- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- January 25, 2013 at 4:16 am#778283ProclaimerParticipant
1 Timothy 3:16
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.This scripture infers that Jesus is God. Although you could argue that even we should manifest God in our lives knowing full well we are not God. Regardless, this verse is certainly a verse that Trinitarians use as a proof verse, and to the untrained eye, people may well accept that Jesus is God based on this verse alone.
But is this all there is to this matter.
Apparently this verse is controversial because most other translations do not say “God was manifest in the flesh”, rather they say “He was manifest in the flesh”.
So what is going on here. Why does the KJV say ‘God’ and most other translations say ‘He’?
I found this explanation in Yahoo Answers and thought it would be helpful to share it.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080728123800AALVzER
Thank you so much for this question. It is a very interesting one.
A few weeks ago, I inquired of a Greek translator who often posts on this site, asking him this very same thing. He kindly and carefully explained to me that, first off, one must understand the nomina sacra (sacred names). He explained that these are abbreviations, in early manuscripts, of certain names and titles.
In ancient manuscripts 1 Timothy 3:16 had the word “os” which looks like: “OC” and means “he”.
The nomina sacra of God looks like OC but it has a horizontal line through the middle of the O and a long horizontal line over both letters (as Abernathy, above, explained).
The Greek translator continues, and I quote: “In one old manuscript (Codex Alexandrinus) it seems to the nomina sacra, but an analysis of the manuscript demonstrated that the two horizontal lines were added centuries later.
Many late manuscripts have the nomina sacra, but all manuscripts earlier than about 800AD have OC “He”
So “He was manifest in the flesh” is supported by all the most ancient manuscripts, “God was manifest in the flesh” has no attestation before 800 AD.”
End quote.
Hannah J Paul
February 13, 2013 at 4:51 am#778284mstrainjrParticipantI just finished a debate on whether Jesus is Almighty God. I took the stance that he is not. My arguments come straight from the Bible, especially the Greek text, as I don’t rely solely on English translations.
You can see the debate here:
http://www.debate.org/debates/The-Bible-Does-NOT-say-that-Jesus-is-Almighty-God-in-the-flesh./1/February 13, 2013 at 7:13 am#778285AdminKeymasterM. Strain Jr, would you like to sign up for this site. There is a forum where the Trinity has been hotly debated for years. The Forum is here:
A Trinity Topic is here:
Trinity Writing here:
And you can register here:
February 13, 2013 at 6:05 pm#778286mstrainjrParticipantCool, thanks! I just registered, but I have a lot of reading to do here before I jump in.
February 13, 2013 at 11:00 pm#778287AdminKeymasterGood stuff.
I look forward to seeing what you can contribute to this topic. 🙂
June 16, 2013 at 4:32 pm#778288ChristianGuestThe Codex Sinaiticus renders the verse to say “He”…
…And yet Ignatius, a first century apostolic father references the verse to say “God”.
Is there an explanation for this?
June 16, 2013 at 9:41 pm#778289AdminKeymasterI was not aware of this and will look into it. The oldest scripts, ‘The Dead Sea Scrolls’ do not have it and as you say neither does the The Codex Sinaiticus.
If what you say is correct about Ignatius, it does open the possibility that if this was the view of Ignatius, he could have inspired a scribe to change later on. Then again it also opens up the small possibility that he quoted it correctly from some older source than we have today.
Regardless, if God is in us, then is God manifest in the flesh? If so, then this verse doesn’t lend a hand to the Trinitarian view even if viewed in that way. Further, we are taught that God is not a man.October 2, 2014 at 6:47 pm#778578tiggerParticipantChristian: The Codex Sinaiticus renders the verse to say “He”…
…And yet Ignatius, a first century apostolic father references the verse to say “God”.
Is there an explanation for this?
……………………………………
Tigger: I can’t find it. Please give epistle name and chapter number.
October 3, 2014 at 10:54 am#778627tiggerParticipantWhoever wrote that Ignatius used “God” in a quote of 1 Tim. 3:16 is, I believe, completely wrong.
I would appreciate an answer to my question.
Why is there no name or information for the person who made that comment?
