i wish we didn't have to argue. i wish there was no inquisition during the middle ages. i wish there was no blasphemy in roman catholicism. i wish the people fully accepted jesus our messiah and the apostles throughout the generations so that today in the year 2005, we can have a clear unadulterated bible.how accurate is the 1911 britannica? i…[Read more]

according to the article, it's clearly shown it has pagan origins to me. what struck me personally was the sense of pouring in regards to a molten image. it may not have been clear to you. i have to do more research. i've already stated this.there are many examples of self-contradictory endeavor. doctors smoking cigarettes for instance. to…[Read more]

onespirit, i think you're being superficial, like saying: “the cheese is spoiled. don't eat it. so why do you eat cheese at all from the refrigerator?”1. the term “el,” as i understand, means “mighty one” and is an expansive term that can be attributed generally to many while without a pagan origin in the encyclopedia.2. the term “god” is more of…[Read more]

i made 2 testing posts in the testing section and i notice a trend. the first letter is always capitalized, but the rest of the letters are made lower case. i have a problem making capital letters in the topic title.

i should have been more careful and posted the link in your other post, eliyah: “The importance of yahweh's name., His name, not pagan titles.”

https://www.heavennet.net/cgi-bin/forum/ikonboard.cgi?act=ST;f=1;t=342 please go to this post instead

1. it's easier to keep it the way it is. more people recognize the title “God” and it's been used for centuries.2. it doesn't matter what. you have faith that our heavenly Father will let you call Him whatever you want. the title “God” is a verbal intonation with the vocal cords. you can still go to heaven.3. too many pagan words already.…[Read more]

david, simply the editing feature is taken off here. i should have been more clear in my original post. simple. i asked the question in the title. i posted possible explanations as to why. those numbered entries weren't my own affirmations.simple, the edit feature is off, i clarified myself quickly.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YHWH eliyah, there is controversy as to the pronunciation. are you sure it's “Yahweh”?

eliyah, i've learned that the number you gave 6,828 for the number of times YHWH appears, concerns only the old testament. is it a possibility the tetragrammaton appears many more times in the new testament if it was originally written in hebrew instead of greek?

EDIT TO MY ORIGINAL POST i do not accept those 4 entries i posted. those are possible explanations i've thought of for why posters have rejected eliyah.

no, i'm not asking if anything should be done in my post. i'm asking for an understanding why you reject eliyah.

i made a mistake in trying to make the bottom part in bold letters. i have genuine mistakes i'd like to edit, but i understand that people can abuse this feature.

no, i want an understanding on your position, david. i think the titles that were substituted in should be reverted back to our heavenly Father's true name given to moses. i need to do more research.

eliyah, i found your website for real. http://www.elyah.freeservers.com/about.htmlyou spelled “surprise” wrong as “supprise”: “…scriptures to be false, and to my supprise…”i sent you an email yesterday, did you read it?

i made a mistake when quoting scripture. i substituted the word “lord” with YHWH but i did not take the word “the” out.

no, it doesn't. what it does indicate to me is that you had a strict interpretation separating the hebrews from the gentiles, when in fact that is not the case.

on 9/13/2005, 23:26 nick hassan wrote, “The Chosen People had a covenant with Him and the gentiles did not.”you are completely wrong, nick hassan, about this. why do you have such a strict separation between the hebrews and gentiles? in the old testament, joseph married pharaoh's daughter before exodus. pagan egyptians = gentiles.numbers 31:15-18…[Read more]

i don't quite see the need for demarcation between the “old” law and the “new” law. i believe that the bible is a continuous teaching over many pages spanning many years. jesus clarified the old testament. for example, the sabbath is for man but man is not for the sabbath.eliyah has already posted previously about the fallacy that paul did away…[Read more]

i feel like dying, people. how can it be this way? we are 4 men i think on this forum on the internet, 2,000 years or so after jesus. how can it be this way?where is the truth? there are 6 billion people on this earth or so, how can it be this way? paganism and garbage.we must work together and follow the laws set by our heavenly Father. how did…[Read more]