Isaiah wrote:I don;t want to press this too far, but if I could just have you list one doctrine that you fully understand, I'd appreciate it…. *********************I'm not sure what point you are trying to make here? Are you trying to drive home the point that no one understands “fully” a teaching? I guess you would have to define what “fully”…[Read more]

Isaiah wrote:How would a small child explain what happaned to Mary when Yeshua was concieved? No matter how you look at this it's a mysterious event that lacks a naturalistic explanation, and in fact is seemingly inexplicable by adults and children…..*****************Yes, I felt that *bump* The virgin birth is much easier to explain to children…[Read more]

That would be like saying that God gave us a clue to who and what Jesus is by giving us an example of conception and birth. For us NOT to use our information about what we know about these basic things……well, that would be to miss the point of the lesson entirely, woudn't it?

But it isn't mysterious in the way you might mean. We know certain things about reproduction. In fact, we know a ton! So, the fact that Mary became pregnant with God's Son doesn't mean that everything we know about reproduction should be altered. Right?

Do you think that, just maybe, YHWH left out some details in the Bible because they are beyond our comprehension?*****************Yes. I agree. However, when it comes to getting pregnant, and giving birth, and naming our children, and watching them grow….that is a no brainer, right? We comprehend that at a very eary age.My son is 9 and…[Read more]

The bible says the the Holy Spirit “overshadowed” Mary and she conceived. I believe the Holy Spirit is God, himself. Not a separate Person.Even the language (overshadowed) brings a certain sense of dominance (as with a man and women). I believe God (who is spoken of in the male sense) provided the sperm. It included everything that a male…[Read more]

WJ – you made me laugh.You're right. We are so much a like. That's what it is.Thanks

Isaiah,God can provide what is missing. He provided the lamb in the OT, and he provided it in the NT. God had a Son. An only begotten Son. He chose Mary. He picked a process by which we are all intimately aware and connected to. Why would he do that if he didn't want us to understand it just as it is? It would be mean for God to say…..now…[Read more]

We were talking about the birthing process. The birthing process was not different. But maybe you couldn't hear me over your own sarcastic, mean voice!

Hello!!! The lights are on but nobodys home!***************************************Down-right mean!I'm sure the Father is pleased with you tonight, WJ. Keep it coming.

Laughable but sad too.************************Laughable? Nice.

I see he was the Monogenes “Unique” Son of God but his birth wasnt different.**************************Did he not grow inside of Mary? Did he not proceed down the birth canal and was birthed a boy? How is this any “different” from the way my son was born?

does YHWH have DNA? **************************Is he a Father?

So she concieve without having intercourse a suragate Mother?***************Please.

Oh, thanks Nick for explaining MORE – ha! And what exactly does “topical” mean?I looked up 1 John 4. What are you trying to say, that “Jesus came in the flesh” and that means that he wasn't born once? Or that because he “came in the flesh” he wasn't BORN? I'm confused on where you stand with this. Clarify if you wish. Thanks.

Oh, and yes, my Mom was a virgin. Typical 50's wife!

Tell me. If there was nothing different about Jesus birth than ours then why didnt the Father just pick a husband and wife and tell them that the Holy thing in them will be the Son of God?*************************************************Because it had to be God's SEED! Excellent question You say:When you were born in the world was God your Father…[Read more]

Says you.I disagree.You tell God that his Son is not legitimate then……..but give me fair warning so I can log off…..:)

I dare say that even the disciples wouldn't understand the Trinity! So, I don't feel bad for not being able to make one out of three.Peter said that he didn't use “clever” and “invented” stories when describing Jesus. The Trinity certainly is clever, and it certainly has been man-made (this has never been in question as history will…

I denounced the Trinity based on it's lack of scriptural proof IN ADDITION to the fact that it played havoc with my brains! But most importantly, it didn't bring me into a loving relationship with my God…..because he was too complicated to understand.Isaiah, please read my above words again God was too difficult to understand using the Trinity…[Read more]