Quote (kerwin @ June 19 2010,15:05)Dennison,I origionally advanced that as a possibility but you came in later while I was just discussing the possibility.  I am personally not sure at this point and I see no reason why it is an issue that one must be sure of or that different students of Jesus cannot legitimately hold different views of and…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 19 2010,13:45)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ June 19 2010,13:31)Idk Mike, its your show, choose what you want to do, im here to serve, in whatever you need me for, if you want me to state the obvious for public record than so be it.lol I can be your offical judge in whatever format you choose to debate.Again i believe you perfer…[Read more]

Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 19 2010,13:48)I like the idea of letting one of them (Mike) pick the resolve and the other (KJ) the format. Otherwise this isn't going to happen. I agree with KJ that there's a potential for the debate to go on ad infinitum if Mike runs with a freestyle format. I wouldn't sign up to that. I imagine KJ, like myself, would like…[Read more]

Hi all,we might as well copy the presidential debates and just have one judge, and two debators, have the members of HN ask questions to where debators would argue about. what do ya think?

Mike,I think your super elderly mind is making things to complicated.how old are you again? 100?jkto respond:Good enough? not really. If you look at the very first post, the topic of this thread, i made it clear how the guidelines work and the page limits. What i truely think is that you want to make quick responses, like a Q&A debate which is…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 19 2010,13:10)Quote (Is 1:18 @ June 19 2010,12:58)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 19 2010,12:48)And why can't we finish what we've already started?  Prove you are serious about this and answer my 2 questions on our debate thread.      If you do that, and Dennison agrees you have DIRECTLY answered the points, we can move for…[Read more]

Let me know when your done debating about debating. At this point, this is nonsense. I think Stu had the most valid points so far in this thread.

Your thread isnt nick proof, lol

Quote (Stu @ June 19 2010,05:31)Quote (SimplyForgiven @ June 12 2010,00:31)I hope that this can open up formal Debates between two individuals or teams of individuals which can be organized and instead of there being a winner or a loser, we become humble students of the word.  Do you expect this process to result in atheists becoming humble…[Read more]

Quote (bodhitharta @ May 25 2010,13:33)This is not fair once again you take liberties with me and why?I cannot post on the thread about Nick whom I would like to defend but anyone can say what they want about me in the other section and there is nothing I can do.I am starting to realize that alot of these chages here have come from me posting and…[Read more]

Hey RokkamanQuote and it was said he even prophesied as a child that he would be murdered with the two theives he saw run into an alley after they stole something (same two theives he was crucified with).Where did you get this from?I never heard of this story before

Quote (gollamudi @ June 18 2010,21:32)Hi brother SimplyForgiven a nice name for Avtar, I thank for your good response. But Hebrew scriptures never intended human sacrifice for sin atonement. If you want please gothrough this thread from the beginning you will understand how much illogical it is on part of Christianity to claim human crucifixion…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ June 18 2010,21:29)Dennison,I actually have not claimed that the particular Jewish tenet that the seven eyes of God are angels is true since I tend to believe the Jews have a variety of interpretations on the subject just like their decendants who call themselfs Christian and I am not sure which is true.  On the other hand some…[Read more]

when one dies for someone else,its not a human scrafise its called being matryer Israel fought many wars where isaerlites die all the time, and the died for what they believed. for king and country,this isnt human scrafise

Quote (gollamudi @ June 18 2010,21:14)Thanks for your explanation brother Kerwin, but I can't agree with you or the writer of Hebrews an unnamed writer on those arguments on sealing the New covenant. Infact the whole logic of Christian New covenant is entirely different from yours also from what the Hebrew scriptures quote. They never intended any…[Read more]

Quote (RokkaMan @ June 18 2010,20:27)Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 06 2010,10:44)To All………..SPIRIT (IS) INTELLECT, AND SPIRIT(S) ARE DISTINCT INTELLECT(S), GOD IS COMPOSED OF SEVEN DISTINCT INTELLECTS OR SPIRITS. it's just that simple, Spirits are (NOT) beings, but the Intellects (IN) the beings. They are expressed by (WORDS) and also…[Read more]

Quote (david @ June 18 2010,17:36)Quote (david @ May 31 2010,08:07)“TO ALL:The name “YHWH” indeed translates into “kurios” ALWAYS!”—Kangaroo JackHe further states:“let . . . David explain why the author to the Hebrews quotes Psalm 102:25-27 from the Septuagint in Hebrews 1:10. The original Hebrew says “YHWH” but the Septuagint says “Kurios” and…[Read more]

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 18 2010,20:58)Hi RM, You must need control.and Respect

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 18 2010,20:57)Hi SF, So we do not rely on our ideas or opinions, on logic or inference. Find it written several times and you find proofsHi Nick,Ecclesiastes 3:1To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven:

Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 18 2010,20:55)Hi RM, 1Cor 2 and Rom 1 clearly show the idiocy of thinking of human thoughts are like God's. Get to know your new Father and you will not need opinion and theory.He does not fit in theology boxes.Nick,Your already trapped in your own theology.and ideas.This is called speculation, stating what scripture has…[Read more]