV Det4:15Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day…[Read more]

9bump:I Said:Quote Yet the phrase before says that he will be BORN in betheleham. It doesnt folllow with the context, so The Ruler will be born from bethelham who's true beginnigns are from a long long time ago, in a galaxy far far away. This isnt starwars. God is called the Ancient of Days, The King since Ancient times, yet It doesnt mean he was…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,09:31)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Oct. 22 2010,17:02)No, This is my way of saying stick to the subject in hand. You always deviate to a new topic.  in other words untopical.       Well, you've brought up the “Jesus is God” thing in this thread already.  And Micah 5:4 nips it in the bud like a big dog.  When will we di…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,09:15)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Oct. 22 2010,17:02)What the heck Mike, You want to focus so much that God created things “through” Jesus. Whether Through or by, the fact is that Jesus created and period. IF you want to believe that Jesus is the Tool and God is the builder, no matter how much you want to say that the…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,09:08)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Oct. 22 2010,17:02)So was God BORN or caused to exist because of his first acts?Scripture never says God's “beginning” was from a certain point in time, does it? SF: Quote No because you want to imply that Eternity is just a poetitics, so the same can be done for beginnings. even the…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,09:00)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Oct. 22 2010,17:02)Because your implying its says “Jesus was caused to exist” but it doesnt say that.  It says his beginnigs/origins are from old/antiquity/eternity,Your two sentences don't even make sense together D-Linquent.You say I imply “caused to exist”, but it only speaks of…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,08:52)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Oct. 22 2010,17:02)I believe that Beginnings is a poetitic way of saying that he has been around sinced the beginning just like the “word” was in the beginnning in John 1:1, the same way you believe that “eternity” is poetitic.I don't believe “eternity” is “poetic”.  I believe that…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,08:35)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Oct. 22 2010,17:02)Ya because you keep on bringing it up as they are seperate persons, but the subject of Micah 5:2 has nothing to do with that.Is this a case of, “HE STARTED IT, DAD!” ?  All I'm saying is that if you are going to say, “I think they are one and the same”, then you are…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,08:33)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Oct. 22 2010,17:02)Point is that he came “from”.Its as if i told you “Im from czechoslovakia” which doesnt exist anymore.So you think the scripture is saying that “the place Jesus came out from” was “from days of antiquity”?  If not, then please drop the “place of going out from”…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Oct. 24 2010,08:28)Hi D,You said:Quote Mike your trying awefully hard to change what scripture say into saying that Jesus was created, its says his beginnings/origins are from enternity/eons ago poetitcaly, but it doesnt say he was born, or was created from this exact time.Your trying to say that this “IMPLIES” that he was…[Read more]

Quote (martian @ Oct. 23 2010,20:03)Quote (kerwin @ Oct. 23 2010,10:41)Martian,You wrote:Quote I am making fun of the stupidity of the Preexisters.It does not sound like satire or mockery to me.  It sounds like anger that has grown from a bitter root. Mockery would be to make fun of the fact that Preexisters believe the absurdity that Jesus was…[Read more]

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHgot ya!

Ed J, actually just because you state that you think you corrected me is not proof that you actualy did.I sure did compare you to Bod.And you fail to see that Rudiments along with the earth are all casted out to be “burn” according to the text.here is what you said so far on this threadQuote Jesus=74: The “Son of God”=74I believe “Jesus”=74 was a…[Read more]

Hi Mike,This will end your whole debate with Ed JQuote (SimplyForgiven @ Sep. 26 2010,10:13)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Sep. 25 2010,13:48)Quote satan's=74 name is Lucifer=74 known as the 'great i am'=74 and is the 'antichrist' of Rev.13:1.Did anyone notice this other than me?Quote Jesus=74 (God's Son's Name in English is: “Joshua”)According to what…[Read more]

Hi All,Paul suggest that i should post our private emails to eachother in reference to this page,so This is me doing that. Last MessagePaul Cohan Said:Quote Hi Dennison!Thanks for the heads up about Bod. As for his challenge, he hasn’t answered a stitch of what I have already posted. https://www.heavennet.net/cgi-bin….75;st=0 (My post is on p…[Read more]

another example https://www.heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;st=300

in example,it also shows up on my phone so i know its not my computerhttps://www.heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;st=330

Quote (shimmer @ Oct. 22 2010,01:42)To Paul Cohen, the site that SimplyForgiven gave above, I like it, from what iv read so far.Bascially their is a faulty logic behind trinity from both ends. You see why i dont call my self a Trinitarian?

Quote (david @ Oct. 22 2010,11:44)Where did everyone go?  Has this board slowed down?  And, I don't think I'm really back.  Just passing through.  But thank's for the “great.”Well I dont know who you mean by everyone?KJ has taken a long break.WJ passes by here and there.I havent seen shimmer in awhile.A number of people havent really been on her…[Read more]

Stu?Your point?