Quote (Stu @ April 25 2012,00:07)So in this further addition to your Gish Gallop, are you saying that perhaps in some cases genetic drift could overtake the effect known as positive selection, or directional selection?What points would you add to the Wikipedia article on URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directional_selection]Directional…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ April 25 2012,15:33)Did you write this?  Or did you steal it…StuartUm…DUH!!!No Stu…i was there as a reporter and recorded all these statements!!LOL….you really are scraping the bottom of the barrel now aren't you Stu…Hey!…Stu…that's like…stew!You know, a mixture of ingredients!Kinda like a primordial stew of ooze…A…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ April 25 2012,21:24)Quote (Devolution @ April 25 2012,17:34)The False God of FreemasonryTo understand the forces behind the strange science of evolution, one needs to realize that, while Freemasonry pretends to be ‘Christian’ or at least sympathetic to the ideals and traditions of Christianity, it is in fact an ancient religious sys…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ April 28 2012,14:49)Quote (Wakeup @ April 28 2012,11:22)Hi Stu.You are so sure,100% sure there is no God. Quote All humans are just the same flesh and blood,nothing else. And so are the animals.Quote What is a good person or a bad person? there is no such thing. It all depends on the chemical reactions in the human body.Quote If I am…[Read more]

The False God of FreemasonryTo understand the forces behind the strange science of evolution, one needs to realize that, while Freemasonry pretends to be ‘Christian’ or at least sympathetic to the ideals and traditions of Christianity, it is in fact an ancient religious system which despises Christianity. Its gods are those of Egypt and Bab…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ April 25 2012,15:30)You plagiarised, by posting without acknowledging the author.  What are we to assume?Had I not determined that you didn't write the screeds of bollocks you have rudely Gish-Galloped all over the forum, I might have mistaken you for a lying cretin creationist, one who knows he is lying, instead of getting your…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ April 24 2012,23:36)Quote (t8 @ April 24 2012,23:20)Quote (Devolution @ April 24 2012,01:20)ADAPTIONYour question is a contradiction.But you can't grasp that now can you?Adaption is NOT a “evolutionary” process.That is false.Adaption calls upon information that is already present within the cells and are triggered when environmental…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ April 24 2012,23:29)Quote (Stu @ April 25 2012,02:19)I was right, wasn't I.Hey 1 + 1 = 2.I am right too aren't I?OK, I will spell it out for you.It was obviously a cut and paste job to the point that you should have just known that everyone else knew it too, rather than think we needed you to expose deceit for our benefit. You thought…[Read more]

BY:JEREMY JAMESThe Long War Against GodEvolution is a profoundly political issue. The Freemasonic elite and ultra-rich atheists who control the pulse of academia in Britain, Germany, France, Italy and the UnitedStates – and have done so for centuries – will not tolerate any attempt to connect creation with its Creator. Since they loath the God of…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ April 23 2012,21:24)Quote (Ed J @ April 23 2012,01:41)Quote (Stu @ April 23 2012,00:41)Quote (Ed J @ April 23 2012,00:20)Hi Stuart,Information always comes from a source, environment and time alone cannot produce any! There is only adaptation by natural selection;Darwinian evolution is a farce! Catchy wording does NOT give his false…[Read more]

Quote (Stu @ April 22 2012,23:58)Quote (Devolution @ April 22 2012,18:40)CONTINUED:BY JEREMY JAMES.T H Huxley, who was probably the most ardent public advocate of Darwin’s theory in the period following the publication of The Origin of Species (1859), had no qualms about exploiting both the Simple Cell trick and the Big Number trick. During some o…[Read more]

BY:JEREMY JAMESThe Real Agenda behind the Theory of EvolutionIn light of all this we must ask why a theory that contravenes so many principles of mathematics and sound reason could have been propounded in the first place? If it was not designed to satisfy our appetite for scientific integrity, then what was it designed for? The answer is human…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ April 22 2012,18:30)Hi Devolution,It's easier to read in “bite size” pieces.Meaning: most don't read  L O N G  posts,   no matter how good or informative they are.Your brother in Christ, Jesus.Ed J (Joshua 22:34) holycitybiblecode.orgHi Ed,I understand this, but sometimes big IS better.You see, certain people we must deal with ha…[Read more]

CONTINUED:BY JEREMY JAMES.T H Huxley, who was probably the most ardent public advocate of Darwin’s theory in the period following the publication of The Origin of Species (1859), had no qualms about exploiting both the Simple Cell trick and the Big Number trick. During some of his famous public debates he claimed that, given enough time, a team o…[Read more]

Quote (david @ April 22 2012,16:33)Thanks for showing me the words Gish Gallop.The brilliance of Gish Gallop, is that even if you, Stu, attack a couple of his points, in the mind of the reader, they can dismiss these, since there are so many other points.  It really is a clever method of persuasion.You are welcome David.It's great isn't it!!I had…[Read more]