October 3, 2014 at 11:02 am#778628terrariccaParticipant1Ti 3:15 if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God’s household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth.
1Ti 3:16 Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great:
He appeared in a body(in the flesh),
was vindicated by the Spirit,
was seen by angels,
was preached among the nations,
was believed on in the world,
was taken up in glory.Paul is talking about Christ not God his father , i still do not see why your question
October 3, 2014 at 12:32 pm#778630kerwinParticipantTo whomever it may concern,
If you look at the underlying Koine Greek it does not even say “God” it actually who or which depending on what you think the topic of the sentence is. Perhaps in the manuscript the AV of the KJV and others are translated from it does say God. I do not know. I do know that those translators that translating from the one more commonly used today are assuming the word is correctly translated as who and believe that who is God. They also do not trust us laymen to find “the truth” for ourselves or to decide they are mistaken and find another “truth”.
October 3, 2014 at 12:35 pm#778631kerwinParticipantTo all that are concerned,
Personally I believe the correct translation is “it” and that the “it” is the mystery of godliness.
I agree that God manifest in the flesh through his Spirit.
October 3, 2014 at 1:39 pm#778653terrariccaParticipantKerwin
I do not going to argue long on this for what paul is talking about in his letter to timothy is all about Christ and our union with him ,and him with his father
this is clearly describe in all of his letters so i have doughts that he would say it in any other way than the true way of the OT
for every describe thaught can be explain in scriptures ,no need to fill in with our own dreams
October 3, 2014 at 1:42 pm#778654terrariccaParticipanttigger
1 Tim 3;16 is totally right and true ,for all scriptures back those thaughts up
October 3, 2014 at 3:34 pm#778715ProclaimerParticipantWhoever wrote that Ignatius used “God” in a quote of 1 Tim. 3:16 is, I believe, completely wrong.
I would appreciate an answer to my question.
Why is there no name or information for the person who made that comment?
Glad you researched this. And the reason that the person is not a member of the forum is because they originally made a comment on the site under a blog post. I am just finishing changing blog comments to posts in forum topics instead. It makes things much easier and I can use one topic for multiple blogs that are related. It helps keep related conversations in one place.
October 3, 2014 at 4:21 pm#778716tiggerParticipantThank you t8.
October 4, 2014 at 6:08 am#778725kerwinParticipantT,
The subject of of 3:16 is not Jesus as he is not even mentioned in the passage. The subject is “the mystery of godliness”. To believe it is Jesus you therefore have to assume that “the mystery of godliness” is Jesus. That assumption is a prejudgment obtained by the interpretation of the Greek word in the clause to God. There are other interpretations by translators that are questionable such as translating the Koine Greek word to angels instead of just leaving it messengers. God gift to man is the mystery of godliness and it comes through faith is Jesus Christ.
October 4, 2014 at 8:17 am#778730terrariccaParticipantK
1TI 3:16 By common confession, great is the mystery of godliness:
He who was revealed in the flesh,
Was vindicated in the Spirit,
Seen by angels,
Proclaimed among the nations,
Believed on in the world,
Taken up in glorycould you show someone else ?
1TI 6:3 If anyone advocates a different doctrine and does not agree with sound words, those of our Lord Jesus Christ, and with the doctrine conforming to godliness,
2PE 1:3 seeing that His divine power has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness, through the true knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and excellence.
Jn 1:14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
Jn 1:29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!
well if you do not believe then there is nothing to say does it ? yes
October 4, 2014 at 6:18 pm#778739kerwinParticipantT,
It is the predominate interpretations of 1TI 3:16 I do not agree as I believe the topic of 1 TI 3:16 is the mystery of godliness and not Jesus as Trinitarians and others do. 2PE 1:3 states much the same thing as I do and if compare my statement and that of Peter you will see they are similar.
My words:
God’s gift to man is the mystery of godliness and it comes through faith is Jesus Christ.
2PE 1:3 seeing that His divine power has granted to us everything pertaining to life and godliness, through the true knowledge of Him who called us by His own glory and excellence.
October 5, 2014 at 8:25 pm#779272NickHassanParticipantHi,
The Word was God.
The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.
Folk always keep focussing on the flesh sadly
The flesh contributes nothing
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.